Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
yes. probably. still, whole sector is really weak. possible pressure on crude to fall below $24 nearterm. alzo, very mild weather in east, storage glut, refiners still at/below 95% capacity even w/outages.
you probably know all this, i'm just venting because i stayed too long at the party on my APA calls. looks like war premium getting squished out of prices. of course, it doesn't take long to jam it back up...
regards,
larry
thread, re: INTC; furthur headcount reductions may be announced after earnings tomorrow. might be a little pop there. of course, jmho, bwdik...
larry
Joe, re: JNJ
"15-Jul-02
07:26 ET Amgen to attack J&J over anaemia drug Eprex-- FT (OPENX) : The Financial Times reports that AMGN is expected today to launch an attack on the safety of JNJ's anaemia drug Eprex; the article states that AMGN's move is an attempt to distance itself from side effects linked to Eprex, which is made by JNJ and licenced from AMGN; AMGN fears that the problem could threaten its two biggest selling products, Epogen and Aranesp, which are almost identical to Eprex and accounted for more than half its $4 bln revenues in 2001." from Briefing.Com
Finn, careful on RD, may not be a bounce.
"15-Jul-02
07:31 ET Royal Dutch: $7.4 bln of bets on power prices could be worthless-- FT (RD) 48.80: The Financial Times reports that former exec George Namur claims that RD's Houston energy trading business has made $7.4 bln of bets on future US power prices that could prove worthless; Namur alleges he was told to come up with optimistic forecasts of future power and gas prices that would justify the deals to Shell head office, and he also questions the way the transactions are treated in the group's accounts." from Briefing.Com
i kinda figured it had to be 'roundabout'.
so:
1. you save it to disk
2. convert it to a 'gif'(?)
3. upload to another site.
4. save it as a 'www.mysite/mycharts/mychart.gif.'
5. link it into an iHub post w/new 'earl'
6. and voila!
actually, do you need to convert the format? bobZ says '.png' should be ok, but, limited to newer rev browsers.
anyhoo, got to kick the crude and barnacles off my own site and get it into the 21st century.(g)
thanks dude,
larry
augie, how the hell did you get 'stockcharts.com' charts to post? if you've already 'splained this, would you point me to msg?
TIA,
larry
zeev, thanks for the USPI suggestion. solid little outfit. i like it.
regards,
larry
very nice summary; thanks, doug.
larry
doug, thanks for your explanation.
it would be cool to be able to temporarily 'un-ignore' a post within an array of message boxes. my programming skills are quite rusty by now but it sounds like an c++ object type of definition where the hidden text string can be toggled between private/public states.
again, it would be a cool design function but it probably falls in the category of 'creeping elegance features'. (g)
regards,
larry
INTC reports next tuesday, 7/16, after close. looking for ll cents. headsup, ladies and germs...
so am i. the dynamic between Zeev and Larry was very useful. where Larry mapped the channel, Zeev played inside it. quite informative.
...rats...
hi guys,
it doesn't hurt to prepare for the worst, but, it's not yet clear to me that the thundering herd of SI whacko's are going to pay for that same level of access on iHub.
alzo, i think there are a goodly number of SI posters who got free memberships because of a loophole in the agreement between NDB-Ameritrade and SI. i know, i did.
holy crap! I must be an SI whacko! [the whacked are typically the last to know.]
anyhoo, SI ignore feature works fine clicking thru 'single post' mode but 'next 10' mode prints all the message boxes even if they've all been tagged 'ignore'. that's an interesting visual commentary in itself.
i suspect this is some particularly complicated db code kung-fu. so, as far as i'm concerned, take your time, get it right.
finally, i think most of us appreciate how much you guys have accomplished w/available resources. it's a hell of a job, my hat's off to y'all. have a great vacation, bz.
regards,
larry
[edit] oops, this should be directed to matt & bob, sorry rick.
i came
i saw
iHub...
.
.
.
burmaShave
this seems pretty unusual to me, bwthdik...
"July 9, 2002
Lucent Panel Broadens Inquiry to Superconductor Papers
By KENNETH CHANG
[http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/09/science/physical/09BELL.html]
A panel investigating possible scientific fraud at Lucent Technologies' Bell Labs has broadened the range and scope of its inquiry to include at least four papers on novel superconductivity experiments.
Editors at Nature, the journal that published the papers, were told of the decision on June 24. "Bell Labs called and alerted us the three superconductivity ones were also subject to the investigation," said Karl Ziemelis, an editor at Nature.
The panel is also examining at least one superconductivity article in the journal Science.
