Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
When the first announcement of a dividend on 9/18/09 pr, it mentioned a consultant....Through inside channels, this set the pace and then, on November 11/19 PR, we got the dividend distribution ratio... 10 shares for every one shared own, or of the O/S...Timeline on this was 60 days...Notice the chart, another negative with respect to a positive note and if you watch the daily tape, just plain shenanigans to cover somebody's ass.
Gee. Cant imagine for the life of me why people would consider the loss of liquidity to be a negative.
What's more interesting is the attempt at spinning it into a positive.
The SEC site provides a great explanation
The figure is not a daily amount of fails, but a combined figure that includes both new fails on the reporting day as well as existing fails. In other words, these numbers reflect aggregate fails as of a specific point in time, and may have little or no relationship to yesterday's aggregate fails.
Combine that with the fact that you cant fail to deliver more shares than the volume.
those are composite numbers, not numbers for that day.
Take a look at the historic volume. Those 5 days only had 64 mil in total volume. I am pretty sure you cant fail to deliver 200% of the volume.
is rhupert a celebrity?
Gotta have your head in the sand to endorse this stock.
Going to be sending JD another round of questions, any suggestions?
when the PPS was almost nothing and the whole NSS conspiracy hadn't even been fabricated yet.
So if we are going to say stuff like this then lets just all make stuff up
Sears is a definate possiblity.
Where is the proof?
Non existent. Different than what the SEC has proven. God bless them for showing their data online for free.
EXPH PPS closes today at .0031.
100% confirmed trades...
0.0031 95000 OTO 15:44:40*
0.0032 5000 OTO 15:43:44 *
0.0032 25000 OTO 15:43:43 *
0.0032 25000 OTO 15:24:12 *
0.0034 5000 OTO 13:34:20 *
0.0034 25000 OTO 13:34:18*
0.0031 99800 OTO 13:11:18*****
0.0031 150000 OTO 11:10:46*****
0.0031 250000 OTO 09:53:31*****
0.0031 250000 OTO 09:49:44 **
0.0031 200000 OTO 09:49:10 ****
0.0031 250000 OTO 09:42:26***
0.0031 250000 OTO 09:40:54***********
0.0031 32000 OTO 09:30:08**
prove what?
That the naked short selling conspiracy was fabricated? Already been proven. Several times in fact.
SEC backs it all up. Good for them. I commend their efforts.
100% confirmed. I will list them all again. Happy to have been an awesome help.
0.0031 95000 OTO 15:44:40*
0.0032 5000 OTO 15:43:44 *
0.0032 25000 OTO 15:43:43 *
0.0032 25000 OTO 15:24:12 *
0.0034 5000 OTO 13:34:20 *
0.0034 25000 OTO 13:34:18*
0.0031 99800 OTO 13:11:18*****
0.0031 150000 OTO 11:10:46*****
0.0031 250000 OTO 09:53:31*****
0.0031 250000 OTO 09:49:44 **
0.0031 200000 OTO 09:49:10 ****
0.0031 250000 OTO 09:42:26***
0.0031 250000 OTO 09:40:54***********
0.0031 32000 OTO 09:30:08**
to the fools who keep buying penny junk and work overtime attempting to convince themselves and others that any of these turds are legitimate.
Geee...can't think of anybody that fits this description.
Yep Doug.
*some* people blame this on naked short selling. Other people understand what actually happened since many are aware that there were zero FTDs for EXPH.
NSS theory was 100% fabrication.
SOS
3-5 year time frame.
the TA is human and can misspeak upon occasion
Can we get a link to where this was said? I believe this statement to be 100% false. I don't seem to recall the CEO saying that. I recall JD saying he would be looking into it.
Next set of questions sent. JD has informed me he is traveling.
Will update when answers received.
Question 11
Is the 10,000 unit order that was PR'd on July 16, 2009 the same as the Stanley order of over 10,000 units that was recently posted on the website?
Question 12
Is the Flooring display order that was recently put on the website for Kronotex in Lowe's?
Question #13
In light of the sec.gov site showing zero failures to deliver for EXPH would you say that there was likely no Naked Short Position of any consequence?
Question #14
Does the company still have any inventory of the Bite Back Product and are there any plans to recoup a percentage of the over 100K investment in this product?
Question #15
Can you give us some specs on the performance of some of the machines? For example how many pieces per hour, tolerances, and size capabilities.
grateful palc has been *exposed*
here's to the rest of them being
disinfected as well
PALC isn't what has been exposed here.
Should I link to the site where we can see ZERO fails to deliver again?
