Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
2007 posts still not 'searchable'?
Can that be fixed?
5,000,000 shares after hours at .0028
May is "Russell Month".
I suppose it would be a pointless exercise to calculate the cut-off PPS required to get TIV back on the R3K/R2K list which would instigate some forced institutional buying. Although it was fun using available info along with some math and logic to see how close we could come to the actual number, it seems like we're a bit too far away to get back in , barring some really good real news.
As can be seen in the post replied to the min. mkt. cap. required to get in was $261.8MM (our best guess at the time was $262.1MM)
I wonder whether that has gone up or down? It had not gone down since 2003.
If it was the same this year as last year , and based on TIV's last filed outstanding share count (25,453,184) , we'd have to have a share price of about $10.29
On the inclusion date last year we were at $8.82 and needed $10.64 to get in. (Higher because we had fewer shares outstanding back then, about 800,000 fewer.)
jonesie
Tomorrow is Thursday, May 8
If TIV saw fit to get their February production data in to DOGGR by today we will see it on the DOGGR website tomorrow.
Maybe some of the Temblor re-work-enhanced production + Temblor new wells production might show up.
And of course we were rocket launching oil/gas soaked cores from PV-1 last August right? But I guess we won't see any oil from that any time soon due to the C classification.
The PV-2 straight well which was said to be flowing light sweet crude is still on the DOGGR site, whereas the others were removed. Was that one supposed to be flowing in February? I recall TIV saying they had contracted with a diluent supplier in spite of that well supposedly being a producer. If the PV straight well produces oil, even if TIV uses it for diluent, they would still have to report the production from it right?
If not this week, then maybe 'next week'. ;)
jonesie
Ditto clawmann
jonesie
p.s.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbyboard.asp?SearchStr=ditto&BoardID=2276&srchyr=2007
We're a bunch of dittoheads LOL
;)
Doing a bit of searching .... (edited)
I find verbiage like this in a Client's prospectus where Cornell is the only selling stockholder. This specifically allows short selling.
"In connection with the sale of the common stock or interests therein, the selling stockholder may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may in turn engage in short sales of the common stock in the course of hedging the positions they assume."
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1137855/000115895707000156/f424b3062507.htm
and this where Cornell says they won't:
"In addition, a selling stockholder may, from time to time, sell the shares short, and, in those instances, this prospectus may be delivered in connection with the short sales and the shares offered under this prospectus may be used to cover short sales. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Cornell has agreed not to engage in any short sales of or hedging transactions with respect to our common stock as long as the debentures are outstanding."
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/770471/000114420407034138/v079503_sb2a.htm
and this where Cornell seems to be able to facilitate shorting of the stock if not actually do it themselves:
"In connection with the sale of the common stock or interests therein, the Selling Stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may in turn engage in short sales of the Common Stock in the course of hedging the positions they assume. The Selling Stockholders may also enter into option or other
transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or the creation of one or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial institution of shares offered by this prospectus, which shares such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction)."
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090967/000106299307002636/exhibit10-5.htm
Anyway, those go back about a year. I didn't find a lot of filings involving Cornell in that time frame where the subject is even addressed. I found only those three using the search string
Cornell NOT university NOT Companies AND Angelo AND short AND hedging
Perhaps Cornell prefers to simply leave the subject unaddressed when possible.
(edited to add): EDGAR Full-Text Search
This page allows you to search the full text of EDGAR filings from the last four years.
So, these searches ostensibly only go back to spring of '04.
Within that time period and using the search string
Cornell AND hedging AND short
on NeoMedia only finds no SEC filings resulting.
Using the search string
Cornell AND hedging
and again only on NeoMedia turns up one NEOM filing and that is simply some boilerplate having to do with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities"
JMHO
jonesie
Not shorting now.
Shorting in the .50's .60's and .70's and either covering later at lower prices, or never covering at all in certain situations.
What kept the PPS from rising further than it did in spite of TS & Friends' claims that $1.00-$5.00 was possible? Heavy shorting can take the wind out of even the most over-exuberant sails, and the 'optimum shorting point' could be easily determined by those most in the know regarding the actual validity of various prospects, and most in the know about the general practice from their work with scores of other clients.
jonesie
Excellent research and logic B.E.
