Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Where to start with your misinformation about SFRX.
Not that that is anything new.
First, this was 3 years ago. They have moved on from Melbourne after learning from the SeaSearcher and a little excavation.
They are at Juno now so you can stop with the constant complaints of Melbourne. And no, I don't care what their website says.
I'm a shareholder in SFRX so I focus on what matters. A website update is way down on the priority list.
I skipped over whatever the con man Torres had to say. Nothing he says is of any value.
Spain will have to prove what ship any treasure comes from before they are able to attempt to lay claim to it.
I know your old school understanding of treasure exploration is out-of-date so I'll just say that times they are a changin'.
No reason that is justifiable on the part of the archeologist who is holding it up.
Nothing wrong that SFRX has done, can't do or is refusing to do.
Best I can tell its just being delayed by the archeologist with the COE.
This is a permit that has been approved in the past more than once by the same COE.
Hold up by archeologist is ridiculous.
But SFRX will get it done.
Latest interview with another captain, Jeff Carr, from SFRX.
Sorry, relegated to one post a day.
Yes. There has been progress. I'm going to refrain from further details.
As usual, all good.
You know Kyle, they put up obstacles and he bowls them over like cannon fodder.
One step closer to tonnage, not trinkets.
Progress being made at SFRX!
This is a very good point.
Would like to see a lot more of this interview.
All good questions. Some of these questions have already been answered on the board over time but I'll spare you sifting through thousands of repetitive posts.
1. Can the strategy be successfully executed? Yes, but this question depends on the answer to your second question.
2. Does Seafarer technology work? The SeaSearcher is the specific technology you are referring to. While Seafarer and Wild Manta have paired up to do a few other industry improvements in tech, those are minor compared to the SeaSearcher. They have done trial runs in a variety of locations and conditions, including the ocean, with a variety of metals, including gold and silver. These tests confirm the functionality of the SeaSearcher. As the SeaSearcher is used more, it's ability improves as it learns as it goes. Some of this was discussed in Dante's interview. While these internal tests have been successful and appear to be showing to major investors that the tech does work, the only convincing proof is for the tech to be used to find treasure in a previously unknown location, like Juno.
3-4. Areas of interests identified? Yes, comments in interviews have discussed "areas of interest". I believe that if Juno had no area of interest, they would move on from the site as they did with Melbourne.
4. Media produced to generate interest? Yes, they are working several fronts and see a lot of potential for this.
5. Wild Manta/Seafarer relationship, who owns tech? Seafarer hired WM to develop the SeaSearcher. Wild Manta appears to be expanding it's offices. Seafarer owns the tech.
6. Permits and approvals? Certainly a subject that has drawn attention from the company. I'll just say that success breeds success.
7. Goals for SFRX? After success of tech and treasure, move to NASDAQ as quickly as possible. Process for this has already been lined up. Continue to find treasure at many wrecks, new wrecks and expand to other industries.
8. Investments by affiliates and their benefit. You can look up their histories to see how they might benefit the company, being tech investors is a good start. Filings mentioned one investor had about 500M shares. I think it was Max and he has more now. The family of CEO is said to have around 1B shares collectively. Other investors also individually own 100s of millions of shares.
Hope this helps. I'm just a shareholder but a well-informed one who does DD. I'm not answering these questions as a representative of the company, just an investor who has been here a long time.
An important comment you made:
That is correct.
My hope and expectation is for both of the above to happen together.
Even better.
Meanwhile, we wait.
So the new defense of .0001 EXPL is that it is ... too good for the OTC?
Failed to raise money, failed to report financials, priced dropped from over a $1 to .0001, Jury found Micah guilty of fraud ... but the real reason EXPL is not on OTC is because... too good for it?
Holy crap. Talk about amusing.
Is the amusement purposeful?
Does the hypocrisy ever register?
All I know is I'm glad I stuck with SFRX and I'm excited for the very near future of the company.
If you watch those interviews with the people that actually know what they are talking about and you still can't figure it out, then you'll never figure it out. Maybe thats by design? A feature and not a bug?
Go SFRX!
Eventful news for EXPL shareholders (which some seem to still promote and care about).
This horrible, virtually worthless stock is now no longer trading at .0002.
With a less than 2 cent trade today, the price dropped 50% to .0001. From over a $1 a share a few years ago to .0001.