The NSS fairy tale regarding EXPH has been exposed. I would be embarrassed if I came up with that theory.
http://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/failsdata.htm
Shows not a single fail for EXPH.
Can't see the purpose to
question # 1 and how it relates to what is happening now..
No doubt.
5) who cares??
Well since these items were asked about during the CC and the answer was only touched on, I would say some people care. Anybody that has ever wanted details about the advances line would care. It takes a bit of accounting knowledge though so I understand why some wouldn't care or get it.
7) Again who cares??
As I have stated this info is incredibly material.
I might as well post the proof again about how you have been wrong about all of the naked short selling theories.
Here is the link again to the SEC site.
http://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/failsdata.htm
Mine bold, JD's italics
Re: Question #1- The O/S at the time was 980 million plus, so they were not referring to the O/S as they gave me that number in addition. This was verified by multiple people and that information has been unavailable since that day. Do you think you could call the TA and find out why the number was in fact 930 million on August 25th?
1) I will inquire. Give me a little time.
Question #9 Why is the TA gagged?
9) No Comment.
Question #10 Are Q3 or Q4 financials being audited?
10) No Comment.
Re: Question #5 What loans specifically are guaranteed? I know that the financials mention a vehicle loan guaranteed. Are there any UCC filings for the bank loans that mention you or GH as personal guarantors, so I would like some clarification.
5) All of them (with the exception of the auto loan you mention which
is not guaranteed by me). Don’t know what you mean about UCC filing for
the banks, but I assure you, we are the guarantors.
Re: Question #7 The website pictures I am specifically referencing are the pictures on the www.expoholding.com website. They are marked before and after and these are pictures that have existed on the DD Displays site since July of 2008. I was told by a unreliable source that these pictures represent etc. cabinets. I would like to know if this is true. If it is true were these cabinets paid for and where were these installed? They are from a condo if that helps you.
7) Give me some time and I will research.
date delayed until 3/1
CombinatoRx Announces Extension of Exalgo(TM) Extended-Release Tablets PDUFA Date to March 1, 2010
4:01p ET February 16, 2010 (Business Wire)
CombinatoRx, Incorporated (NASDAQ: CRXX) today announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has extended the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) goal date for review of the Exalgo(TM) (hydromorphone HCl) extended-release tablets New Drug Application (NDA) from Monday, February 22, 2010 to Monday, March 1, 2010 due to federal government closings.
The U.S. rights to Exalgo tablets were acquired from Neuromed by Mallinckrodt Inc., a Covidien company, in June, 2009. Neuromed acquired the U.S. marketing rights to Exalgo tablets from ALZA Corporation in April 2007 and was responsible for clinical development and regulatory filings. Covidien is responsible for all commercialization activities for Exalgo in the U.S., including marketing, sales and all post-approval FDA regulatory filings, and will now own the intellectual property for the product. ALZA is responsible for manufacturing, packaging and supply of the product. CombinatoRx and Neuromed merged on December 21, 2009.
About CombinatoRx
CombinatoRx, Incorporated (CRXX) develops novel drug candidates with a focus on the treatment of pain and inflammation. The company applies its combination drug discovery capabilities and its selective ion-channel modulation platform to generate innovative therapeutics. To learn more about CombinatoRx, please visit www.combinatorx.com.
Great question Golf. Contrary to what others will have you believe this question has not been answered.
I will ask it.
Next batch of questions. Will update as soon as I receive answers...
Re: Question #1- The O/S at the time was 980 million plus, so they were not referring to the O/S as they gave me that number in addition. This was verified by multiple people and that information has been unavailable since that day. Do you think you could call the TA and find out why the number was in fact 930 million on August 25th?
Question #9 Why is the TA gagged?
Question #10 Are Q3 or Q4 financials being audited?
Re: Question #5 What loans specifically are guaranteed? I know that the financials mention a vehicle loan guaranteed. Are there any UCC filings for the bank loans that mention you or GH as personal guarantors, so I would like some clarification.
Re: Question #7 The website pictures I am specifically referencing are the pictures on the www.expoholding.com website. They are marked before and after and these are pictures that have existed on the DD Displays site since July of 2008. I was told by a unreliable source that these pictures represent etc. cabinets. I would like to know if this is true. If it is true were these cabinets paid for and where were these installed? They are from a condo if that helps you.
grateful palc has been *exposed*
here's to the rest of them being
disinfected as well
PALC isn't what has been exposed here.
Should I link to the site where we can see ZERO fails to deliver again?
