Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
drop it, moonie ... you've become a boring boor.
Pretty much ... but just a cowinkydink nae doot.
I wanna know where clozer is !!!!!!!!!!
Why isn't he posting? He ALWAYS had time for posting, even during the season.
"Looks like were a plugging along..justa plugging along.."
whatever you say, paige.
But I bet you regret having gotten your friends and clients to buy in.
... and quartertone's post just a few minutes ago ...
He "and others" can't say they weren't warned. Many many times and in many many ways. Even his boiler room movie reference isn't new ... I think it was chimp who first mentioned that movie in connection with loch/cdex.
I simply cannot understand those who threw new and presumably good money after bad time and time again.
I see even jennifur is throwing in the towel, unless ...
And where is moonie? He sure spent a lot of time yammering on about walmart which was about as on topic as the weather in China and now nothing.
Sure wish I knew who ATXMAN was ... one of the mysteries.
Oh I think tommy was verrrrrrrrry Street (as in Wall) wise ...
like a serpent on a rock.
He just didn't want anyone to rain on his parade. Or rock, as the case may be.
... almost as classic as capndagoodwow's figgering out that DDMan was out to get a leg up on loch/cdex and that was why he was bashing this poor li'l company!
hey, crow ...
were you here/there when osscout figgered out I was related to the head guy in the SEC? That was classic!
Like Blanche, she alwuz relahed on the kahndness of strahyange'rs!
I'm not surprised! His Qronicles were hysterical!
Also chimp ... very savvy and smart and funny, too.
Beans was a winner ... tommy tried to rope him in but he didn't know what he was dealing with, I imagine (tommy didn't, that is) til beanie spilled dabeans. Tommy made a few misteaks like that, not knowing what he was dealing with.
I doubt buffy's still here -- we'd know it in an instant!
Who was it, wallis simpson I think ...
who said "I've been rich and I've been poor and rich is better."
(Also don't see any recent posts by clozer who was one of the ones who made out like a bandit when he was pumping the what-for out of elf and vammp. Then he was going to get his forensic lawyer friends on things -- make sure a sh'holder meeting happened -- etc etc -- but somehow nothing he was going to do ever happened. Then he started the sanme routine about holding Malcbaby accountable -- and nothing happened -- and now silence.
Just isn't the same wihtout the old hypesters. Dust in the wind.)
I STILL wonder what happened to karlspanger.
Last thing he posted, I think, was to me (after a long period of defending the Bs and their friends) -- something like "keep digging" or "go get 'em".
He knew, and so did his pal osscout (who "entrusted" capndawow with the Kineman (sp?) report). But only karl said go get 'em.
Got to admire him for that.
how true, 4diddy. eom
It's like the dark of the moon on the boards ...
where are the usual defenders of the faith? Now that capndagoodwow and edgy and what's his name are gone, it seems no one cares enough to pump it up.
I guess they got what they were after so easy enough for them to disappear and leave the rest to fend for themselves.
plus ca change ...
Fascinating "exchange" (excerpted, as was capndagoodwow's wont) on t'other board; the corollary to raiderman's profound observation, bolded, is at the bottom (A).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
By: Raiderman
13 Apr 2006, 11:19 PM EDT
Msg. 27037 of 27055
(This msg. is a reply to 27013 by drumbah.)
Jump to msg. #
drumbah:
Other than the fact that several of the nation's hospitals are now using our product and have issued press releases promoting our product.
Other than the fact that this company is producing some revenues and is doing all of its filings on time.
Other than the fact that we had a government contract.
Other than the fact that we continue to recruit people to our management team and board who have "been there, done that."
Other than the fact that we have had two shareholders' meetings which gave all investors the opportunity to see our management up close and personal.
Other than the fact that we've signed a deal with one of the nation's leading medical device distributors.
Other than the fact that our technology has been featured in internet stories and TV stories across the nation.
Other than the fact that we have demonstrated our products to the medical community at three or four shows.
Other than the fact that some of the nation's leading medical experts have actually touted our products at these shows. . .
I would believe that CDEX is a scam.
But since all of the above are facts, then anyone who would even hint that CDEX is a scam would have to be an absolute moron or a paid basher.
Now, this isn't to say that CDEX will be wildly successful. It is a small, growing company with many obstacles it will have to overcome. But to date, it has done a good job of overcoming these obstacles.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
By: drumbah
14 Apr 2006, 09:06 AM EDT
Msg. 27044 of 27055
(This msg. is a reply to 27037 by Raiderman.)
Jump to msg. #
RAIDERMAN
Other than the fact the share price falls at everyone of your statements.
Again, my opinion. Not a paid basher. So I guess I'm a moron. OOPS I meant ABSOLUTE MORON.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
By: Raiderman
14 Apr 2006, 09:19 AM EDT
Msg. 27045 of 27055
(This msg. is a reply to 27044 by drumbah.)
Jump to msg. #
drumbah:
You're confusing the quality of a company with PPS. If the company is quality, it will get revenues and the PPS will increase.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
By: kires17
14 Apr 2006, 10:38 AM EDT
Msg. 27047 of 27055
(This msg. is a reply to 27045 by Raiderman.)
Jump to msg. #
So how do you explain the jump to $1.30 just a couple of weeks ago and then right back down to even lower levels?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
By: drumbah
14 Apr 2006, 11:00 AM EDT
Msg. 27049 of 27055
(This msg. is a reply to 27047 by kires17.)
Jump to msg. #
kires17
Watch out or you too will be put on ignore. Don't ask anything like that. This board appears to be for "positive" information only. The PPS is not important at this point according to some.
