Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Gee, bleah, I guess the foundation sent Robby Boyd a fake C&D too, eh? The our-street documentation notations have been explained endlessly; you choose to ignore the explanations to maintain your delusions.
Berge-stocklemon also had info posted on the bond some time back.
Howzie-that claim will come soon. It's part of the power of the Shorty/Broker/SEC/Illuminati conspiracy to deny the peeps their deserved wealth.
Gry-you don't know what the hell you are talking about, and you certainly have a total ignorance of civil procedure.
Good god gry. An SEC complaint is not heard on the date it is filed. BTW "civil restrictions" have nothing to do with jail.
But if you enjoy looking like a know-nothing, feel free to keep it up.
gry, you couldn't be more wrong. The complaint was just filed, and isn't on the docket. Good grief.
Good grief, shaman, the SEC only has the authority to suspend trading for 10 days, that's why. You might want to learn the basics before making foolish claims.
Liquid-you will have to wait until PACER updates. Rufus had sufficient time to file a brief and memo of law in opposition to the motion, and he did nothing. It was essentially a default decision.
Really, les? Are you familiar with SRCI, IFTA, AZNT, IBZT, CYPT, VLPI, RNKE, and a host of others? All fraud on the pennies is blatant, and it's done for money.
For that matter, why did Key Lay take the risks he took? Or Jeff Skilling?
And yeah, you will get jeers. If you think that your company is the victim of price manipulation or "naked shorting," you don't engineer a trade suspension and a fraud complaint. You fill a suit against the supposed miscreants.
The sheer absurdity of the Rufus claims prompted an unusually rapid SEC response.
Please, stushy. The SEC documents make it painfully obvious that the bond claims were bogus. And this case goes far beyond the bond issues.
You would think that one peep in the Atlanta area would have attended the hearing. Odd that nobody has posted notes from it.
I guess the granting of the TRO kind of took the wind out of their sales.
Right, SS31. It was all part of the plan. BTW if you believe Rufus' claim that no insider shares were sold, then why is the SEC asking for disgorgement in their complaint?
Jim Bishop-so did Altomare and a host of others. Give $50 and you too can put it on your resume. I'll front your contribution through my US bank so that you don't run afoul of US elections laws governing contributions by foreign fishermen.
Nonsense, gry. The ruling is on a TRO, and a ruling in Rufus' favor would mean only that the information provided by the SEC did not justify the TRO.
Of course since Rufus never even submitted a brief and memo of law in opposition to the TRO-or to the hearing, for that matter-, rufus isn't going to win. You don't waltz into open court with a box of documents and say "here is the proof".
Did you not read the SEC exhibits? It is clear that Rufus committed multiple frauds on investors.
Oh nonsense, kili. Every sheep in every suspended scam makes that claim, and guess what: there is never any finding of overstepped authority. You don't understand civil procedure too well, do you?
Churak-it's not beyond belief that Ruffie forged his signature.
Liquid-you really don't understand much about state versus federal jurisdiction, do you?
Ask ruffie about his account.
Asset freeze next. Treasury Financial Fraud division has already frozen Ruffie's personal bank account.
If they scheduled homeboy rufus to testify in Sept., then the investigation started shortly after the stock started trading. Due process takes time.
LOL, bread. You must own CMKX too! Same level of denial on the part of the cult.
Or perhaps you are, shall we say, "close" to the company.
Gan-pure profit, yes. The "no tax" BS is a myth.
What the hell are you talking about, stushy? MM "approval" has zero to do with nasdaq.
And, sparky, this stock is forever dead.
Looks like the SEC is going to "reset" the price to zero.
LOL, dragon. Right. You always manage to sell at the top.
Post them all, tim.
Hunter-TRO granted.
Yep, sunny. They gave Rufus a lot of rope, and when he filed the phony SOX certification, they used it to hang him.
Nothing covert, cindy. Just a tie in to scammers involved in other scams. Their specialty is discount CD's that they short against. They also have a BVI corporation that they use as a front.
