Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"let him be"? Sure will.... But I will always correct inacurrate information. If he is so worried about his investment then why post false info? and why sound like a basher?.... Kind of counter productive don't you think?
Merry X-Mas to you.
Look at the Acc/Distrib indicator .... Unless my eyes are crossed ... I see all accumalation yesterday .. NOT dilution. Plus all volume is green... Learn how to read a chart. ...
All Green my friend.... Now go away!
Welcome to my new Options trading board. Feel free to post potential strategies, exit points, entrance points, chart trending, and any other market related topics.
Assistants wanted! PM me if interested.
Thank You
Yes very nice
You act like a company has never been sued before...... How many law suits does Sony have at anyone given time? Walmart? etc.etc. .. Please stop acting like its the end of the world .... There will probally be more in the future as with any company. But to answer your question.. you would have to call the company ask to get a detailed answer. However, I'm sure it will be appealed for many years and then if they still have to pay .. installments are normally the way to go. No judge will deny installments .. after all its only 800k.
Press Release Source: AuGRID Corporation
AuGRID to Launch Stock Buy Back in 2007
Tuesday December 19, 10:00 am ET
VINELAND, N.J., Dec. 19, 2006 (PRIME NEWSWIRE) -- To all public concerns, it is the very serious intention of AuGRID Global Holdings Corporation (``AGHC') (Other OTC:AUGC.PK - News) to complete at least one of the aforementioned acquisitions in our previous press releases. What AuGRID has been very carefully planning is a stock buyback program to retire 4 billion shares during the first three quarters of 2007. Our strategy is simple. AGHC is in the process of acquiring firms that have revenues, history and profits. It is out of these revenues and profits that AGHC intends to acquire a portion of the float and retire the stock back to treasury. It is in the managements' analysis, and that of our advisors, that a float this size is counterproductive to the growth after a completed acquisition. The capitalization table should be reigned in through a stock buyback program.
Not on mine or ogclip's watch!
og ... you want the pleasure?
Hi og.. glad tobe back :)
Old issues that have been discussed time and time again.... All your questions have been answered a number of times before in prior posts... do some research and seek the answers. Rehashing old news over and over again does no good and leaves me to suspect your motives.
Yes sir .. we'll hold the fort down for ya. :)
Thank you :)
His intent/motive is quite clear... crystal!... Look at his profile.. only 2 posts and both were bashes against AUGC.... I say a ban is justified... pure and simple.
LORTAP MACS,
We need to talk .. please pm me your email.
Admins.. please delete this and ban this punk
Who cares?
cheese,
Stop with the rumors .. we are sitting at .0001 .. NOT .0004 ... keep to the facts.... Or I will petition to get you banned..... STOP RIGHT NOW! when we get to .0004 then talk about it.. but not until then ..... KEEP TO THE FACTS.. JACK! Got it? Good!... Lets talk about what we do know are FACTS.
Thank you and get lost with your BS!
I for one am glad that my fellow investors are not putting up with the BS being spewwed from the mouths of people like Robby and HRHR. So many stocks I have been in when these guys would show up and just start spouting pure crap and then vanish. Meanwhile most people cling on to their everyword and kiss thier ass. It makes me want to puke. I can finally breath a breath of fresh air knowing this board will not end up like the others. Keep it real people ... keep it real.....These two (and others) just create rumors and false expectations on the backs of less experienced or extremely stuck investors. After watching these two in action I have learned one thing.. and that is do the complete opposite as they say.... when they say buy ... sell! Pretty simple concept imo..... I would assume (ass out of u and me) that they are MM's or have a close contact who is a MM.. that is how they can predict certain pr's and what not. Paid pumpers?.. nah .. I doubt it ..... The game is played all the time by the mm's .. they do read the boards.. hell, one did a Q&A session on breakouttrading a couple of months ago...That i participated in. These aren't crooks though... they aren't in it "JUST" for themselves per se'..... If you can learn to spot it you can ride their coat tails and make money as well .. the key is .. try to end up on the same side of the trade as they are...... Anyway... Thank you all for being real and not falling for their crap...... I will refuse to let them turn this room into other rooms that they invaded. Look at BKMP most posters over there are in la la land .. blinded by their own rumors.. rumors that were started by HRHR and others just to be let down.. Again .. I am so grateful that we will refuse to go down that road.
The ask is .0003 .. You made the offer .. now I'm calling you on it. I thought you would back off...
Come on mimurray.. You know what I'm saying .. this thing sat @.0004 for awhile and it was at that time. Now we're at .0003 ... Hell ok then I'll give them to him at that price. YOLO pm me lets see if you can put your money were your mouth is.
YOLO,
Why not double up now? You don't need him to dump his 200m shares for you to do that .. I dare you .. I have my L2's on now .. let me see the order!.. there are plenty of them out there... hell... You want mine to? been trying to dump my 5m @.0004 for 2 months ... noone wants this POS!
This stock is pathetic!
BWDT = POS!
"Logging, you have 62 posts arguing about the 20% ownership. That's excessive IMO.
It has been explained to you over and over. Please refrain from alienating the board with anymore repetitive posts on this matter.
Thanks."
Explained or Dismissed?
