Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What does NNLX test require? It's just spoken of as if it exists and is the best. If by chance we ever see a test then we can figure out what's the best.
Is NNLX a lateral flow test?
Perhaps a little, it's like a flashback. haha. what a saga
I just thought your question as to what competition does NNLX have was humorous, If you've not seen the competition by now I doubt pointing all them out would make any difference. You ask a comparison with the many known tests to the unknown, unseen, vaguely described, never refined, yet to be prototyped or tested test.
The question is what competition can NNLX be?, if it gets that far you will be able to answer the simple things, like color.
Not knowing the color is going to make it hard to determine the competition.
Apple success has been the fad factor, appearance more important then you imagine.
Depends, what color is NNLX test?
Yes there is hope, but your comments reminded me of this age old video that I suppose will never be outdated.
Good question
Good one, not the first time I've heard a shortage of reagents is the bottle neck. Why is that,made in china?
Are these reagents needed with NNLX test?
"on a track toward more accurate diagnosis" is the only other statement too accuracy that I've seen the company make, again they are not saying 100%
A statement like totally accurate just blends in on a MB when motivation for posting is the only metric considered.
Here's the thing with me, it's to the company credit they do not make the "totally accurate" statement, it would seem reckless, imagine the liability. Little that I know about all this, it would not be believable or taken well as an opening line when introducing it to the industry.
good link post on TX
Someone on the void didn't like what I said, well that's never happened before, HAHAHA.
I don't really see a reply to what I pointed out as to what the company said about the accuracy, and I don't see the claim that the test is 100% accurate being repeated. There's a special comprehension skill used over there, for example,
I quoted the company: "should not show re-positives".. period.
The reply stated: I was attempting to make it sound as if the slide indicated that the NanoLogix technology had the shortcoming of re-positives.
If it doesn't get deleted it gets twisted, there is a reason it's a void, leave it over there.
The question was around the claim that the test is totally accurate, my answer is no,
The slide is one thing to see, on the slide I see words like "should not show re-positives", "a manner that has not yet been attempted" "on a track toward more accurate diagnosis" being used.
How what the company says is being interrupted that into "totally accurate" is beyond me. Perfect is a high hurdle, I doubt any company would ever make that claim.
From what I have seen it is not.
aaahhhhh, we are one at last, haha
The way of the new normal!
Perhaps he thought the holy cow would be worth more as burgers?
My thoughts exactly, after all theses years of same old repeats it is getting a little stale. it's hard to imagine the excitement, but here I am, its like a Seinfeld, always something amusing you missed in the first time you watched an episode.
I have this to say about that,
I doubt what was published was a misrepresentation of facts, I think the products are not anything that is going to be used in a major way, BNP doesn't seem practical in a busy lab.
Flatpack, preserving things in inert gases is used on many fresh products we buy, two years maybe? I don't think anyone cares. It's a gasbag with a bunch of holes in it, maybe a few home gamers buy a few on amazon, don’t know why you would buy pre pored to save for later.
Should start at 13 min., little before a discussion on what's going on down there in Texas.
Warning; controversial subject.
Surly EU is justified banning travel from any hotspot they want, how much better would they/we be if they got ahead of the science like Trump did and banned travel from China when we did. Woke science at the time labeled Trump prejudiced when he did that, but now it's good science in EU? Until there is herd immunity a travel ban is simply a delay to the inevitable,
There's no logic to the emotional rhetoric talking points you have espoused. Few things in science are absolute, never was since the day science told us the sun went around the earth. To think of science as absolute is the real denial.
BigD politely avoided the obvious and is right to do so. Interesting discussion that is a non starter when it begins by repeating political slogans.
I've been very skeptical of the numbers. I'd be curious if was a public or a private lab, in Texas I presume.
Delete your cookies.
Don't know, imagine it depends on their tolerances for pain.
Welcome to NANO world!
I would think the 3cent crowd knows how the stock normally trades and would be done selling by now, still a nice profit to be had but volume is returning to normal.
There has been 13-14 million shares trade in the last month at higher prices, that's a years worth of normal volume. As time goes on if nothing comes of this, the covid crazed buyers will be the motivated sellers into no volume.
I continue to allow origin unknown? As likely as the lab seems, maybe China knows patient 0 but We've not seen it? The amount of asymptomatic and mild cases suggest it may have gone unnoticed for a long time before a large enough number of cases with unexplained Pneumonia accumulated in one place that raised the flag to look for the unknown. I allow for any possibility but it would not be the first virus that hastily received a misleading title. (Spanish flu origin)
None of the experts want to find they're wrong about anything
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-france-retests-idUSKBN22H15R
And Yes, hate as a motivator never has a pleasant outcome.
