is...gliding thru the $$$
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Don't make me laugh!
Just think how BioAmber and others are going to end this Fossil Fuel-Geo-Political nightmare that has a reoccurring theme.
Cats out of the bag...did anyone see the TV Ad by Chevron yesterday evening
pointing to them moving to alternative plant sources for energy... showed a field of plants, as the future.
I stand by what I posted...ENO had options, but he owned 1,000,000 shares outright. It's in black and white only one way to read it. BIOA-BIOAQ is a winner no matter what the company name is in the future!
Just stop the outright disinformation already! Thank you in advance.
Eno Richard P Director; Officer; Chief Executive Officer
BUY OPTIONStock Option (right to buy) Common Stock 500000 [500000 shares] @ $0.04 [$0.00] 1000000 Shares Directly Owned
Oh, aren't you Shakespearean!
Thanks...just implicates them more in the restructuring.
Irrelevant
You don't know what they...seriously?
True that! 1. BioAmber did not go bankrupt.... case dismissed not discharged. FACT
2. Frontier "Shares are expected to trade until the plan's effective date. They will be cancelled on the effective date and for shareholders long FTR on that date, it would be your "sold" date for tax purposes." that is what happened to Frontier.
3. BioAmber did trade after the head fake bankruptcy, (only similarity) but then the valuable shares were shelved awaiting future action from the restructuring, in the best interest of all stake holders, not declared worthless for tax purposes. (difference) BIOAQ becomes ??? for the win!
If you believed that...you would not be here all these years...getting paid. Not one of you better gigs eh!
More BS... You and others have posted..."you expect shares to be cancelled anytime soon" ...even several years ago. "Suspended is a waiting action"...we wait. BioAmber shares have been purchased, there is a reason for stretching this restructuring out. When optimum value has been achieved... Purchaser will move shares to Nasdaq or NYSE most likely. I don't care what you post. The Big holders are in the know and are patient. Small holders should do the same. Nor do we care if some choose to let go of their shares. Question is what keeps you folks here. BIOAQ shares have significant value as time will reveal.
I could care less about the number of days that have passed... the picture is much clearer now... I am waiting for the paid that's coming. And it will!
LOL... How so? I took my antipsychotic today!
Bingo my friend. There is the possibility that they are maneuvering behind the NDA/CA's to float the final resolution out a bit to fill up the coffers
given shareholders didn't buy the ruse. The Judge can be seen as cooperating in "the best interest of all stake holders." The key here for us is to have strong hands holding on to those shares. Interest is compounding for us and still KKR, Eno, LCY will make out like bandits. Everybody wins.
Certain physical assets... not IP... In upfront payment... "The purchaser did not seek the assignment of the Company’s contracts, which meant that certain intellectual property under license from third parties was also not transferred to the purchaser." Any reason you didn't include that sentence which followed your quotes. Really? Seriously???
Please link that BioAmber doesn't have any IP!
Sorry...could not help myself my friend but Bingo...hit the nail on the head. It's going to be a sludge flood! Who's got some...me.
Of course it's not being traded publicly right now any beginning investor would understand that, and those in the know understand why...what are you missing?
I don't "feel" anything... creditors are a part of the restructuring play and NDAs are why they will not disclose their compensation or future compensation. Thats why you can't link a legitimate source proving otherwise.
I am not asking for a promise... I'm asking for a link. A link you can't provide, no one can, because they haven't written anything off.
Please link just where one has wrote it off you can't.
Nice try but no sale!
I'm with you Dog your perceptions aligns very closely with mine and several others and together we represent and pretty broad and experienced group. I just hope our friend here is not representing his Law Firm in these posts, because he did state that he had knowledge of what was going to happen but couldn't comment or something to that nature or it would cost him biggly. Hummmm.
You would have to ask PWC why...I am sure G5 was just as suprised.
I don't think they faked a liquidation...what I think is that much is yet to be revealed. The NDAs in this restructuring are world class and PWC was bound by them as well no doubt.
Give me a break PWC does not have a stellar history of doing what's right...and they have $$$ out for it.
I think we have pointed to where you need to do your own DD enough, if you were truly interested, you would post the link and point out where Biowin is in error... You can't... because the truth is staring you in the face my friend.
That is so much crap.
No need to worry, we don't... probably won't need a reinstatement because of NewCo, otherwise its less than chump change, you should know that!
Buy whom? ...link please!
Kind of like the triple option, you guys tackled the wrong guy...touchdwon.
You are correct, the big $$$ did not convey, The purchaser did not seek the assignment of the Company’s contracts, which meant that certain intellectual property under license from third parties was also not transferred to the purchaser. It would also be helpful to learn the definition of "certain". The only assets that were purchased were "certain"
sorry no cigar.
So more and more garbage opinion...which in fact is incorrect.
Looks very much like BioAmber has made production and trade agreements with a consortium of partners. $$$ Question is who will be the umbrella?
Thanks toncatmad...direct quote from article you posted "After an undisclosed investment, LCY Biosciences has reached 18,000 metric tons of annual capacity and aims to bring this output up to 30,000 metric tons by 2023." HUMMMMM undisclosed investment, could it be the disclosed 4.3? Hummm just maybe they invested in share purchase, given the are fullfilling the terms for the NOLs. Thanks again.
Straight forward and easy to understand. What is outside of the NDAs is they are following requirements to qualify for NOLs to the letter!
Wouldn't have thing to do with NDA...would it!
You gotta be kidding me... IPs, contracts not sold, purchase not finalized, no bankruptcy and I'm sure LCY can't use those NOLs they are cranking out the sludge for. LOL