Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I copied and send.
Just send another e-mail to JB:
Jonathan,
we need good news and div. update A.S.A.P. or all your efforts with R/S will be worthless.
Regards,
Solidgold
Gam ata! Peace and prosperity to everyone!
Doc, this is Lem who is vacation boy, not me. As far as buying something else I have to sell this one 1st @$120 PP new SH.
Jonathan, it is time to move up!
I have a better idea: lets buy it together. Doc, another mil and we could do it.
Play for yourself song "Aruba, Jamaica, ....". I'm sure that you can name this tune.
GO LEM GO!!! And the best of time to you and yours!
This is exactly that I was asking him yesterday (and not for the 1st time), no answer yet. I think announcement about a new record and pay dates would do wonders for this stock now. Apparently JB is not ready yet to do it, than I would agree that RS was done a litle premature. RS should be done together with new record and pay date annoucements, and effective right before the float. IMHO
Something to read part 2:
NPfIT systems failing repeatedly
20 Sep 2006 Click to see the
11 reader comments below
More than 110 major incident failures have been reported by hospitals and GPs over the past four months relating to systems provided by the NHS National Programme for IT.
The problems, which have affected dozens of hospitals across England, were serious enough to be logged by NHS managers as ‘major incidents’. The issues were revealed by an anonymous NHS IT director speaking to Computer Weekly.
The IT director told the magazine: "Some NHS trusts that have implemented Connecting for Health [centrally-bought] solutions are struggling to cope with poor system performance and service availability issues.
"The local service provider is working flat out to resolve the issues. However, a great deal of damage has been done in terms of deteriorating end-user confidence and satisfaction with respect to the systems."
E-Health Insider understands that the 110 serious incidents reported by Computer Weekly may actually understate the true number of problems. Industry sources say that some problems are routinely not reported or recorded or classified as less serious. For instance, the July data centre failure that affected 80 trusts is understood to have been counted as a single major incident.
EHI has also learned that a 9 September failure that resulted in the iSoft system delivered by Computer Sciences Corporation to Morecambe Bay Hospital NHS Trust becoming unavailable to all staff was only treated as an 'amber' incident, rather than a 'red' major incident.
The contractual specifications for services to be supplied under the NPfIT say that staff and clinicians will receive sub-second response times, with 99.99% availability. But in many cases staff have found systems can either be extremely slow, impossible to access or unavailable to them for hours or even days.
The extent of the problems raises basic questions about the architecture of the programme and the belief that only a highly centralised NHS IT programme - delivered at considerable cost by large international consulting firms - can deliver the reliability of systems needed in the NHS.
While the early problems will hopefully just prove teething problems, they raise the spectre that staff will not be able to fully rely on CfH systems and will still need to maintain old systems and paper records. The programme has yet to begin widespread delivery of clinical rather than administrative systems.
Some of the problems have occurred with failures with picture archiving and communications systems (PACS), resulting in clinicians not having access to digital x-rays and other essential diagnostic images, or unable to access work lists. In one incident reported to EHI, a trust still technically had 'access' to PACS but was unable to view or transmit images.
According to Computer Weekly, there have been occasions when PACS has gone down during the course of an operation in which clinicians needed a copy of an x-ray to refer to, forcing the surgeon to suspend the procedure until a hard copy could be found. In the future such a backup may not be available as digital x-rays are meant to completely replace ‘wet film’ images.
About 20 of the breakdowns caused simultaneous problems across several NHS sites. The most serious, triggered by a failure in a national data centre at Maidstone in Kent in July, led to systems at 80 hospitals and primary care trusts collapsing for up to four days.
Trusts have frequent failures with patient administration systems becoming unavailable and staff and clinicians losing access to their systems, leaving them without details of appointments or planned treatments.
Problems with the Cerner Millennium system at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre earlier this year led to a sharp increase in patients waiting times, breaking national targets, after patients were lost in the system or dropped from waiting lists. Other trusts have reported recurring problems with being unable to log on to systems or access patient information.
Other reported problems have led to vaccination rates in London dropping by up to 19% following failures in BT’s child health system. Patient records disappeared at trusts in the North-west region following a series of software errors. In July E-Health insider revealed that Birmingham Children’s Hospital NHS Trust had found outpatient appointment data for 800 children became unviewable to staff after a botched software upgrade.
Richard Bacon, a member of the Commons public accounts committee, said: “This is the latest evidence that there are serious and growing problems with the whole NPfIT in the health service.
“In many respects the NHS IT programme is making things worse not better, while sowing distrust and disillusionment across the health service. The tragedy is that if the NHS continues on its present course, a huge amount of money will be spent and much of it will be wasted.”
CfH said that the NPfIT was working well, and the errors that are being reported are being looked into before the whole project eventually goes live. The DH agency said that trusts could fall back onto manual systems if electronic systems became unavailable.
“Any interruption to service is unfortunate but trusts have tried and tested manual systems to provide continuity of care. Service availability is typically much higher than for systems procured before the NPfIT.”
CfH added: “We expect performance to compare favourably with any large-scale organisation that uses IT – especially in the first year of operations.”
© 2006 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Something to read:
Once again Connecting for Health (CfH) appears to be displaying a taste for brinkmanship as negotiations with Accenture over its position on its two billion pound LSP contracts go to the wire on a 28 September deadline. With negotiations still in 'flux' it is not clear whether Accenture will continue as an LSP wholly or partly, or whether rival LSP Computer Sciences Corporation will take over.