I have no idea how a trade was actually made someone squeezed out a dingleberry from this stone and sliced it's value in half.
So very glad I stuck with SFRX and it's very bright and shiny future!
Progress continues to be made at SFRX!!!
Tonnage, not trinkets!
While things keep looking better and better for SFRX, I'm not so sure I would put a lot of value in the word of anyone who once:
• Said to not buy a stock that later went up 3,000% (SFRX)
• Advised buying a stock that then went down 99.99% (EXPL)
• Had the gaul to say the problem with EXPL, when it was trading around 50 cents, was that there was a lack of shares available and buyers were waiting for larger blocks to be available. EXPL now at .0002 and non-trading, non-reporting. Now says EXPL is “doing fine.”
• Doesn't know the difference between a promissory note and a convertible note.
• Argues the tech for the SeaSearcher is imaginary while at the same time says it already exists.
• Pretends not to understand how the SeaSearcher has value.
• Is unable to see the expanding uses for the SeaSearcher tech in multiple industries and that it can be used on many wrecks, not just one
• Says Tim Reynolds does not understand salt water
• Implies the SFRX BOD is personally selling shares when they are not.
• Says no one is promoting EXPL while promoting EXPL at the same time
• Attacks a company for 7 years without owning shares while also claiming they have a buy order submitted to "load the boat" with SFRX shares when treasure hits
• Thinks Micah being found guilty by a jury on 19 counts of fraud is just part of doing business and not a big deal, "he was just found liable, not guilty!" LOL!
• Equates being reimbursed for a phone bill as the same as receiving a salary
• Brags about making money on a P&D
• Does not believe a teredo crust exist and is just ‘hype’ because they lack the experience to know about them
The above list is not complete, but it's plenty to make a sound decision regarding investment advice.
Keep in mind, Seafarer is criticized:
When Seafarer’s own CEO is positive about the company.
When they communicate with the public and when they do not communicate with the public.
When the price goes up (“wash trading!”) and when the price goes down.
When the volume is high (“wash trading!”) and when the volume is low.
When they have a new development and when they do not have a new development.
When they do something or when they don't appear to do anything.
When they announce what they expect to happen and when they do not announce what they expect to happen.
When they communicate to the public before something happens and if they make plans to communicate to the public after something happens.
When they promote something and when they purposely don't promote something.
When they hire someone or when they fire someone.
When Kennedy takes a salary and when he does not take a salary (12 years, no salary).
When... well, I guess it could be a long list.
Eventually it will be when they do find treasure and when they don't find treasure.
Basically it's every single thing they, the shareholders or anyone currently or previously associated with the company do – whether good or bad.
All I know is that I would not take advice from entities that have no firsthand knowledge about the operations or understandings regarding the crew, officers, scientists or the capabilities of the SeaSearcher.
The best source of information is from the company and people who are actively engaged with the equipment, strategy and operations.
If you think you are going to get insider information on this company or that you will know when something big is about to happen because of insider buying or insider activity, you are mistaken. The people who know will not be saying. The people who say they know, do not and will not. There will not be leaks.
You see, according to non-shareholding trolls of SFRX (who did get stuck with .0002 P&D EXPL):
Seafarer is a clown show that will never get a permit,
but if they do get a permit it will only be a ‘swim’ permit and won’t allow them to dig,
but if they do get a permit to dig then they don’t have the right equipment,
but if they do have the right equipment then the site has been picked over for 30 years and there is no wreck there,
but if it hasn't actually been picked over and there is a wreck there then FBAR won’t let them bring it up,
but if FBAR does let them bring it up then they won’t be able to find the treasure because they have no experience,
but if they do have experienced military trained divers and invent a SeaSearcher that helps them find it then the SeaSearcher doesn’t really exist,
but if the SeaSearcher does exist then it doesn’t work,
but if it does work then it’s nothing special and it’s already been done before with other equipment thus it already exist,
but if does exist and it is special then it’s not needed because all the treasure that has been found so far was found without it,
but if it does make finding treasure much much easier, faster and more efficient, then there won’t be much treasure there
but if there is a lot of treasure then they won’t be able to keep it
but if they can keep it then they won’t be able to keep it very long and Spain could come take it any day,
but if they don’t come take it and it is a lot then…
well, it’s only one wreck so it’s a “sell on the news” event and they couldn’t possibly use this new technology again on another wreck over and over again and again or transfer it’s usage to another industry and most definitely there would never be a military use for it even though that’s already been mentioned but it hasn’t happened yet so that means it will never happen.
