Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It is quite clear what you said.
I would be willing to bet JD has zero regrets regarding those contracts. He probably doesnt believe he was sold a bill of goods over and over like you say.
They sold 2 million shares at .03 and they sold another 10 million right before that.
That is 60k plus at least 120k if we use .012 as the price for the other 10 million, which I think we can all agree that is being conservative.
That's 180,000 bucks raised.
How could that be if JD renewed the contract like 5 times?
From claytrader's irp disc.-
June 2009
EXPH - $1,500 from company for technical chart coverage and profile
July 2009
EXPH - $2,600 from company for technical chart coverage and profile
* A total of $4,100 has been paid for two separate contracts
August 2009
EXPH - $800 from company for technical chart coverage and profile
* A total of $4,900 has been paid for three separate contracts
September 2009
EXPH - $500 from company for technical chart coverage and profile
* A total of $5,900 has been paid for awareness via multiple contracts
November 2009
EXPH - $500 from company for technical chart coverage
* A total of $6,400 has been paid for awareness via multiple contracts
Would seem a bit disingenuous to say that the MM's or traders had well orchestrated runs.
Do you have sara lee in your cupboard?
i'll take starting with 50 :)
I think you meant to say 1.
The penny market has become a complete scam. It is not a way for companies to raise funds for legitimate business endeavors, it has become a way to raise funds to pay salaries in order to be able to continue to raise funds and pay salaries.
Thousands of companies out there that run at huge losses, promise the world, never deliver and then just keep doing it.
Throw on top of it all of the tributaries of pure stink that branch off from that money flow and you have a system that has become absurd.
Every day I can read umpteen excuses about why simple universal good business practices are not being done. Why?
Because one of those tributaries flowed into their account and they don't want it to dry up.
Great post.
I laugh every day at the unbelievable defenses put up for stocks that are absolute garbage.
It is an interesting psychological study. People will engage in complete fraud and will lie through their teeth because they have lost so much money and have convinced themselves that it is the fault of others.
It's sad, really.
I think it'll eventually will go much higher than 0.05,
I think it will too!!!
After the next reverse split it will be above a nickel for sure!
20100225|EXPH|63000|2588000|O 24.4%
This is incorrect.
63000/2588000 = 2.43%
YM=abc^2-2
Who cares what it shows YOU.
Menards has an awesome selection of quality custom cabinets as well as a big selection of lower tier cabinets. I was simply refuting the false statement that they needed etc. as much as etc needed them.
They don't need any new cabinet companies.
Scoreboard.
awesome dude!!! up 20% already!!!
obvious who was to blame for the collapse of this stock.
In fact I dont think I have ever seen a clearer example of it.
Shareholders should be very upset at management for the complete destruction of their investment.
Even with the ask thin there isn't enough buying pressure to move this up.
Have we received an update yet about how many shares were traded in the .002s now?
hahahaha.
what specifically do they supply to menards?
The bid was dropped through pure manipulation
I will make sure the CEO knows and looks into who exactly made that trade..I see some are talking about a can of worms..The can just got opened...veno
please ask JD to find out the identity of the tape painter today too. That was pure maniplulation and it is a crime.
amazing what passes in this system that needs to be disinfected.
still waiting for responses from JD.
tic toc.
i think the manipulative trader that painted the tape with 750 shares should be carted off to jail.
oh the humanity.
then you didnt look close enough. They have many lines of custom cabinets that are of great quality.
the cabinets they stock are unfinished.
must have been easy questions.
Has anybody had any questions answered lately from JD?
If yes could you please post them?
I still have not received answers, but perhaps nobody is.
I guess nobody has an answer to the math.
Perhaps somebody can explain how the short volume on 2/12/10 was 3.5 million shares which was 100% of the total volume and yet the short interest was only 5?
How did they cover the 3,499,995 shares?
Thousands of these examples available...
Hmmm. What was somebody saying about wrong?
Perhaps somebody can explain how the short volume on 2/12/10 was 3.5 million shares which was 100% of the total volume and yet the short interest was only 5?
How did they cover the 3,499,995 shares?
lucy,
the question you need to ask yourself is if what all the short selling conspiracy proponents say is true...
How could AVEW have 299844 out of 350000 shares shorted on January 29, yet have there be ZERO short position at the end of the same day?
It is mathematically impossible. If the MM's shorted 299844 shares then they could have only covered 50156 shares that day leaving 249,688 shares short at the end of the day.
Well there were zero shares of short position. So how is this possible?
Its because people are misinterpreting what the daily short volume is.
That is exactly what 4kids said earnest.
aerp = just another otc bb co. destroyed for profit by those who can
It appears we all agree that management was the problem.
what do they make at the ARTS factory?
Shares?
unfortunately I have not received a reply with answers.
perhaps somebody can explain something to me...
The short position on December 31 2009 was 5 but the "short volume" was 3000000 on Dec. 31 and the total volume was 3482499.
How can this be?
out of curiosity how could the open short position for PSGI at the end of january be 163 yet on January 29 the short volume was 124711 and the total volume was 191777?
I am not going to discuss any theories, what I will tell you though is it doesn't need to be gagged to request certs (as proven by JD) and the transfer agent's job is to account for the shares.
It is not a semi annual, annual, qtrly., or special event kind of thing. It is what they do every single day. It's kinda like oh *gosh* their job.
Considering all shares have to be accounted for and certificates were pulled in some cases..
Just curious why when the certs were requested 6 times for the share buyback the TA wasnt gagged during that period?
I mean if requesting certs requires a gag and all why not then?
Oh wait. Thats right. You dont have to gag a TA to pull certs.
You also dont have to gaga a TA to account for all the shares.
Thats what a TA DOES EVERYDAY. Such a joke.
Isnt it a bit disigenuous to say that 90% of expo's shareholders don't even visit this venue, but then use as evidence for a conspiracy that lots of trades go "unclaimed" in this venue?
Just curious.
Can we see a copy of this vote anywhere?
Can we see a copy of the actual wording of what you voted on?
Why were materials not distributed to all shareholders after they were distributed to shareholders that attended the meeting?
It's ok. I already know the answers so dont waste your one post tomorrow.
contact finra and ask them directly
it's the daily volume done short out
of each day's total volume
The trouble is people don't understand what this statement means. But hey just keep on believing that it means people are shorting these stocks and causing them to go down.
Even you cant argue with a straight face that shorting is causing PSGI to decline in price.
Whats really funny though is that the big "short" days are when this stock goes up.
Funny. At least to those that get it.
And you have even less proof that he isnt selling.
Until we see proof that they are actually doing something other than printing shares, running at a loss, and just acquiring companies for what appears to be the sake of sending out PRs and selling shares then this thing is a huge risk.
Instead of being upset about people that have been right repeatedly having "no proof", why not find some proof that shows we are wrong?
I suggest you call them tomorrow, it will be enlightening to you.
I count 4,473 instances of people not understanding the data presented.
I am not one of those people.
That is the point.
This argument has little to zero merit
That was kind of my point.
I suppose you are also in the camp that when a stock goes through a reverse split that anybody short is completely off the hook for covering?
Thats a cute little picture.
Too bad you don't understand the way things work.
Or is it your stance that several of the stocks sitting at .0001 that showed 100% short volume were from people or market makers "shorting" because they expected the stock to go lower?
Funny stuff.