Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Are you referring to this?
"McCusker's is recorded closed at this location".
I just found it on Google, not sure what the heck it is?
Disinformation: is false information spread deliberately to deceive.
I certainly didn't put up any numbers or information on this site, or any other!
I simply have an opinion on whats available, if the false numbers came down I would have less to talk about!
Simple!
When you look at ALL of it, it does not paint a picture of "saving money" as much as he was in financial distress and thought he found a way to bail himself out!
He went to a garage sale and bought an old used "Public Shell", he then tried to use "the Home Depot" type approach to "Fix it up"!
Not only did the Home Depot approach not work he had to have several more experts come in and try to repair what was screwed up.
This is not smart or Savvy at this point! It starts to scream Scam and More Due Diligence is in order, and that's where things start to get interesting! If we look at only the "Feels Good stuff" this thing looks great! Just a peak beyond and "feels good" starts to wane.
When these negative things are masked with numbers that are known to be no good, (25 mil to 50 mil rev, unknown SS) it moves it beyond a screaming scam!
I want to believe the Company is not responsible for the bad numbers posted here and on the other web sites!
They made an announcement that the currant number is much lower so....how do we interpret what these lies are suppose to mean?
Excellent analogy
Happy 4th to you as well!
Have a good one.
"a clever way to make it public"
The problem is in the Pinky world this also translates to a clever way to Scam people, that is why I tend to look at the negative "found" information with extreme scrutiny.
It's good strategy to dig deeply to find the answer on negative issues before making a trade or investment.
especially if you find that things have been blown out of proportion on the positive side.
When I first stepped in here I saw huge revenue numbers that blew me away....a little bit of digging proved otherwise then the company announces otherwise, huge red flag for me!
Now start adding in the mistakes and typos and delays...we are getting farther away from Savvy and leaning towards the other possibility.
Just my opinion and why I stay in the middle as much as I can, some days it's hard to stay in the middle.
Now this is interesting....
McCusker's Italian Restaurant
Address: 1210 Hall - Johnson Rd #200, Colleyville, TX 76034
Phone: (817) 788-3998
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#tbm=lcl&q=McCusker+%26+Company+Inc.&rflfq=1&num=20&stick=H4sIAAAAAAAAABXMuQ3CUBAEUDlBxBgR_Mgl7DV7dEELFjIisGRkGqMuquA73Jk3ez61kSOSvZQBLyKyonZlczG4UGUgyhVObRRJLq1Mghx9gNul1FiFFRIBA0w75H5kQmGZQRroYTIi3YJhBxSxaGOhOJTSODsF2zFXKVOwd0YV_QHkOwy_4XZftve6TPP62abPMu-P1_Tc9j8uUxcrxgAAAA&rldimm=14624562098757963560&tbs=lrf:,lf:1
Going out on a limb, but I suppose the Pizza Guy Investigator could have ordered a pizza and offered up the 4508 address as delivery, if no one was home...he would have got a call back to try and re-deliver!
All that for 7.99 plus a 1.50 delivery charge!
Just saying!
Happy 4th
http://www.paliospizzacafemenu.com/
Trade or Invest where ever you stand, it's pertinent!
Agree Money to be made, we just need answers...lots of them as of right now!
It just builds into a lot of other things that would lead one to a conclusion of the character of McCusker and his ability to run a company, some just see it as a black eye...Investors should consider all things when contemplating a risk such as this!
Not just the "feels good things"!
Just an FYI if you look at the "Pizza Dude" investigation on 5/8/17 The Pizza Dude testified that "someone was there" all of a sudden on 5/11 service of summons..... poof gone!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132674685
Nice rebuttal very straight forward and simple!
I was simply suggesting to "Pizza Dude" rebuttal that he can take it a step further and put it to bed properly, seeing that he may now be the Pizza Dude liaison!
I still think this is a McCusker character issue more so than a money issue.
I have had a case like this that escalated out of SCC to a bigger arena....just saying...not closed out yet!
SCC is good leverage coming out of the gate, quick and easy to file.
Just my opinion!
If you have already spoke to "The Pizza Dude"
Maybe the Pizza Dude has the Plaintiffs number, a call to the plaintiff would provide some valid input as to what the real story is?
The case is still Open and Filed on May 11, 2017 after the "Pizza Dude" investigation.
