Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I hear ya Capt, LOL, I guess that did sound like pumping although I do believe 100% in what I said. Still holding every share I've ever bought of IBCS. So it might be a pump, but it definately ain't no dump. lolololololol
I hope you are right and the CMKX listeners stay and invest. Although, it really doesn't matter as far as the success of IBC radio. It would just be a plus.
I agree that CMKX has had an impact on IBC listeners. No doubt about it. Although, so did QBID, and now you rarely hear a call about QBID. Soon, the same will be said for CMKX. And IBC radio will still be there growing stronger waiting on the next QBID or CMKX or who ever it may be. Listener base is growing, and it will grow with or without CMKX. The pay to listen is just another revenue stream for IBCS, and is needed because of the popularity of IBC radio, not because of the popularity of any one particular stock. Subpenny stocks come and go, and through it all, IBC radio will be there to cover the ups and downs as they have done from the very beginning.
Sorry DB and Capt. if this was out of line, just had to defend IBC because they are so much more than just a mouthpeice for CMKX. Soon we will all know just what IBC radio is all about. And it's gonna be HUUUUUUUUGE!!!!!!!
LMAO, I think most of us are.
LOL, I know lots of really good trading info was posted during it, so that made it all worth while as far as I'm concerned. You know, sometimes it takes an arguement to get two good traders together. I mean, as we all know, traders in general are some arrogent SOB's. LOL
Oh, I have, and they've been some doozies going on in there. By the way, before I get something started, I definately didn't mean anything by that soap opera statment. Because I feel both you guys have tons to add to any thread, and I enjoy reading both of ya.
No, I'm not nervous, I've enjoyed the hell out of the soap opera I've read for the last few days. LOL, that along with the excellant bounce and trading stratigies. This has been great, and I'm glad you guys worked out you're problems, seems like a great thread, thanks for the welcome.
Just read through the last 40 or 50 posts here and, WOW, I feel I've just went to school and took a course on bounce plays. Thanks for the great posts lance and harbs, board mark added.
PISTONS BY 20
PISTONS BY 14
GO PISTONS...............lolololololol
Yea but that's the Piston's game plan, and they are executing it to a T. Hey don't sweat it, ya'll have another half to try and figure out those Pistons. NOT
Lakers score 32 in the half, that's what you call DEFENSE
GO PISTONS
The reason Detroit didn't just hack someone and put them on the line is because they play GREAT defense. And if they had it to do over again, they would probably do it the same way. Don't discount this team, because DEFENSE wins titles. Maybe more so in the NFL but it is still very important in the NBA.
LA really impressed me early in game 2 playing good D, not usually even in their game plan, but they did it pretty well. Looking forward to game 3, should end up being a pretty good series, even though most Laker fans were expecting a cake walk.
Excellant post nyc, and I have to agree that when I first found this board it didn't take me long to figure out that I was in the vast minority. Stricky a liberal monopolized board and they want to say that we can't debate a subject and all they want to do is ignore a post. Go figure.
It probably would be great to trade on the Aussi exchange, except hey, I have enough trouble keeping up with what's going on over here. LOL. Not to mention the wife if I told her I was going to stay on the puter trading for 4 or 5 MORE hours a day. LMAO, I don't think so.
Thanks DB, that's what I like about this company, everything out in the open. Thanks for the DD
I hear ya, I got a few I'm gonna get out of and roll it over too.
Me too Bob, their millions are really making me jealous, with my little ¼ million.
That is what this bitpass is going to do. Give us more exposure and more potential investors. And keep in mind only so many shares to go around.
Exactly, you hit the nail right on the head there. Many stations unhappy with their present programming will probably want to get IBC broadcasting on their station ASAP. Great post lotsofdough.
I agree, it is kind of hard to understand at times. I guess what we have to keep in mind is that there are still alot of people that have not heard of IBC radio, and we know that is going to be changing once this technology is announced. I liked that one link that DB posted and IBC was refered to as a pioneer. In time, I honestly believe, IBC radio will be a household name known world wide. This is just gonna take time and I guess the good thing about it is, I'll have time to add to my holdings.
What's up intheknow, ready for a good day for IBC?
Ok sarals, I just finished reading Kerry's plan, and I will say he talks a good game, although some of it I had to just laugh at a little. Some things are much easier said than done. North Korea is going to be a hand full, no doubt. Now, let me ask you something. He didn't say a word about Iraq except that we're wasting our time there. What is his plan, leave things as they are now in Iraq, and move on to other problems in Iran or N. Korea?
Well, now that's definately the easy way out now isn't it. 9/11 must have had no impact in your life, or did you just blame that on Bush too. LMAO
You know what really gets to me is that the main stream liberal media can't even let a former president get into the ground before they start bashing. It is in very poor taste in my opinion and just shows how ignorant, immature, and bias they are. If I had hard feeling about a former democrat president, I would atleast show the respect to let the man get a proper burial before saying a word. All of our former leaders need that respect as far as I'm concerned, especially one the calliber of Ronald Reagon. It really just makes me sick.