"Question" #4
The SEC filings that no longer list Malone. How can this be?
No Comment on Karl Malone, execept the following which I have been
authorized to say. "Karl Malone, has never removed a restrictive legend
from any Expo Holdings, stock he owns, and has never sold a single share
since inception."
"Question" #5
The advances on the financials. These are listed as a current asset.
This would mean that this is money owed to the company.
Yes, it is money owed to the corporation by myself and Glenn Harrs.
However, it is important to note that GAP requires us to report this in
this fashion. It does not show the other side of the "coin" where the
company owes us significantly more in terms of gaurantees and loans.
"Question" #6
The massive sell off.
I don’t know what you want in terms of a comment here. As best I
can tell, a significant number of shareholders sold off. Additionally,
MM were making a market. I am not allowed to give my opinion of what
happened but I do have one.
"Question" #7
The cabinets. Why are there no pictures showing how the upper
cabinets work? Showing double units? Are the pictures marked before and
after from July 2008 really etc.?
If you are referring to our etc. website pictures they are all etc.
brand cabinets. We are working with a photographer for additional
professional photos but they have not been posted yet. If you are
referring to our expoholding site, it is a mixture of some etc. brand
cabinets, some commercial, and I think some residential. As to July
2008, I have not researched to see what you mean...I will tell you that
testing of our product has been ongoing for almost 2 years.
"Question" #8
The California Closets pictures. Were these just an accident made by
the web designer getting carried away?
California Closets was a competitor when we focused on the 1st
choice brand. We also manufactured displays, and yes a photo was out
there that had our display, and a California closet "program" on it.
The person responsible for making the document has moved on a very long
time ago, and quite frankly it wasn’t brought to my attention until some
emailed me that that you (or maybe someone else) had found it. I
removed it promptly and apologized formally to California Closets
Corporate.
My thoughts will be bold text, JD's in Italics. I will try to reference past question numbers in the follow up questions
"Question #1"
The restricted shares. On August 25 I spoke to the TA twice. Once to
Elson and once to Maria. Both of them told me that the float was
930,538,167. This was also confirmed by other people. I also had a phone conversation with you where we discussed this. During that conversation you told me that the company hadn't put a restriction on all of them, but that regardless the SEC placed restrictions on them and that only 1% per quarter could be sold.
I have no clue what Elson or Maria told you...It would seem to me
that 930ish would be the outstanding at that time...however, don’t quote me on that, because I simply don’t know what they said to you. We are held by rules, SEC, FINRA, tranfer agent rules, those guys, that do restrict insiders to 1% per quarter (I think), I don’t know for a fact because I've not exercised that option, nor have I ever removed a restrictive legend on any share I owned. Further, I've never sold a single share of mine since inception.
"Question" #2
The 2/3 of the revenue typically falling in the second half of the
year. Now somebody the other day sent me a private message [PM
hereafter] that brought up that you could be making this statement based
on numbers from when D&D was private. Perhaps that is the case, but I do
know that of the numbers released for Expo that statement is false.
Actually, regarding this statement, I may have mispoke (cant remember
exactly what I said, but it should have been something like "2/3 rds of
our business is conducted in the last half of the year." which is a true
statement, however, that if from a manufacturing point of view not
actually shipments. Most of our actual work, not the shipments or
billing does occur in the last half of the year. Its pretty typical.
"Question" #3
The financials for Q3 2009. I cannot fathom any logical reason for
why they have not been released.
I have not released them yet. I do want to point out, we are not
required to release them on any timetable. We are, as I have stated in
the past a non-reporting pinksheet company that electively reports on
the company's timetable.
On Saturday I became aware of some activity that I considered fairly unethical and I sent a scathing email to JD [perhaps unfairly blaming him for the actions of others]. I have documented for the board much of our past contact, even though several people try to brush it off as being fake or made up. It is no secret that the threat of legal action had been made and it is no secret that I stood firm in my beliefs.
I figured I would get an angry retort from JD, possibly more threats, and it would go from there.
The response I received could not have been further from what I expected. I was absolutely shocked.
What I received was an extremely polite, professional message containing an apology to me and some very humble admissions of having made some mistakes as well as an olive branch.
I kind of didn't know how to react. Was it enough to change my beliefs about the company and JD? Of course not. Was it enough for me to consider a different approach and begin a dialogue with the man? Absolutely.
So I sent him a numbered list of thoughts as well as an apology of my own for having let my emotions get the better of me, which is the same thing I accuse many others of doing. He sent me a numbered list of replies. We have agreed to continue this question and answer session. I will post these in a different message.
