Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
U.S. District Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Foley Square)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:09-cv-04297-UA
05/01/2009 1 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from the United States District Court - Eastern District of Texas; Case Number: 5:08-cv-199 DF. Original file with documents numbered 1-22, certified copy of transfer order and docket entries received.Document filed by Scanbury, Inc., Marshall Feature Recognition LLC.(ama) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/7/2009: # 1 doc.3, # 2 doc.4, # 3 doc.5, # 4 doc.6, # 5 doc.9, # 6 doc.10, # 7 doc.11, # 8 doc.12, # 9 doc.13, # 10 doc.14, # 11 doc.15, # 12 doc.16, # 13 doc.17, # 14 doc.18, # 15 doc.19, # 16 doc.20, # 17 doc.21, # 18 doc.22, # 19 doc.23) (ama).
(Entered: 05/07/2009)
05/01/2009 Case Designated ECF. (ama) (Entered: 05/07/2009)
05/01/2009 CASE REFERRED TO Judge Richard J. Holwell as possibly Related to 1:04-cv-3026. (ama) (Entered: 05/08/2009)
That scenario does not need to occur for PHEI to do well in the meantime.
In my personal opinion it will be the other way around when TR clears his restrictions with the SEC. I think that PHEI being publicly traded, will absorb GSI and TR will resume at the helm. IMO he is still the driving force behind both Co's. All pure speculation on my part but thats what I believe at this time.
It is also my opinion that the GSI and Phantom Game Store will be one and the same. Phantom may wrap it in their own skin etc but the content will come from GSI. I am expecting the Phantom Game Store to relaunch within the next 30 days or so. All IMO of course.
GSI has not launched thier service yet so there is no current revenue. They are also a private company but the agreement calls for PHEI to receive 7% of GSI gross revenue plus a 49% ownership of a revenue generating and hopefully growing and profitable company can only help PHEI financial statements. The future value of GSI will have a direct impact on the value of PHEI all IMHO.
Also this prior post provides an indication of timeline.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=36685471
Here's a better look at whats going on with GS, good to know that PHEI holds 49% of GS and will get 7% of all gross revenue. Bigger opportunity than the lapboard IMO.
http://games.gamestreamer.net/
Item 8.01. Other Events
At the annual shareholder meeting of Biophan Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on September 12, 2008, shareholders were asked to approve a proposal to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock to 800,000,000. The meeting was adjourned with regard to this proposal until December 1, 2008, and further adjourned until February 4, 2009 (subject for further adjournment by those attending the reconvened meeting) or such earlier date as the Company obtains sufficient votes to approve this proposal. At the reconvened meeting on February 4, 2009, the meeting was further adjourned until February 26, 2009 (subject for further adjournment by those attending the reconvened meeting) or such earlier date as the Company obtains sufficient votes to approve this proposal, and the location of the reconvened meeting was agreed to be the offices of the Company at 15 Schoen Place, Pittsford, New York 14534. At the reconvened meeting on February 26, 2009, the meeting was further adjourned until April 30, 2009.
At the reconvened meeting, Mr. John Lanzafame, the Company’s CEO, reported that only 41% of the outstanding shares voted in favor of the proposal to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock. This measure required over 50% of the outstanding shares to vote in favor, and the large number of unvoted shares prevented this threshold from being reached. Accordingly, the proposal was not approved, the vote was closed and the meeting ended.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1084000/000114420409023829/v147953_8k.htm
Look at the 30 trading day low close for the most probable explanation of recent PPS action. Don't forget who's driving the bus!
Is it really naked SS if you have access to virtually unlimited numbers of shares with which to cover?
IMO it's manipulation alright but some are focused on the wrong target.