You would have to be careful asking because with the case pending he may not answer some questions.
Case No. JP03-17-SC00022873
Plaintiff CRISAN, IOAN DANIEL
5507 CLERMONT CT
COLLEYVILLE, TX 76034
Court records also show he was served for the other case at the office on 1/20/17 that case ended in a default judgement for $9906.66
New Tweet, "Anyone have a birthday in July?"
Oh wait that was the June tweet....my bad sorry!
Ahhh yeah like the "anybody have a birthday in June tweet"
Holiday pending....I would have at least tweeted next week, but maybe we will get an "update today"
As pointed out before...a company that is "FAT" does not go get a "Float me loan" to cover "cash flow problems"!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132429352
I agree with this analogy it just makes way more sense when you look at the evidence available!
perhaps the landlord breached on a portion of his commitment to McCusker with the space given..... (appliances not working, water issues, build out not completed as promised....>)
This is speculation..... an open court case is not speculation!
looks to me McCusker had the landlord on some things.....
This is an open case in Tarrant county court! It's not over and settled until the case is closed out.
If McCusker had "issue" with the lease he would be the one suing the landlord!
That is not what the document reflects in the court file, the landlord is suing McCusker and it is an OPEN case.
Are you suggesting we are not under Yield?
Much better approach.... with disclaimer!
"could be a chance"
Thanks exactly....speculation!
WARNING SHARE STRUCTURE NOT ACCURATE
Just in case you are new here please see:
The share structure is not accurate, we do not know what the share structure is at this time.
The numbers that are shown in the intro are Incorrect!
Anything you see on here is a guess at best and HIGHLY SPECULATIVE!
This stock has been substantially diluted to cover bad Debt!
The company has not announced or corrected the SS at this time!
This ticker is still trading YIELD on otc, if corrections are not made soon this stock could go to STOP!
6/22/17 PM PR Release
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/ORRV/news/Executive-Team-Reorganization?id=162859&b=y
$4-million in revenues. In 2017 and with the NTS acquisition, new contracts, and effective executive leadership we EXPECT revenues to grow to estimated $5.5 million.
This is not a (25 mil to 50 mil) company!
These are not opinions they are FACTS Please investigate for your self!
A "short-term investor" responded with this yesterday:
So everyone bullish here is expecting to cash in at 10x or more, which is not bad.
It would better serve even the "short-term investor" "Trading this" to take down the false revenue numbers we have posted here!
Please see new sliding calculations here:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2017/6/24/cxebgCapture.PNG
UPDATE
Cautiously optimistic and carefully watching all indicators here!
Still a lot of "Hyped speculation" but looking through both sides of the spectrum of opinion here, we have a potential for a good emerging Company.
6/22/17 PM PR Release
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/ORRV/news/Executive-Team-Reorganization?id=162859&b=y
We now have some solid info from the company that indicates things are being addressed and we are moving forward slowly. With a lot of negativity and Speculation emerging, the Company has managed to address the first huge Speculative item with a somewhat receptive response!
If FINRA approval gets completed, they will at some point have to address "The Speculative SS" That may or may not be received the same way.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132627561
With continued transparency on the "left to do list" from the CEO, we have the chance for a nice run up from where we are right now!
We have made it past the Hyped Fake revenue numbers with some flat line action VERY Good Sign in my opinion. If we hadn't had that FAKE REVENUE speculation we most likely would not have flat lined!
Please see new sliding calculations here:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2017/6/24/cxebgCapture.PNG
Still have things to sort out and as long as the company stays on top of what they are working on, investors and traders are sitting in a good place at .0007!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132672058
NO IT DOES NOT.... PERIOD!
EXPECTED revenues is not revenue!!!!! Period
The Pizza Dude way back on May 8th... Wow I can't believe the rebuttal people choose to respond with!
that the merger is 100% complete.
And the details are coming for investors to look at, that's the answer I got from Frank on June 15th, I want to see the details!
That's all I've ever said here and I think as an investor...I have a right to see that!
I hope it is nothing but good news, until we get the details...posters are going to assume things all over the spectrum of good and bad!
"negotiated very well"
Would not have left behind 2 lawsuits....Sorry!
I just disagree with that one.
HMMMM again you are not close here!
I never said McCusker was a scam warranty company!
I'm stating that the industry has a black eye because of.... trying to respond to a post with an explanation here!!
