Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Been in phot since 1/13/13 been in pweb for 4 days. Don't see a reason to leave either one
You better pray
It's seems to me that its been running 50/50 on the share increase. Plenty of longs have posted both sides.. I did say longs have an agenda, they want the price to go up. By your reasoning bashes should post good news as well
It seems that all would see this is for what it is.... You buy a stock do your dd, you buy it because you believe it will go up you post you dd, you repost legitimate articles and worthy items you find on the net. You have an interest in the stock being acknowledged on the price per share to up. Like it or not you have an agenda!
So in return what is the agenda to bash? The vast majority of time bashing posts have no merit, no lagetimacy, no basis in fact. So to bash a stock is to have an agenda for the price to go down. Why else to take the time to post. You might like to drink Budweiser and hate the taste of coors, but you don't go on a campaign to ruin
Coors because there is nothing to gain. They bash for gain nothing else
Finally look at their sources. Pro phot posters use articles from reputable sources like WSJ, bussiness week
When a brasher does use a source it's from a second rate blogger from a rag like SA.
This your other log on name?
Then sell.........bye bye
You called for it
Retweeted it so I would have it on my account
Timothy Sykes (@timothysykes)
2/6/14, 8:48 AM
profit.ly/1MoO9j?aff=12 Short this weed hype $MJNA $CBIS $PHOT $HEMP
Download the official Twitter app here
Robert Volz
Here you go
.http://t.co/dTDuZf6Mb1 Short this weed hype $MJNA $CBIS $PHOT $HEMP
— Timothy Sykes (@timothysykes) February 6, 2014
Must have hit a nerve at SA. they will let certain people post blogs as articles, but they keep deleting my previous response under comments
At 9:00 am Timothy Sykes tweets to his followers to "short phot". Then at 10:20 am this "small cap machine clown" posts this exact blog on ihub. #58413 under the name of "eagleeye 14" To which several long time phot posters refute the validity and basically trash it. Then he post the same crap on SA. It is no coincidence the order, timing, and collusion of these events. Either SA has no regard for what it allows on its site or they are duplicite in this act
Yawn
It's all in the name....... House of Representatives passed a bill to legalize hemp production for industrial use. People saw the word hemp and went nuts.......same way MJN& jumps when the news is about medical marijuana
Well said
That was a pathetic attempt
It was a form t trade
Form-T trade is just a late reported trade. Happens on many stocks.
T-trade means relatively nothing
I don't have a team....but I want a team too..... How many do I need for a team? Did you interview your team or is just pick people from your group home?
Why wouldn't he be allowed to vote? You don't need identification or even be a citizen of the USA now a days
What Everyone Needs to Know, that "the Constitution does not allow the federal government either to order state governments to create any particular criminal law or to require state and local police to enforce federal criminal laws." Hence a treaty that purported to require such legal subjugation would not be "under the authority of the United States," and any act of Congress aimed at dictating state drug laws would not be "made in pursuance" of the Constitution.
Furthermore, the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs says a signatory's obligation to enact criminal penalties for the nonmedical production, possession, and distribution of marijuana is "subject to its constitutional limitations." The penal provisions of the '61 convention includes the caveat: "subject to the constitutional limitations of a Party, its legal system and domestic law." How does that interact with the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which states, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people"?...
There is an argument that America's unique situation regarding states rights allows one of these states to do this i.e., legalize marijuana without violating the treaty
Total of 400k accumulated over past 4-5 months. Average down to 0.0515
Old news been posted many times
Nice try
Where are you confirming this?
Where are the mods on this one? They sure jump on everything else
Over on yahoo under feedback the list is growing on getting seeking alpha removed from "news headlines" and listed as blogs.....join in and flood yahoo with votes
It seems like one of the greatest fears of the medical marijuana community is slowly being realized, as corporations quickly adopt cannabinoids into their vast profile of patented medicines. Leading the charge is GW Pharmaceuticals, a UK- based pharmaceutical company who manufacturers Sativex, an outrageously overpriced oral spray that relies on THC and CBD for its medical effects.