In May, Bell Labs set up the independent panel, led by Dr. Malcolm R. Beasley, a professor of applied physics at Stanford University, after outside scientists had noticed that identical graphs had appeared in several Bell Labs papers, even though they supposedly described different experiments.
The lead author of the three superconductivity papers, like the articles questioned earlier, is Dr. J. Hendrik Schön, a scientist at Bell Labs in Murray Hill, N.J., who is the focus of the investigation. Dr. Bertram Batlogg, a former director of solid state physics research at Bell Labs and now a professor at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, is an author of two of the papers. Dr. Batlogg is also an author of several of the other papers, which described transistors and other electronic devices built out of organic molecules.
Dr. Schön declined to comment. Dr. Batlogg has not returned calls.
The investigation has put in limbo an offer to Dr. Schön by the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research in Stuttgart, Germany, to become director of one of its departments. The institute sent Dr. Schön a letter of intent in March, before the investigation started.
"This is at the moment canceled, and we wait for news to come from Bell Labs," said Dr. Bernd Wirsing, a spokesman for the Max Planck Society, the umbrella organization that runs the institute. "He has not yet received a contract from the Max Planck Society."
In the superconductivity articles, published in 2000 and last year, Dr. Schön and other Bell Labs researchers described how they had varied the behavior of several superconductors — materials able to carry electrical current with almost no resistance — by applying an electric field to add or remove electrons.
Scientists were initially excited about the technique, because it promised to allow them to study superconductors in more careful detail than had been possible. But other researchers had not been able to duplicate the experiments.
The Bell Labs scientists published one paper about calcium copper oxide, an exotic high-temperature superconductor that is not well understood, and another about soccer-ball-shaped molecules known as buckyballs that act like traditional superconductors.
"The mechanisms for superconductivity in the two cases are obviously different," said Dr. Philip W. Anderson, a professor of physics at Princeton University.
Scientists noticed that the curves that described how the superconducting temperature changed with the number of electrons added or removed were "surprisingly similar," Dr. Anderson said.
"If the data came up that way," he said, "you would notice it and be it a little amazed. But it wouldn't be impossible. But when there's suspicions, this is another amazing coincidence, if you like."
Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company / Permissions / Privacy Policy
i'm seeing a current price @ $20.80, last traded @ 4:09, on yahoo.
ELX @$40 seems like a fantasy these days...bwdik (g)
larry
this came out a little earlier, fwiw...
"08-Jul-02
Enterprise Hardware Q2 Preview : Goldman Sachs's Laura Conigliaro remains cautiously upbeat and expects most of their cos to make numbers; credits large systems/storage vendors in-line performance to price stabilization, seasonality, curency benefits, and lowered June qtr expectations; believes SAN component cos will continue to see accelerating growth. Firm stresses visibility remains weak for the heavily back end loaded Sept qtr but adds that any Q3 est revisions should be relatively minor; maintains that enterprise systems and storage valuations are close to or within pre-bubble ranges."from Briefing.Com
emphasis added.
larry
thanks, bob. stockcharts just won't come up for me. i'll keep working at it.
larry
bob, just checked source on stockcharts.com
and it looks like they're using macromedia fireworks which uses the .png graphics format. is that a problem?
alzo, what about a site local repository for limited-life chart storage?
larry
USPI, thanks. i agree on the THC perspective, just thinking they might be good for a 'buck r 2' wed, thurs. longer term, i was looking at TRI, STJ, DGX.
larry
hi zeev, in the health sector, what do think about the prospects of THC? i think they report this thursday and they usually beat estimates. just did a 3:2 split. TIA,
larry
nice chart.
this is a welcome feature for a stocktalk thread. great software 'kung fu', guys.
larry
"It works for messages written *to* you."
D'OH!!! there it is. thanks, bob.
"...I like to chat...so I hope they increase the posting limit..." well, pony up some bucks ya cheapskate.(vbg)
larry
hi bob,
i don't see the 'keep' link on my screen. and yes, i'm a subscriber.
thanks,
larry
now all we have to do is convince Zeev to post here.
this is a nice site, relativly uncluttered, improved since my last visit.
re: yahoo group boards: clumsy, cluttered, with irritating ad layout. only go there to get larry D's charts.
looking for just a little AMAT market pop to sell my QLGC above 48.
man, did i ever get INVN wrong. i know it won't get back to 30 anytime soon, but is there any reason for it to hit 15? it still looks unique in its niche, so my bet is it will recover some traction soon. if not, why not?
what's with the 10 posts a day rule? softy, this has got to cramp yer style, bud. (g)
larry