Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
From IBOX
I was reading the last JNSH pacer filing and CCGI really has a lot of affirmative defenses. It looks like from a drive by perspective that, that Judge really did a miscarriage of justice.
<just the facts>
Ditka, Farkus is building out his network. Dilution is part of the process. If you read his last interview, he clearly outlines his plans as to why he is sacrificing short term profit for the buildout. How is this guy suppose to build out with out dilution. Is everything suppose to be free. That is how business works.
SB what do you think the 52 grand given JNSH on the CCGI filing is for?
<Puzzling that no one cares to ask the company this very basic, and highly relevant, question... >
I think I follow, you can sell them. But you won't get any money. Just for clarity what I mean by "any money" is not a lot, OR VERY VERY LITTLE.
<roach motel>
Who do you sell millions of shares with zero volume. Even stranger who would want to buy them. Farkas? pennies on the dollar.
So what makes you think those chargers are worth millions. I think I missed your answer?
You couldn't sell them if you wanted to. No volume. Roach motel. They come in but they don't come out.
< Farkas>
I rarely give out advice on stocks. Some one from another board took a large position in JNSH and was begging everyone to buy in. I looked at it very objectively then starting doing my drive by's. On them and their competitors. Godfather pizza and etc. But I really find no value here. I will go on the record saying that this is a good time to get out. By next year the share price will be substantially lower
By little do you mean drive by?
There are many certainties in JNSH. One of which is Farkas. As far as a low market cap. 1.5 for a pizza shop is a lot. Judging be revenues I think closer to 300k would be a BETTER NUMBER.
Farkas is probably so busy inking deals and buying networks at pennies on the dollar he hasn't had time. Talk about a lot of press releases. Very busy guy.
There's a 50-50 chance you were hacked this year
By Patrick Howell O'Neill on May 28, 2014 Email
Forty-seven percent of Americans had personal information exposed in the last year by hackers, according to new Ponemon Institute research.
Up to 432 million accounts were compromised as databases at major companies like Target, Twitter, Evernote, eBay, AOL, and Adobe left masses of user data in the hands of cybercriminals who continued to strike gold against increasingly porous cybersecurity.
If the last 12 months look bleak, there’s little reason to believe the next 12 will be any better. The next big hack is coming. It’s not a question of if, just when. The answer, undoubtedly, is very soon. There are very few breathers in between big break-ins these days.
Data breaches can give away extremely sensitive information. When Target was attacked in one of the most prominent attacks of 2013, hackers walked away with millions of customer names, credit and debit card numbers complete, expiration dates, and three-digit Credit Verification Value (CVV) codes.
Just last week, eBay was attacked and hackers made off with usernames and encrypted passwords. The extent of the damage isn’t yet clear—it’s possible that the encryption holds and the passwords prove useless—but all 145 million eBay users were told to change their passwords after the attack.
If, like a lot of people, users shared the username and password across multiple accounts, then all of a sudden a huge portion of their digital life may be vulnerable. Many people can’t even remember just how many accounts share the exact same username and password, leaving themselves unknowingly exposed to a single hack.
That’s not all. Names, dates of birth, addresses, and phone numbers are floating out there with protection that regularly gets broken. That kind of information can lead to stolen or hijacked identities that can take weeks or months to detect.
As the Internet becomes indispensable in our lives, computing has become sophisticated beyond comprehension. Every single website and application you use is a puzzle of systems interacting with each other in changing ways, held together by string and the sweat of information security professionals who are fighting unknown opponents with shifting capabilities. It isn’t enough. They’re just human beings, after all.
A recent survey of 500 American businesses found that over 75 percent have had security incidents in the last year. In fact, each business averaged over 135 incidents and a third of the respondents say the frequency of attacks has increased. The businesses said they lost an annual average of $415,000 to cybercrime last year to say nothing of the data lost.
If that sounds like a lot, it’s only part of the picture. Sixty-seven percent of businesses were unable to calculate how much cyberattacks cost.
Many American businesses are defending themselves poorly. The same survey found that only 38 percent invest strategically in cybersecurity based on risks and impact to business. A tiny 17 percent take steps to classify which data are most valuable to business.
It takes almost no skill and very little knowhow to launch a basic cyberattack today. Readymade hacking products make the whole process easy for anyone with some money to spend. Add a little education and talent to that picture and all of a sudden, the Internet is a hacker’s oyster.
My own data was breached in the Adobe and eBay hacks. It will almost certainly happen again.
"It's becoming more acute," Larry Ponemon, head of the Ponemon Institute, told CNN. "If you're not a data breach victim, you're not paying attention."
H/T CNN | Photo via Kevin Zollman/Flickr (CC BY SA 2.0)
It is also very common that the company with the larger pockets ultimately win.
toonces, you make a valid point that every company and lawsuit is different and a different set of circumstances applies to each. But that being said, JNSH is in the worst situation because they are dealing with Farkas. Anytime you go to court there is never a slam dunk. Anyone telling you otherwise is lying. But the norm is to have these things drag out and collecting is usually like pulling teeth from a tiger. My quote is relative in the regards that the CEO is being very honest with shareholders. Anyone in any business knows it is very hard collecting. And I am sure that there are many companies regret suing after ocurring legal expenses
OK, I will start the ball rolling here. I think that long term Fuel Cell will eventually become the mainstream technology, but it will probably take awhile. Toyota, Mercedes and Honda have invested heavily in it, but the expected roll out is in 2020. Even then that would be a starting point. That would give CCGI a pretty big window to become profitable.
Regarding the settlement, I think that is pretty clear to everyone that this will drag out for years. But I even in the end I really don't think the award will be anything substantial. I would think after years of waiting they will settle for anything that they can get. Which IMO would be some shares of CCGI. Below is a quote that I found by another company regarding Judgments. I think this directy relates to JNSH's situation.
It looks like Farkas is trying to Gobble up every EV network. After reading CCGI's latest press release. It would look like JNSH must be in his crosshairs. He outlines his strategy and sounds like he is willing to take a loss to get it. Any thoughts?
What part of this pr is BS. I understand that they give discounted shares to institutional investors but even at a discount they must be certain that they will make money.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/2235953-after-acquisition-binge-car-charging-sets-its-sights-on-dominating-the-ev-charging-industry
Would you know if anyone on this board speaks with Farkas. Does he take calls from shareholders?
You are the one that keeps posting about the certainty of a 200-1. Why are you asking me for a link. I always maintained that I have no idea.
If you were wrong about about it happening right after the becoming fulling reporting, maybe you are wrong about the certainty of a 200-1. Hmmmmm
Incorrect,
Now you said it but it has nothing to do with what you posted. What you posted was a reference of NSCT being on the pink sheets
You wrote:
omtrader, great post. eom