I think that 'usually indicates' is key.
Unless one is a 'start-up' adrenalin junkie you'd think sticking with a force like mBlox would be the way to go if possible?
I also noticed who was the 'public face' in the PRs.
jonesie
clawmann I'd have to go back through filings
While going through filings of many other companies for Yorkville 'start dates' and types/sizes of fianancings I ran across a lot of 'non shorting' verbiage.
I noticed that in quite a few NEOM filings related to Yorkville there was not such verbiage. I'm not saying there never was any, but that there have been cases where there wasn't.
I have no idea whether or not verbiage like that in one older deal would automatically cover the same subject in subsequent deals.
As you touched on in your post, with 'affiliates' all over the place, including in places like the Caymans and Cyprus, I suppose anything is possible.
JMHO
jonesie
RNWF : 8-K out , Default and Forbearance
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/96664/000136110608000107/renewalfuels_8k-043008.htm
Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
On April 28, 2008, Renewal Fuels, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Forbearance Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Montgomery Equity Partners, Ltd. (“Montgomery”) and YA Global Investments, L.P. (“YA”). Montgomery and YA (collectively, “Lenders”) are holders of secured convertible indebtedness of the Company (the “Indebtedness”) having an aggregate principal balance of approximately $4,249,720, and aggregate accrued unpaid interest of approximately $562,920.23, as of April 21, 2008.
Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company gave formal written notice to the Lenders of events constituting defaults under the notes and other documents evidencing and securing the Indebtedness (the “Loan Documents”), that are continuing, including the Company’s failure to repay a portion of the Indebtedness that had matured.
Pursuant to the Agreement, Lenders agreed to forbear from exercising their rights and remedies under the Loan Documents until September 30, 2008, unless and until there is a new default under the Loan Documents. In connection with the Forbearance Agreement, the Company agreed (a) to amend the warrant entitling YA to purchase 1,050,000 common shares of the Company, to reduce the exercise price to $.001 per share; (b) to increase the interest rate payable on the Indebtedness to 13% per annum; (c) to allow the Company to prepay the Indebtedness at any time prior to September 30,2008; (d) to extend the maturity of the portion of the debentures due December 28, 2006 (evidencing a portion of the Indebtedness in the aggregate principal amount of $549,720, and being the only portion of the Indebtedness that has or will mature prior to September 30,2008) to September 30, 2008; and (e) for the Company’s cash deposits, to enter into a Deposit Account Control Agreement with a bank that, upon the earlier of a new default under the Loan Documents or September 30, 2008, gives YA exclusive and immediate control over the Company’s cash deposits in such account.
8-K out, Default and Forbearance
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/96664/000136110608000107/renewalfuels_8k-043008.htm
Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
On April 28, 2008, Renewal Fuels, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Forbearance Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Montgomery Equity Partners, Ltd. (“Montgomery”) and YA Global Investments, L.P. (“YA”). Montgomery and YA (collectively, “Lenders”) are holders of secured convertible indebtedness of the Company (the “Indebtedness”) having an aggregate principal balance of approximately $4,249,720, and aggregate accrued unpaid interest of approximately $562,920.23, as of April 21, 2008.
Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company gave formal written notice to the Lenders of events constituting defaults under the notes and other documents evidencing and securing the Indebtedness (the “Loan Documents”), that are continuing, including the Company’s failure to repay a portion of the Indebtedness that had matured.
Pursuant to the Agreement, Lenders agreed to forbear from exercising their rights and remedies under the Loan Documents until September 30, 2008, unless and until there is a new default under the Loan Documents. In connection with the Forbearance Agreement, the Company agreed (a) to amend the warrant entitling YA to purchase 1,050,000 common shares of the Company, to reduce the exercise price to $.001 per share; (b) to increase the interest rate payable on the Indebtedness to 13% per annum; (c) to allow the Company to prepay the Indebtedness at any time prior to September 30,2008; (d) to extend the maturity of the portion of the debentures due December 28, 2006 (evidencing a portion of the Indebtedness in the aggregate principal amount of $549,720, and being the only portion of the Indebtedness that has or will mature prior to September 30,2008) to September 30, 2008; and (e) for the Company’s cash deposits, to enter into a Deposit Account Control Agreement with a bank that, upon the earlier of a new default under the Loan Documents or September 30, 2008, gives YA exclusive and immediate control over the Company’s cash deposits in such account.
