Remember one thing caty a dog enjoys a bone. Doesn't he?

Leo, I really do not care if you think my opinions are naive, and incorrect. But one day my past post will materialize then you will have to acknowledge who was right all along.

By the way, I see you too do not like to hear the ugly of a company.

In my opinion, today's PR was all hype. We all knew that they were reducing cost.

Above is based on my opinion.

learn, wayne, ward, caty, happydog ....

learningasitgoes, "you stated, either you are stupid or you have no regard for the thoughts or feelings of others. Since you could care less about anyone else, why should anyone care about whether you are happy or not?"

I am giving opinions and it has nothing to do with the feelings of others. If others take offense to the messages that I post it is their problem. I do not post messages with the intention of offending. By the way you are right when you said, why should other care about me? The option is there to put me on ignore. Your opinions does not offend me.

Wayne, you need to learn about spec stocks. True, some Nasdaq stocks go under. Peter Lynch stated that a stock under $5.00 a share is more likely to go under than a stock over $5.00 a share. There is a reason why he stated this. Now, what does that make a spec stock? Another thing, I never said that HISC is a bad company, I said it is a spec stock, a stock that would make me alot of money or make me lose a little money.

You stated, "why are you here anyway, I know you're not an investor." Your statement is ridiculous.

What does the word cariture mean? New word to me. I never said that caty talks bad about me, but I would say one thing, all of her posted messages tells me alot about how she feels about me. Ask me if I care?

Ward, you stated, "your conduct when using iHub should reflect an appropriate respect and consideration for the other members of the site." An opinion is not a loss of respect. If others take offense to it that is my problem. Opinions are not factual so one should not get offended by them. Another thing, many here disrespected me and used comments like the above and you do not see me complaining, meanwhile you're trying to insinuate that I am not complying with IHUB.

At least you're not stating any wrong doing by Frank Moody. You are careful in choosing words though you still believe Frank Moody committed a wrong doing.

Caty, agrees again.

Happydog, how valuable is caty? Don't answer.

I never bashed, nor trashed, nor insinuated any wrong doing by the HISC. I am a shareholders of HISC. So, all the messages that I post on HISC is opinions.

It might sound redundant but the fact is that I am responding to a post which dismisses me from being redundant.

It is good to know that you read my post and agree and disagree with some of my post. I do not take offense to opinions, even if I am refuted.

Another thing, before accusing me of being redundant see why I posted that why. Could it be that I responded to someone's post?

bobby, you don't even know what the word spam means. Opinions are not spam, and what I gave was an opinion.

The problem with many on this board is that they cannot accept the bad and ugly of the company, all they want to hear is the good about the company. HISC needs to hear what we hate about the companyand this does not indicate that we are trashing the company.

I never bashed, nor trashed, nor insinuated any wrong doing by HISC, I am a shareholder. As I previously mentioned, they have a fiduciary obligation and responsibility to shareholders, we are entrusting them with our money.

You guys are the ones that are trashing and you are doing it to the one who left the company so that the company as a whole does not get the blame.

Remember you win as a team and you lose as a team. If you are correct about Frank Moody then Fred had to be part of it. He was part of the team, wasn't he?

The above does not conclude that Fred does not know what he is doing. I am certain that he is taking every measure to establish HISC as a reputable company, a company with high potentials and future expectations.

Above is based on my opinions.

Dirt, in response to Wayne, I agree with you.

Let me also add that many on this board are throwing the blame on Frank Moody when in fact Fred was part of that group. Many on this board stated that Frank Moody screwed up. If this is true and Fred knew about it and stood quiet then he's just as quilty. Unless he is blind to the operations of a company.

Amazing, that when a CEO leaves shareholders tend to put all the blame on them. Assuming it was true, then the new CEO is responsible to clean up the mess, but it should not be use as and excuse to justify the negativities of the company.

A public company has a fiduciary obligation and responsibility to do everything in their power to better the company and increase shareholders value. Remember that we shareholders are entrusted them with our money.

Another thing, it is illegal for a company to misappropiate shareholders money for personal gains.

Wayne, HISC is a spec stock, and with spec stocks one invest with hope expectations. If you disagree then you need to learn more about spec stock.

Wake up from your dream.

