Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
WHAT!? LOL OMG
There is zero evidence to support that claim. What we know is the deal is agreed upon adn confimed on the InMed site. InMed is proven to have the 135mil+ in revenues. The deal has already been partially executed and the item in default is being resolved. LOL SMH
first,think about what you are saying... "Maybe wayne runs the inmed site"
InMed is a almost 20 year established business... how in the world does wayne run it?! He is a stock owner in Toron... how in the world is that connection made?!
second, As for transparency... This is a startup! again, stock owners such as myself and even insiders who own shares are pointless and worthless without the deal. The deal should be getting 120% of Toron CEO attention... This is not Johnson&Johnson... This its the OTC, and at that a startup company. Lots of money to be made here but the expectations are off base. Not thinking about this situation correctly.
I would think that is the case, but that is just a guess. Its hard to say how long it will take since we dont know exactly what it was.
There is something you are missing. Toron is a startup. Getting the stock price to move before this deal is done is not and should not be the priority. Anyone that owns this insider or retail wont have anything until this deal finalizes. When the new CEO came in knowing that the default status needed to be fixed this would be the sole focus. Who cares what warm and fuzzy any of us have if the deal doesnt get finalized. There is one goal and one focus right now for the CEO... fix the default. None of of shareholders should want them to spend time making us feel good when all their attention should be given to InMed in completing this deal. What good does the stock price moving because "investors have more confidence" if its at the expense of Toron leadership finalizing the deal with InMed. IF this deal was not being privately funded that would be a different story, but it is. We will be the focus and attention after its finalized.
please post a link to this promo... still cant find one anywhere?
its hard to say but considering flagship has agreed to put up the 10mil and both parties agreed to be compensated in 100 mil shares each we know that part is agreed upon by all parties. This has so many properties involved and such there are so many factors but we already know the major things are agreed upon which is ONE reason we know this is something small they (meaning InMed, Toron, and Flagship) need to work out. If Toron and InMed are both saying well I think this is your responsibility InMed posting on their website that the deal is in default status is a great way for them to put pressure on Toron to cave. This is business.
well yeah if it wasnt on the site we would have an announcement sayings InMed is now a subsidiary of Toron.
What are you asking? InMed controls their site until transition is complete. Getting control of their website (their brand basically) is one of the last parts of a transition. Less emotion and more focus on facts will guide you best. The DD is good and the facts are there... if those start to change thats one thing but until they do just stick to the facts and not anything else. Deal was agreed upon and signed in Oct. The deal is already in motion as MO mentioned. Shares have been transferred, InMed trusts dissolved, new CEO in place. The agreement is in default means that a piece that was agreed upon isnt done. This means it needs to be done, it in no way says or even suggest the deal is off. That is way more difficult than working to resolve it. This deal has been in the works for over 2 years, they are not going to just back out after so much of the deal is already finalized, they fix it.
This is a great point and has not gotten the attention it should have
Thanks I will! Good DD.
This isnt even the same company is was then! LMAO just same name and symbol... LOLOLOL
One lucky buyer... Me! still acquiring.
I was talking about the post i was replying to. I know the tron DD is good...
just more assumptions with no proof or evidence SMH
no evidence of that at all
He has been CEO of a startup in the midst of a major acquisition for about 30 days... lol Its all good. Ill be happy to hear from him for the first time shortly when he announces the deal is finalized. Btw, hes interim CEO not permanent. His job is to finish the deal and help finalize the board and a permanent CEO will be appointed.
Personally having the proof and the proof existing are two completely different things. Clearly many people in here are just fine with the proof they have. Maybe dig deeper.
Yes these are all fact! We know what we know! DD
Because they are illegal! Lololol
Lololol this is fake news!
Lololol wrong...
All guesses and opinions... Wrong
LOL This is just plain wrong and if its looked up that would be seen... its pretty easy to see
Again... thats not what default means LOL SMH
hmmm not what i said...
that is actually a false statement. A few have sold but this is a stock that moves easily which is why when the final news drops this will hit the moon.
oh no... just look at medicare to back it. Look at the LOI to back it. Look at the InMed site to see the deal was signed and agreed on. DD shows its fact! lol
illegal overseas shorts are exactly that illegal... they work differently. They are identified differently and I see all the evidence I need that its occurring!
That does not prove there are no illegal shorts... ERRRR WRONGO
Or are they still illegally shorting this stock? probably...
Again they never did that either. The deal was signed and agreed upon in October as they stated. That is when the deal was closed. In mergers and acquisitions a deal is agreed upon with actions both parties are required to take by certain deadlines. When a deadline is missed that is what a default status means. It does not mean a deal did not happen and it does not mean a deal is off. Also claiming that InMed "confirmed Tron has 0 revenue" is also completely false. That is a conclusion that was drawn based on a misunderstanding of Mergers and acquisitions but claiming that "Inmed Confirmed it" is 100% false. That is an active claim not passive and it never happened.
Well that is 100% completely fabricated. InMed did not confirm anything of the sort. That never happened.
thats one opinion and nothing more. The checklist has a great deal of good DD.
well that is just plain wrong! lol not even close to accurate
Its DD not marketing... how can it be labeled marketing just because its positive?
Patel was completing the documentation to become CEO as its clearly stated. He was brought in to finish the deal (what else would he be doing on for a startup company with one deal signed) and that is what hes working on now that the documentation is complete (see the nevada website which clearly has him as CEO now). This really is not that hard to see lol
I did provide some of my proof and frankly enough. It was ignored... I dont really care either way if its agreed with lol
having proof and providing it are two different things LMAO
Everyone doesnt know that or there wouldnt be many people acquiring and buying still. Thats a false claim.