Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Did she say QEDN was buying Nestle?
NOTICE OF LATE FILING
Bahnsen posted a Notice of Late Filing but hasn't given any explanation as to why the attorney opinion letter has been removed from www.otcmarkets.com. She stated the overdue disclosures will be filed by 9/30/21, which is after the SEC's deadline requiring disclosures to be current.
Doesn't she have to obtain an attorney opinion letter before the September 26, 2021 effective date for Rule 15c2-11? Can she obtain an opinion letter before late disclosures are filed?
Bahnsen needs to provide some answers.
NOTICE OF LATE FILING
Bahnsen posted a Notice of Late Filing but hasn't given any explanation as to why the attorney opinion letter has been removed from www.otcmarkets.com. She stated the overdue disclosures will be filed by 9/30/21, which is after the SEC's deadline requiring disclosures to be current.
Doesn't she have to obtain an attorney opinion letter before the September 26, 2021 effective date for Rule 15c2-11? Can she obtain an opinion letter before late disclosures are filed?
Bahnsen needs to provide some answers.
It looks like she is going to need another attorney opinion letter regardless. The prior opinion letter for QEDN has been pulled off of the www.otcmarkets.com webpage.
Does she have to get another attorney opinion letter again since QEDN is no longer current?
She's not even trying to keep this ticker on life support. How hard is it to report that there is no revenue...again?
When was the Q2 report due?
Maybe...would be nice to hear something from Bahnsen about this. Clearly, they didn't intend this with just a month before SEC Rule 15c2-11 goes into effect.
They aren't even current. Yield sign is up.
YIELD SIGN IS BACK UP AGAIN.
Maybe yesterday's sellers knew something you didn't. Bahnsen needs to explain what is going on and why GEGI is no longer current.
YIELD SIGN IS BACK UP AGAIN.
Maybe yesterday's sellers knew something you didn't. Bahnsen needs to explain what is going on and why QEDN is no longer current.
Maybe...but when QEDN was able to issue shares the share price shot to a penny and a half...and then crashed to trips. The stock has been trying to lift off with the same types of blogs Bahnsen has been reporting for years. However, since Bahnsen can't feed whatever volume is generated with new shares it just sputters out. QEDN can't create that buzz that leads to crazy volume without issuing new shares.
Too bad for QEDN that Lattuca has prevented them from issuing new shares.
I dug a little deeper...
BAHNSEN PERJURED HERSELF AND SUBMITTED FORGED EVIDENCE IN A COURT OF LAW:
The Court Order containing the below can be found in the Lattuca v. GEGI litigation. Blancato is Kate Bahnsen's maiden name and the below order comes from her divorce case in Nevada.
https://apps.stjohnsclerk.com/Benchmark/Home.aspx/Search
Enter the Captcha search Purdon or Genesis Electronics Group
The below order is attached as an exhibit to Docket # 714 (9/28/17)
QEDN doesn't sell any product. QEDN has $0.00 in sales since 2014.
There is a Green something listed as a inactive company in Nevada and Bahnsen is listed as the officer. Its not Green Mine Solutions or Green Mind Solutions though. I can't find a way to search in Colombia. If there were any sales Bahnsen would have reported them in the financials so QEDN hasn't been selling seeds for GMS.
That's the problem with this is that QEDN has never done anything. QEDN hasn't had one penny of revenue since 2014. It doesn't look like there is any intent for QEDN to ever have any revenue.
In that same paragraph Bahnsen mentions that in 2015 QEDN entered into an agreement to acquire Green Mine Solutions (GMS).
Notice it doesn't say the agreement closed and Green Mine Solutions was actually purchased. It appears it was not purchased because if it was Green Mine Solutions would be identified as an asset of QEDN in the balance sheet.
Everything Bahnsen says now on twitter and elsewhere is Green Mind Solutions. Everything Bahnsen said two years ago was Green Mine Solutions.
And what does this have to do with QEDN???
QEDN is not mentioned anywhere on that Contract. QEDN just filed its financials and didn't list GMS as an asset of QEDN. What contract gives QEDN rights to anything?
WHAT PRODUCT!!! There is no evidence of product.
Doesn't there have to be product before there is a PO. QEDN hasn't demonstrated it has any product to sell.
Especially considering the financials are misstated but it is still somehow showing as Pink Current.
Lucky you...if you buy 25s again you won't sell 35's...but go ahead and see if you can make lightening strike twice.
Buy 25s and sell 19s. Sounds like a plan. This ticker when Pink Current, how come there hasn't been a run?
C'mon man. Keep up with the times. QEDN is now mining Sacha Inchi...it is way more efficient than growing it.
QEDN's FINANCIALS ARE VERIFIABLY WRONG!!!
The Financials reflect that Lattuca has a judgment against QEDN for $134,025.68 and $5,050.75.
