Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sorry, didn't see your post before. I don't look at those, I use other indicators and those indicators have been pretty reliable from the time it hit a high in the .03's to the time it has been wallowing around in the .014 .015 +- range.
Thanks M. I remember reading that yesterday and figured it was just BS, but even though it was, it accomplished what is was supposed to do. If anything, what can be learned from this is that you can come on here and post whatever you want without much oversight going on.
Where is the email, memo, or whatever, that caused this fellow to email DB?
I did Dadoo, as a matter of fact I take a look every day, and sometimes during the day. Yesterday was a + day which is good and made the WEEK a + week. Not a huge + week, but you take any percentage of an increase over a decrease. As a whole, some of the indicators that I look at indicate that there is a lot of work still to be done here. Now that's based on the assumption that there will be no info, either bad or good, that comes out and influences the PPS. At that point, it will do it's thing one way or the other, and at that point all you can do is sit and watch.
Now your making a little more sense. Thanks for the compliment!
There are 52 weeks in a year, so what week are you "predicting" that the breakout will begin?
I think you have summed up my point very well. I think that because a majority of the posts here are made by those who are in the "100% believe segment", some might get the impression that we are all like that, and there isn't a great number of people who look at this thing very objectively. It's funny, but when I see these guys come on here and bash the stock and try to say that we are all a bunch of idiots and we are clueless because we believe whatever we are told, I wish there was a way I could make these guys understand that there IS a great number of us who look at this thing from a different angle.
Correct, I am not an attorney. Putting that PR out without following up with another PR that confirms the loan tells me the loan has not been made. I don't read these PRs the same way you do. When your emotionally involved like you are, you have no choice but to take this info at face value and believe. I own the stock but I don't let my emotions overtake my judgement, common sense, and understanding of the process. Again, I can do that because I have no emotional attachment, you have no choice but to believe everything that is written is the truth, and that is exactly what Dean Bradley is banking on, and as you can see, for some people it works, and for a lot of us here it doesn't. Now don't take my observation as an insult, it's just the way I see it, and I have seen nothing that shows I am on the wrong track.
And what do you do when the class action suit is filed by the sellers who sold their shares between the time you recieved (assumption) the cash, and the time you actually revealed that you had the cash in hand?
to paraphrase a statement made in a somewhat similar situation; "the clock be tickin"
Fink, what else would you expect him to do? His back is against the wall, anything less than "this is done" by him is not acceptable, without that the stock tanks. He also knows there is no tolerance for some "pie in the sky PR" that says nothing and leads to more speculation. It's really simple, yes or no, there is no middle ground here.
I thought u were talking about an event such as loans or acqi's.
If he has info that he knows that had to be disclosed and failed to do so, yes there would be a problem. A big problem.
even though you may elect not report a material event (despite an obligation to do so).
What does this mean Willy? It appears that u r saying u have to but u don't have 2.
Great image creation!! You left me hanging though, what does Dean say when he opens his mouth?
Thanks Bob, it would have had to be back awhile for the figures to make sense.
if they did 20% at the time, the total OS would have to be 77M at that time. Is there a way to check the OS on or around that date?
Nothing.
Yep, that is the organeyezation that I am talking about.
I don't read it that way, but that's just my opinion. If they did get the funding it would be a big boost to both the company and the shareholders, so I would expect to see another PR that says something to the affect that the "money is in the bank" complete with quotes from the parties involved and with information that leaves nothing to the imagination. The big problem with believing that it has happened is that during this time period the share price has trended down, so if the public believes that Q has the money, we are going to be in a XXXXload of trouble if the best we can get is .015+ after recieving 350M.
Any company period. The SEC would be all over a company if they didn't.
Dooley, like myself, you own the stock, believe whatever you want to believe, it's your money so you have the right to do so. My faith isn't as deep as yours, but that's what they have THE SELL order for!! Please, make me some strawberry while your churning away.
Brit, as someone who has written PR's and will continue to do so for various reasons, my opinion of the PRs put out by Dean is that they are amateurish and are meant to say something without really saying anything. By that I mean the PR becomes the issue as opposed to the content of the PR. I have posted this before, and I believe that most of the intrigue here is directly related to the content, or lack thereof, in these PRs.