.<font color=#006400>2 More Yorkville Clients move to the Pinksheets
EYIIE.OB changed to EYII.PK
NFBHE.OB changed to NFBH.PK
.<font color=#006400>2 More Yorkville Clients move to the Pinksheets
EYIIE.OB changed to EYII.PK
NFBHE.OB changed to NFBH.PK
.<font color=#006400>2 More Yorkville Clients move to the Pinksheets
EYIIE.OB changed to EYII.PK
NFBHE.OB changed to NFBH.PK
LOL
As has been posted before, the number of 'FTD' shares required to put NEOM on the SHO list is pretty small. I don't think anything to do with ordinary shorting/covering is going to have much effect on our stock price.
However, naked offshore shorting (originating in the Cayman Islands perhaps?) assisted by friendly MM's might never even show up on any FTD reports.
Unlike verbiage I've seen in filings of other Yorkville clients, I have seen no verbiage in Neomedia filings prohibiting, or noting Yorkville's agreement not to indulge in, shorting of NEOM stock.
Anyway, no spike. :(
jonesie
BUYINS.NET: MIVT, NEOM, UTLM, CKNWF, ISYFF, EBFD Have Also Been Removed From Naked Short List Today
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M2
09:25 a.m. 05/07/2008
May 07, 2008 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX) -- BUYINS.NET, www.buyins.net, announced today that these select companies have been removed from the NASDAQ, AMEX and NYSE naked short threshold list: MIV Therapeutics Inc (MIVT), NeoMedia Technologies Inc (NEOM), USTelematics Inc. (UTLM), Cell Kinetics Ltd. Warrants on (CKNWF), IFCO Systems N.V. (ISYFF), Ebenefitsdirect Inc. (EBFD) .
I know , I'm sorry. I'll stop :)
You're right , in the past the moves were hard and fast.
Maybe NEOM has one more left in it.
I sure hope so.
I sure wish Chip Hoffman would deign to grace us with a word of one sort or another.
jonesie
Last look
F.E.S.S.
Frictionless Ecosystem of Sliding Shareprice
11 months of down
Another look
IMO NEOM was technically dead by Christmas of 2001.
If it had not been for the amazing storyteller Tobin Smith few would ever have heard about it again .... certainly not enough people to have engendered that last run on nothing but the vapor which was pumped out of NeoMedia's Ft. Myers HQ.
jonesie
Interesting look
A little less than 7 years of NEOM
Has it got one more run in it?
The tech companies leaving Ft. Myers .....
..... don't seem to get much in the way of share price appreciation after their relocations.
Recently INRA relocated from Ft. Myers to Washington state per Success's post which also mentioned NEOM's departure:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=27394571
Two Ft. Myers tech companies leaving for other states.
B.E., in your post I am replying to you mentioned the coincidence of INRA closing at .0045 and NEOM closing at .0043.
Coincidentally NEOM has seen .0033 today and INRA is at .0032.
In addition to the commonality of Yorkville financing and the relocations from Ft. Myers our PPS's seem doomed to move in lockstep.
jonesie
p.s. Judging from the 'successes' of other otcbb Ft. Myers companies I guess it's no coincidence that Ft. Myers has been dubbed Ft. Liars relative to the stories told by the penny stock execs it spawns.
SHORT INTEREST AS OF TRADE DATE 4/25/08
Short Interest for TIV as of Trade Date 4/25/08:
2,320,625 shares , the lowest short interest since June 2005.
Short interest was down another 37,882 shares during the most recent reporting period. This period covers trading from 4/11 through 4/25.