Couldn't resist.
Drumbah
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
By: kires17
14 Apr 2006, 11:59 AM EDT
Msg. 27051 of 27055
(This msg. is a reply to 27049 by drumbah.)
Jump to msg. #
Drumbah
After 7 years it's very important!
With all the positive news and connecting of the dots we should be at $3.00 minimum. It goes to $1.30 on nothing. Market Makers are playing games but the question is who is guiding them?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A. Corollary
And if the company is NOT quality, it will NOT get revenues and the PPS will NOT increase.
So there it is. The compleat story in a nutshell.
Maybe someone else can come up with a plausible answer to Kires' question: Who is guiding the Market Makers?
ot moonie ...
I just don't get it.
It wasn't anyone's business what crow posted about his experience on the other site, yet he posted it in the name of transparency.
So why don't you tell us what happened to you under your other permanently booted alias?
The only reason why you wouldn't, it seems to me, is because you have something to hide.
That doesn't speak well to your "character." Not at all.
ot moonie ... spoken like someone who has absolutely nothing to hide.
If so, I'm sure you'll be happy to explain.
Do keep it simple so everyone will understand.
No bigg words, no changed subjects.
Just the facts.
OT -- moonie:
Have you let Matt know how you're abusing the terms of ihub membership yet?
... or at least first thing in the morning.
I do I do (think it would be karma justice) ...
and I'm sure moonie with his incredible moral integrity will inform matt instantamente.
what does that boot heel by "membership type" mean, moonie?
could it mean you were permanently booted off ihub?
is matt aware that you're back under another alias? have you told him yourveryownself?
ohmygoodness, look here ...
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/profile.asp?user=21786
now why did you give up a perfectly good ihub alias for another?
crow has told us his story ... why don't you tell us yours? And don't try to spin it tooooooooo much.
oh.
thx much for the explanation.
How do you know so much about what "they" do, moonie?
Do you have friends in high/low places?
Well of course you do, but how about your friends in other places?
btw, tell me -- yet another simple and very direct question -- did you ever post here on ihub as monsoonman? Might as well tell the truth since it'll be easy enough to find out.
rotten ...
you've noticed that moonie chose to ignore your invitation?
wmft...exactly what false bit of info have I fed into the mix? If you're going to make a statement like that, how about posting some proof to back up your claim.
He's good at ignoring what doesn't suit his purpose and driving into the ground what he thinks does.
my mother had a patent wonst apon atam ...
but she never did anything with it. Too bad ... it was a greeeeeeeeat idea.
Did any of your "uncles" give you anything in return for your gifts to them?
very much ON topic ...
seems there;s someone on diamonte's closely monitored board who has a thought or two about patents ...
By: drt2054
08 Apr 2006, 12:08 PM EDT
Msg. 26914 of 26915
(This msg. is a reply to 26911 by Raiderman.)
Jump to msg. #
Sorry, not so:
Application No.: 10/717921
Title:Methods and apparatus for molecular species detection, inspection and classification using ultraviolet fluorescence
Assignee: CDEX, INC.
Filed: November 21, 2003
Patent No.: 6,771,369
Title: System and method for pharmacy validation and inspection
Assignee: Analytical Spectral Devices, Inc.
Filed: March 12, 2002
While they did have an application related to x-ray fluorescence that was submitted on October 11, 2002, it has nothing to do with Valimed.
ASD filed a patent, and it was approved, but it was too broad.
If the patent was too broad the patent examiner would have rejected the claims and they would have had to narrow them until the examiner found them acceptable. Look at the file wrapper: that didn't happen.
CDEX filed a patent, and it was much more specific
Again, look at the file wrapper: CDEX originally filed patent that was very broad, the examiner objected, and the scope was narrowed until the examiner accepted the narrowed claims.
Why do patents start out with broad claims? Because broad claims are 'better,' if you can get them, they are much harder to work around.
Maybe drt will grace this board with his presence.
welp, I guess he's gone for the nonce.
pity.
all those unanswered questions just left hangin there in the ethers.
maybe another day.
I thought you were leavin, moonie ...
but you had to come back, I see. I asked you specifically about royal inbreeding, but you (once again) refused to answer a direct question.
oh well.
ciao, babe
Nova Scotia!
What a nice place! Do you like Nova Scotia? I do.
(Your roots are "of royal nature"? Whatever does that mean? And how inbred was that "royal nature" or fambly?)
great minds, lmorovan ... !!
cept I like my spin better, that he was hatched fully grown, maybe crawled up out of the swamps around Lake Michigan.
Did your forebears come through Ellis Island, moonie? Or were you hatched fully grown on these very shores?
Scary, fershirley.
... and how many can you stuff into your 'craft'?
glad to hear 'cabal' isn't tm'ed. I was getting worried there, since I'd used it (though I did have the firesight to put it in quotes).
two things, moonie ...
1/ what makes you think I don't already live somewhere west of Marietta when my first cousin used to live? Should never jump to conclusions, moonie. They'll do ya in every single time.
2/ very little humour is beyond my ken.
very good, moonie ... took you a while to come up with that, though. Reaction time a little slowed down these days?
ps ... I also asked you another question you don't seem to want to answer: who IS nolajo? You said you now know (words to that effect).
TELL US !!!!!!!!!!!!!
I really wish you wouldn't stray so far off topic, moonie ...
or if you can't resist doing so, start answering the questions you're asked.
I asked you if you'd tm'ed 'cabal' or if anyone could use it with impunity.
I also asked you if you can now carry passengers.
You've answered neither one.