actual short sales on a stock that is at .0001????

can't. stop. laughing.

Please nobody believe the false information.

EXPH was not "shorted" today for 3364000 shares.

And just so nobody is misled, this does not mean that EXPH was shorted today for 3364000 shares.

Great post Renee.

only one problem this time .. they couldn't get exph
*longs* to sell ..

WRONG AGAIN.

interesting day here today.

Just want to point out that the shorting that everybody claims is happening is simply a lack of understanding of the reports available.

was there ever a signed contract???

Well sure looks like he was asking a question to me. He even used three question marks. Crazy.

I will ask JD the question Choir.

How can asking if a contract was canceled or a question asking if there was ever a signed contract be absolutely wrong?

Seriously.

How on earth can asking a question be 100% wrong and misleading?

Thanks for your help. I am happy to know that people arent shorting this at .0001.

That would just be weird.

seems like a pretty low percentage compared to most NASDAQ companies. I find that interesting...

EXPH shares must get delivered same day quite often then.

what you posted is pure speculation once again

Would that be like saying that JD was visiting retailers for etc. just because he was traveling?

Or is positive speculation ok.

Just so I can understand this better...

So on December 9 when the volume was 32224600 and the "short volume" was 31724600 that doesn't mean that 98.4% of these shares were sold short expecting that the PPS was going to go down below .0001?

Are you sure? I mean that is of course perfectly logical and would also match up with certain documents available on the web, but it contradicts what we are reading posted by lots of *experts*

so what you are saying is that when the short volume turns up as 3.5 million on a day where the volume is 3.5 million that it doesnt mean that they sold it short (as in expecting it to go down in the common usage of the term)?

It almost makes too much sense.

As to July 2008, I have not researched to see what you mean

Did not confirm what 4kids said. Why would he have to reasearch something that he allegedly already told somebody? Perhaps he didn't tell anybody that after all.

As far as the SEC/Malone question, he said no comment. So do not put words in his mouth.

time frame given on the CC was 2-3 years.

then i went thru the pix
shown in the expo website and then i contacted
mgmt and asked for info on all of the pix shown
in the photo gallery .. it was certainly nice
to get confirmation of the quality done and the
diversity of locations

The info that you posted regarding those pics has yet to be confirmed by JD as being true.

I find that interesting. CV y_o ttfn C_Z y-z

Q-X
P-G13
AR
TGIF

whats also odd is that on Dec. 22 2000000 out of a total 2000000 shares were shorted.

Perhaps this "short volume" means something different? Seems really odd that a stock at .0001 was shorted.

I cant wait for the next filing to see what the O/S is.

Hopefully the revenue numbers actually add up too.

aren't they actually having a hard time paying these bills, hence the lawsuits?

Just curious.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbyboard.aspx?boardID=9530&srchyr=2009&SearchStr=catalyst

Maybe somebody knows what it is????

it is what it is .. and most can comprehend that

Most comprehend that they don't care for excuses.

Nobody cares why EXPH isn't where it hypothetically could be. They care about what it is and where it is actually at.

The same tired rhetoric is ridiculous. Its because of the macro, its because of their customers, its because the earth should be flat,blah blah.

We aren't talking about whether or not it is ok to turn in a book report late. We are talking about the PPS of EXPH.

It isn't where most people want it to be, first and foremost JD. JD issued an apology at the SH meeting and he acknowledges having made mistakes. Due to past missed projections he will no longer issue them. If simply blaming the macro environment every time was considered acceptable to him, he wouldn't have made that switch. He also wouldn't be apologizing or making efforts to change how he has handled things now would he?

Most can comprehend THAT.

so approx 88.5 percent of friday's volume was short
gotta love a system so *mucked* up .. that it defies
logic ~

Strange how 88% is "short" yet the stock went up 9%.

Wonder why that was?

anybody have any idea why the 3.5 million shares traded on 2/12/10 were all short volume?

Single huh?

Any man with an IQ below 130 answers this question incorrectly

Question #1

Are you smarter than your wife/girlfriend*

A. Yes
B. No












*These answers will be published

You haven't read about envion's process of converting plastic, which only 4% of is recycled, into oil?

Their process isn't even as efficient as JBII's.

If you had a 170 IQ you wouldnt think that was funny, you would be buying shares like crazy like the rest of us.

What a ridiculous article. How dare they print such drivel.

Chevron is just jealous that they cant convert plastic to oil at an almost 1 to 1 weight ratio.

Was my sentiment just after midnight on Feb. 16 not 100% correct?

I gave it a number 1 sell indicator on that day. PPS is down a good amount since then.

Long term and short term are two different things.

Do you realize how efficient of a process it is? I mean for every 2.2 pounds of plastic, they can create 1.9 pounds of oil.

That is mind boggling. Shorty going to be covered in petroleum jelly derived from plastic so it doesn't hurt so bad.

500 million is super undervalued. This thing should be worth 10 times that.

Did you see the short position? Shorty gonna have to cover soon. MOASS incoming.

does anyone really want to see the destruction
of anymore legit co.s by those who profit from
that behavior?


This hasn't happened to Expo and it hasn't happened to any other company ever.

Any company that has argued this was the reason for their demise had a myriad of other problems staring it in the face. That can't be ignored.

You have seen the short volume per day on it, and it is clearly being run down by the shorts.

How can one say this?

The "short volume" from Dec. 8 to Dec. 24th when this ran from 1.19 to 4.75 was over 51% of the total volume.

Do we even know what that "short volume" technically even means at this point?

highly efficient indeed then if every 2.2 lbs of plastic makes 1.9 pounds of oil.

I am not very familiar with JBII, but what else do they claim goes into this?

Just electricty?

Wouldnt that conversion rate basically be an almost 1 to 1 conversion?

How much does a liter of oil weigh?

gotta link to where it says that if there is an R/S that they never have to cover?

Thanks in advance.

Pretty sure that if there Expo were to R/S all shorts would have to cover.

I could be wrong, but that really doesn't make any sense. If they didnt have to cover whenever an R/S was announced, they would sell 12 quadrillion shares and never have to cover. Then of course there would be tons of extra shareholders after that.

Pretty sure they would have to cover.

Now that this short information is availble proving to those here who have said over and over again there is no NAKED SHORT position, well it is time for all to file those complaint forms with the SEC, file complaints with the DOJ and send letters to your local congressman.

Short position does not equal naked short position.

A large naked short position that has never been covered would result in a huge amount of FTDs. As has been posted and linked to, the SEC site shows zero FTDs for EXPH.

Has anybody bothered to check the short volume percentages for other stocks?

Check out the short volume of plenty of big board stocks that are in an uptrend. Hmmm.....

Expo diluted 100 million shares from May 27 to June 26th 2009. This was after conversion.

of those who've *shorted*
expecting said co. to do a R/S and never have
to *cover*

I'll take a link to this please.