Lattuca has a judgment against QEDN for $187,042.00. If Bahnsen can't even get the amount of the judgment right what are the chances of the rest of the numbers being correct.
You can view Lattuca's judgment against QEDN by going to the below website searching under Purdon and viewing Case CA10-1547. Then click on Docket Number 679 on 8/17/2017.
https://apps.stjohnsclerk.com/Benchmark/Home.aspx/Search
Well she has been wrong about pretty much everything she has ever posted.
Greed kills...why not take the profit now? You know what they say about a bird in the hand.
Well, the basic requirements are not met because the amount of the QEDN judgment is wrong. It is interesting but unorthodox that the CEO would want to mention my posts.
What is taking so long to get this current? Has Bahnsen confirmed whether the financials are accurate or why she had to amend the financials? It looks like the most recent filings included the Lattuca Judgments in the liabilities section as ("Judgment under Dispute").
It looks like the amended sections of the financials that were filed have to do with the Lattuca Judgment and referencing my posts 54207 and 42574 and a post from Bazooka. I am flattered that my Ihub posts are so important that they made it into the financials for QEDN but I have honestly never seen specific posts from Ihub included in corporate financials. Have you ever seen financials make reference to specific posts on Ihub?
On January 10, 2019, Bahnsen posted that a Federal Investigation for stock manipulation was started against several individuals on account of my posts. I can tell you that in the 2 1/2 years QEDN's post I have never been contacted by the FBI or the SEC or any other agency.
Bahnsen is salty about the Judgment to Lattuca and salty about anyone that posts about the Judgment. I am not sure what her personal vendetta with Lattuca or me is about but when she allows her personal vendetta to result in misrepresentations in the financials and delays in the stop sign being removed she is harming QEDN's shareholders.
https://www.incaworldwide.com/post/2019/01/10/federal-investigation-for-stock-manipulation-by-michael-lattuca-lisa-purdon-and-brad-hugh
NO REVENUE...HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.
NO REVENUE REPORTED SINCE 2014. Literally, lemonade stands owned by 5 year olds that are crushing QEDN's performance.
Which document are you talking about?
STILL NO CORRECTED FINANCIALS.
It is absolutely astonishing that Bahnsen has had to file multiple corrected financials to report $0.00 in revenue. In her last correction she attempted to list the Lattuca judgment in the liabilities section of the balance sheet...it is abhorrent she didn't list all of the liabilities in the first few versions she filed. However, she listed the wrong amount of the judgment. It is not hard to list the people and companies that are owed money by QEDN. What a cluster.
I agree with the Rule 15c2-11 analysis.
I'm not sure about the rest except that the state typically only requires the articles of incorporation. The shareholder agreement and not the articles is the document that likely sets forth the voting rights. I imagine when QEDN went public a prospectus was required to inform investors about what they were buying into. Not sure where one would get a copy of that document and I am not even sure it is still relevant if there were changes in structure.
In the Lattuca litigation it was determined that Lattuca is shareholder in GEGI. In the litigation Lattuca requested this information. GEGI has refused to provide any documents, including this information. So yes, it is documented that shareholders have been refused the governing documents. Are you aware of any shareholder that has the governing documents for QEDN or GEGI? You would think that sec Rule 15c2-11 would require the governing documents to be made public but as far as I can tell it does not.
Sure it would. Any shareholder would also want to know what the rights of a common shareholder are. However, no amount of research is going to help with this question. Whatever documents Bahnsen has about the alleged different classes of shareholders she has refused to make them public.
That being said, GEGI was incorporated in 1998. I doubt Bahnsen has a complete record of the corporate documents. I have not seen anything that states that the common shareholders don't have voting rights and it would be extremely uncommon for the common shareholders to not have voting. rights.
Are you suggesting there are multiple classes of shares or are you suggesting Bahnsen owns more than 50% of QEDN common stock?
The most recent filing indicates that the Bahnsen Trust owns 4% of common stock and that Bahnsen personally owns 100% of Class B & C shares. There is no third party verification as to whether this is true. Also, QEDN has never provided any shareholder agreements that would allow the shareholders to evaluate the difference between common stock and class b or c stock.
Typically, common stock has the right to vote and other classes of stock (preferred stock) have a preferred dividend and get paid first upon dissolution. Nevada law requires an annual meeting every year. GEGI had an annual meeting about 10 years ago.
It doesn't really matter. Either way the shareholders should hold their annual meeting (which has never occurred) and vote to remove her.
I doubt it was her decision to revise the financials, again, to include the judgments. She left the judgments out of the balance sheet as part of her forever feud with Lattuca. Everyone knows a judgment is a liability that must be included on a balance sheet. Her refusal to admit the obvious is now costing time and money and making QEDN look even more incompetent. All of this and Bahnsen still can't issue and sell shares.