I never used the word EVICTION!
I said it can suggest negative things and it does do just that in my eyes, you can interpret how ever you want.
AXE Documents suggest otherwise
The Tarrant county docs suggest that 2 separate party's sued him to recover monies on 2 separate leases situations!
One seems to be a residence that he lived in, the other seems to be the office, anything can be assumed when looking at the suits but when you are sued it's not because it was amicable!
This builds into the character of McCusker in a very negative way!
"where is this supposed warranty business operating out of currently?"
This is a good question and I don't know the answer, maybe someone can find it and post something with backbone to answer this?
The "new address" is just that, are we to assume he picked up all the employees with the desks and moved them?
I remember at one time someone posted something like 200 employees with the FAKE 25 mil to 50 mil revenue numbers....that's a lot of people to "relocate"
Correct but he is making an effort to pay off the company Debt so this adds validity to "cleaning things up"!
Malicious or not is in the eye of the interpreter, you have valid opinions to some rather large unanswered questions.
No one can discount a lot of what's been uncovered with a direct answer! Leaves much room to surmise!
The Tarrant county docs are still in the puzzle...not pretty at all!
"the oldest SCAM in the book"
This is a huge arena for topic of discussion because yes a lot of warranty's are not what they are hyped up to be!
People get smacked in the face with the "Warranty reality" everyday and it sometimes leaves a huge black mark on the industry!
Not all warranty's are bad...not all are good!
Tons of Bad examples out there...it would be an endless topic but very valid!
Personally...I NEVER buy an extended warranty on anything, bad experience has taught me it's not a good option!
MORE ANSWERS NEEDED
This is what concerns me the most!
"And you own the shell from my reading of the merger agreement."
We really don't know where we are with this part yet, FINRA may very well be thinking the same thing and be "HIGHLY SCRUTINIZING" exactly that!
We do not have the answers to some very importat questions pertaining to how all the typo and clerical mistakes fit together into this complicated puzzle!
The common answer on here is "The Attorney Opinion fixed it"
The Attorney Opinion said you "have a merger", it does not tell us what merged with what and what it all settles in as?
Posters are not considering the fact that Tracey removed himself as Custodian of "Oceanic Research and Recovery Group"
I asked Frank on June 15th what's been done to "fix this" and he responded!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132219273
"If they have concerns we have concerns,"
"the answer to your question will be revealed at that time,"
This statement does not mean "its fixed" it means Investors will have something to look at and "SCRUTINIZE" to try and determine each and individually what the documents "reveal" and it's not even possible until FINRA gives the thumbs up and "approves"!
The missing piece that adds to this:
REVENUE & SS NOT ACCURATE
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132627561
"to please our schedules."
This has nothing to do with them making statements and not following through in the time frame THEY said would transpire.
If we talk a walk back through some posting on here and Twitter, Many times the "wait until Monday" has been posted.
That's my point!
I'm not following yours?
Point is .....still waiting every Friday!
What's yours?
These words are becoming a Friday ritual!
Sad to say!
You can camp in fantasy land on any stock...They are offering up a reality check by squeaking out the expected 5.5 mil number, I highly doubt they would shock us with anything larger at his point!
With all the mistakes here it would not make a lick of sense to unleash some huge number....buyers would only be left skeptical with that approach.
If they don't reel in the nonsense before launch this thing will get hacked to pieces as real info comes out!
VERY logical input, much appreciated!
VARIABLE TO CONSIDER
that would put this at .0041.... VARIABLE
trades 25x, that is the typical multiplier.... VARIABLE
25 x .0041 would put this at .1025.... VARIABLE
It could also be 4 mil REV at 2 bil SS
that would put this at .002 x 25 = .05
or .002 x 10 = .02
.02 is not a bad number from .0007...Agree?
What if the NTS acquisition is intended to prop something up that has declined? Again VARIABLE.
"NTS acquisition, new contracts, and effective executive leadership we expect" These are also "VARIABLES"
That's why the sliding scale is a valuable tool in allowing an evaluation of valuation.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2017/6/24/cxebgCapture.PNG
I would agree with you for a fantasy weed stock or something of the like, but this has a real forecast of 5.5 mil....so hard to make a run like that when they are starting to give you something to put on a calculator!
Please see new sliding calculations here:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2017/6/24/cxebgCapture.PNG