BB1 since you keep skirting around the issue and
bringing up other people, I will take this as a
sign that you have no proof that Roger Pawson
owns Behl or is a board director of Behl. That
is all I wanted to know. Thanks for your relpy.

B1 I ask about Pawson, doesen't Sun Biz list Burton as
ceo and president of Behl? I don't believe there is any
mention of Roger Pawson.

BB1 does Pawson own Behl?

Does anyone have documented proof that Roger Pawson
is on the board of directors of BEHL?

avaritia, I am not saying that Fisher is
innocent of wrong doing here, but nobody
can seriously think that Berry, Rawson and
Shen were just unknowing bystanders in this
deal. Personally, IMO, they all are quilty
of wrongdoing, its really just a matter of
how much of the scam each one had in this
fiasco. Last post for the day.

BB1, please produce a copy of the company bylaws
showing Roger Pawson as a board director of Behl.

There is absolutly no evidence that Roger Pawson
is anything other than a shareholder in Behl. So
any referrence to the contrary is pure speculation.

jbsliverer, you have no idea who is involved with
Behl at this time, other than the three gentlemen
named in the Pr.

avaritia1949, a tough row to hoe is putting it
mildly considering the mess the old board left.
Which leads me to believe that Burton felt that
Behl cleaned up and with the right people in place,
could make him and others a fortune and I am not
talking about $75,000 or so for a clean shell.

avaritia1949, your probably right, Burton would not
take on Behl for $7500. How about $750,000 or
$7,500,000 ?

avaritia1949, trip nickles, probably not. What about 0.01.
That would be a giant return on investment from where it is
now.

63strat, I am only interested in hearing information that
is factual about the current Behl. I do have information
about the new Behl. Where I got that information is only
my business and I don't need to share it with anyone. I
really don't care what anyone says or believes about what
is going on or who is running Behl at this time. The real
fact that I can share with you is that both boards are a
waist of time. We will all see what unfolds with Behl and
it is my opinion that we will know very soon. Until then,
it appears that all we can do is trade barbs and insults
on a daily basis.

prsch3259, no facts at all about what you state, just your
opinion about Behl and who you think is involved now. Here
is a fact, Roger Pawson is a shareholder in Behl, nothing
more and nothing less. Fisher is no longer involved with
Behl.

prsch3259, again, thanks for the heads up on Behl's
demise. Since Behl is out of business, I suppose there
is no reason to talk about Behl any longer.

prsch3259, that it what I have been looking for,
some solid proof that Behl is out of business.
That certainly settles that issue. I guess there
is no reason for this board to continue, it has
been fun. GLTY

BB1 how do you know that I have had no contact with
anyone currently connectes with Behl? There is no
point in a reply, as I will not divulge anything
regarding that matter.

BB1 how do you know that no business exists, just
because Behl has decided to keep everything under
wraps for now certainly does not prove that no
business exists.

BB1 just because you say its a fact about Behl,
does not make it so. Everything about Behl's future
demise, is nothing more than pure conjecture. No
one can be absolutly sure as to what will happen.

kurt_vdh, good that you did not sell your shares in Behl,
as a restuctered company is on the horizon with new people
involved and a solid business plan. It is taking longer
than everyone expected but because of the previous boards
actions it is understandable. IMO that the news that all shareholders are expecting will happen in the very near
future that will explain not only what is currently going
on at Behl but a clear and precise look at all of the new
ventures that Behl is undertaking. GLTY

jb, please inform me as to who is running Behl, do you
know for sure or is this just your opinion?

Please correct me if I am wrong, but didn't Frank Rawson
file that 4th Qt. report? We all know what a standup guy
he is.

prsch3259, since it has been posted that the representative
is involved in the so-called lie and scam with Behl, I will,
at this time end my involvement in this conversation.

pickard, has anyone currently associated with Behl
lied to you? What scam is the new Behl involved in?

prsch3259, a request for an interview with Burton was
passed on by his representative and was confimed that
Burton had received the invitation. I am assuming that
it could be his lawyer or secretary as I would certainly
believe that he has a lawyer and most likely a secretary.
However, if you don't believe that Burton exists, then
it really does not matter.

nnnn73, It was Michael Burton's representative. My guess
would be his secretary or maybe his lawyer.

prsch3259, I know.

babyisis, is I were Burton and owned 750 million shares in
Behl, I would certainly be doing everything possible to turn
this company around. I would also believe that anyone who
ownes shares in Behl would want the same thing. So the real
important issue at this point is not so much who Burton is,
but what he is doing for the shareholders. Since he is working
on his timeline and not ours, we will just have to wait. That
is based on the assumption that you believe Burton is for real.

prsch3259, that is something that we can agree on.

