Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It has always felt to me as if their main focus is pumping the stock price in order to work the dilution angle, even though they could make so much more money by just following through on their 'pump' ideas and just growing the company. It's like they are stuck in 'easy money' mode without realizing that doing it the right way would be almost as easy and much more lucrative in the long run.
You are right, they definitely need to stop using the same ploys to boost the price. It's been years and they are still stuck on Gummies, ambassadors, website updates etc. All things that sound like growth when you hear them for the first time, but by the 4th/5th iteration they just seem played out.
I'm usually the last one to say they aren't diluting, but they usually dilute in the hundreds of millions/billions of shares from what I recall. I haven't been watching it too closely, but the volume I've noticed when I do check in seems so minimal that if it is dilution, they have changed their tactics a little. If they are diluting at this low price, I think that would be the worst sign possible as they would be squeezing every last little drop they can from it. For all your sake's, I hope that isn't the case, although this recent round of pumps and dilution has definitely fit with their methods for the last 5-6 years.
Lol, ok.
In general I would agree. Makes no sense to put so much effort into this just to dilute it into oblivion. I've just seen this company do so many nonsensical things that I can't really bring myself to believe in them (They have done this exact thing in the past). If I trusted them, I would load up on these .0003s, as should anyone that thinks they will come out with an actual catalyst to move them up into good territory. I just can't, but maybe they will make some moves for the shareholders this time, who knows.
Seems the same as previous pumps. If so, they should get another pump to the 5/6 range before before all momentum is gone. Or maybe this is the time they turn it around and actually do something besides simply announcing the name change etc. that they 'plan' to do in the future. Either way, if I were in now I would wait to see what that news is and at least try to get my original investment back or make a profit at 5/6. No way I hold through this next pump just to watch it go back to no bid and take my investment with it. I still remember when they promised the dilution was finished last time, and the financials revealed they were actually diluting the day the press release was dropped, lol. Anyway, this is not a bash or a pump, just chatting about a stock that has held my interest for a while now.
Im still right here checking in occasionally. I have no intention of changing my name. It's still a P.O.S. but I have no reason to bash anymore since everyone in it knows exactly how this company has been run for years now.
I am not spending any time arguing with you over semantics. Buying after a complaint has no impact on whether the SEC will investigate.
Jeremyan7 Monday, 10/04/21 09:49:45 PM
Re: Joe Burmeister post# 66799 0
Post # of 66806
"Pretty sure SEC will 100% throw out your complain if you bought more after the complaint. That’s pretty silly"
I don’t expect they will act on it either. They don’t seem to care what Ballas does. But it won’t be because you complained and then bought more. Not sure why anyone would think your purchases clear Ballas of all the wrong doing. Now that would be stupid.
As a 'bear' on this stock, I was shocked they filed anything. Now I'm curious to see how it plays out. Still don't trust Ballas at all, but I guess time will tell if he is gonna make you guys some serious bank. Good luck.
There is that mature discussion I was talking about.
I guess ignore it. He has posted actual info in the past I believe. If he's really just being a troll just block him. But I'm sure he would tell you why he doesn't trust the company. But you weren't the one sending him nasty PMs and attacking him, so you weren't who I was saying is difficult to take seriously.
I do. I dont get angry at differing opinions. I have gotten drawn into reacting to attacks in the past, but I try to do better at not reacting to those now also.
You consider and evaluate their opinions. Agree or disagree like adults. Especially as it relates to a company with a history of dishonesty.
No matter how many days in a row it rains, it will never be the weatherman's fault.
You can't even take it serious. It's like the children that get angry at the weatherman for predicting rain on beach day. If you aren't 100% positive, you are their enemy.
It's the same thing that hasn't been right with this company for years now. They take fake loans from their friends and pay those loans off with shares. But the shares are worth a LOT more than the loan. So a 50k loan returns millions for the lender. I've been saying it for years.
Not going to debate all of this with people that attack me for stating the obvious, but feel free to call me names and question my motives etc.Ballas has been doing this for years, and he;s not going to stop until he is arrested for it.
The company tweeted last week that they will be filing this week. If they do, will probably be a good win for everyone holding.
Oh, I'm skeptical of the outcome myself. But even this tweet is more than I expected, so I will just have to wait and see if he surprises me again.
The reason I checked it at first was because there are tons of these https://fakedetail.com/fake-twitter-profile-gererator out there. I could literally make an account that seems to have been active and tweeting for years. I felt like it was real, but also felt like verifying was worth a couple minutes.
