Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Don't forget Drago has a lot to benefit if he can get it too.
Don't want to argue. I think he will go for quick sale. He makes good money fast. JMO
We've been circling the drain for awhile the judge decided it was best and flushed. Now shareholders won't get anything. The first $100,000.00 bid and the receiver is going to sale. He make his 40% and he out of here.
Fact is he's going to be sued!!!!
Well I guess it's time to start putting my lawsuit together against Dave Williams. Let's see how he likes it when people go after his money. Only difference is he never worked for it. Got his money by suing people out of theirs. Now it's his turn.
Well people this is the end for Clyw if in fact Dave Williams is still with us.
Post#33752
I really like the last comment
[/
A special message to fellow shareholders:
It is important that I provide you with some information that has been omitted by the BOD's new critic on this forum.
(Plaintif2000 [moderator]please post this with a sticky)
As you have been reading, Plaintif2000 has recently become a critic of the new BOD and has "chosen" to speak against the actions and abilities of the BOD. Suffice it to say there has also been a lot of communication outside of this forum between plaintif2000 and directors of the company immediately precedent to this "change of heart" by Plaintif2000.
Plaintif2000 wants to be a director and he had made it clear to the BOD that he feels the board's refusal to make him a Director of the company and purchase his unsolicited "copyrighted material" to promote the company, is a clear breach of the fiduciary duty of the Directors. (He actually blames this on me personally but has just morphed in into some Board-wide conspiracy. Not so in this case. This was my decision to not endorse him and, whether shareholders agree or not, it was solely my decision to not endorse him in the end.) Plaintif2000 has stated that, because because he feels he clearly demonstrated his vastly and "irrefutable" (My descriptive word, not his) superior qualifications and abilities to all of the the existing board members, he "obviously should have been picked" to be a director. He also has stated that the unsolicited "promotional" Power Point presentation he created and presented to the board is absolutely necessary to the survival of the company. He adds that he is the only person capable of explaining our patent technology to the court. (we don't quite know exactly what he means by that at this time but can guess) Thus he concludes the "obvious breach of duty" of the board (ME in particular because I wouldn't recommend him to the BOD)for not appointing him.
After indicating to me a few days ago of his claim of breach of duty (by me and relating to the above), I responded with a second denial of his (now a) demand. Plaintif2000 then started with his subtle(?) but clear attacks against the existing board under the guise of "his opinion" w/o relating the true reasons of his recent reversal of opinions of the Board.
The board immediately started feeling the effects of P2K's postings and those effects have been very negative in the opinion of the BOD. The BOD feels this action of Plaintif2000 is improper and after discussion I decided that, though he was acting improper, it would be better for the shareholders in this particular case if I, the alleged problem maker by P2K, resigned so that he would be placated and stop what we considered to be damaging and intentional acts against the company (we simply can't afford this "blatant rabble-rousing" at this time). At approximately 1:27 PM this afternoon I sent an offer of resignation to P2K if he would stop these alleged improper actions here on ihub. I then resigned effective 8:00 AM tomorrow eastern time. P2K did not stop his posts and, in fact, appears to have only been emboldened by my "resignation". Subsequently, and in response thereto, I informed the BOD that I rescinded my resignation letter and the BOD accepted that request.
I now leave this up to the members of P2K's choice of venue, this forum, to draw your own conclusions. I might suggest you request that he provide a copy of his resume and his "promotional material" for your evaluation. The BOD has posted its background already in the public filings. You may well agree with him and vote for him by write-in vote in the coming election.
I had asked Ihub admin to block Plaintif2000 and they apparently felt my request did not have merit. Thus I have had to "air some of our dirty laundry" here to deal with this. My personal apologies to members of this forum that we were unable to deal with this in a more appropriate fashion. It was not for lack of trying, indeed I tried every tactic I could to stop it. He is exercising his right to do as he wishes and be held accountable thereto.
No matter what P2K posts from here on out, I will not rebut his statements. That is up to the members of this forum to work out or not. We cannot afford to allow the BOD to be drawn into a protracted discussion on this, or any, subject in this forum.
The independent board members are currently spending about 25 hours a week as it is and all have their own companies to manage at the same time. We are making headway. But I cannot report at this time and in this fashion any further. One thing I can say: this new board will no longer tolerate ANY "self-entitled" entities to enrich themselves at the expense of the shareholders as a whole if there is any way at all we can stop it. That would include parties who attempt to drive down the share price to enrich themselves, monetarily or for any other reason.
In conclusion: P2K's remarks reduce to a simple "this board is no-good because I am not on it". Whether you agree or not is your decision. Just understand it for what it is.
David Williams
Director
quote]
Tx what was that post # you found for me?
Question. What does it matter if someone has 2 post or 2 million post? Their opinion doesn't change. Just as if you started posting 2 days ago or 2 years ago. Your opinion is still the same. So let the people post.
I know isn't that great the way Dave Williams makes his money by suing people. This one really shows the integrity and caliber of Dave Williams. Getting involved in another lawsuit to make easy money. Shows real good character.
If you liked that read you'll love this one. Board BDGR post # 35453. Let me know what you think. Wonder if the judge new about this.
Been reading some old post of Ben Lurkin aka Dave Williams and now I see. Here are just a few 37339,39039,39041,50172.
If Dave Williams is such a straight shooter and this glorious savior of Clyw why then did he and might still be posting on ihub as an alias instead of using his real name. When he first started posting on ihub he did use his name so why did he hide out under an alias later. My opinion he was trying to keep the share price down while undermining his fellow BOD. Why I have no ideal. Dave Williams does not think logically and could have been doing all this crap just because it made him feel good.