Although Sativex is not currently available to patients in the U.S., it can be prescribed in Canada, the UK and other European countries, at a price of £175 per bottle. As crazy as it sounds, the only difference between a £175 bottle of Sativex and a $20 bottle of marijuana extract from your local dispensary are the patents that GW Pharma has been all-too-quick to file.
Just last month, GW Pharma’s newest patent application was published with the title “Phytocannabinoids in the treatment of cancer.” That’s right, the makers of Sativex are trying to patent the compounds of marijuana for treating all forms of cancer. But is that even allowed?
Probably not, since medical marijuana’s cancer-fighting effects have been well known since the 70s, not to mention prominent spokespeople of the movement, such as Rick Simpson, who have provided personal testimonies of marijuana’s ability to cure cancer. As a result, it is unlikely that a patent would be granted on medical marijuana itself or common extracts like hemp oil.
Even still, pharmaceutical companies are well aware of the loopholes in patent laws that can easily be exploited by slightly altering a chemical or formula, which is what seems to be the case with GW Pharma. In their most recent patent, all GW Pharma had to do to claim exclusive rights to the cancer-fighting effects of cannabis was to call it a “botanical drug substance”, which they define as a mixture of cannabinoids and non-cannabinoid materials. As a result, GW may just be holding the golden ticket to a cutting-edge cure for cancer, something that has eluded medical research for decades.
It’s interesting to note that GW is not the first to exploit the medical properties of marijuana by form of a patent. In fact, it is almost common knowledge among the medical marijuana community that the U.S. government has been actively involved in obtaining patent rights on cannabinoids. Patent #6630507 was granted to the Department of Health and Human Services in 2003 for “Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants,” which clearly outlines their usefulness as a treatment for stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and dementia.
Unfortunately, it’s not just GW Pharma and the feds than seem interested in monopolizing the medical marijuana market. Cannabinoid patents have been filed and granted to all sorts of corporations and individuals for some of the most obvious of inventions. But there’s really nothing we can do about it, since the federal government continues to state that marijuana is not a medicine, preventing honest and not-for-profit organizations from conducting human trials. And by preventing human trials, the feds have created a large gap in research and development that can only be filled by profit-driven corporations seeking to monopolize the incredible medical properties of nature’s most unique plant.
Once again, it seems like average citizens will fall victim to Big Pharma in their rush to claim the medical marijuana industry as their own. Sadly, it may just be a matter of time until hemp oil is wiped out and patients will be charged 10 times more for a bottle of Sativex, courtesy of the genius inventors at GW Pharmaceuticals.
Big Pharms are catching up now that is what has Holder dragging his feet. Lobbyist have the pull
Ok doc......it's gone
pps in feb started the month at 25 ended at 31. Easier to answer questions then
Sent him a email on April 18th and 23rd to get their stand on current events with this stock......as of today still no answer
What's that got to do with the address?
PhytoSPHERE
137A Lewis Wharf
Boston, Massachusetts 02110
Thoughts on this.
This may be way out there but is it possible that the big money behind pharmaceutical lobbyists is what is delaying holder from his decision. Buying time for the big pharmies to catch up or keep marijuana companies down til they decide to buy them up?
Thoughts on this.
This may be way out there but is it possible that the big money behind pharmaceutical lobbyists is what is delaying holder from his decision. Buying time for the big pharmies to catch up or keep marijuana companies down til they decide to buy them up?
Agreed I've done this last month from a similar post.....great post
If links you to a map with the main greners warehouse. Unless I misread you asked for the warehouse location
http://www.crunchbase.com/company/greners-com
Dude read what I sent you.... Crunchbase is a company data base. it says right on the site, " link to greners warehouse. You wanted info, so get of my ass