Month-----ShrsShort---- % Change
---------------------------------
Apr 2008 - 2,320,625 ----- (-1.61%)
Apr 2008 - 2,358,507 ----- (-1.16%)
Mar 2008 - 2,386,251 ----- (-0.30%)
Mar 2008 - 2,393,494 ----- (-0.37%)
Feb 2008 - 2,402,283 ----- (-0.43%)
Feb 2008 - 2,412,708 ----- (-0.17%)
Jan 2008 - 2,416,782 ------ +1.88%
Jan 2008 - 2,372,266 ----- (-0.40%)
Dec 2007 - 2,381,745 ------ +0.02%
Dec 2007 - 2,381,262 ----- (-0.02%)
Nov 2007 - 2,381,837 ----- (-0.83%)
Nov 2007 - 2,401,841 ----- (-3.97%)
Oct 2007 - 2,501,137 ------ +0.71%
Oct 2007 - 2,483,500 ----- (-0.30%)
Sep 2007 - 2,490,932 ----- (-0.84%)
Sep 2007 - 2,511,943 ----- (-0.56%)
Aug 2007 - 2,526,079 ----- (-3.35%)
Jul 2007 - 2,613,736 ----- (-4.92%)
Jun 2007 - 2,749,037 ----- (-0.42%)
May 2007 - 2,760,565 ----- (-0.39%)
Apr 2007 - 2,771,400 ------ +1.82%
Mar 2007 - 2,721,853 ----- (-0.57%)
Feb 2007 - 2,737,463 ------ +1.64%
Jan 2007 - 2,693,334 ----- (-2.77%)
Dec 2006 - 2,770,185 ----- (-1.5%)
Nov 2006 - 2,811,009 ---- (-11.9%)
Oct 2006 - 3,192,293 ---- (-2.27%)
Sep 2006 - 3,266,297 ----- +0.09%
Aug 2006 - 3,263,093 ---- (-5.04%)
Jul 2006 -- 3,436,104 ---- (-17.3%)
Jun 2006 - 4,156,544 ---- +13.87%
May 2006- 3,650,143 ------ +1.83%
Apr 2006 - 3,584,379 ----- (-5.41%)
Mar 2006 - 3,789,445 ----- (-4.23%)
Feb 2006 - 3,956,897 ----- (-3.56%)
Jan 2006 - 4,102,837 ------ +3.86%
Dec 2005 - 3,950,446 ----- (-1.88%)
Nov 2005 - 4,025,937 ------ +5.01%
Oct 2005 - 3,833,789 ------ +1.39%
Sep 2005 - 3,781,376 ------ +9.56%
Aug 2005 - 3,451,421 ----- +24.25%
Jul 2005 - 2,777,900 ----- +39.66%
Jun 2005 - 1,989,039 ----- +20.65%
May 2005 - 1,648,631 ----- +40.68%
Apr 2005 - 1,171,931 ---- +113.52%
Mar 2005 --- 548,854 ----- +86.95%
Feb 2005 --- 293,590 ---- +327.46%
Jan 2005 ---- 68,682 ----- +96.67%
Dec 2004 ---- 34,923 ----- +37.38%
Nov 2004 ---- 25,421 ----- +10.40%
Oct 2004 ---- 23,027 ---- +408.66%
Sep 2004 ----- 4,527 ---- (-59.68%)
Aug 2004 ---- 11,227 ---- +132.59%
Jul 2004 ----- 4,827 ---- (-31.31%)
Jun 2004 ----- 7,027 ----- +55.22%
May 2004 ----- 4,527 ------ TWBFTS-
Apr 2004 ----- 4,527 ---- (-94.73%)
Mar 2004 ---- 85,881 ---- (-13.21%)
Feb 2004 ---- 98,951 ---- (-00.88%)
Jan 2004 ---- 99,833 ----- +00.89%
Dec 2003 ---- 98,951 ---- (-18.30%)
There is definitely good support around $6
Reported production increases could cause substantial appreciation of the share price from here IMO.
Good luck to all who have held from Oct '05 or even Nov '04 when the share price was also around $6/sh.
And extra good luck to those who bought at higher prices based on various rumors and promises of pending new production over the years.
jonesie
premarket 50K at .0038
The newest on there is Qualcomm
Not sure when they were added
bleedingedge , you are correct
I started to post again noting that the salary/bonus part started on 6/18/08.
That's a lot of moolah for presiding over a 90% hit in share price to date.