BB1, I came here today to see if anyone had any new info
about Behl that would be considered negative, unfortunately
all I got was a history lesson about Behl, so nothing new
here except old info and opinions about Behl's future. I will continue to visit from time to time waiting for someone to
tell me something I don't already know.

The speculation of a R/S is pure speculation and again
I have been hearing about that for some time. Now when
and if the R/S occurs, then that would certainly be a
provable negative fact about Behl. Until that happens,
all posts about a R/S will be treated by me as nothing
more than spam.

babyisis, nothing in your post that is new info, just
more history lessons about Behl. This is no more than
a list of things that have not happened yet. It by no
means proves that they won't happen, just not on your
timeline is all.

63strat, again old news, been hearing about the R/S
for some time now.

jbsliverer, yes, billions of shares are being sold to
pay off debt, I know that and I also know that there
have to be buyers for those shares. So yes that is a
fact and we know what that money is being used for. Now
it is possible that some of those shares are being sold
off by the past board members, still lining their pockets.

babyisis, I guess that my point about not needing anymore
history lessons about Behl are not going to be adhered to.
The old Behl mess must be cleaned up before the new Behl
can move forward. So hopefully someone will post anything
that is a negative provable fact about Behl that is new.

jbsliverer, you are certainly entitled to your "OPINION".
The only thing that is a fact past Jan. 1st 2011, is that
Behl has elected not to release fluffy Prs. like DF did.

I believe that there are many new investors that have
given Behl's new management team letters of commitment
to invest in their business plan with the understanding
that they first must clean up the mess left by the old
board. So. two important things are IMO, being worked on
at this time, one, cleaning up the old mess and two de-
veloping the new business plan. DF was a terrible at the
business end of Behl and unfortunatly relied on a bunch
people who were only interested in a quick buck. If these
peple would have been reputable we would all be rich right
now. All it means is that we have to wait a little longer
for our investment to pay off.

Just so everyone here knows the truth, there are a lot of
positive things, IMO, going on at Behl as we speak. This
information will be released by Behl's management team as
the new business plan is completed, Dennis Fisher is no
longer associated with Behl and like all of Behl's past
board members, may or may not have been involved with any
illigal activities. If anyone here can disprove my state-
ments I will be more than happy to post an aknowlegement
of their proof.

Sincaster, my point is this. If anyone here has proof of
anything that would be considered negative about Behl, I
would like to hear about it. An example would be finding
out that Fisher is still envolved with the company. Info
like that would prove a lie. And I certainly would have
no objection to asking the same question about proving
any positive statements being made about Behl. Once again,
I am not interested in what happened prior to the Pr in
Dec. 2010 announcing the take over by Burton. What I am
asking for is anything that would prove that the scam is
ongoing. Only new info please. Thanks

babyisis, everyone knows about the qt. report and
when its due. Instead of repeating the same old
news every day about Behl, why don't you spend your
time on proving or disproving what Behl is up to
now. An example of what I would like to see would be
absolute proof that Pawson is more than just a share-
holder. I due understand your
frustration and distain for Behl but what would be
exstremely interesting and beneficial. IMO, are posts
containing accual proof of anything associated with
the current Behl. Now I know this is an opinion board
and you don't have to prove anything but I think that
it would be very helpful if anyone here could post
anything about todays Behl. I really don't have anything
specifically in mind so I will leave it to anyone that
has something besides the same old news. Thanks

Greengold, well you can put Rawson in that group. He lied
to me about the BNPD payments. Imo, they are all quilty.
I also believe that all of them are currently under some
form of investigation, the only problem is, we may never
know the real truth. If Behl fails, it will absolutly
amaze me if anyone goes to jail. My guess is that they
will all move on to their next scam. People like this
continue on their lives of deception until they either die
or go to prison.