IMO ... It has not been explained but rather dismissed all together. I may not agree with everything he says but he does raise valid points. Points that deserve to be discussed and not dismissed by a few just because they disagree with them.. He has 62 post talking about this ..right?.. I see a couple thousand posts repeating the same pipe dreams and rumors. Shall they stop posting too? I think so ..... Atleast what loggin is saying is facts..They do only own 20% of Blackout Communications and they own TFN.. What is so wrong with discussing facts. "True" investors will look at this forum as a joke if all that is allowed tobe talked about is inacurate information and rumors.
"Last post; Lets look at boxing, its a hand to hand combat event, and its not exclusive to any one network[ HBO, Showtime, Fox Sports, etc. etc.] they all carry boxing matches and are very successful with their viewers, the same can be said of MMA's, different networks can carry it and they can all be SUCCESSFUL!! GL EVERYONE!!"
This is very true..and yet those networks don't tout themselves as the only 24/7 Full Contact Sports channel either... In order to be true to their business model they most definitely will have to try to get exclusive contracts with most if not all the different segments of MMA.. This is all I'm saying. If I can watch UFC on Spike for free. Why would I want to pay to watch it.. I could be wrong but this is just my opinion.... TFN is a brillant concept and I love it.. but lets be realistic about what really is going generate profits and whats going to make this concept the best that it can be. By advertising the way they do ....They leave people to imagine that thats exactly how this channel is going to be. Full exclusive programming from the MMA arena.. All The Time... Not just some times .. but All The Time!
Last post from me too .. good nite and good luck
True .. I agree with you ... but lets not forget the business side to this... I'm sure Spike has their feelers out aswell and can always change to meet the demand.... But please don't mis-understand me .. I DO AGREE WITH YOU!... TFN has the "nitch" factor over Spike.. and because of that "nitch" they definitely are the top contender (pun intended)
I am assuming by the talk here on this board and the whole 24 hour thing that MMA would have to be exclusive to just one network.. TFN?...maybe .. but one would have to think it has to be or will be at some time or another.. soo my point is ... Spike will be competing for the those exclusives as well as TFN.. and only one will get it.
I hope just like you guys that it is the TFN ... but I also don't bury my head in the sand .. I like to discuss all sides .. not just what makes me warm and fuzzy in side.
You have good points ... But you also prove mine.. UFC may or may not be exclusive to Spike .... Its what ever the contract they have with Spike says.....But in most cases they normally are on a season by season bases and then re-negotiated before the fall line up.
I would beg to differ... Your CBS analogy is mis-leading. First off.. We are not talking about one network offering two types of programing.. It's more like two networks offering one type of progamming. And in cases like these the program owners bid for spots and are signed to the major network. Thats why you can't watch the Super Bowl on two different networks. Same holds true here.. The Spike channel,IMO, is the 800 pound gorilla. TFN will most definitely have their work cut out for them.. But there will not be two networks hosting the same programming .. It's a conflict of interest ... Except in the case of re-runs or unless they giving the rights by the network to air such events.
A good example is football AFC is contracted to view on CBS... NFC is contracted to view on FOX.... Monday nites are contracted to view on ABC .. so on and so forth
Ok.. my comments: "BKMP (imho) is a viable investment due to the hype and all of the mis-information and inaccurate desciption of their business model".
What I meant was if anything else those who understand the market can capitalize on those who are less understanding... Meaning the ones that invest on their emotions create a company that "the" company really isn't through rumor and speculation.... Hence the ones that understand can capitalize on that.
TA = Technical Analysis
FA = Fundamental Analysis
loggin in,
Rest assured there are some (very few) on here that understand what you're saying. I being one of them. Most on here are wandering endlessly through innuendos and hyperboles. Trying to piece together the clues as if it was a mystery. Trading and speaking on their emotions rather than the fundamentals and market conditions. I don't even try to reason with the unreasonable anymore.. Their minds are set and nothing will allow them to remove the blinders. BKMP (imho) is a viable investment due to the hype and all of the mis-information and inaccurate desciption of their business model. Knowledge is power and those who choose to be confrontational against the ones who speak in terms of FA's and TA's are the ones will be left holding the bag.
Thank you.
Well .. The last thing I want is to get into an argument with you over symantics... It doesn't matter if the company is privately or publicly held... ownership is ownership. I really don't feel like explaining it to you .... I'm just trying to have a conversation with people on this board who have a real and true understanding of investing... I have no time for people that wear blinders and can't see out side the box because of their emotions.....
Good post !
Most likely it's a test sell to determine liquidity of the stock ... I have had a GTC sell order in for 500k @.0004 for 2 weeks now. The order still isn't filled... so again.. since the .0004 are a tuff sell .. someone probally did a 200 share test sell @ .0003 .... JUST MHO
You need to finish posting the rest of the definition... so it is in it's proper context.. please don't post partial or selective information.
Here is the true definition:
holding company
Definition
A company that owns enough voting stock in another firm to control management and operations by influencing or electing its board of directors. also called parent company.
Now: The question is.... Does BKMP own enough to do the above?.. Is 20% enough? Is BKMP the "Parent Company"?
Actually .. I am .... There's nothing wrong with speaking truth... Get your emotions out of it and start thinking clearer on the fundamentals about you investment.
I have better things to do with my money .. But thanks!