Will Getting More Passionate About Mobile Advertising Deliver Profits? PLUS Reality-Check For Ad-Funded Content Schemes
Author: Peggy Anne Salz
Between Mobile Advertising U.K and research and interviews I am conducting for MSG’s own MobiAD World Focus project, I am sharply focused on finding answers to the “big questions” in mobile advertising. The obvious question (Where is the money?) came up during last week’s European Mobile Media Conference in Prague. It’s not an easy one to answer, but Jonathan MacDonald, an esteemed colleague who also has a long track record in advising companies on their mobile strategies, was up to the challenge.
He turned the question around and showed in his presentation that the money is where it always was: With people we are best advised to stop treating as consumers. (You can view Jonathan’s slide deck along with a few others here, thanks to Jan Rezab from HungryMobile.)
So, how do we get our share of the money out there? Jonathan suggests companies position themselves closer to people and respect their requirement (particularly in the mobile space) for conversation - both with the brand and with their peers. In a nutshell: “Abandon control of communications and realize that advocacy is more powerful than you. Provide facilities and utilities for people to talk with each other and listen [to what they say].
The next step is about creating and co-creating experiences, products, and services that people value. Get that right and the way is clear to pursue a strategy that will ensure you get your share of the money. I won’t give it all away here (and perhaps you’ll have to attend Jonathan’s upcoming mobile advertising workshop), but let’s just say a big part of it is “creating things that are open, customizable, extensible, and share-able.”
http://www.msearchgroove.com/category/mobile-advertising/
Enough with the chart predictions already, even the most respected are wrong as much as right. Notice the date of the post and what happened after Dart's prediction.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=36018676
Latest Blog post
Posted in Message from the CEO on April 27, 2009 by phantomadmin
Here is the latest Transmission:
Hi John,
They did send us the membrane on 17, but the quality is not as good as we need. QC asked them to rework, and the supplier will send us the new membrane on April 29, 2009. I’ll watch this schedule.
Best Regards,
Jennifer/Ione
Hopefully have more info in a few days.
http://pheiblog.wordpress.com/
NITE and other firms under SEC scrutiny.
SEC Fines Specialist Firms for Unlawful Proprietary Trading
The SEC brought enforcement actions against 14 specialist firms for unlawful proprietary trading on several regional and options exchanges. The firms agreed to settle the SEC's charges by collectively paying nearly $70 million in disgorgement and penalties. According to the SEC's order, the firms engaged in improper proprietary trading on the American Stock Exchange, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, and the Philadelphia Stock Exchange. The SEC charged the specialist firms for violating their fundamental obligation to serve public customer orders over their own proprietary interests by "trading ahead" of customer orders, or "interpositioning" the firms' proprietary accounts between customer orders.
The SEC instituted settled administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings against eight specialist firms for unlawful proprietary trading on several regional and options exchanges: Botta Capital Management L.L.C.; Equitec Proprietary Markets LLC; Group One Trading L.P.; Knight Financial Products LLC; Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing L.P.; SLK-Hull Derivatives LLC; Susquehanna Investment Group; and TD Options LLC. The SEC filed civil injunctive actions in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York charging 6 Specialist firms for engaging in unlawful proprietary trading on the Chicago Stock Exchange (CHX). The defendants are Automated Trading Desk Specialists, LLC (ATD); E*Trade Capital Markets LLC (E*Trade); Melvin Securities, L.L.C. (Melvin); Melvin & Company LLC (Melvin Co); Sydan, LP (Sydan); and TradeLink, LLC (TradeLink) (collectively, the Defendants). Without admitting or denying the allegations set forth in the complaints, the Defendants have consented to the entry of orders permanently enjoining them from engaging in the violations set forth above, and have agreed to disgorge ill-gotten gains totaling in the aggregate over $35.7 million and pay civil penalties totaling more than $6.7 million. The orders are subject to the approval of the Court.
http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2009/03/sec-fines-speci.html
I'm on the bid but have only got 10000 shares so far today
NeoMedia is licensing its technology to foster innovation.
