Posts are opinion only. Not a recommendation to buy or sell any securities.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
RGLG - where strong hands live - lets get at that "scary" ask wall
I share the boards sentiments. At least we finally start seeing some action. Have to wonder what this all means...
I share the boards sentiments. At least we finally start seeing some action. Have to wonder what this all means...
someone w/ level 2 - post it
trash
Dollar amount sitting on ask at .0003 yesterday = $147,000
Dollar amount sitting on bid at .0001 today = $197,000
Hoping the dust settles soon... one way or another.
Can anyone post a Lvl 2 screenshot?
This is an online forum. This is not investment advice. DO NOT make trades based on advice from anyone other than a registered financial professional. Even then, do you own research and realize that anything can happen. Values can go UP or DOWN & the OTC market is known for being very high-risk.
No one knows the future - the past is not guaranteed to predict the future - That said, we all make our own decisions here & bear all the responsibility, as individuals, over how we buy & sell securities.
Where did Trisha Bollman go?
I thought she was listed as a consultant here in the past, but I cannot seem to locate her name anywhere in relation to RGLG... hmmm
Hilarious!
Next time I pass by I will try. There were a lot of workers there plus the city inspector so I didn’t want to get out of the car. When I found their address and realized how close they were, I just wanted to make sure it was legit since I hold a tremendous amount of shares. 👍🏻👍🏻
— K (@UntamedEngineer) April 5, 2019
Agreed.
Additional Texts from Tony Anish:
When asked if The Caravel Group is the "other entity" currently generating $12M here is the response from Tony Anish:
Tony Anish: "No we are working on acquisition of additional stock in Caravel as mentioned in press release but that is not the potential acquisition."
Me: "Is the potential acquisition already a part of MLHC or SQCC? If it's not Caravel, is it one of the other entities MLHC already has partial ownership of?
Or is it completely unrelated to any entity currently associated with MLHC & its subsidiaries?"
Tony Anish: "Completely unrelated"
The plot thickens...
I am seeking answers to the 700M+ increase to the OS.
Please read my last post again. The Series B Super Voting Preferred shares ARE being returned to the treasury - as stated by Tony Anish.
This has been debunked. The Series B Super Voting Preferred shares are being returned to treasury as stated by Tony Anish.
I'll see if I can confirm that thought.
what does this have to do w/ evsv?
Last paragraph in the article your quoting:
"Visit www.greenroadsworld.com to learn more about Green Roads and its 50 pharmacist-formulated CBD products that offer health and wellness specialists and patients a safe, effective alternative to toxic prescriptions and over-the-counter drugs. Green Roads products range from oils, edibles, capsules, terpenes, teas, coffees to creams and even a line for pets. Green Roads products are formulated in a state-of-the-art ISO clean room and manufactured in cGMP compliant facilities to ensure purity and potency. To validate that each new product batch is “clean” -- without pesticides, solvents, metals or unnatural substances -- all products are tested by a third-party lab that has ISO 17025 accreditation; test results for each product batch is accessible via the QR code on each product package."
What does Green Roads breaking into the Florida market have to do with EVSV? indulge me
Most visitors to this board have read this info tut. I would love to discuss the most recent findings we were just talking about, rather than recycling old news (which seems to be the status quo here)
I also have some of the same concerns you pose regarding SQCC fitting the description in the 2/21/19 PR.
Again, I was nothing short of grilling Tony for these answers & I am not sorry about my "tone".
Tony kept referring me back to the statement from the 2/21/19 PR:
“This is a fantastic transaction for M Line. M Line will control the public entity and I will take over as CEO. M Line will consolidate the results of the new company. This transaction is expected to close within ten days. This Company’s primary business will be in the hospitality industry and we plan to put our hospitality division in this Company including the new acquisition that we are currently negotiating. The new entity we plan to acquire currently generates over $12 million in revenue and is expected to grow to over $17 million revenue this year.”
I guess this is up to the individual investor regarding how to "digest" this statement. Unfortunately for those seeking actual answers the underlined statement above is quite implicit...
In regards to the 34 non-US investors with all those shares, I believe they were issued on July 22, 2013.
It is tough to tell if/how many of those shares are still held by the original 34 non-us investors. SQCC used to have operations in Hong Kong It's pretty hard to verify that piece. This will be the next piece I will fight to get clarity on.
Interesting text conversation w/ Tony today:
I'll spare you the exact conversation as some have a problem with my "tone" when I seek much deserved answers.
Few items revealed:
The 10,000 Series B super voting preferred shares are being returned to treasury.
MLHC is still in negotiation relating to the "new entity" mentioned in the 2/21/19 PR
Apparently, SQCC isn't the entity currently generating over $12M, that was in regards to this "other entity" they are still negotiating with.
Your welcome
Shocker, he has clarified the year end date.
Thank you Pistol, but I have read all the twitter updates. "By up to a week" is what they state in the post.
Unfortunately, I can no longer just "buy-in" to MLHC or its subsidiaries' implicit Twitter posts.
I have been burned too many times by believing "MLHC News" as such. What I am asking for is clarification regarding when the actual move-in date is.
Keep context in mind. We were explicitly told no dilution, company would pay debts w/ income from operations, etc.
