Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I have a buy in for another 200K at .007...should have grabbed it this morning....
Looks like action is picking up. 900K trade just went off at .008
Keep the faith....
According to a post on RB, the SH meeting at the Red Rock has been confirmed...guess they found the deposit money in a sock somewhere, Bill....
I am with you too, Spark. Havn't I seen you on DKGR? I am up on that one (for now). Will be interesting to see where it ends up.....
I'm with you 6391. I have seen those types on every board. I have never said this is a guaranteed winner and remain open to the notion that I may end up losing, but for the five or six I lose on I make it up on one that climbs. All my eggs are not in one basket...
I still believe, as many others do, that we may make money on this. It is good to see differing opinions.....however when one so vehemently denies the possibility of making money on a company, it is usually sour grapes for bad decisions made earlier...pity the closed mind.
We have differing opinions...I am just happy to know that I have enough knowledge to respect other's opinions, even if they are not in line with my own. Pity the position one is in when you refuse to consider a differing opinion...
Go Griffffiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeee
"Conclusion" (on some peoples part, but not everyone) does not equal "evidence".
We have differing opinions on the ability to profit here...why is that so hard for you to grasp?
Everything that you have brought to the table provides zero evidence of profitability or no profitability...it is all speculation...which is my point. If you want all the things you are asking for, go buy Microsoft.....
Now what in the world would make you think that I could prove something in a GFCI PR? That is stretching it a little, Bagger...Can you disprove what they have said? Don't give me the "cannot disprove a negative argument"...that was done eons ago when people thought the world was flat.
As I have said, you have no more evidence of your position being right than I have of mine being right. We have different beliefs and that is what makes this world go round. Only time will tell if there is profit to be made here or not, and that is what I am here for....
Nice, Peeker...I wrote my response then read yours next...I guess I am not the only one who is not in the naysayer's camp.
Oh Bagger, still trying to discredit the ones who believe that a profit can be made here. Yes, I cannot prove a profit...any more than you cannot prove there is not one. Read my prior posts...we are all entitled to our opinions, and mine still is that there is money to be made here. Time will tell...not you, not me....
To quote Yogi Berra....Deja Vu all over again
Sorry Cyo...we'll have to disagree on that one. Professionals do not draw conclusions without evidence. Amateurs do....
OK, Bill, I will buy why you think that they are not making a profit. I am pleased that you stated that as an opinion and not as a fact, which your prior posts indicated. No one has shown anything to indicate that they are not making a profit, nor has anyone been able to show that they are!
Cyo, I did not make a personal attack, I only asked Bill to prove something that he stated as fact in two consecutive posts. You will not find any posts from me stating that Grifco is profitable, nor any that state that Grifco is not. Without published financials, it is anyone's guess. No one here, including yourself, has shown anything that relates to profitability (or non-profitability).
In regard to a professional deducing profitability from PR's, I disagree with you. A professional bases conclusions on evidence and does not "guess" about profitability based on press releases. If your accountant bases profitability conclusions on PR's, I would suggest that you get a new accountant pronto.
In regard to me being "one of the people that refuse to believe any of it", read the first statement of my post (again). I do not know...you do not know...Bill, Bagger, Len do not know...that is the rub of it, isn't it? All we have are PR's. As I have stated before, I will either sink or fly here, but until we get published financials, no one knows. No one, including you, has shown me anything that I can choose to believe or not believe in. Just because I have as much belief in the possibility of a profit as you do that this company is not real is not a reason to belittle me or any other of the longs here....
Go Griiifffiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Bill, please explain how you know that the company has no revenues.
Good catch Strongus....
And by the way, Front Desk is twowords....
Bill...you have to get a life beyond beating up those that believe that there is a possibility of realism here. Upon reading your earlier post, I also called the Casino (and, as you, ended up talking to catering) who confirmed the meeting. I didn't post my conversation because antagonistic drivel does not serve anyones purpose here.
Now you question the deposit for the meeting? Come on! Do you really think that they reserved the space and will renig on the deposit so that they can fool people as foolish as you seem to be into buying stock? Won't you once acknowledge that this might be for real? What in the heck is your agenda here? Are you still trying to protect the Newbies? No offense intended (Len) but you sound so much like someone with an axe to grind. Why in the heck are you so bitter to those like me (and Strongus, etc,) that still believe that we might make a profit?
Cyo...way before 5/1 there were people (uhhhh...Bill, Len, Bagger) were SCREAMING that the share count was way over 39M. I will concede the point that you make..that the share count today may be higher. My point was only that we finally got a confirmation (true or not, but now he is hung on his word, in writing) that the share count was as has been stated all along......
Bill...we received confirmation of the number of outstanding shares. We received confirmation of Lyamec's continuing interest in GFCI. We received confirmation of an upcoming shareholder's meeting.
