Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You like 1 or 2 opposed to none? Spreading like wildfire!
Lol at retweets...
7 years!? Wow...I can def understand why you're still around then. Many must've suffered huge losses around that time. Hopefully you can get some of that back one day.
Riiiightttt...as in yeah right.
We won't need the company to issue a PR after the stock tanks after Eves disappoints again this week.The losses will def be newsworthy. The dodging and lack of transparency will blow up in Eves face soon enough. Not wishing losses on anyone, but more are coming imo.
The pr will state the company received great interest from major players. This will lead to even more baseless speculation on this board. Anything else would be a (very unlikely) anomaly imo.
I see this as a glorified networking event, which may facilitate more CCTC can kicking. I hope I'm wrong, though...
Wondering how many times you guys and gals will speculate about (insert topic related to CCTC here) and get it wrong? Baseless speculation - it's like playing a slot machine in Vegas. "I believe this machine will win in 10 mins." Cmon..
CCTC tweeted earlier but deleted it. Not sure what it said, but started with "industry leaders pledge....". When I clicked the link I got a message saying it had been deleted. Just FYI.
Unlikely. It's already June. Fed doesn't move that quickly typically.
Thoughts? CCTCs government lifeline may be dead, which would require the company to step up its business acumen - assuming it doesn't get the cradling and hand holding it needs - to move closer to its finish line, what'll happen next? I'm not confident that the management/business dev/finance/PR, etc team (of two) has the capacity (or knowhow) to pull it off. Let's hope for some substantive interest from those who know better. GLTA
Such a circus...
Lost me at: "Aiden Neary, COO of Clean Coal, said".
This thing will be dead soon. Re-read the last 10-Q...embarrassing.
Oh wow! This dog$...actually stayed green today?
Speculation will turn that into profits, but I still think it's not a long-term hold. While the tech may be viable, the company's leadership should be ousted or supplemented with business savvy individuals for it to have a chance, imo. Seems as if they're novice types. Even if they aren't. I could be wrong, but...all we have is their track record with this company to judge.
Anyone ashamed they bought into this stock/company? Seems like folks are edging closer to being had, imo.
They can't. Look into recent history. They need hand holding to move the ball forward.
If you knew it was gonna be a winner you wouldn't have to argue so vigorously...
Confidence is silent. This is fear.
I don't any "signs" pointing to this being a winner. All signs point to more can-kicking shenanigans, per usual. It would take some major handholding for these two to depart from their sluggish, convoluted, haphazard trek toward whatever it is they're hoping to pull off.
How about this...?
After promoting and losing the potential Australia deal, do not alert your investors to the fact that you lost; but rather keep shareholders in the dark long enough for you to craft up the next "potential deal".
...yeah, I'd dial back the rainbows and butterflies, folks. I personally will be sitting back waiting for a fraud investigation to kick off if this WY stuff doesn't pan out...like the many, many pending deals, and the like, preceding it.
Seriously, enough is enough. These guys shouldn't be eating on the shareholders' dime for years and years. Either put some nasty pressure on them or expect to bleed out your investment - these folks couldn't land a deal if their lives depended on it...if history is any indicator, imo. How is this slug even still breathing after this long??! I guess when things get dry, the CEO releases a nice prerecorded market update to keep the vulnerable hopeful? Just a theory.
Yep. Overly optimistic nonsense. Anything is possible I suppose, but CCTI stinks.
Lolololollll! Brace yourself for some more juicy disappointment :)
Regardless of politics the company conducts business poorly, if at all. I seriously speculate about fraudulent activity on a regular basis with this one. It would make for a good case study (or episode of American Greed) if it turned out that way. Let's hope that's not the case.
The company has a black eye (due to fraud from previous leadership) and questionable practices nowadays, a blinding flash of the obvious when it comes to where it's going....let's "hope" for the best, shall we? Bottom line, unless these "dudes" clean up their act (and businesses practices) the future doesn't look good to me. Regardless of the bs politics we're discussing.
Speculating. Probably like many, many others are - frustrated. I would be too. This company has been pushing a pipe dream for a while now with many different "almost there" messages, just to later let the "pending deal/development" fade away with no explanation (there are several examples).
$20k in lobbying funds is relatively low. However, I welcome the investment as someone who thinks this company should've been doing more over the last few years. Hopefully, it's enough to get someone to whisper the company's name once, lol. I'm sure at least a few of you have lost a lot more while hoping and wishing for success here.
Delusional investor base. This thing stinks to high heaven.
I'd like to add in to this with an additional LOL!
Pour one out for dsaul. He just got flattened. Lol!
I think that DOE offering funding contingent on these tests doesn't make sense. I tend to think that the test are to bring the company into contender status. That said, if there's not much (or any) competition then it may be safe to assume the outlook will be positive.
The company itself, imo, could be run a lot better. I'd imagine the company's current business standards need to be addressed as well. Imagine the federal gov getting in bed with this company in its current state...the lack of transparency, the failed initiatives, lack of money to fund its own projects, etc.
Disagree?
Would you consider that DOE would require the tests to verify the tech meets its standards prior to placing CCTI into consideration for funding? That's seems more realistic to me.
Well, he's upset. No offense, sir! Calm yourself...
This company is full of BS if history is any indicator. Hardly even a company imo. Just two guys trying to get someone to buy into their tech. I purposely did not use the word "sell" because I don't believe these guys know how to sell and/or market their product. Just my $.02
Bloody Monday. Where to next folks? .05? LOL
Good stuff.
Anyway. Enjoy another weekend in the red.
Except...is the company worth anything right now? I imagine only what someone is willing to pay for it if it were for sale; but, if we're looking at revenue or the like...well.
Wonder what the true value of the shares are?