By the way, if little HISC post a net profit with the amount of shares outstanding then they will no longer be a spec stock and they should immediately up-list to one of the exchange.

Reality is that it would never happen unless they merge.

I say a merger with Actsoft because they're both small companies. If Motorola becomes interested in HISC they would buy them out. The question that we need to ask is .... for how much?

You guys who are expecting HISC to post a net profit keep on dreaming.

Yes, they will improve in lowering their expense.
Yes, they will buy back shares.
Yes, they will retire more shares.
Yes, they will get approval of some patents.
Yes, they will get new partners.
Yes, they will sell more CT.

Regardless of the above, the only way they will make the shareholders happy is by merging with Actsoft. This has nothing to do with the PPS. The PPS will move with good news, news that Wall Street wants to hear, but to expect a profit I do not think so, unless they merge.

Above is based on my opinion.

Ward, HISC generates revenue on sell of product, residual income, commissions and software. Please explain software. Does it have to do with Actsoft?

Ward, when are they expecting to post earnings?

This is the HISC board, but since you guys are bring up other pinksheet stocks, let me give you one .....

PGPM <---- remember this simple

You post did not say anything but hype. What should Fred do to better shareholders? Your opinion would be good to read.

Will cable internet be obsolete?

Have a built in cyber tracker in the computer with a satellite address and you are connected to the internet.

badge, check out this link .... http://criminal-justice-online.blogspot.com/search/label/police%20cars

Actsoft is performing, they have a good management team.

This is old news but a must read on Actsoft ....

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/03-12-2007/0004544564&...

I have a .25 cents sell order with an expiration date.

badge, check out this link .... http://www.actsoft.com/pdfs/products/Cyber%20Tracker%20Slick_Security.pdf

Look at Actsoft logo on the address, nice logo.

True, the foundation has to be poured first, but all the material are present.

One product is not going to do it for a company.

badge, I disagree .... like I previously mentioned, they should start now in creating a software division. It would not interfere with them pushing the CT. Don't wait. Once the software is created they can start selling it as one unit.

A small company with a combine hardware and software pruduct would position themselves to be a takeover candidate (my opinion)

Buzly, you're partly correct ..... I have a sell order on my shares.

You're wrong on the discussion .... It is good to discuss penny stocks, input helps all shareholders and tells us if we should risk more.

Buzly, HISC is a spec stock,

* one buys into a spec stock risking losing it all.
* one does not sell a spec stock unless the PPS rises.

Once you learn what is a spec stock fear of losing it all is irradicated.

Ruminate on this .... Don't invest in spec stock if you are not willing to lose it all.

Dirt, the word getting should have been omitted, oops.

You know how in New York, if you do not pay tickets on your vehicle and it gets over a certain amount they tow your car away? Think about it, the city can save alot of money by shutting off your vehicle until you pay your ticket. Then this would require that all vehicles have the deviced installed.

Anyway the above would never happen, it will give the city the ability to shut off all vehicle if they don't want vehicles on the streets for the day, not to mention, if the computer fails we are all screwed, LOL.

Take the above as humor and not as an opinion or thought.

Since HISC is getting involved in the M2M industry they should really make every effort to merge with Actsoft or consider opening up a software division within the company. This way they can create other types of programs to work with the CT which will allow them to sell a complete unit to other companies.

Also, they need to get other software companies to use their products here in the states. They might have made the CT to work with map point, but they need to get Bill Gates to use their CT.

HISC can position themselves to be taken over because they are the "first" with a revolutionary Cyber Tracker."

The wireless GPS/Data device is the first location based device with the ability to run data and voice at the same time. Traditional devices running data applications are not able to provide voice conversations simultaneously.

It will be nice if Oracle systems takes them over. Oracle System is an insuperable company, they are incapable of being passed over.

It is important that they merge with a company like Actsoft, because it is the only way they can positioned themselves to be takeover.

Ward, why is HISC only pushing one product, the CT? Don't they have other products, like the Cyber Rad and Cyber Shield?

Diversification of products is the key to generating high revenue and building positive cash flow. One product is not going to do it.

With all the accomplishments that suppose to take place in the 3rd quarter will it move HISC PPS up?

Board is quiet today. Maybe shareholders are discourage? Maybe shareholders has not else to say, but wait? Maybe shareholders are getting sick of me? I bet is the latter one.