Good luck to all the shareholders of SFRX!
#tonnagenottrinkets
Regarding things that do actually matter to shareholders:
Just came here to say...
Tonnage.
Not.
Trinkets.
Please don't feed the trolls. Those acquisitions are just the board members being paid for their service on the board for the last year. Happens every year around this time.
The REAL question is:
Why are these board members collecting so many shares? For years now you see them get paid in shares instead of dollars. Okay, fine and good and all. But you'll also see in those filings that their share count continues to go UP, year after year. As best I can tell, haven't done the match or watched that closely, they haven't sold a share in YEARS.
They have 133M, 84M and 129M shares. That's a lot of shares.
It appears they haven't sold a share in years.
I think all of the actual shareholders of SFRX know why they are hoarding so many shares.
I bet the 'related party', aka family members of CEO Kennedy, are holding on to their billion shares for a reason.
I notice this bit of information available from the filings is never mentioned by Micah's minions.
Agree Wahoo. Let SFRX and the crew of scientists do what they know best.
Unbelievable and 'beyond laughable' the ridiculous advice being offered by non-shareholders of SFRX and promoters of the expired P&D EXPL.
Sure, come out now with promises of what kind and how much treasure is on the site – before they've laid hands on it.
What could go wrong?
I guess I shouldn't expect anything more from those who consider operating 19 scam companies as just part of doing business.
See https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2021/lr25156.htm
Kennedy overpromised already with his "first quarter" comments from a couple years ago.
He's sure not going to do anything close to that again not to mention stepping it up to the SEC violations such an absurd recommendation would violate.
With one last step, they will be digging on Juno. I'm fine waiting the short time now left.
Just amazing what the armchair quarterbacks will offer up as the simplest of solutions to situations of which they have no comprehension.
Thanks for your sensible comments wahoo. You sound like someone who actually does hands-on DD instead of taking potshots from the stands and claiming expertise.
#tonnagenottrinkets
You comments are beyond amusing and very telling.
Good luck with Micah's scam company, EXPL.
A few more trinkets and you might hit... .0003?
Oh, right. Non-trading company.
#tonnagenottrinkets
Glad Reynolds took over from George on state filings a couple years ago. He had some cleaning up to do.
All taken are of now. Good to go!
Funny to see all the holiday weekend work from a non-shareholder go to waste. Again.
#tonnagenottrinkets
New interview out from Reynolds about the SeaSearcher.
I just read on the Internet that the EXPL trinket photos are fake!
Not surprising from that swirling toilet bowl of a company run by a guy with fraud convictions for running 19 scam companies... or was it 20? It's rhetorical.
Triple-Oh!-Two for a reason!
Glad I have my SFRX stock instead!
#tonnagenottrinkets
Just a friendly Thanksgiving reminder:
I'm not so sure I would put a lot of value in the word of anyone who once:
• Said to not buy a stock that later went up 3,000%
• Advised buying a stock that then went down 99.99%
• Had the gaul to say the problem with EXPL, when it was trading around 50 cents, was that there was a lack of shares available and buyers were waiting for larger blocks to be available. EXPL now at .0002 and non-trading, non-reporting. Now says EXPL is “doing fine.”
• Doesn't know the difference between a promissory note and a convertible note.
• Argues the tech for the SeaSearcher is imaginary while at the same time says it already exists.
• Is unable to see the expanding uses for the SeaSearcher tech in multiple industries and that it can be used on many wrecks, not just one
• Says Tim Reynolds does not understand salt water
• Implies the SFRX BOD is personally selling shares when they are not.
• Says no one is promoting EXPL while promoting EXPL at the same time
• Attacks a company for 7 years without owning shares while also claiming they have a buy order submitted to "load the boat" with SFRX shares when treasure hits
• Thinks Micah being found guilty by a jury on 19 counts of fraud is just part of doing business and not a big deal, "he was just found liable, not guilty!" LOL!
• Equates being reimbursed for a phone bill as the same as receiving a salary
• Brags about making money on a P&D
• Does not believe a teredo crust exist and is just ‘hype’ because they lack the experience to know about them
The above list is not complete, but it's plenty to make a sound decision regarding investment advice.