A lot of things seem to have simply gone away.
The flu numbers are always vague estimates, it's probable that majority of people with the flu don't get tested, you know it when you got it. Reported flu tests are done in clinical settings, on the most vulnerable. The rest is a guess
Flu is thought to be seasonal but never totally goes away, interesting that covid appears to be increasing in June. Is it the amount of testing? Perhaps if we did the amount of testing for flu that we are doing for covid we would find even more people who are sick and don't know it.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/04/30/fact-check-cdc-still-tracking-flu-deaths-2019-20-typical/3044888001/
Dr. Gottlieb, on CNBC was praising the results of a new steroid treatment for advanced covid cases, potential to really drop the covid death rate.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/16/potential-coronavirus-treatment-dexamethasone-could-have-immediate-impact-former-fda-chief-says.html
What's next? Feels like musical chairs.
I take it Bret saying holy cow is what became thought of as 100% accuracy? No false negatives,.. That would be a leap of faith, holy cow!
"based upon preliminary development work done for detection of proteins associated with Ebola in 2014',"
" it may not be viewed as worthwhile in a cost:benefit analysis by various agencies or institutions."
As far as I know there is as little known about the Ebola test as there is about the covid test. Is the covid test is based on the same idea? If that is the case the statement, "it may not be viewed as worthwhile", would seem to stem from what was learned during the preliminary development work on Ebola.
Did they not follow up simply because Ebola faded out or it was found to be viewed to be not worthwhile.
I hear the covid test to be released is 100% accurate on the MBs. What has NNLX claimed?
"sensitivity of over 98% and specificity of 100%" is what they said in this, big Claim too live up to. hard to imagine. wonder if that would exclude the possibility of a bad sample,,must
pretty sure same test as your link
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-britain-test-idUSKBN22Z0PI
When you see what NNLX is talking about let us know.
Why is Phosphorus Genomics even called a home test? It's a home sample kit, 5min sounds great but "Testing results will be available 72 hours from receipt at our laboratory", what good is that, recover before you find out. Certainly not worth $110 plus additional costs related to collection devices and shipping.. And I have come to agree with you that CDC will want a record of results for many reasons, that is likely one good reason a medical professional will stay in the mix. Doesn't mean there is not a solution to all that.
Have no idea how NNLX test will be any improvement to any of the above, don't even know if the "home test" is simply a collection kit, be nice to know something to be able to compare it to anything,. Going to have to compare it to this when you can
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2020/06/15/cue-health-ceo-on-new-covid-19-diagnostic-test.html
I haven't looked and I'm not going down that road again, from what parents said it will raise the same questions. Someone brought it up with N-assay, turned into a pissin match with no facts or links (that weren’t deleted) on the void board. The only conclusion I could come up with at that time was if I really wanted to know how the company is able to retain rights when their name isn't on the patent,, I'd ask a patent lawyer. If you find something I'm curious.
There was an explanation given on the other board recently, It says, "the company pays for the patent fees, leasing, research time, etc. then the company has a legal stake". It has been publicly stated the test was created in NNLX lab.. might work for you.
I sorta regret blurting out anything about it, just play the stock, if some sort of deal would happen this go round it'll come out in the wash at a higher PPS, no deal no problem.
I think you had it in your other post, two separate thing. The patent enables the showing of a protected prototype. The FDA can't test an idea.
Other note, It depends, If a licensing deal with Nutra Pharma Corp. would prevent a licensing deal with JNJ? Another question for the lawyers.
I agree with your outline, two programs to enable a rapid view of options. to me sounds like a correct approach.
If I where to push back it would be on the time of FDA approval, I know all to well how slow anything .gov can be. But, who would think they would have a response to the patent this soon.
Civility much appreciated,especially these days.
I have a curiosity for you, I found by accident.
http://www.nameshow.com/domain/nnlx.com
It says nnlx.com is for sale at the price of $5983.
There is Chinese writing and I opened it on a computer where nothing matters. Nothing happened.
I certifiably do not imply that has anything to do with NNLX.
I Just don't know enough but have seen N-assay patent and I saw Farro, I saw Bret, I did not see nanologix.
I've seen other patents that have the companies name on it. that's all.
I really don't know . why is everything they do so vague.
i will take your MB word it, that's not much but i tend to agree with you that its as should be , you say you're lawyer ,, i sure ain't
Haven't spent much time on it. This looks like the patents are expedited to enable getting a test to the point it can be evaluated by FDA. The epiphany that created the holy cow was about the time many companies (and myself) thought they had the go ahead to just sell a coved19 home test, that was clarified and stopped. There is no if.
As I see it now they will still need FDA, but expect that also would be expedited. Step 1 is coming up with prototype.
Who's name is on the patent?