I didn't "want" it to be fake. I just like to have as much of the facts as possible and I know they are really easy to fake.
If someone is saying it's a fake account, they should easily be able to post the evidence that lead them to that conclusion. I didn't see anything suspicious.
I checked it when it was first posted. Not many people can buy now anyway, but if it was fake I wanted to let everyone know before people started opening international accounts and dumping more money in. I just didn't mention it because I didn't feel like having people claiming I was calling it fake, lol.
I did a little research on this. While it is possible to make a fake Twitter with a “history of posts”, via a software available to anyone, when I search the ubqu board for that name “ambassadorH1” or whatever it was that released the tweet about the financials, I see that tweets from that account have been linked many times in the past. So if it’s a fake account, it’s not a new one. I came to the conclusion that the Twitter acct is real. Or at the very least not created recently just to fool investors.
Oh i haven't left. I'm still here to see if they follow through.
I did not see this coming. If they really do file financials, then as shocked as I will be...I will have been proven wrong. I still wont be convinced Ballas is a changed man, but investors that kept faith he would file will have turned out to be right, and I hope they will be rewarded.
Assuming they actually file, of course.
That’s why I say they don’t seem to care. Not me, but others spoke to sec people and were told they would handle it but they couldn’t update us on the progress. Obviously nothing happened, since he’s still out here scamming people.
If I were still invested I would do it again. We discussed getting a lawyer to prep it last time so it would be in a format the sec would appreciate. I didn’t lose money so it wasn’t worth it for me. I did my work to help the other people that were screwed.
It does take some time. I spent hours with printed out copies of all the financials breaking it all down. At the time it was like 6 years of fins. It doesn’t take much time to look through them and see the glaring issues, but it takes time to organize it in a way to explain it to others, aka the sec.
It won’t end him. The sec doesn’t care. Here is an easy one. Look at the fins around 2016 or so I think it was. They added debt to the books which was personal debt Ballas brought with him in 2014 or so. His personal debt. And it stayed off the books for years. Until he decided to pay that personal debt with ubqu shares.
SEC doesn’t care. So many of us reported all this stuff. Others may still have it. I think Smokey said he does.
I don’t still have the copies. And I’m not wasting my time downloading and notating them again just because Nobody here wants to take the time to do it themselves. The information isn’t hidden. It’s right there. Look at who they paid in shares for their various loans. Look at the amount of shares paid. Look at the fake lenders. Look at their reasons for the loans and the fact that none of the reasons ever came to fruition. Just take the time to do it. Although it’s a little late now.
All of that is in the financials. Anyone that has done any DD doesn’t need others on here to prove anything. Read the financials. And be pissed at the idiots that told you they were irrelevant.
0.000001 ? -0.000099
who's wrong?
Took him 3 weeks to release the first one. And it ended up being an insinuation rather than a deceleration. The wouldn't say they are becoming current, Just a teaser to keep the fish biting.
People that ask questions are not the type of people they are after. They want the ones that will take their fleecing quietly, and continue to defend them no matter how obvious the scam.
"Look at our profile...this is not intended for shareholders...this is a Product Marketing Page...I know this may be hard to understand but when you purchase stock it does not go to the company...buy some CannazALL you may be able to relax...the company is doing everything it said"
It doesn't go to the company because these fools gave all the shares to their friends to pay off that fake debt. So when you buy, you are buying from past lenders that received the shares as payment and made millions from investors.
Look carefully at everything they have said they will do, vs. a biased interpretation that twists their words into something promising for shareholders.
You win. I’m done. It’s a big conspiracy. Wish we knew who it was so we could go after them for all the money people have lost here!
You can stop any painting down by placing a bid at .0001 and buy up whatever shares people try to dump.
Lol, I agree. Someone is trying mighty hard to make no bid look like a bad thing…how blind would someone have to be to pretend ubqu is in any kind of trouble…
Absolutely. Although the 3 or 4 pumpers will stick around arguing that it can recover from de-listing. They have already started grooming their followers to expect it as if it's part of the plan.
Put my vote down too. Ballas will continue his decade (at least) long pattern of screwing anyone he does business with, including shareholders. Of course, that’s the same vote I’ve been casting for years, but I suspect more people are open to hearing it now that it’s coming to fruition in a very dramatic fashion.
It wasn't an email, It was the financials (notated with explanations, etc. ) submitted via the submission form on the SEC site if I remember correctly. I did it twice. That was years ago and I don't still have the notated fins, but the financials can be downloaded easily, and you can notate them yourself.