From 10/10/18 twitter:
M Line Holdings, Inc. Eliminates Dilution Concerns Press Release: https://t.co/T6siI7Dbia We are growing exponentially! $MLHC
— M Line Holdings, Inc. $MLHC (@mlinehc) October 10, 2018
The current year end for this company is June 30.
Tony has mentioned changing their year end to March 31 or April 30.
We have not heard anything from the company & one of the proposed dates has passed.
What I am asking for in my text is clarification on the year end date
It doesn't take "cojones" to ask people to be accountable.
Text from Anish:
Me:
Not surprising - you missed the 3/31 year end deadline WITHOUT A WORD. Assuming you will miss the 4/30 deadline WITHOUT A WORD.
Rise JV still inexistent.
"Dilution Freeze" set to end soon. NO WORD ON EXTENSION - what a shocker....
Plus your plans for Castle Rock bar have been drawn on a mural w/ paint. Go check yelp, you'll see it. Looks very unprofessional.
No word from SQCC other than the same picture of an empty event center in the middle of a ghost town.
Delay on the new warehouse - now we have no timeline other than it's been "Delayed"
Really........?
Tony Anish:
not sure what you are talking about March financials are not due for 45 days and will be finished before then.
Rise jv is close. you do not understand the complications of this deal. warehouse was delayed one week and said so. you really need to be sure of what you are saying.
Me:
How would we know what's going on when you remain silent on these topics?
No one cares about Castle Rock. Instead, update us on these other topics.
Probably one of the most hated Co.'s & CEO's right now.
RSI on hourly looking crazy
Tony is either a born crook or he is 100% clueless & unfit to be CEO.
Great question, what I mean by "coming off the books" is this:
much of the debt is owed in the form of Convertible Notes. This is a loan from a lender that can be converted to shares if the lender so chooses. As we have been seeing, many of those note holders have converted, and have sold their shares, thus increasing the OS.
This is not an ideal situation for shareholders. Yet, when this happens the debt is reduced.
The lender is essentially trading the $$$ they are owed, for shares in the company. Many of those lenders have sold their shares. Some could have chosen to hang on to some, but it is at the lenders discretion.
The silver lining here is that for the shareholders who are still holding MLHC, our financials will look better as the debt will be reduced by all the conversions that took place.
KEEP IN MIND - NO the lenders are not sitting on billions of shares. They have sold the vast majority. I have confirmed this with the CEO directly.
Note holders who converted & sold shares have done just that: essentially sold their debt away via conversions. When financials are released, audited ones I might add, the debt will be reduced.
Clowns can cry dilution all they want. The Outstanding Shares have not changed. Yes we had lots of convertible note holders who converted & sold shares, but when that happens These Notes are coming off the books.
This looks like the impatient herd of new holders who bought over the last month closing their positions since the new public entity was just announced, and they were anticipating selling when this news was released anyway.
We need this type of VOLUME to churn out the flippers.
MLHC chart looks like its at one of the most bullish points we've seen in 2019.
Can you please clarify how marketing stickers really rev you up (your EVS*V ticker), but actual revenues (MLHC) do not have the same effect? Interested in your twisted explanation.
Clowns playing games trying to shake some shares loose.
Thank you! :)
Was that you who sold the near 26M shares today?
Everyone wants to be right & call things before they happen.
I will be patient with this one. Thank you for the panic shares. One less weak hand going forward.
They can boast of a buyback and only repurchase 10% of the shares if they wanted... IMO this is another empty promise that we will wait weeks (& much dilution) waiting for it to come to fruition.
They have increased the # of trading shares by more than 50% - So what if they start a buyback, they need to buyback ALOT of shares IMO for it to be noteworthy.
Seems that Tony doesn't care about MLHC. He wants to squeeze every drop of shareholder funds out of this ticker, then *possibly* move the operations into the new public entity.
His ambiguous worded PRs appear to only be an attempt to expedite dilution.
He states dilution "freeze" is negotiated, but leaves out any piece of concrete info. This way, there is less accountability & more flexibility for him to figure out the wording of another PR.
Thank you for another impartial & unbiased perspective. Its not 100% bull, 100% bear. Its not black & white. There are pros & cons to every company and its about time people start taking an honest & objective look at both sides.
187 million volume & the ask @ 4 has not changed. I wonder when the dilution "freeze" kicks in..... no dates given. only arbitrary wording meant to prod us into making assumptions.
This is misleading shareholders imo.
Thanks for the genuine response wilabee. That goes leaps & bounds on boards like these.
They are currently in negotiations w/ large retailers. SuperValu is one I can confirm w/ certainty as I have spoken w/ Jake Nelson - one of the leaders of the VEA team. I take a deal w/ retailers w/ a grain of salt... Sounds promising, but there are plenty of items that go unpurchased on the shelves.
I want to hear about this company farming hemp on the land in AZ, using their C-Pods, progress on the joint venture, progress on anything for that matter. All we get is more fluff IMO.
I don't want to hear about fluff plans like a RV park, etc. One piece that drove me nuts is when Tony talks about the large population to draw from in regards to those bars & event center... Look at the address on a map. This is baron land in the middle of a desert. I would be OK if Tony agreed, but he is misleading shareholders by stating there is a large population to draw from.
We want concrete numbers & a CEO who is true to his word. Ive said it before, transparency & follow-thru were the biggest things going for this CEO & he has made it a mission to destroy his validity & his reputation.