Oh well , I guess today those 'option awards' are worth about 90% less than they had to be recorded at back then , so the $512K figure isn't really valid unless the 'immediately exercisable' portion was exercised .... and apparently it wasn't as a filing would have been required.
jonesie
We seem to be going backwards ....
.... in every direction at once.
PPS , news mentions , PRs , Reader lists , you name it.
In fact NeoMedia seems to have added a 2nd and 3rd 'reverse gear' to their transmission for better reverse acceleration.
The only things not going backwards are compensation packages?? (maybe FP's did a little bit).
From the 2008 10-K:
"Bonus – During 2007, we adopted an incentive plan for William Hoffman, who joined us mid-year as our CEO. Mr. Hoffman’s bonus for 2007 was determined by the Board of Directors at the time of his hire, and was based on the achievement of Revenue, Operating Profit, and Operating Metric objectives for the remainder of 2007. The Board reviewed the objectives subsequent to year-end and determined that Mr. Hoffman had met his objectives for the year ended December 31, 2007, and his bonus was paid out in March, 2007". (probably a typo, clearly should have said March, 2008)
What Revenue, Operating Profit and Operating Metric objectives could possibly have been "met" and resulted in a bonus?
jonesie
From the zxing part of Google's Code website:
http://code.google.com/p/zxing/wiki/InterestingLinks
NeoReader isn't on the list.
There are a lot of others on that list.
Readers
* Kaywa
* Mobilecodes at Nokia
* SnapABar from Jaxo, Inc.
* ConnextTo from Nextcode
* i-nigma Reader
* ScanBuy ScanLife reader
* iMatrix Reader for the iPhone
* QuickMark
* Semapedia's reader guide (Not a reader, but a guide to find one)
* CamClic reader
re: SKS/Bonk
As I thought, when NeoMedia first put a reference to Jay Bonk in a filing ( the 10-Q for 1Q07 which was filed on 5/10/07 ) there was no mention of Jay Bonk working with/for George O'Leary or SKS Consulting.
"On April 17, 2007, NeoMedia named Jay Bonk, who has been working for the company on a consulting basis, as interim Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Bonk replaces Roger Pavane. A longtime sales executive with Motorola, Bonk’s experience includes 22 years with Motorola, including stints as Vice President of Business Development and Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing."
Obviously it says 'consulting' in the 'has been' category , but one doesn't immediately leap to an SKS connection from that.
I wonder why there was a need to expand on the relationship description to include the SKS connection in the 2008 10-K filed this year .... or to have omitted it in the 1Q07 10-Q?
jonesie
From the 10-K
(Just perusing the 10-K since the company isn't telling us anything other than what was in the 10-K)
"compensation paid to persons serving as our principal executive officer during the last completed fiscal year"
Name and Principal Position Year Salary($) Bonus(S) Option Awards($) Total
William Hoffman CEO 2007 $140,223 $68,800 $312,717 $521,740
re: Sprint/Deutsch Telekom/German-connection
Someone posted earlier about the above and mentioned CH's past association with Sprint , possible current association with Deutsch Telekom , etc.
In reply:
"doesn't CH have ties with sprint?"
Yeah, but that ended 13 years ago.
1987-1995
From 1987 to 1995 he worked in numerous positions in sales, marketing and management with Sprint's Business Services Unit.
"and haven't we worked with DT in the past?"
Deutsche Telekom is a member of MC2. Does that equal 'we worked with'?
http://www.mobilecodes.org/
"and isn't Gavitec a German company?"
Yep.
Nice drill-down. Great dots. It's a we thing. Kick some manholes.
LOL, good luck to us, we need it.
jonesie
This is interesting re: O'Leary / Bonk
Jay Bonk is listed as an employee on the SKS Consulting website now , as has been noted already.
Oddly , I don't think when we first heard about Jay Bonk coming on board that we were quite aware of his connection with GO/SKS Consulting. We just heard the Motorola 'stuff'.
But in the most recent 10-K the relationship is mentioned as if there was always the SKS Consulting connection:
"In December 2006, we entered into a twenty-five month consulting agreement with SKS Consulting of South Florida Corp. (“SKS”) whereby we pay SKS $1,000 per day worked on our behalf and 60,000 warrants per month for services rendered by George O’Leary and Jay Bonk. In payment of this agreement, we paid SKS $211,500 and issued stock valued at $13,513 to Mr. O’Leary and stock valued at $4,504 to Mr. Bonk during 2007. Mr. O’Leary is on our Board of Directors."
jonesie
It looks like Tatum may be out of the picture?