Well looking back on the document copying that was done. Seems was all a scam. The company that was picked was introduced by Ben Lurkin aka Dave Williams so it would seem all the funds went to Dave after all. I will do some more looking into it to see exactly what post to reference. That being just one of the many scams of Dave Williams and his cronies.
This is the best. Shows EW to be an idiot and DW to be a liar. How funny is this. Love those e-mails from DW. Looks like a couple of posters knew who DW was all along. This is so great, you can't make this stuff up. Hilarious. I think I'll do what someone recommended on here and write a book about all this.
I know thanks for the support.
Butt. Dave Williams doesn't have and never has had any of his own money, much less $300 k worth. All the money DW has, came from lawsuits and people he has manipulated.
Think about it. Dave Williams did not want anyone to benefit from Clyw if he wasn't in charge. Now the judge is after his butt and then he informs everyone this information. Seems DW still up to his old tricks but that is not surprising coming from him. I told everyone you can't trust Dave Williams and he is showing why.
Now that this waste of shareholders money is out of the way I will be contacting the BOD to see what they have planned for Clyw. Hoping that the BOD still has investors lined up so as to be able to have funds to remove us from the gray market. Although I do realize a lot of the initial investment will be to pay for attorneys and court cost for the DW fiasco. I am hoping the judge does not take the full 3 weeks he is allowed but if he must he must. Just means a little more time before we are free and clear of DW and his wanna B's.
I think if everyone would hold and not sell for awhile KMAG would really move.
Nope that's not what I said.
If you say so.
So it is just Dave and ------- that have this (relationship) not --------- and any other BOD member correct. So Dave told the judge that it was ok with him if --------- stayed and listened about the settlement and Dave posting on ihub. That is pretty interesting that he allowed ------ to stay wouldn't have anything to do with ------ withholding the video of Dave Williams making a complete fool of himself at the forum from the rest of us shareholders. Maybe the financials being copied wasn't quite what it was made out to be. We shareholders did find out that the company that copied the books were a company Dave knew and picked himself. Hmmm. Could be the monies collected from innocent shareholders was divided up. Dave seems to be screwing Shareholders over yet again. I can't seem to get past the fact when Dave was voted off for that short time Turrini had gotten some investors willing to invest as long as there was no Dave Williams involved.
So it is just Dave and you that have this (relationship) not you and any other BOD member correct. So Dave told the judge that it was ok with him if you stayed and listened about the settlement and Dave posting on ihub. That is pretty interesting that he allowed you to stay wouldn't have anything to do with you withholding the video of Dave Williams making a complete fool of himself at the forum from the rest of us shareholders. Maybe the financials being copied wasn't quite what it was made out to be. We shareholders did find out that the company that copied the books were a company Dave knew and picked himself. Hmmm. Could be the monies collected from innocent shareholders was divided up. Dave seems to be screwing Shareholders over yet again. I can't seem to get past the fact when Dave was voted off for that short time Turrini had gotten some investors willing to invest as long as there was no Dave Williams involved.
So you say since Dave and you have a close relationship that you were allowed to hear confidential information and if more Shareholdets had showed up they would not have been allowed to hear what you heard
People have called Dave a lot of names including myself You simplified and said it best. Dave being on the stand 3 hours and everyone else 45 min or less tells me he had a lot of wrong doings to answer for.
One arrest for assault and battery you could say wrong place wrong time.
Two arrest for assault and battery you start to think hmmm
Three arrest for assault and battery you know something is definitely wrong with this person
He needs help medically or other.
What about Dave's 3 arrest for assault and battery. Was that discussed.
Allegedly, that being the key word. So your saying it is ok to beat a person but it's wrong to steal from that person. Cougar6 I don't have your morals but I wouldn't want someone running my business that threatens or intimidates people. Just not good business sense. When your wanting investors to invest in your company you don't want people like DW or EW working for you.
Let me see if I got this right. CT gets arrested for but never convicted of stealing. DW gets arrested and convicted 3 times for assault and battery. EW gets arrested and convicted of assault on a homeless person. And most of y'all see CT as the bad one, come on people this isn't rocket science.
Can't say , TOU violation.
Just me but I don't put much stock in what SHag has to say. I will try CT again later if I don't get a response soon.
Court should be over 6:30 up there. Will try to contact CT to see what happened.
Can you imagine the look on DW 's face when the judge started reading off the threatening e-mails he sent to everyone. Haha priceless. What about when he watches the video from the forum again priceless.
Dave Williams is suing Clyw not it's officers. Since Clyw doesn't have any money CT and KP are paying for this out of their own pockets.
Well if that happens then Clyw is screwed. It will all be over with. Don't see how anyone can want DW back on board but if that happens might as well kiss Clyw goodbye.
And as long as that crook Dave Williams is around or any of his minions we can't clean house. So I know the judge will do what is right and kick DW to the curb. And good riddance
I personally would not want anyone else on the BOD that has the same principles as DW. We had one that done everything DW wanted and that was EW. We don't need another yes man. Clyw needs all new BOD members and as long as DW is around that won't happen.
Does anyone have DW e-mail? Since he will not answer my post I would like to see if he is man enough to answer my e-mail. It's not a hard question. Will he (DW) allow a shareholders meeting to elect new members? Yes or no , pretty easy even for Dave Williams. And if yes how soon? If he responds (which I doubt ) I will post his response.