TERRORISTS FOR KERRY
By DICK MORRIS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
June 5, 2004 -- OSAMA bin Laden could have made a good living as a political consultant if he did not choose to kill babies in stead. The al Qaeda/Ba'ath Party strategy in Iraq and Afghanistan is, at core, a political one. They seek not just to pull Iraq into chaos, but to defeat President Bush as well.
Every bomb, terror attack, suicide raid or urban guerilla offensive is aimed squarely at ending Bush's political career. Ironically, the real test of American resolve will not be our willingness to stay in Iraq, but our desire to keep Bush in office.
The history of terrorists messing around with the political systems of their victim countries is a long one. The Viet Cong/North Vietnamese Tet Offensive in January 1968 set in motion a chain of events that led to Sen. Eugene McCarthy's excellent showing in that year's New Hampshire primary, Robert F. Kennedy's entry into the presidential race and, finally, Lyndon Johnson's withdrawal from the contest.
In 1994, when Yasser Arafat wanted to defeat the moderate Labor Party in Israel so he could posture himself in opposition to the hard-liners, he resorted to terror attacks in Israel right before the election. The carnage so shocked Israeli voters that they turned against the frontrunner — Labor candidate Shimon Peres — and elected Likud hard-liner Benjamin Netenyahu instead.
In March of this year, al Qaeda turned the Spanish election on its head with its railroad bombing and defeated the favored candidate from the party of pro-Iraq war President Jose Maria Aznar and elected an anti-war socialist instead.
But to fathom the al Qaeda/Ba'ath strategy, we need to remember how the Iranian militants manipulated the hostage crisis in 1979 and 1980 to defeat their bete noire, President Jimmy Carter. By dangling and then retracting the hope of releasing their hostages, they made Carter look weak and overmatched. Once Reagan won, they quietly let the hostages go. As he was sworn in, they were flying home and Carter was frantically handling the wire transfers of funds to pay their ransom.
Al Qaeda and the Ba'ath Party want to defeat Bush to avenge his tough stance against them after the 9/11 attacks. They know that John Kerry would usher back the Clinton days of timid U.S. reaction and that the Democrat's likely repeal of vital sections of the Patriot Act would open the door for their terror strikes in America.
The thugs want Bush out and are determined to ratchet up the cost of the Iraq War to bring about his ouster. That's why they will target any American they can. By having the troops continue their current activist role in Iraq, Bush is sticking to his policies at the risk of committing political suicide.
Turning sovereignty over to Iraq won't stop the terror attacks. They will decline only after Bush is either re-elected or defeated. It is the elections in the United States, not those in Iraq, that the enemy most seeks to influence.
Bush's surrogates should bring to America the message that the terrorists would be overjoyed to see the end of his presidency.
During the Cold War, American politicians regularly used to campaign as the candidate the Russians wanted to lose. Bush's people should begin to speak of the message a Kerry election and a Bush defeat would send to the terrorists. The Spanish example is worth citing.
It is obvious that Osama and his allies all want Bush out. It might profit Bush's supporters (though not the president himself) to point out this obvious fact to the American people.
The Center for Constitutional Rights does not apply to the savages that decided that it was OK to fly 747's into the World Trade Center Towers, killing thousands of innocent people. God, how quick we forget what brought us to this point in history. Or is it that you just don't care?
I agree DB, that's 3 posters today with over a cool million. Way to go guys.
Wow, I can't believe it they sold me 40,000 at .028, thanks guys LOL, that takes me up to a ¼ million (250,000) Yeeeeeeeeeehaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
I have the same trouble. Try this. Click the audio streaming, and move it over the middle of the screen and then delete. See if that works.
Sounds like a plan, good luck to us all.
Man, good luck, I've only got 210,000 so far, but if you start thinking about all the shares that are held and not in the market for trading, you see what a rocket we are sitting on. Man this is exciting.
Thanks DB, now this is for Terrence and maybe it will help him understand why we don't trade high volumes. Someone earlier today stated that they had 2.1 million shares of IBCS. That is over 5% of the float if the float is 40 million. Take into account all the other longs that have not sold a share and you will understand why the low volume, and the very best part is, that when this great news hits, and there are not many shares to be had, BOOM, we're going up, and going up in a hurry. Maybe that helps a little bit.
Does anyone know the float at the present time? Isn't it like 40 or so million?
WOW, 2.1 million. You really are a phat kat. LOL
Good luck to us all.
Your always gonna have people in IBC that don't know what they're holding, probably sold those shares to buy CMKX, lol
Ol slim tells it like it is don't he. It really is a riot listening to some of these CMKX'ers. LMAO
Muley, was that you? Good job bud calling em the fudge brothers on the air. LMAO, I liked that lololol