Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm adding on the higher low dips LOL steady climb here people, don't be scared of the fluctuation in short term.
IMO and GLTA
very nice constant climb in a couple of weeks, sure short term is swinging up and down, but long term...very nice and steady uptrend. Should be trading from 22-25's and up very soon.
Like i previously said, spike ranges ---> 30's to 15's / 40's to 25's / 55's to 35's / 70's to 55's / and so on...
Higher lows are making a steady climb up! IMO
Slow and steady for longs!
IMO and GLTA
same here! taking what i can before the big pop to $$$5-10
Volume is preceding the pop girls, loading up here for a nice leg up between 5 and 10.
Dont cry later IMO
GLTA and IMO
with buying volume like this.... 1's gone before NY imo
I'm adding and adding more LOL
IMO and GLTA
This could be the patent
DD credit for thriving in paradise
https://www.google.com/patents/WO2015198306A1?cl=en&dq=fms+safe+driving&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjArt_v94LRAhVorVQKHYasA3QQ6AEIGjAA
i disagree...anything under 1$ is silly to sell LOL
ONCI owns 49% of the company that owns the patent, so logically it would not mention ON4 in the patent filing
maybe just the 1$ gem that rarely pops out of the OTC
going up i tell ya, hope to see 5's before years end
PATENTED...THAT IS HUGE NEWS! this means that other companies would have to licence the use of the same technologie... and i believe there are many. So this equals in incoming licence revenues on top of generated revenues...
Maybe one day 1$ IMO
Can you pls post his reply? or send it in pm?
50's is possible, it would be a best case scenario, but hell...it did it before
IMO and GLTA
testing 35's today $ONCI, if we break that level or gap up, we see 40's or more. Possibly we set record high this week
IMO and GLTA
annual report is out with FMS mentioned...good enough to start with?
0026 or gap up with news
give it some time, one or two days with this volume and this one is ready to pop.
$DCAC getting ready to move up...
slowly adding here bit by bit... a 0010 would be great soon IMO
NEWS after close IMO tomorrow we see 0035's
35K$ revenue a month from FMS app current revenues was the best one until now
Here you go...
-FMS 35K rising revenue a month, + 7*9K/Vendor and now awaiting on *FLEET* news = at least 1M$ revenue
-Other acquisitions almost done (like MJ JV)
--> here is the link to the annual filing (ending period 31oct 2016). He his early. He had until end of January to file this. Again he shows that he's committed to do what is needed for an uplisting (requiring 0.01 price at the minimum) AND it confirms the FMS
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=ONCI&id=164183
It is not just PR... it's official!
Very very curious about the next Q to come out. It will probably already state the incoming revenue and new acquisitions.
0.01 coming up! IMO
agree BBW, Berman has delivered again. And will keep doing so.
with rising revenue, and more JV's to come at the pace it is happening now...could be very likely IMO
we test 0025 today, with some great *FLEET* revenue news we see a nice green leg up into 30's IMO
IMO and GLTA
yep it is 0.25, but it will decline to the exact price half an hour before trade.
0.25 is where it is heading though IMO
Annual report out on 15 dec, FMS is mentioned!!
For all other acquisitions we will need to wait for the next Q report.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=ONCI&id=164183
GLTA
Annual report out on 15 dec (report until oct31 2016)
FMS is mentioned!! For those who doubted it... here is the official confirmation.
For all other acquisitions we will need to wait for the next Q report.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=ONCI&id=164183
This will see its 0.01 very very soon IMO
IMO and GLTA
Revenue news tomorrow $ONCI probably on FMS global vendors... and "fleet" means imo more vendors then anticipated. With some patience we see a penny very very soon IMO
When we win the appeal in CAFC, can't offended go in appeal to Supreme court against CAFC decision?
For 9/10 cases we definitely hold the validated claims for trial after all this is done.
I agree, we will certainly see trial, this CAFC appeal is very good for WDDD. With more claims to go in offence against ATVI, it will be harder for them to defend in trial.