Significant to me in that it does not say wants to, or would like to, or anything of that nature it says IS
Emerging Stock Report: EmergingStockReport.com initiates research coverage on: NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (OTC BB: NEOM)
Apr 20, 2009 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX) -- NEOM | Quote | Chart | News | PowerRating -- Emerging stock report is currently offering a complimentary trial subscription. To view our research go to www.emergingstockreport.com Emerging Stock Report a leading provider of independent investment research, today initiated coverage on:
April 20, 2009 -- NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (OTC BB: NEOM), the global leader in mobile barcode scanning solutions, was selected by IQ mobile, the leading mobile marketing company in Central Europe, to provide 2D barcoding services for their advertising campaigns. The first campaign launched using this technology was an interactive advertising campaign to promote Nokia's new Navigation phones in Austria, which recently concluded.
About ESR:
Emerging Stock Report is a leading provider of independent investment research in North America our services include, research analysis on the small cap markets, real time news and financial data, market commentary and the ESR newsletter .Emerging Stock Report's staff of small cap investment professionals is dedicated to providing the emerging market's investment community with the tools and avenues necessary to make the important investment decisions. To view our research reports on a complimentary trial basis and take advantage of our other services go to www.emergingstockreport.com and click on the complimentary trial subscription button on our home page, or go directly to our registration page at www.emergingstockreport.com/register.php
ESR Disclosure: Emerging Stock Report is not a registered investment advisor and nothing in this release should be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell securities. Emerging Stock Report has not been compensated by the above mentioned companies.
CONTACT: Emerging Stock Report e-mail: info@emergingstockreport.com WWW: http://www.emergingstockreport.com
M2 Communications Ltd disclaims all liability for information provided within M2 PressWIRE. Data supplied by named party/parties. Further information on M2 PressWIRE can be obtained at http://www.presswire.net on the world wide web. Inquiries to info@m2.com.
For full details for NEOM click here.
Related News [NEOM]
Emerging Stock Report: EmergingStockReport.com initiates research coverage on: NeoMedia Technologies...
NeoMedia reports deal with IQ mobile and use of its technology in Nokia campaign
Nokia Navigation(TM) Phones Launched with Innovative Campaign from IQ mobile and NeoMedia
PennyStockChaser.com: NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (OTC BB: NEOM) Hot Stock on the Move
StockProfiler.US: NEOM, SSHS, AZPN
More News >>
http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/2279795/
damn your fast
I felt that the commentary regarding the CTIA position being reconsidered was very significant.
Good or not so much?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Will DataBar Kill The Self-Checkout Produce, Coupon Nightmare?
Written by Evan Schuman and Fred J. Aun
April 16th, 2009
Grocery chains have for years struggled with self-checkout systems that couldn’t easily deal with produce, POS stations that simply couldn’t handle complicated coupons and barcodes that didn’t understand expiration dates.
But in a move that many in retail IT see as the potentially biggest change in product labeling since the rollout of the UPC barcode 35 years ago, DataBar is looking to sharply increase its retail presence as of January. Among the chains most vocally advocating for the advance are American chains Wal-mart, Winn-Dixie and Krogers plus Canada’s Loblaw.
At its core, the DataBar codes are today’s barcodes but are much more tightly packed with much more information. “The UPC barcode has served retailers well, saving them more than a trillion dollars in its lifetime, but technology moves along,” said Jon Mellor, spokesman for GS1 US, the United States arm of the international standards body GS1.
Another GS1 official, senior director of industry development Stephen Arens, argued that some promotions today cannot be completely encoded in the UPC found on coupons. That forces cashiers to look at a customer’s order to validate whether the promotional products are included in the items purchased. They then have to key-in the discount amount.
The DataBar will theoretically eliminate all that and “really increase the opportunity for the cashier to just scan the coupon,” Arens said.
Consumers will also find it much easier, he said, to use self-checkout lanes for buying fruits and vegetables once the items are labeled with DataBar stickers and the kiosks are adjusted to read them. Instead of having to use a touchscreen to input a PLU number (that they often must look-up first), buyers will be able to scan produce just like they do with most other products.
