Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Naaah. Longs are always rewarded. I don’t think we’ve waited long enough yet.
The only thing it’s been used for, as far as I can tell, is fodder for dishonest pumping when it was on its marathon journey to the site.
Didn’t the university foot the bill for the kiln?
Therefore,
Right. Nothing says “liftoff” like a 181-share buy to close out a day that saw a total of 5,600 shares traded. That’s not even $3,000 worth of action on this tried and true turd.
This appears to be little more than a playground/ATM for noteholders. Nothing else to see here.
“as this continues to move down, it will propel backward.”
Just like ICLD did after its most recent RS.
Right. Just like ICLD did.
More likely, as this continues to move down, it will propel backward.
“Natural resources, including gold, could mean significant economic development in the future …”
From recent opinion piece that can be found at https://alaskabeacon.com/2022/07/27/west-susitna-access-project-increases-access/
The ratio is irrelevant, since it doesn’t change total value. The real question is what the magnitude of dilution will be.
Over many, many years of management ineptitude and company futility, waiting has become one thing shareholders can reliably count on.
Nobody is “done” by virtue of the split. Valuation remains the same until the dilution starts.
Regardless, you can be sure beneficial owners will be the last ones negatively affected. For all we know, they secretly dumped just like Eves and Nearly did.
The only relevant (and provable) discrepancy is in number of shares owned by management compared with the number in the previous report. 21 million secretly dumped shares tell the only story that needs to be told here, despite endless attempts to ignore and deflect from this FACT.
Major dumping going on today, along with some laughable attempts to offset the dumps with tiny manipulative buys.
“Why create such an easy list of lies?”
Because there is never a shortage of dishonest insiders willing to repeat the lies, and definitely no shortage of people willing to continue to believe the steady stream of BS as if they’ve never been lied to before.
That "strategy" hasn’t worked anywhere else. Why would it work here? Look what happened after this company’s own split a few years back. With a couple of notable — and suspicious — short-term spikes, this PoS, like so much other pink-sheet garbage, has been on a steady decline to zero value since then.
But maybe things will be different this time, right? LMAO.
How's that "bull trend" looking?
I'd ask, "based on what?", but I know expecting an answer would be a fool's errand.
Here's another oft-asked question that has yet to be answered by anyone who doesn't already see the obvious: Why would management secretly dump 21 million shares ahead of a reverse split and massive dilution if they believed "growth and potential are enormous" or if they were expecting "revenue to bump up"?
Here's a related question: Why should honest shareholders not also dump if management doesn't even believe in the company anymore?
Don't worry. I don't expect answers to these questions either. That's because the only actual evidence available to honest shareholders all clearly points to a company swirling the drain because of a couple decades of futility and dishonesty and five years of very toxic debt provided by folks dishonestly touted as "brilliant investors" and "saviors" of the company.
But sure, this is always how it looks in the pink sheets right before great things start happening. LMAO
I'll be surprised when people actually see the ugly but truthful light that's been shining in their faces for the better part of the last five years. I'll be surprised when the truth is accepted more easily than endless far-fetched and baseless speculation.
For sure. But it won't happen overnight. We still have decades of dependence on fossil fuels. So it's too bad CCTI has no game.
Even in a state with more than 50 percent of the nation's proven coal reserves, and about one-sixth of the world's coal-resource base, utilities are moving toward renewables.
Gordon and Barasso should be elated, considering Wyoming's economic reliance on coal. Doesn't change that it's almost certainly irrelevant to the nearly defunct CCTI, not to mention a clear overreach by the court. I love how radical right extremists love to tout states' rights, until it serves their agenda to be opposed to states' rights.
I believe the point was to counter the implication that there would be a positive impact.
The impulse to split semantic hairs can be often be irresistible, especially in the absence of a substantive counter-argument. But I appreciate the opportunity it can also provide to restate and clarify the obvious about the swirling-the-drain nature of this lame and dishonest company.
I don’t think that’s pumping, per se. But I agree it’s irrelevant.
CCTI is almost certainly out of the coal-cleaning business. Not that they were ever actually in it to begin with. And even if they are still in the biz, I also agree that a little emissions regulation is probably in the company’s favor.
Without illusory comments and implications of positive news, this lame excuse of a company would’ve folded its tents years ago.
For sure, the blatant dishonesty that underpinned the last five years would not have been possible.
The truth is obvious to anyone uncompromised by emotion or agenda.
The whole point of the split is to continue paying noteholders. Nothing else. Read the 10-K. It’s right there in black and white.
The mention of uplisting is secondary BS hype, just like it always has been.
The uplisting fantasy has been used by management and dishonest insiders to deceive the gullible for years and years. Hard to believe anyone still believes it.
#BarnumWasRight
Hope is the “strategy” that makes the stock market such an efficient mechanism for separating people from their money.
The university was always involved for its own research reasons. They were not a partner, and they were certainly not at management’s beck and call. When the research was finished — and apparently deemed a dud — they moved on to something else.
I think the only confusion is from the way the U was falsely promoted here. Same BS happened with SAIC, Leidos, WNP, and others over the years.
The filings are legally required, although that did not keep either Eves or Nearly from properly filing change of beneficial ownership status when they dumped 21 million shares.
And Two Rivers — “employer” of significant shareholder and falsely touted “savior” of this company Tacho M. Sandoval — certainly didn’t see anything proper in Nacho’s suspiciously timed Oct. 2018 Form 4 that they asked him to correct because it gave the appearance of “market manipulation”.
Correct. The uplist lie/pipedream has fueled fake hype surrounding this company for years and years.
Lots of things would generate interest. But none of them have happened.
Why anyone thinks, without evidence, that any of these things will suddenly happen because of a reverse split and massive dilution, after management has secretly dumped 21 million shares, is beyond my understanding.
More simple DD: “Investors” don’t line up to buy shares in a company whose management believes so little in it that they just secretly dumped 21 million shares ahead of a reverse split and massive dilution.
“do the simplest DD and just go to the cctc Twitter account and see a total shitshow of undelivered promises.”
It really is that simple.
“Why in the world would someone buy this turd?”
No one with half a brain and eighth-grade math skills would. As you point out, there is no good reason to buy, especially right before a reverse split and massive dilution.
If there was an actual, verifiable reason to think something is suddenly on the horizon after five years of no progress and no meaningful communication with shareholders, the time to buy would be after the new dilution gets baked into the PPS.
“What new investors are there?”
None. It is laughable for anyone to claim there are “a ton”.
LMAO. Like that hasn’t been said countless times over the last 12 years. All it’s gotten anyone is diluted, devalued, and dejected.
Again, if you truly (and ridiculously) believe that good things are still coming, it still makes no sense to hold when you can sell now and buy back right after the split.
Holding and allowing yourself to be grossly devalued before any subsequent rise in price (that there is no evidence is coming) is not the way wise, unemotional investors maximize their profit. All you’re doing is allowing noteholders to profit off your loss.
I’ve yet to hear a mathematical case for holding. It’s all just idle speculation wrapped up in baseless hope.