Here is what i have found on recent IP appeals to the CAFC, very good to read. My opinion is that we will win the appeal.
CAFC Overrules PTAB Claim Construction That Used The Specification To Contradict Unambiguous Claim Language
November 27, 2015
|
Bruce Barker
The CAFC recently overruled a PTAB claim construction that altered the plain meaning of unambiguous claim language in an attempt to align the claim with an excerpt from the specification. Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Sipnet EU S.R.O., Case No. 2015 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 25, 2015). The Court criticized the Board’s decision for ignoring the literal language in favor of the specification, holding that when claim language is unambiguous, the specification plays a more limited role; that is, instead of acting as a guide for resolving “uncertainties on interpretive questions,” the specification can only impact claim scope if it clearly disclaims or redefines the unambiguous language. (Id. at 8).
At issue in this case was the ‘704 patent, which is directed to a technique for establishing a point-to-point connection between a pair of computers over the Internet. The claim at issue states that when a first computer wants to connect with a second computer, it sends an inquiry to a network server, asking whether the second computer “is connected to the computer network.” The Petitioner argued that the language "is connected" should be construed in view of the embodiment shown in the specification. Accordingly to the Petitioner, the disclosed server responds to such an inquiry by providing an IP address from when the second computer registered with the server, regardless of whether the address remains viable at the moment of inquiry. The Board agreed: “[U]nder the broadest reasonable construction – ‘connected to the computer network’ - encompasses a processing unit that is ‘active and on-line at registration,'" citing an excerpt from the specification that suggests a connection is established when a computer is registered in the database. (PTAB at 6, citing the ‘704 patent at 5:35-38).
The Federal Circuit held that the Board’s claim construction conflicted with plain meaning of the phrase “is connected,” because the claim “plainly says that the query transmitted to the server seeks to determine whether the second unit is connected at that time, i.e., connected at the time that the query is sent.” (CAFC at 7). The Court criticized the Board for not even mentioning this literal meaning, and instead starting its analysis with the specification. (CAFC at 8). The Court said that the specification of the '704 patent does not contradict the claim's plain meaning. Rather, it reinforces the literal meaning when it proposes that computers should automatically notify the server when they are about to disconnect, so that the server’s information remains current. (CAFC at 11, citing ‘704 patent at 6:10-14).
The Petitioner suggested that the specification does not adequately describe or enable a system that could provide current connectivity status as required by the literal claim language. But the CAFC would not even entertain that argument because such issues are beyond the scope of inter partes review. (CAFC at 12).
Judge Dyk dissented, arguing that the language “is connected” does not require “absolute accuracy or absolute currency” for the same reason that the Court previously concluded in another case that the phrase “real time” need not be “instantaneous.” (Dyk at 5, citing Paragon Solution, LLC v. Times Corp., 566 F.3d 1075 (Fed. Cir. 2009).
anything on PACER, filings, news?? should hit today
$ONCI DOJI reversal forming on 180 day
fake wall, if you hit the ask it will disappear
$ONCI going green again, testing that 0020 again, probably will brake soon enough
update for sure... no doubt, no fear, just wait and ride it out
Today is the day "stay" will be lifted and we will continue to trial or settlement IMO
if longs are riding this out until 0.2514 ... that says something
probably riding free shares, so they can take the long wait LOL
IMO and GLTA
very very thin ONCI, can easily spike up
why do i see ask at 0.2514 at current moment? LOL
I believe that we can see 0050 for sure when Q confirms all. Maybe even before the end of January.
If an 8K would come out before that would also be sufficient.
I would average down/up (depending what your holding) at current prices, we didn't see the last of ONCI IMO
We can't forget that there is also a reduction in shares coming up here. AND with that an uplisting (minimum requirement is 0.01).
And like i said that will come true when we are around 0050. If we would have broken that level and holden it for a few days, the reduction and uplisting probably already would have happened. Its not if its going to happen, but when.
IMO and GLTY
-all posts are my own opinion. Do your own DD-