Boat, I know you are being derisive and I have no problem with that, nor do I feel a need to criticize you. As far as going subpenny, that is very unlikely to happen for a long time. the downward trend has lost steam and I think it's fair to say that that the support at .013 held well. Barring some unforeseen event, this thing will continue to trade above that figure and will rise on any positive news, or even news that a PR will be released at a certain time in the future.
That's the attitude!! As long as a posts doesn't cause me any trouble, I'm cool with it!!! Drama Queens heh, how about responsibble people who aren't looking to make a buck at any cost, especially when that costs is going to cause somebody or somebodies not related to the situation some problems. If this kind of thing makes no sense to you, no problem, I understand, the quest for money does that to people.
That's understandable D. What you have to realize is that whenever a name or name of a company pops up on this board, there are a group of extremely overzealous individuals who will do whatever they can to use those names or company names to further their cause, either pro or con. That leads to some unsuspecting person, typically some poor receptionist sitting behind a desk to get flooded with calls and being asked questions about things that she has no knowledge of, or, being asked to track down individuals whose name is asscoiated with the number that was called. It happened last week with a company called AA, which is similar to the name that Q has created. I don't think they appreciated it very much and in the end it caused a "over the phone rift" between a principal of that company and DB. And for what reason??? Absolutely nothing!! Wait, I'm sorry, the reason it all happened was that somebody from one side had to prove something to somebody from the other side and in the end all it did was piss off some woman in Texas for no good reason.
Got your posts. I agree, I hope knowbody calls one of these guys. Or should I say 75 people don't call these guys.
I understand that people on here want to see information that might be considered positive for QASP, as a matter of fact I am one of them, but you have to be respnsible with your posts. I have to give brikk kudos for not letting anyone post names of companies that were thrown around concerning the acqi. for fear of those people who work there hearing something that may or may not be true, and them having their lives turned up side down on an INTERNET RUMOR.
Being a public company does not mean that all information concerning that company is open for the world to see.
You really can't believe that it's right to go into a private office, take pictures, post the pictures on the internet, and then have the names that are on a board in a private office be put on the internet for all to see. It's on a board in a private office and I am sure if Bradley was around that day this guy would have never been allowed in that office.
You guys should realy get a grip on yourselves and stop posting these guys names on this board. I'm sure when they talked to whoever at AA they never dreamed that there names would be on display on a investment site for the whole world to view and also for the whole world to speculate what their relationship with AA is. It's funny, most of you post behind some alias screen name without giving the public a hint of who you are or what you are about, but you have no problem pasting somebody else's name all over this board wether they want it to be there or not.
I know you were messin around with him. By next week I will try and come up with some encouraging posts and see if it actually helps.
It's XMAS Eve JP, things are pretty mellow today. Sleepin and Sample are probably out doing some last minuye shopping or they are respecting the holiday weekend truce.
I understand DB, but for all the craziness that goes on here, that one seems to make my head pop off of my shoulders. I really wish a post or multiple posts could make a stock price rise, or even fall for that matter. I would stay up all night writing my posts, buy or sell short at the bell, start posting, and make a killing for the day.
Thanks Dale.
Don't bail now Boomer, the stock is going to get a little pop in the near future. I don't know what your buy-in price is, but at this point hanging in there 6 months + will at least give your account a chance to grow a little. Look for previous highs, see where you stand $$$$, and go from there.
With TDA you also can use ThinkorSwim, but that too doesn't give you the pennies. It appears that TDA just doesn't support L2 for pennies so the only way to get them is through a subscription to a 3rd party service.
DB, if you believe that Boomer's post can cause a stock price to drop, can you please use the same reasoning and conclusions to come up with the ingredients that are necessary to put in a post to make the price INCREASE.
It's a great program, very simple to use and it does everything you need it to do. Most of the time when you email for support you will get a response from Jerry, the fellow who created it, and you get a informative reply.
Thanks Manti!