(And FP's salary may be a little less than it was initially? (original info in post replied to here))
We don't seem to be paying Tatum their portion of this part of FP's original employment agreement any longer:
$8,250 / month fees to Tatum
$5,500 / month cash bonus to Tatum/Pazera, 30/70 split, goals TBA
125,000 / month options/warrants to Tatum/Pazera, strike prices TBD, 30/70 split
The new agreement is in Exhibit 10.88 of the most recent 10-K and there is no mention of Tatum in it other than this odd little bit at the end , I wonder what this means:
SCHEDULE 1
Company/Group Position
Tatum, LLC Partner
They sure need to do 'something'
More vocal would be a start , seeing as how they haven't been 'vocal' at all for months.
Execution of some revenue-generating or exposure-generating plan would be even better.
"On June 3, 2007, NeoMedia Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“NeoMedia”), entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) with William J. Hoffman, Jr., pursuant to which Mr. Hoffman, 45, was hired as NeoMedia’s Chief Executive Officer with an effective date of June 18, 2007"
On 6/15/07 , the trading day before his 'effective date' of employment , NEOM closed at $0.0375
At the current PPS of .0033 we have suffered another 91.2% loss in share price , plus the additional dilution we have suffered.
I believe that kind of loss is referred to as 'decimation'.
And we were 'decimated' prior to that from .375 to .0375.
I've heard of 'exponential returns' , I guess these are called 'exponential losses'.
Meanwhile I imagine that discipline has indeed been exercised with substantial paychecks being cashed on a regular and timely basis.
We don't seem to have received very much for our money with regards to these salaries/benefits/expenses.
jonesie
"doesn't CH have ties with sprint?"
Yeah, but that ended 13 years ago.
1987-1995
From 1987 to 1995 he worked in numerous positions in sales, marketing and management with Sprint's Business Services Unit.
"and haven't we worked with DT in the past?"
Deutsche Telekom is a member of MC2. Does that equal 'worked with'?
http://www.mobilecodes.org/
"and isn't Gavitec a German company?"
Yep.
Nice drill-down. Great dots. It's a we thing. Kick some manholes.
LOL, good luck to us, we need it.
jonesie
The first part was posted in direct reply to ....
.... a comment about AnnounceMobile.
I may have missed a previous definitive statement by AnnounceMobile that they were in no way associated with NeoMedia any longer ... but in case there had never been such posted , I posted that portion of an email I received from AnnounceMobile.
There have been ongoing comments regarding Jeff 'being back' etc , I simply thought it would be worthwhile (as in not meaningless) to state the simple fact that AnnounceMobile has rendered itself 'OT' as far as NeoMedia is concerned.
And that was no less interesting an email since to the best of my recollection Jeff Mould said if NeoMedia ever needed a multi-million dollar equity stake partner he'd be that himself.
More dust in the wind.
jonesie
And that other part is totally meaningless.
What Jeff Mould 'believes' or is or is not 'supportive of' means absolutely NOTHING to us or the share price.
jonesie
As of 4/2/08:
"At this time Announce Mobile, Inc. is no longer partnering, and/or providing services, with NeoMedia Technologies (“NeoMedia”). Our decision to discontinue our partnership was based on several reasons, most important of which is our corporate relocation and restructuring that is currently underway. As part of this restructuring we will no longer be providing services or solutions that directly relate to the technology platform offered by NeoMedia and therefore have chosen to forego our partnership agreement with them."
Nicely put AK
and re: "see how far they're willing to go to cheat their fellow gambler" we've all seen the boards where 'they' go 'far', the most recent one I saw with thousands of pumping posts even after the highs had been hit was COPI. Makes ya wanna puke lol.
GLTY
jonesie
NeoMedia Vital Signs:
Flatlined
What goes through a NEW CEO's head that he can rationalize coming on board, be paid by a publicly held company, yet not say one word to shareholders for months.