Defendant Rufus Paul Harris also known as Paul Rufus Harris
U.S. District Court
Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:06-cv-02568-CC
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Conversion Solutions Holding Corporation et al
Assigned to: Judge Clarence Cooper
Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Date Filed: 10/24/2006
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 850 Securities/Commodities
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Securities and Exchange Commission
represented by Alana R. Black
Securities & Exchange Commission
3475 Lenox Road, N.E.
Suite 1000
Atlanta, GA 30326-1232
404-842-7678
Email: blacka@sec.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Debbie T. Hampton
Securities & Exchange Commission
3475 Lenox Road, N.E.
Suite 1000
Atlanta, GA 30326-1232
404-842-7635
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
William P. Hicks
Securities & Exchange Commission
3475 Lenox Road, N.E.
Suite 1000
Atlanta, GA 30326-1232
404-842-7675 Direct
Email: Hicksw@SEC.Gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Defendant
Conversion Solutions Holding Corporation
Defendant
Rufus Paul Harris
also known as
Paul Rufus Harris
Date Filed # Docket Text
10/24/2006 3 CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 65(b) FRCP re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Securities and Exchange Commission (vs) (Entered: 10/24/2006)
10/24/2006 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Law in support# 2 Text of Proposed Order)(vs) (Entered: 10/24/2006)
10/24/2006 1 COMPLAINT filed and summon(s) issued. Consent form to proceed before U.S. Magistrate and pretrial instructions provided. , filed by Securities and Exchange Commission.
(Attachments: # 1 Summons # 2 Civil Cover Sheet # 3 Exhibit Index Exh. 1# 4 Exhibit 1A# 5 Exhibit 1B# 6 Exhibit 1C# 7 Exhibit 1D# 8 Exhibit 1E # 9 Exhibit 1F# 10 Exhibit 1G part 1# 11 Exhibit 1G part 2# 12 Exhibit 1G part 3# 13 Exhibit 1G part 4# 14 Exhibit 1H part 1# 15 Exhibit 1H part 2# 16 Exhibit 1H part 3# 17 Exhibit H part 4# 18 Exhibit 1 I part 1# 19 Exhibit 1 I part 2# 20 Exhibit 1 I part 3# 21 Exhibit 1 I part 4# 22 Exhibit 1 I part 5# 23 Exhibit 1 I part 6# 24 Exhibit 1J# 25 Exhibit 1K# 26 Exhibit 1 L# 27 Exhibit 1M# 28 Exhibit 1N# 29 Exhibit 1O# 30 Exhibit 1P# 31 Exhibit 1Q# 32 Exhibit 2# 33 Exhibit 3# 34 Exhibit 4# 35 Index of Exhibits)(vs)
Sabra is tied into the Swiss corporation Enterprise, a front for Israeli con men and the company behind the IBZT scam.
Emergency hearings and TRO requests are rare. They telegraph serious charges coming.
orders defendants to preserve business records
Mouse-the hearing isn't about Rufus proving anything. It's about ordering him to produce information or face contempt of court. The suspension is for 10 days, period, and it will trade on the gray market if it reopens. If a receiver is appointed, then it won't even trade on the gray market.
Jim-but the shell they formed GECC from was domiciled in GA, although incorporated in Deleware. Small world.
Chevy-it's a motion to compel the production of documents and records, a motion for a TRO against the destruction of records, and a motion for an asset freeze.
Berge-The BBAN scam ties in with some other interesting folks, including twice convicted Felon and document forger Jim Bolt of GECC fame, who now facing criminal charges for securities fraud.
Gee, whatever happened to Dragon? Is he at the hearing too?
But hunter, if Ruffie had done that, then the stock would still be at six pennies with no volume and he wouldn't have been able to rip of the $10+ million he stole from the cult.
Uh, liquid, the summons was issued because of his failure to comply with the subpoena, and the TRO is to prevent the destruction of documents and other records. And freezing assets.