You can criticize all that you want, but you are sounding like a broken record. This ship IS floating and is going to continue to do better and better. It is a shame that you refuse to acknowledge the progress that is being made.
First, the proposed merger with Tree Top Industries will not affect the dividend payout of 75,000,000 shares of (Other OTC:CTBG.PK - News) to the 39,682,540 shares of record of GFCI which are entitled to the dividend distribution on the basis of 1 share of GFCI getting 1.89 shares of (Other OTC:CTBG.PK - News).
Sounds like a confirmation of outstanding shares to me!
I agree Strongus, though I cannot fault them for speculating about Lyamec's continued involvement. The silence from Lyamec has been deafening.
Bagger don't be so hard on yourself. Time will tell, but things are looking good for us longs! I know you hate to admit it, but a profitable exit is looking better and better!
Bill, good volume in the last hour with most at the ask. GFCI and CTBG both green...I think we are headed up! Keep the faith!
You guys are no fun......Bill has continued to pound on us who believe in this stock. He has no interest whatsoever other than to pursue his personal vendetta. When he finally goes over the edge and proves to everyone (even those who have never seen him post) how (OK, I can't say this because I don't want to be deleted, so I will temper it) much he needs help, you delete it....and Bagger defends him.
Hank, Bill, see the light....let it go. If you don't like GFCI, go somewhere else. Don't spend your energy criticising us that still believe that we will make a profit. Expend your energy towards those efforts that will increase your wealth. Go help an old lady cross the street. Go help a child learn to read. Go read a book. Are you trying to be the Grinch that Stole Christmas? For God's sake, guys, what in the world are you so angry about?
Hey Hank! We look poised for a break-out!!!
You should drop ML and go to Ameritrade...no problem there...I have done it. They even give you a big bold message telling you that you have been flagged as a day trader and that if you do not maintain your balance you will be restricted.
Also, I doubt they restricted all trades, more likely just buys. I don't think they can not allow you to sell an asset that you own.
Cyo...Reg's require that you maintain a minimum balance of $25K if you are labeled a "day trader"...which means you have done four "round trips" (buying and then selling prior to settlement) in 5 days or less...if you don't carry the balance, you are restricted to selling only for a 60 day period.
You bring up a good point there. I never considered that the high number of sell orders at outrageous prices could have caused the restrictions.
As much as I would like to believe that naked shorting is a problem here, I have serious doubts (OK Len, Bagger and Bill, mark that one). I would like to think that the problem could be that easy to fix (and if that is/was the problem, it would be a boon for longs when the truth came out) but the lack of solid evidence of profitability by management (IMO) is what has caused this stock to flounder. The only question that still remains (and has for my life in this stock) is whether they are real or just a bunch of PR's....time will tell.
B2L,
IF (and I am not saying it is or is not) naked shorting is an influential factor with this stock, would the status "difficult to borrow" actually matter? I am a contractor, not a securities expert, but doesn't the "naked" part of naked shorting imply that shares are sold without being secured (borrowed)?
I did not dispute the strength or no strength or speak of the merits of a penny up or a penny down. I was just attempting to point out the error or your comparison. The rules changed. If you can't see a difference, so be it.
Your comparison of "pre-restricted online trading volume" to "post-restricted online trading volume" is not a valid comparison. That is the only point that I was trying to make. Come on Cyo, you should be able to see that.
That is my point. If the online trading is now restricted due to lower day trading then that will be reflected in a reduced number of shares traded, resulting in a skewed view when comparing yesterday's numbers to volume prior to restrictions. You are not comparing apples to apples.
Wow, Bagger, that is the nicest thing that I have ever heard you say about Grifco! We may make a believer of you yet! There is hope!
If the trading restrictions reported last week are for real (due to purported suspicious trading activities outside the control of the company) then it is not a fair comparison to look at average volume in the past against what is happening today.
Thanks, Len. I think we are all here for the same reasons...education, entertainment, and most of all, to make a few bucks! I wish no ill will to anyone here or elsewhere.
How about it Len? Did Bill and I play nice this afternoon?
I guess it will remain to be seen whether the trading restrictions are good or bad....we ended even for the day, so at least for now they are not hurting us....
I don't know if it matters WHY...but I certainly hope so and I hope it is not because of GFCI management actions. If it is out of management's control, then yes, WHY does matter, as it could happen to any manipulated stock.
As I have said before, I am not blind to the possibilities of this going in either direction. That is the nature of a pink...however as I have also said, I am here for the duration; I will either crash and burn or soar with the eagles. You have re-posted some of my posts, but not all of them. I said once:
I lose on seven of them, break even on two and make good money on the tenth (or something to that effect). As long as the tenth makes up for the first seven, I am doing good...and so far, I have done well.....