Changing Daily
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So hemp is tour company?
Where is that on HEMPs income statement?
Now it's a start up? I think when you take over $25,000,000 out of the company over 4 years and are charged by the SEC for fraud, you are probably not going to get an award.
Pot stocks or hemp stocks? But I'll bite; why aren't any of the other "top 9 " defendants against the SEC? In fact can you name any other pot stock in court with the SEC? High profile? Adding the CEO's dilution; HEMP has lost 99% of its value from its high. So yeah the SEC came after this high profile "pot stock".
High profile? Have you ever heard of HEMP outside of this board?
Just a matter of time for what? Can you read a balance sheet? Oh yeah, hemp tours for $250 bucks a pop.
It truly is amazing what $29 million will buy.
Right, and do you know why? Because when/if Bruce/Hemp are found guilty, there needs to be a way to pay the victims. They do that with the assets. Bruce loaned money to HEMP from sales of HEMP shares obtained illegally. So who owns the equipment? You'll see. Do you think the SEC just randomly picked HEMP out of a hat to go after? You guys think the Lord Bruce can do no wrong, but I ask; are you up or down from your original investment. I don't know you from Adam and can answer that for you.
No, that is not the case. Bruce is on trial, not HEMP. Name one other MJ (let alone hemp) company that's going to trial with the SEC. The company, not the Execs. What the SEC is after is how can there only be assets of $3.9 million in assets and over $50m in capital surplus on the balance sheet? There is no effort to help the shareholder, only Bruce and his "Boys". You guys should be pissed instead of making excuses for him.
I respect your opinion on Eppling, but if that's the case, why is Bruce a Defendant?
The company won't be shut down. Bruce will. The company's stock would be haunted to protect shareholders, so would have been done long ago. Bruce on the other hand will get several years in prison with restitution to the company for shares taken. To avoid jail, he will not be allowed to hold office in a pubco etc. it's a game Bruce plays that does not have yours or my best interest. I am stuck in this hoping the settlement gives the company back several billion shares.
Name another who is a known felon going to trial against the SEC who has dumped billions of shares for personal gain. Go ahead and challenge. Anything you challenge defending Bruce you will lose at. Just stop and NOT listen to Facebook posts and write the facts, chart, share dilution, and what has been promised and not delivered and tell me what you find.
Biiiig difference in a motion in limine and dismissing all charges. No charges will be dismissed. You can twist this all you want. At the end of the day, you better pray the next CEO is ethical.
With all this good news, why are there so many new shares entering the market? Serious responses please.
Contact the Transfer Agent. Pretty simple.
So more competition!
Please explain the "pump and dump" when people were begging for a press release and the issued and float have been exactly the same for the last 2 years. He hasn't sold one share or the float would be higher.
You were just on the other board asking who this CEO was? All of a sudden he's the worst? Literally 7 minutes before your post, asking who he was. LOL!
Question; If it's not Bruce selling, who is selling all the shares entering the market? Serious responses only*
What does that have to do with HEMP? Just Google Bruce and HEMP; and their connection with the SEC.
Oh so that means it's okay then. I thought the theft was only HEMP, but since it's everywhere, it's okay then. Where do I send my check? I would rather send it straight to Bruce so I don't have to pay multiple $7 trade fees to Scottrade.
That's only an increase of about $11 million in shares into the market. Or about $90,000 per day.
That would the only "fact" way Bruce or HEMP will not be punished. FACT!
So the SEC has dropped all charges against Bruce?
Please enlighten us on where and how you know them as "fact"? Inside info?
It may mean nothing, but HEMP sure gets brought up in the same sentence as the SEC an awful lot.
It's always a great sign for a company with the most talked about topic on these boards is the court proceedings of the CEO and the SEC.
How can there profits when Bruce pulls $20m+ in shares every year?
And company execs pumping stocks as if they were "shareholders"....
Question; for you guys going on the HEMP tour; is Bruce charging you for the tour even though you're a shareholder?
Come on Pura, WTF? Put some news out or something. How does a stock go from $3+ to a death spiral and management does absolutely nothing to stop it?
Amazing what $26 million looks like.
The good thing about Facebook is that the SEC does not recognize this as a true PR, therefore anything can be said without the SEC "fact checking".
VNDM is always a good sign!
Always check OTCMarkets. If it was frozen, it would be skeleton
Fraud? It's only fraud if lies were told to steal something. What was stolen?
That's wonderful. Can you justify why and how he has sold so many shares?
It could be no bid. You would know if the SEC froze the stock. The SEC would put news out on that fact. The company is current with zero revenue. The filing said a potential split, not for sure. If there were lies, they would be addressed individually with the execs. How can there be financial issues with zero revenue. But at the end of the day, you made my point with "what else could it be?". Yet it was stated as a fact. Fake news?
I hope you're right. I've been a holder for over a year. As to why be reporting? Transparency. As to other companies; how many are controlled by a felon, facing charges from the SEC, and under scrutiny. It seems he want everyone to see exactly what the company is.
The SEC is not an auditing firm. His company is not being audited; period. Other wise it would not be an "alternative reporting" company. I'm not trying to argue with anyone. I was just responding to a comment where someone said the company do a buyback...... after losing $24m. My point was to need positive cash to buy anything.