DataBars attached to produce tell retailers not only the price and type of product but can also include the name of the vendor (Dole, Del-Monte, Chiquita, etc.), recommended freshness expiration data and other useful information. “Produce retailers will be able to get brand-specific information rather than commodity-level data,” Arens said. Mellor added that the DataBar approach will allow for easier labeling of more perishable products costing more than $100, while the current UPC variable weight system can only go to $99.99.
But not all of this transition will be akin to scanning sugar and spice. Most chains will have to absorb non-trivial costs to support the upgrades, a tricky move at a time of store closings and massive layoffs. Most product scanners built since 2000 are capable of reading DataBars but investments need to be made beyond just the scanners.
To get the advantages from the new codes, all kinds of middleware will also likely have to be upgraded. “It may be that it’s not in a company’s near-term budget or plans to upgrade its scanners, but doing so is just a matter of going through the process of having either the scanner suppliers, field engineers or retailers’ front-end staff and engineers activate the capability and make sure the software is ready to accept and process the data,” Arens said. Retailers are “‘getting product-specific sales information for detergents, pasta, refrigerated meats, dairy products,” Arens said. “All that information is flowing to buyers, space management systems and other places and it’s all driven by UPC data. Many of those same decision-support systems will be able to be used by the produce department now.”
One of the attractions of the new codes is that they seem to be addressing true pain-points for retailers today, especially in the self-checkout and expiration date areas. Some retailers have been talking up the imminent changes. (Editor’s Note: Some of those anonymous comments are from execs working for very large chains. We’re linking to those comments for a reason.)
In theory, a lot of the benefits promised—but not yet delivered–by DataBar could also be delivered by item-level RFID chips, which also promised a lot and has been very slow in delivering and only for those rare trials where a retailer is pursuing item-level. Although we’re hesitant to compare two not-yet-delivered technologies (In the land of Vaporware, the more imminent rollout is King), DataBar seems to be much closer to delivering and it’s approach seems to have side-stepped many of the cost and technology hiccups that have been holding back item-level mass acceptance. But Arens argued that DataBar might help advance both, with DataBar seen by some retailers as an inexpensive “transitional step” toward item-level RFID labeling. “The software and applications they put in place for the GS1 DataBar have the same data structures,” he said. “Some retailers believe this is a good transitional move.”
DataBar also should be able to help with marketing objectives, such as keeping track of which brands are selling better. Mellor said the GS1 DataBar can be used in the deli/fresh meat/seafood/poultry departments for many of the same reasons as produce because it provides “enhanced product description information, such as Brand A vs. Brand B vs. Brand C.” Retailers can also encode into the DataBar labels a “sell by” date on store-packaged food that would be “caught at the front end if there were some out of date packages in the meat case.”
“The uses of additional data available with the DataBar are especially relevant for in store-packaged fresh products,” said Dan Grady of C-Core Retail Consulting. “Companies are considering what data elements might enable closing the loop on traceability, updating the POS with date-of-package sold, for true production planning, carbon footprint and other item information that may enable improved fresh execution and reporting.” Grady noted that those in-store use discussions “will require scale companies to support the DataBar for in-store products and vendor/retailer collaboration.”
After 2010, the next “sunrise” date for DataBar adoption is Jan. 1, 2014. That’s when GS1 US recommends all other categories of retailers “consider preparing point-of-sale hardware and software systems to scan and process” the new labels. It said many appear to be going forward already. “Examples of industries expressing interest in implementation of GS1 DataBar prior to 2014 are healthcare, magazine publishers, cosmetics, jewelry, and categories of fresh foods, such as meat, poultry, and fish,” said a GS1 US statement.