Learn the game, play the game, win the game!

Leo, what is your opinion on the EVSY spin off, and what do you think HISC and Actsoft should do.

Leo, the choir is listening, LOL.

Gcanderheggen, what's funny is that we can talk to friends but nothing happens, LOL.

CPA get's paid to work your numbers. I don't think they will position themselves to recommend something, if it backfires they are burnt as a CPA.

Yes, this is why I think that the EVSY deal should have never happened. $500K could have reduced the number of shares another 800 thousand.

Jimmy, they can get the PPS over 2 cents without executing what I posted in the past. They need to buyback or retired more shares which will bring investors in due to low float of shares.

Also, several PR's in one month with sell orders will capture attention and buyers will come in, ultimately moving the PPS.

Ward, do you really think they merged? Yes, they purchased 40 millions shares of Evans stock (50 plus percent), and though Fred Wick called EVSY our sister company he also stated them to be two unique companies.

An opinion based on a thought: Maybe they did want Frank Moody to be CEO of EVSY, but because the shareholders have bitter towards him they used the endorsement excuse to be at peace with shareholders. We all know that they stated that they did not endorsed Frank Moody as CEO of EVSY.

All of the above is based on an opinion whether one accepts it or not and is given in a form of an opinion whether it is hypertical or not.

As we all known opinions are not factual. Under no circumstances am I bashing, nor trashing, nor insinuating any wrong doing by the company. all of the above

My last post for the day ....

Since the merger between HISC and EVSY did not happen, can it be a possibility that HISC and Actsoft would merge, or Actsoft acquiring HISC? Remember, Actsoft probably pulled away from being acquired because the merger did not happen and what I stated in one of my previous messages that I posted.

It would be ideal and benefit us shareholders for both HISC and Actsoft to merge and HISC proceeding with the changing of the name to GLOBAL TEK. I can see this happening and I hope it does. I will be happy if they give me 1 Actsoft share for every 25 shares of HISC I own.

Actsoft has the customers, is generating good revenue, posting net profits, and with a name like Global Tek will capture the eyes of other companies.

Above is based on my opinions.

Enjoy the day,

http://www.hissusa.com/press.php?sub=pressReleases&showAll=1

The above link says it all .... It depicts Frank Moody as a CEO who got things done. The minute he leave sharehoulders starts criticizing him. Not to mention, Frank Moody was relected as CEO of HISC.

I believe that the reason the Actsoft acquisition did not go through was because they were a profitable company and had alot of expectation. They probably felt that they should have acquired HISC not the other way around. I am certain that it probably also had to do with Frank Moody's departure. Frank Moody looked like he had a good relationship with Actsoft.

Read the 10/18/05 PR if you want to see the truth about Actsoft. They were profitable.

The problem with shareholders is that .... when a company has problems and the CEO leaves they immediately want to blame it at the one who departed. Just remember, Fred Wick was part of the team, if Frank Moody did something wrong then Fred Wick is just as quilty.

The above probably is going offend most of the shareholders on this message board. But who cares, the message that I am posting is intended to offend anyone, I am giving an opinion.

What's more important is if both companies signs a distribution agreement, not the approval of the GSM version.

Sandan, if there was a wrong doing in the accounting why didn't they prosecute Frank Moody? Maybe the numbers were right afterall?

Re: HISC

Leo, no need for that. Many on this message board are allowing opinions to offend them. As much as they bad mouth me, I kept my cool. Your opinions are offending some as well.

I agree with you that the message spencer posted was ridiculous. This is not a kindergarten class. By the way, I do respect spencer but don't alway agree with him and he knows that.

I played enough penny stocks that I know what I am talking about whether one accept my opinions or allow my opinions to offend them. There is a reason why I position myself substantially.

Many of the messages I posted were removed, but they had to repost them. They cannot censor my opinions as long as I am not in TOU violation. In my opinion they were censoring me unethically. I commend them for construing my messages and reposting them back.

Some sarcastically said good luck trying. After I proved them wrong they did not respond which demonstrates how childish they were.

What makes a message board is opinions whether one accepts it or not.

Above is based on my opinion.

Yes and no. I look at it this way, retiring them now allows the possibility of the PPS to rise. This would be due to less shares with profit expectation. Just my opinion.