I want to make several things very clear. My views have NOT changed (doesn't mean they can't or won't). I have received zero new threats and this is not any kind of binding agreement. This comes from JD and me starting a conversation and taking it from there. No more. No less.
I have been given the ability to ask any questions and I have given JD the option of replying to any question with "no comment" and I gave him my word that I would not turn those responses on him and accuse him of hiding something. He is under zero obligation to answer my questions and if he is worried I will twist them around on him he will obviously be less than willing to have this Q and A.
I have made him aware that some of the answers I have received so far I do not find satisfactory or honestly even believe a few of them. However I will not be pointing out what I see as anything wrong with these answers or any future answers here on this board. My follow up questions can speak for themselves and people can make up their own minds. If I see people unfairly manipulating the responses or attempting to twist them beyond what I consider reasonable, I will likely end the process or perhaps JD will.
I have made my views known over and over and over and over yet again. It has become a grind and it is honestly not worth the effort anymore. Contrary to what many people believe here I do not own shares. I have not traded shares in months. I am not looking for a better entry point, never have been. I do not intend to ever own shares of this company's stock again.
This is simply two men on opposite sides of a wall banging their heads against it attempting to take a different approach because both of their heads hurt.
*That said* I will start posting some of the "questions". This first batch is a bit more informal because these were more just thoughts. Going forward they will be in a better format.
People can also PM me any questions they would like me to ask.
as if JBII needed any other reasons to avoid it, the number one sell/timber indicator is present.
I would get the traders to tell me how wrong I was
As usual. Just like the last 5 issues you had to call your broker to get confirmation that I was correct. Do it again and you will learn.
so many posts on how easy it is to paint the tape with a 2500 share trade to lower the bid.
Trades don't lower the bid unless it clears the bid
That would mean someone would have to withdraw the best bid in the last few minutes of trading to reach .0029
Yeah, that never happens on a friday.
The bottom line here which veno doesn't want anybody to pay attention to is that there was NO BID SUPPORT above .0029.
Even if the other stuff he was saying was absolutely true it would still mean that there was not a single bid above .0029.
Stocks don't move much higher than their bid support. Sorry.
Why on earth would you sell to yourself on accident?
If you are buying at a,b and c and selling at d,e and f you would never sell to yourself on accident.
It would only be if done intentionally.
IMO, I don't think it should be a publicly traded entity.
Then it would be closed.
How do you think they were able to survive a 940k loss?
It would not be illegal to use multiple accounts on EXPH on a daily basis. Anybody telling you different is misinformed.
What would be illegal is if they were selling to themselves.
If you have an etrade account and ameritrade account you can have buy orders entered for etrade at .0028 and .0027 and .0024 and sell orders for TDA at .0035, .0037 and .0039.
100% legal.
what we are saying is that retail can't make somebody else's bid go away. If the high bid is .0032 a retail trader cant make that disappear.
You know it. I know it.
You bet I am in the know. I know that a 7 dollar trade doesn't manipulate the bid. The bid was already at .0029.
Welcome to earth. Happy to have helped.
It has nothing to do with somebody wanting to buy $7 worth of stock. That's what you aren't getting.
A few weeks back I entered an order to buy 1000 shares of a stock. Right before close i got 30 shares. I was willing to buy more. What happened was somebody sold me 30 shares.
You don't need cooperation on both ends.
Somebody sold 2500 shares of EXPH at the close of business on friday to the top bid. For all you know the top bid was for 12 million shares. The top bid remained .0029 which would indicate that the bid was still there and it was only a partial fill.
Wasn't illegal and it never will be. Sorry.
Call the SEC and ask them. Call your broker. Call an imaginary securities lawyer on retainer. They will all tell you that you are wrong.
I started this board and never got around to posting anything funny on it. So here is a start...
http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/1065/disguisedweapons2.jpg
Even if a trader had 75 accounts he CANNOT make a higher bid disappear.
The highest bid was .0029.
If that bid happened to be a trader that had multiple accounts then it means that the highest legit bid would have been below that even which of course proves that this thing has zero buying pressure propping it up.
That's why some people have expanded their theories to say that the traders and MM's are working together, which is preposterous.
but a 2500 share trade tanks the pps and the bid
This can't be explained any clearer.
The Bid is the Bid. No retail trader can make the high bid appear lower that what it actually is.
Its a ridiculous assertion. There were no bids higher than .0029 or they would have been the HIGH bid.
Unreal. Call your broker, since only he/she can get your to realize these things.