http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/supply-chain/will-databar-kill-the-self-checkout-produce-coupon-nightmare/
http://www.gs1.org/productssolutions/barcodes/databar/overview.html
BC, I appreciate your insightful posts for the thought provoking positives that you bring to the table. However the innuendos that conversion features of debt instruments is somehow not important does not sit too well with me. We all want a piece of the pie here, and it's IMO, important to know whether that pie will be divided into a couple billion slices or the potential 48 billion that was just reported in the 10K. Some very knowledgeable posters reside here in the asylum but at times, refrain from sharing knowledge because it may offend a few of the cheerleaders. The potential share count has improved tremendously with recent developments but we are not completely out of the woods just yet (thanks Clawman,YJ,Beam, Koko,and several others for tolerating my skepticism). I am and have been an avid supporter of NEOM for the most part, always believing in the promise of the tech. I have bought stock when NOONE else would and believe that I/we have earned the right to ask questions without being chastised. This board has educated many many folks in all aspects of our investment. I hope the board as a whole, drops the recent gang attack censorship of posts with differing views of what DD is important. Most longs know what we own, regardless of the risks, why would we avoid discussing them?
Regards,
Interest rates on the various YA financings range from 8% to 15% and all were funded prior to the patent decision (except for the most recent $500k). The default rate on all of the CD's was 24% which was just waived by YA, so there has been recent improvement in financing terms. Hopefully the trend will continue and NEOM will become more credit worthy.
Not all mine just 250k but i'll take it nonetheless. Up 18% on that one so far
Sweet , had a buy order in at .023 and they filled me at .0211
My point was that there is no mathematical way that Series C conversions could account for all of the dilution. If series C conversions stopped on Feb 17, there has to be another source.
AS 12/31/08 = 1,371,904,960
http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1022701/000114420409020478/v145996_10k.htm
AS 4/06/09 = 1,749,733,152
http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1022701/000114420409020138/v145850_ex10-14.htm
Dilution 12/31/08 - 4/06/09 = 377,828,192
Total shares traded Jan 01/09 - Feb 17/09 = 152,529,457
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=historical&cb=1239823917&symbol=NB%5ENEOM
Max number of shares held by YA on Feb 18 @4.99% = 69,860,000
Total trades + max holdings = 222,389,457
Where did the other 150mm shares come from?
Big thanks for that link, exactly the language I had been looking for to confirm recent posts. Claw disregard my last post and forgive my skepticism.
I'll be anxiously awaiting the 10Q for confirmation. The quoted section relates to financial reporting obligations for derivative instruments.
For each convertible instrument, we evaluated all significant features and, as required under current accounting standards, aggregated the components into one compound derivative financial instrument for financial reporting purposes. For financings recorded in accordance with FAS 133, the compound embedded derivative instruments are valued using the Flexible Monte Carlo methodology because that model embodies certain relevant assumptions (including, but not limited to, interest rate risk, credit risk, and conversion/redemption privileges) that are necessary to value these complex derivatives.
Equivalent amounts reflect the net results of multiple modeling simulations that the Flexible Monte Carlo Simulation methodology applies to underlying assumptions. The assumptions included in the calculation are highly subjective and subject to interpretation.
Almost reluctant to make this post as it will be seen as negative by some, but very important to know for sure IMO.
Claw, am I reading your posts correctly? Is it your opinion YA has lost all future rights to convert Series C and only stand to recover the 8% dividend and face value of the remaining 19,000 plus Series C? I am happy with the clarification of voting rights but still unclear regarding future conversion rights. TIA
More new developers/publishers on GS website, getting bigger and bigger.
Recognise the first one?
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/
http://www.kalypsomedia.com/en/index.shtml
http://www.1cpublishing.com/
http://www.phoenixgamesgroup.com/
http://www.zushigames.com/
http://www.freeloader.co.uk/
http://www.alten8.com/
http://www.novalogic.com/
I'm talking votes, not shares.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=32804332
The presence at the Special Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of voting capital stock outstanding on the Record Date will constitute a quorum, permitting the meeting to conduct its business. As of the Record Date, the stockholders held a total of 3,230,944,960 votes, including 1,300,244,960 shares of common stock and 19,307 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, each share of which is entitled to vote the equivalent to 100,000 shares of common stock. As such, holders of at least 1,615,472,481 votes must be present at the meeting, in person or by proxy, to obtain a quorum. Proxies received but marked as abstentions and broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the meeting.
http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1022701/000114420408056844/v128341_pre14a.htm
Unless they hold a majority vote IMO.