Keep in mind, Seafarer is criticized:
When they communicate with the public and when they do not communicate with the public.
When the price goes up and when the price goes down.
When the volume is high and when the volume is low.
When they have a new development and when they do not have a new development.
When they do something or when they don't appear to do anything.
When they announce what they expect to happen and when they do not announce what they expect to happen.
When they communicate to the public before something happens and if they make plans to communicate to the public after something happens.
When they promote something and when they purposely don't promote something.
When they hire someone or when they fire someone.
When Kennedy takes a salary and when he does not take a salary (12 years, no salary).
When... well, I guess it could be a long list.
Eventually it will be when they do find treasure and when they don't find treasure.
Basically it's every single thing they, the shareholders or anyone currently or previously associated with the company do – whether good or bad.
All I know is that I would not take advice from entities that have no firsthand knowledge about the operations or understandings regarding the crew, officers, scientists or the capabilities of the SeaSearcher.
The best source of information is from the company and people who are actively engaged with the equipment, strategy and operations.
If you think you are going to get insider information on this company or that you will know when something big is about to happen because of insider buying or insider activity, you are mistaken. The people who know will not be saying. The people who say they know, do not and will not. There will not be leaks.
My position in SFRX has increased.
Good luck to all the shareholders of SFRX!
#tonnagenottrinkets
I forget that a lot of people don't know much about the treasure industry and its history.
So, while I was disappointed with content at first, I can understand why they need to spell it out for a new audience. Step by step and build it up.
Curious to see what they say about the SeaSearcher in the next episode.
And then let's all see some proof of it functioning in the wild, not just the lab!
Go SFRX!
SFRX continues to make progress!
Incredible research partnered with incredible technology equals success!
Looking good!
Seafarer has one real issue: Putting treasure on deck.
Regarding that, when their data said to move on from Melbourne, they moved on.
They are not moving on from Juno which leads me to conclude that their data is telling them something different.
I see this as a very good thing. I think their one real issue is about to be a thing of the past.
Meanwhile:
I'm not so sure I would put a lot of value in the word of anyone who once:
• Said to not buy a stock that later went up 3,000%
• Advised buying a stock that then went down 99.99%
• Had the gaul to say the problem with EXPL, when it was trading around 50 cents, was that there was a lack of shares available and buyers were waiting for larger blocks to be available. EXPL now at .0002 and non-trading, non-reporting. I'm sure those promised big TV deals are right around the corner.
• Doesn't know the difference between a promissory note and a convertible note.
• Argues the tech for the SeaSearcher is imaginary while at the same time says it already exists.
• Is unable to see the expanding uses for the SeaSearcher tech and that it can be used on many wrecks, not just one
• Says Tim Reynolds does not understand salt water
• Claims the SFRX BOD is selling shares when they are not.
• Says no one is promoting EXPL while promoting EXPL at the same time
• Attacks a company for 7 years without owning shares while also claiming they have a buy order submitted to "load the boat" with SFRX shares when treasure hits
• Thinks Micah being found guilty by a jury on 19 counts of fraud is just part of doing business and not a big deal, "he was just found liable, not guilty!" LOL!
• Equates being reimbursed for a phone bill as the same as receiving a salary
• Brags about making money on a P&D
• Does not believe a teredo crust exist and is just ‘hype’ because they lack the experience to know about them
The above list is not complete, but it's plenty to make a sound decision regarding investment advice.
Keep in mind, Seafarer is criticized:
When they communicate with the public and when they do not communicate with the public.
When the price goes up and when the price goes down.
When the volume is high and when the volume is low.
When they have a new development and when they do not have a new development.
When they do something or when they don't appear to do anything.
When they announce what they expect to happen and when they do not announce what they expect to happen.
When they communicate to the public before something happens and if they make plans to communicate to the public after something happens.
When they promote something and when they purposely don't promote something.
When they hire someone or when they fire someone.
When Kennedy takes a salary and when he does not take a salary.
When... well, I guess it could be a long list.
Eventually it will be when they do find treasure and when they don't find treasure.
Basically it's every single thing they, the shareholders or anyone currently or previously associated with the company do – whether good or bad.
All I know is that I would not take advice from entities that have no firsthand knowledge about the operations or understandings regarding the crew, officers, scientists or the capabilities of the SeaSearcher.
