Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I was really upset he didn't offer 10,000 to 1 odds
https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/55056853/if-someone-gives-you-10000-to-1-odds-on-anything-you-take-it-if-john-mellencamp-ever-wins-an-oscar-i.jpg
Page 7 of the document, labeled as page 4 in the corner. Under "Advance Livable Communities"
Something you said earlier is right, in that nothing forces this as exclusive. They would just be recommended on the city website is all the assumption would be on my end. But considering the city would not be ripping up ground to lay additional or upgraded cable wires, people will not be pre-obligated to cable the way we have been in the past. And they gotta make sure they at least have an Option A for the new plan.
Actually, jersey city really just is transit
Keep reading, "deploy public wifi"
Here is Jersey City for ya bud
https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/NJ%20Jersey%20City.pdf
That's not how things work. You don't get to close your eyes and wish them away.
Newark
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://cms.dot.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/NJ%2520Newark.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi81v_xipzZAhUCuVMKHbXuBfQQFjAEegQIDBAB&usg=AOvVaw38PENRdaMCuMReE4iv7B5L
Opening a link clearly establishing NJ to the federal government initiatives on smart cities... such a chase.
Research smart cities, they're coming across the country, there are a few NJ specific projects readily findable. This is not new.
It's saying that city will be wireless internet everywhere. And they will be the go to tv provider offered.
I cannot analyze charts either. Only financial statements.
That last 10q had $205k cash and $396k inventory. Obviously alot of the inventory has to get turned over to new inventory but it's unloaded at a higher cash value than it is held at. All that to say, they should be in a good spot to pay the minimum 6 months later, and a potential spot to pay more (but I don't wanna get my hopes up). But the numbers show it is there for the taking.
Yea, so it translates to 200m / $200k extra.
We have carried a cash balance of approximately this level all year which gives me confidence they will be able to pay the difference when the time comes.
But I think if that difference is more or less all we could really afford to pay off with excess cash, in that case then it makes sense to do it at the end of the period. As opposed to saying paying 1 year ago today and maintaining roughly a $0 bank account all year instead. Then the slightest misstep puts us in a tight spot. Now 1 year later, I think they'll be in a stronger spot to pay it off and coast.
And if God forbid they actually convert every last cent, then yea, they'd need a moderate increase to a/s and it will take 4 more months. And it's worse, but not devastating to the valuation math done at 900m.
We'll see.
Click back to my recent posts where I spell that out.
But 185m was as of Nov 2016 10K and most sites pick up on that. And it was a brutal rip towards 900m which I think will end neard the end of March 2018.
As of Aug 17 it was 550, with 350 left.
Since that brief 10 seconds when it hit .009?
That's why I don't use the specific term dilution, even if some say it applies.
It will not go down as a direct result of the addition of shares because "we own less"
It will go up as a direct result of the conversions being over because there will be "less shares available at this price today"
Even when we max out our shares, which is coming soon, we would be undervalued at this current pps.
Most of that 350 is already past tense now, that was as of august.
It is the conversions from convertible notes adding to our share count. So most would say yes.
I get way too into a technicality and say since our valuation at end share count is still undervalued. I don't like to use the term dilution (because it implies to me spread out until watered down, and we are not overly watered down).
But yes, lots of shares added and sold. That's the catch. And you got here towards the end so you should be good.
I just took 10k, reduce the ask a bit
I hope not. Good luck and welcome.
I'll try, I'm very bad at remembering the exact moment even when I think about it for an hour though
I'd say I like that very much
@hemplifetoday
And I did a Twitter audit on them during the summer and their 9000 followers are 99% real
https://www.twitteraudit.com/Hemplifetoday
That's why most of the people here have been here for a year.
We are thoroughly convinced of all we need to know about the validity and strength of the company. We have just been waiting for the market to wake up.
Somebody is there picking them up, and it's not us, and they are not doing it millions of times over with a plan for a loss.
We'll see. The game has just begun.
"This year, over 196.3 million U.S. adults will watch pay TV (meaning cable, satellite or telco) "
Your article is a positive for OTTV up and down.
Yea, because it's not worth $100+ per month.
And they still have millions, I'd guess over 100m, of customers to lose. We are prime to pick up miniscule scraps for major gains.
Probably. Don't matter. We sell live TV. Our competitors are Comcast and Time Warner
And yet... the average American pays their cable company over $100 a month for this free tv you speak of.
Spring Breakers
Seems like this monster is about to wake up. About time with all these recent news releases.
Let's go $WUHN
Member mark... he must have been your #x follower.
I got a follow too this morning and it jives that he was my mm40. I was confused at first as well.
My assumption is... that Forbes list specified hemp derived... so they must be MJ derived.
Otherwise it does not make sense for them to not be top 2 on volume. So they must be n/a
My estimate is 350m shares were still left to be added after 9/1... at a pace of about 50m per month.
That would run out by April. And we'll be debt free and without sell pressure and without an egregiously high number of shares... and at any point, I think they have the cash to surprise us early with turning it off... or at least hope that.
This is a little blast from the not so distant past, but its crazy to see how wildly the valuation comparison changed between then and now.
This was written at year end, when they were at 10 cents and we were at 2 cents.
That being said, I have not kept up with the other company, I apologize if it is inaccurate on their half. I believe I may have heard they could have retired some shares so I dont see how that jives with my prior understanding of their debt. And their revenues do seem to grow by the month I hear.
You are on the right path with this comment.
I should clarify our market cap isnt quite $3-5M but it is still egregiously low in comparison. I think you may be thinking we still have 185M shares as of last years 10K.
The missing link brings it together.
We have 550M shares as of the last quarter (8/31), probably 700M on this upcoming 10K (11/30) and expect to have 900M max soon enough. But after that point, i do trust we will be able to use our excess cash to pay off the nominal remaining balance. (I think $200K and weve carried consistent cash balances in this range).
At 550M shares and .0172 is $9.5M
At 900M shares and .0172 is $15.5M
Our issue with our PPS staying low has never really been "there are too many shares, you dont own a big enough piece for them to be worth anything"... our problem has been "there are too many shares available for sale today, so sell pressure is pushing it down"
I strongly believe April to be the month that ends. And I keep hoping for sooner.
How about KFC? How about All State?
Approximately 1/3 their revenue and 1/2 their gross margin (better gross margin %). We also have lower fixed costs, so if our margin were to ever pull even, we would have better income.
My numbers may be a couple months out of date though.
But he doesn't stand to rob anyone of their money by standing outside a casino, so different circumstance for him here where he profits off that here.