Old post from another Co. but please explain why it would not be relevant.TIA
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=32976053
I'm still here and picking up shares. Some real BS trading going on though. I sat on my bid at .0006 all day and the MMs traded below my bid on at least three trades. Never did get filled except for 2900 shares, my commission costs were many times the stock value LOL
That's the way I read it also, and I don't like it!
Nice day all around!!
Appears to me that someone is quietly accumulating here.
Quiet is an understatement btw.
Where is everyone?
All of those patent applications have been abandoned according to the USPTO website.
It is my opinion that the future of this company resides in the game store and their revenue sharing affiliation with GameStreamer. I have been watching the progress of those websites and they seem to be coming along nicely. Someone is working on them on a daily basis.
Company appears to be in a stealth mode, probably waiting until they are actually ready to launch both the lapboard and the game store. Stock price is flat and this board is dead.
Oh well, nice opportunity for me to quietly accumulate.
http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair
http://www.gamestreamer.net/
http://www.streamserv.com/index.html
http://games.gamestreamer.net/
Here are a couple of old posts that relate to your question.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=31242436
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=35673498
Trying to get in cheap eh lol better get the 1's while they last!!
ARSC Volume alert .0008x.001 Looks like it will run on that news!!
News for 'ARSC' - (ARSC Board Authorizes Spin-Off of Hydra Fuel Cell to Shareholders)
HOUSTON, Apr 07, 2009 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- The Board of Directors of American
Security Resources Corp. (OTCBB:ARSC) has voted to spin off its wholly owned
subsidiary, Hydra Fuel Cell Corporation (www.hydrafuelcell.com), in a special
dividend to the shareholders.
The plan approved by the Board calls for a significant investment directly into
Hydra before the spin-off. The spin-off will be submitted to the shareholders in
a proxy which will describe the transaction and contain the ratio of Hydra
shares to ARSC shares for the dividend. The company expects to have the details
of the spin-off completed within 60 days. After the spin-off Hydra's stock will
trade independently
Frank Neukomm, Chairman and CEO of ARSC, explained, "A spin-off is the quickest
and most effective way we could find to get the remaining investment that Hydra
needs to complete certification and begin commercial production. We have had
discussions with European investors who have expressed an interest in
participating in this with us. Considering Hydra's $21,000,000 order backlog and
its technologically advanced HydraStax(R) fuel cells, we believe that this is
the best method for our shareholders to receive the benefit of the significant
value that Hydra has created which is clearly not reflected in the price of
ARSC's stock today."
American Security Resources Corporation
ARSC is a holding company developing clean energy technologies. Its Hydra Fuel
Cell Corp. subsidiary is developing high volume, mass producible hydrogen fuel
cells. Its American Hydrogen Corp. subsidiary is developing methods to
inexpensively formulate hydrogen. The Company also has created a financing arm,
American Security Capital, to provide financing options to buyers of the
subsidiaries' products. For more information, please see:
www.americansecurityresources.com
Safe Harbor Statement
This news release contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of Section 27a of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21e of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Although the Company believes the expectations
reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can provide no
assurance that actual results will meet or exceed such expectations.
SOURCE: American Security Resources Corporation
CONTACT:
American Security Resources Corporation
Frank Neukomm or Bob Farr, 713-465-1001
info@amsrcorp.com
Copyright Business Wire 2009
-0-
KEYWORD: United States
North America
Texas
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: Energy
Alternative Energy
Other Energy
SUBJECT CODE: Dividend