Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Smitter - In case you were'nt aware of this already, ARSC was on the OTC about a year or so ago, if I'm not mistaken. This should make the process a little easier I would think.
Total I-hub claim - about 179MM shares/e
How come I'm not in the list? I posted 2 million an hour ago./e
2 million
Novice - You can view it here too:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/it?s=ARSC.PK
Trades - buys 2:1 over sells:
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=trades&symbol=arsc
Groovemaster - That's the one! thanx/e
Twomey (all ears) - ARSC put out a PR a while ago that said they leased out a factory (in OH I think), but I can't find the doc.
Release the founds, or is that hounds. LOL
RJ Trotts - Got all 6 of your messages, but I don't have PM. I haven't put much thought into ETNL - just holding my shares. This board has been a good source of info and appears to be well balanced. What else can I say - Where are those announcements expected last decade? And did they pay off that short term loan? More Qs than As here.
Penman - Thanx, Happy New Year!
Penman - You mean .0169, not .0165. Are you saying that because the transaction price was .0051, it is really a buy, but far enough below the ask to be recorded as a sell. Anyway, I don't get it. How does one know to buy below an ask that is not even presented? L2 was showing .0169. This link is new to me and would appreciate help deciphering it. I think it could provide more useful info than what is posted by dancy and lawrenzo.
Easier to read trades:
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=trades&symbol=etnl
All sells!
A better trade chart:
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=trades&symbol=etnl
All buys so far today:
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=trades&symbol=arsc
Its just insane how these hyped penny stocks of companies that sell sponges, expensive light bulbs, skin lotions, fake gold mines, media gimmicks, bankrupt financial, etc. get all the attention (and huge, short term gains) while ARSC with its patented, proven, sophisticated, "holy grail" of energy independence justs fades into oblivion. I was bored and just thought I'd vent a little. Thoughts?
As I've repeatedly stated - scam companies don't get official issued US patents. Scam companies may file applications, but real companies defend, pursue and enforce ingfringement.
Suprabiz - Aw, come on - you know you want revenge or redemption. The only way you're going to get it is to buy again.
Poles - Na, I was almost tempted to pay as much as a quarter a share way back, but fortunately did not. Actually made decent money trading it starting in 2007. I understand that making a patented, mass producible/ cost effective fuel cell suitable for the residential market is no easy or fast accomplishment and there was/ is a financial crisis going on that stifled/ delayed progress. Now I'm long with an average at .oo12. I'm not overjoyed about the share structure either, but at least they have been transparent about it. I still believe that patience will be hugely rewarded.
Shaka - Without much DD, I just guessed right about no patent and believe that the price of their product is too high. Not bashing, just skeptical. My new guess is that since the "inventor" and one of the executives is Chinese, that the purported sale of $1.1 million of bulbs to China was, in effect, to themselves, but made for a great PR. But ya know, people buy into just about anything sometimes. Having said all that, I'm sure many will make good profit here.
Shakabuda - All I know is that I did all the lighting for two of my houses for only a few bucks three years ago and have had to replace only 3 CFL bulbs this year. They're all basically made the same, sorry, you spent so much at Home Depot.
Shakabuda- Try 59 cents at the 99 cent store fo CFLs - that was already in the bottom of my original post - scroll down.
Funmaxus - Thanks. I saw an application from 2005, but nothing issued yet. Usually only takes about 2 years.
Shakabuda - So you think wasting $120 is smarter, ok whatever.
STocksmaster - Saves you nothing if you have to buy 7 or 8 pairs($140) to do the same amount of lighting and air purification as what I proposed for $20.
Icepickr - Interesting, so it has to be Himilayan sodium chloride, nothing else will do, LOL. Looks to me like ZVTK just stuck a couple of electrodes in a CFL. If there's no patent, its more like a Pet Rock - heck,I guess somebody sold millions of those at a high profit margin, LOL
Maxwell- Here's a link to an $8 ionic air purifier:
http://www.google.com/products/catalog?hl=en&source=hp&q=ionic+air+purifier&um=1&ie=UTF-8&cid=8680024760408089540&ei=0oQ5S93rKYuqsgPF3OXFBA&sa=X&oi=product_catalog_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDIQ8wIwAg#ps-sellers
CFL's are only 59 cents at the 99 cent store
I can buy 15 CFL bulbs for about $10 and a larger ionic air purifier for about $10. What's the big deal?
Poles - Did what? Imagine if a billion shares traded in 2007 - couldn't have happened - Why? Because there wasn't as many shares or investors/ traders. Imagine if 3 billion traded tomorrow - would the pps shoot up alot? Very likely. Could it happen? I don't know. Depends on how many investors/ traders and available shares. Can you buy 10 or 20X as many shares now as you could in 2007 with the same amount of money? Yes and it seems that there are alot of investors/ traders willing to accumulate large numbers of shares at the present - is it enough to dry up the float? I don't know. Its all just proportional numbers between then and now. Dilution/ News type and amount or lack of either makes the difference.
Poles - What is too many O/S anyway? If there are enough investors, then it doesn't matter - its all about supply and demand. Float dries up and she shoots up. Float gets bloated she dives down. Keep your eye on the volume for clues.
Robnthemarket - FWIW - The A/S and O/S were under a billion at the time of that e-mail/ post. So I don't know what's worse, an R/S or 4 + billion in shares of dilution. I don't know why they seem to be still diluting when they have funding coming in - extra Holiday vacation money maybe??
Robnthemarket - Refer to my post #10909
Rocket -interceptor - Sorry, about the OT post.
Markettrader - Why didn't you inform this group a few months ago of this wonderful stock that is RMDM when it was .0002? Little late, ya think. In my experience, I've never seen a stock hold 500% gains very long, let alone a Floridian pinky with a Chinese subsidiary that's only been trading a few months. Time will tell.
Markettrader - Hey, you might be right. I'm placing my bet on patented fuel cell tech that frees homeowners from the grid, rather than $1.75/liter bottled water (must be very special water, is it patented?). Anyway, I guess I'm counting on the public to be better informed and have their priorities straight.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/United-Beverage-United-Liquor-prnews-4168368303.html?x=0&.v=12
Klepto - see my post #10909./e
Close HOD, WOOHOO!
slfm - WOW! I saw that this morning also. Does that mean no one is willing to sell below .015? Unless VFIN comes in lower. The float must be getting low.
Twomey - You should respond back to answer his question. "Did you read the response to the "ripoff report"? Why is it less legitimate than the complaint?" Because the complaint sounds so familiar - UL certification soon, spin off within 60 days, wire transfer posted, check is in the mail, etc. Jon Elayda fits right in. I'll hold my shares for now - basically stuck anyway, but I'll believe it when I see it.
All I did was Google Comentum. Is it Comentum Capital Opportunities or Opprotunities? Either its an idiot mispelling/typo or a cool play on letters (lol). I find both names.