But while the accountants, lawyers and management consultants earn their fees and cut deals, most of the NHS awaits for puffs of smoke to emerge. Unfortunately it is local NHS organisations that are paying the price as progress across the hospitals sector in the northern clusters has largely ground to a halt.
It is no exaggeration to say that the trusts are being almost entirely cut out of the loop on fundamental decisions about their future IT provision. The priority appears to be about CfH and its prime contractors cutting a high stakes 'deal' to keep a version of the programme going and preserve reputations.
Given the well-documented problems of CfH - particularly on problems with key software delivery and lengthy delays - it might seem an opportune moment to take stock and reshape the project. Conversely, other NHS veterans argue that it is now, when the programme is at its most vulnerable, that CfH needs the greatest support or politicians will label all health IT a failure and claw back funds to tackle NHS deficits.
Lem, thank you for keeping me up!LOL
Lem, only you could come up with it. Are you drinking yourself now?
I already bet the max, pushed the handle and was left to pray.
MCA, I can relate to this big time! But what other choice do we have? We ether believe in company and hold, or we don't and sell. I'm holding mine.
Hey guys and girls, cheer up!!!
I believe that Jonathan is doing his best in trying to build a real company in one of the most difficult areas of the market.
Let's give him our support and prayers, and strength on holding on to our shares for much better times ahead. The company is moving forward and PPS will follow. GLTUL
Lem, you are not the only "lucky one" my friend.
When I look at some of mine cost basis per share after R/S I wonder how long it'll take me to get to $18.60 PPS?
So we are getting new partners and the partners of the partners. Still no word about divy. We took the risk and it would be nice to start getting some rewards by now.
Here is one more response from JB:
Dear Jonathan,
I hate RS, but trust your choice. Still waiting for the great things to come for all of us in the near future. Always my best wishes to all of you!
Will hold strong with great anticipation for the very best.
Solidgold
--------------------------------------------------------------
Solidgold,
Thank you. The plan was well thought out and for good reason.
Things progressing very very well with Vodafone and the NHS as with Oracle and the new projects. We are at the National EMIS users group for the next two days giving us the opportunity to market MedifyRemote to EMIS's users on a national basis. The feedback so far has been favourable to say the least.
I am building to a close on this which will result in my ambition and belief that Medify is and should be a significant corporate entity. In order to ensure this, the pps has to be strong and we can no longer afford to be a penny stock as we are now active and commercial partners with some of the worlds largest and leading corporations.
Once again thanks for your comments and your support.
Jonathan.
Talking about my neighbor and partner Oracle. It's doing not bad at all. May be it's a good sign for us.
So, if I see it correctly, we are all of old timers of MFYS agreeing on the latest positive developments for this company!
And as much as we all hate R/S we all say "welcome home " to MDFY and "G 0 J O H N Y GOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!"
It's trading!
A promised PR should be in today after closing.IMHO.
As much as I hate RS I see progress with the company in the right direction. New price, acquisition, low float,new partners, euro divy and projected income should move us way up.
GO JONATHAN GO!!!
Both companies are practically neighbors in the same building.
Clancy, can you post a link to this please? Thank you.
Just shows 0 for bid and ask.
I got my new shares posted. No trading info according to my broker.
Lem, another "Dock of the bay" please. Thanks.
So after buying us out it'll be easier for him to count-the price is going up ! I would sell for 20 billion dollars!
Should I tell them, they right around a corner from me?
Good morning. I see .20bid/1.01ask. It should have PR before trading. JB wake up!
Herbie, where did you see "30,000 units in Aug. 2007?" Thanks.
Doc (until you change your verylongon to something new), my experiences on RS were from bad to dead. The only positive I can say at this point about RS is that I was thinking about this myself as no other choice seems logical by now.
The name of the game didn't change : CONTRACTS and REVENUES, but possibility for a big reward after such a heroic holding from us longs is getting slimmer.
Jonathan, you owe us big time, so GO JOHNY GO!!!
Clancy, please have mercy om my grammar.LOL
But this is a jury to whom material facts have not been given or given properly. And this jury could be a victim big time.
JB is still making mistakes in this statement (14 instead of 20) and no mentioning about div. But I guess I 'll take it as an answer on my last e-mail.
Why was no statement given about RS in September Update?
Did the company new about this just a few days ago and misled
again? I even don't want to start listing all of this stuff what I would call at least misleading. I send another e-mail to JB, but don't anticipate any answer from him. Even if I would get one I'm not sure how much value I could give it.
Capitain, my thoughts axactly. And why the announcement about RS after the delay of lunching on German exchange so far? Looks like it was the only solution for proper lunching.
No way div will be based on present number of shares or 28th of July! Record day may be extended.IMHO
And what was the purpose for Forward 4:1 split earlier?
In general this is not a good news. It proofs to me the company doesn't even knew which direction to go, forward or reverse. It will kill all iadeas of bagger returnes and admites that company was not able to implement the original plan. And usualy stock goes down after R/S if no major benefits provided rigth away such as higher listing. But Stock targets could be finally on target after this one. Saying all of that I have to admit that RS was always on the back of my mind. For JB I have no comments and still have nothing from him yet. Sorry for mistakes.