The best source of information is from the company and people who are actively engaged with the equipment, strategy and operations.
If you think you are going to get insider information on this company or that you will know when something big is about to happen because of insider buying or insider activity, you are mistaken. The people who know will not be saying. The people who say they know, do not and will not. There will not be leaks.
My position in SFRX has increased.
Good luck to all the shareholders of SFRX!
#tonnagenottrinkets
If management believes good things by EOY, we may be trading more than pennies or even silver.
Depending on what "good things" means.
But I'll take silver by EOY all day long!
We all know why triple-oh-two is here. Micah's Minions founding member.
Still pumping expl to get more people trapped in the trips.
This just in!
Buggy whip salesman says cars are just a fad! "If you're not smelling horse farts while traveling, you're doing it wrong!"
New logo out for SFRX focusing on ticker symbol.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=661746955512972&set=pb.100050330210203.-2207520000.&type=3
Now they go get the gold?
2.6 million on the bid if some whiners want to get out. If said whiners have any shares to begin with that is.
You think Mr. "Load the Boat" will understand what you are saying?
Will fly over his head like a paper airplane in a hurricane.
Well, if there's anyone who's going to know about Seafarer, it's going to be someone who doesn't own shares in the company yet insists on 6 years of attacks.
Not.
#tonnagenottrinkets
We can all make our own decisions on SFRX but I'm not so sure I would put a lot of value in the word of anyone who once:
• Said to not buy a stock that later went up 3,000%
• Advised buying a stock that then went down 99.99%
• Had the gaul to say the problem with EXPL, when it was trading around 50 cents, was that there was a lack of shares available and buyers were waiting for larger blocks to be available. EXPL now at .0002 and non-trading, non-reporting.
• Doesn't know the difference between a promissory note and a convertible note.
• Argues the tech for the SeaSearcher is imaginary while at the same time says it already exists.
• Is unable to see the expanding uses for the SeaSearcher tech and that it can be used on many wrecks, not just one
• Says Tim Reynolds does not understand salt water
• Claims the SFRX BOD is selling shares when they are not.
• Says no one is promoting EXPL while promoting EXPL at the same time
• Attacks a company for 7 years without owning shares while also claiming they have a buy order submitted to "load the boat" with SFRX shares when treasure hits
• Thinks Micah being found guilty by a jury on 19 counts of fraud is just part of doing business and not a big deal, "he was just found liable, not guilty!" LOL!
• Equates being reimbursed for a phone bill as the same as receiving a salary
• Brags about making money on a P&D
• Does not believe a teredo crust exist and is just ‘hype’ because they lack the experience to know about them
The above list is not complete, but it's plenty to make a sound decision regarding investment advice.
Keep in mind, Seafarer is criticized:
When they communicate with the public and when they do not communicate with the public.
When the price goes up and when the price goes down.
When the volume is high and when the volume is low.
When they have a new development and when they do not have a new development.
When they do something or when they don't appear to do anything.
When they announce what they expect to happen and when they do not announce what they expect to happen.
When they communicate to the public before something happens and if they make plans to communicate to the public after something happens.
When they promote something and when they purposely don't promote something.
When they hire someone or when they fire someone.
When Kennedy takes a salary and when he does not take a salary.
When... well, I guess it could be a long list.
Eventually it will be when they do find treasure and when they don't find treasure.
Basically it's every single thing they, the shareholders or anyone currently or previously associated with the company do – whether good or bad.
All I know is that I would not take advice from entities that have no firsthand knowledge about the operations or understandings regarding the crew, officers, scientists or the capabilities of the SeaSearcher.
The best source of information is from the company and people who are actively engaged with the equipment, strategy and operations.
If you think you are going to get insider information on this company or that you will know when something big is about to happen because of insider buying or insider activity, you are mistaken. The people who know will not be saying. The people who say they know, do not and will not. There will not be leaks.
My position in SFRX has increased.
Good luck to all the shareholders of SFRX!
#tonnagenottrinkets
Why do non-shareholders think SFRX is still on Melbourne?
Oh, right. Because they don't know what is going on.
But then, they also think teredo crusts don't exist and even mock the idea of them so maybe they are not the best source of info.
https://www.thelastwreck.com/salvage-history
Sure is quiet.
Interesting.
SFRX all good in Florida. Progress continues!