is...still here
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
There has been so many holes drilled in the Elk Creek land that it must look like Swiss cheese from above.
The share count did go up:
"On April 28, 2023, the Company issued and sold 314,465 Common Shares in a registered direct offering at a price of $6.36 per share."
Is that the link for the video from the 'missed' meeting in Belgium?
I think it may be from the sell of a small strip of land to the state of Nebraska. (less than 2 acres, I believe.)
Nice. ?
Probably should try to have that post stickied.
I haven't claimed anything. (unlike most posters on this thread).
I have asked questions that anyone has the right to ask.
This is a stock discussion thread. If people don't like the question, they don't have to respond.
My, my...
All this run-around just to cover up the possibility that Niocorp does not have a patent or a pending patent, but may be relying on a patent from another company, who they may have an agreement with, which might include issuing 30,000,000 shares of stock to that company.
You might want to dig a little deeper.
I see lots of claims and no facts.
All I am looking for is the truth.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172006279
"{But their name is on the application for Patent, I'm sure. (patent pending) "
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172006342
"NioCorp’s patent-pending demonstration scale rare earth extraction and purification solvent extraction process operation is ongoing in Trois-Rivieres, Quebec,"
Did you even bother to read the response from Niocorp?
".....While our focus remains on using proven commercial technologies in the public domain, we will act to protect the parts of our process that may be novel. "
proven tech
in the public domain......
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172005512
That is not an answer to "who owns the patent."
It is a 'non-answer'.
Big difference between patent and intellectual rights.
3) - Who owns the patent/rights to this New Process being implemented? Or can it be licensed moving forward?
RESPONSE:
"We hold the rights to any intellectual property developed and related to the Elk Creek process by virtue of our contractual relationships with L3 and other entities involved in the work. While our focus remains on using proven commercial technologies in the public domain, we will act to protect the parts of our process that may be novel. "
Thanks Nebraskan. Good article.
I already know who the patent I am talking about is assigned to.
Hopefully you are right.
Just something nagging about Eric Larochelle being listed as one of the inventors of a patent. If it is the same patent pending process, it raises more questions. Somebody is getting paid somehow....
Looks can be deceiving..
Care to point out 'publicly' any part of that post that is wrong?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171986048
Also any more info on what L3 is getting paid to do the testing for Niocorp?
Who owns the patent that the people on this thread and company news articles post about?
So no production until at least 2026?
I think some of those pictures are the same ones used in some of the Molycorp articles.
Sheeeeesh!! That is total Bullshit.
NB holders "lost 90% of their share count."
The total outstanding shares decreased by 90% (but not the A/S)
Then more shares were issued.
so each and every NB holder lost some of their ownership stake and percentage of ownership in the OS of the company
Most everyone understands that and should ignore the misinformation/disinformation campaign. SMFH
nice little bump up today with less than average volume.
I had mentioned that idea last week.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171929532
Ok. I see how you got so easily confused. I responded to a post where someone mentioned an 'up-date'.
I never requested an update. I only e-mailed Olsson a 'general' question. I pointed out that the Olsson website has contact information, it includes a phone number, (I never said I called them) - it also has a link to contact them that takes it to an e-mail.
Stick to facts. don't post something I didn't say, or do. Read and try to stick to the truth.
I didn't ask for an update.
Niocorp is not their only client.
They have a contact number for questions. I used that contact info and never received a reply.
Good luck on update. I e-mailed Olsson on the 17th and still haven't heard anything from them.
Does the name Dean C. Kehler ring a bell with you?
Maybe you don't know as much as you think.
Sorry Putz, I'm really not coming from anywhere. Just in doing research I see a lot of 'problems' I try to resolve.
I sincerely hope these guys on this thread make a whole lot of money in their investment. I'm just not convinced yet to the point where I might consider jumping in.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/el-pollo-loco-shares-down-15-6-after-trimaran-liquidation-9a2022e1
El Pollo LoCo Holdings Inc. shares are down 15.6% to $8.69 in Wednesday morning trading after Dean C. Kehler, a board member, resigned in connection with the liquidation of the Trimaran Group.
Another company added to the list of companies that are bankrupt, in receivership, or in liquidation that these guys are 'associated' with.
Any idea on what the current outstanding share count is now?
A blast from the past:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=108297393
Could probably play the same video today and not many would realize it is almost 10 years old.
Same names, same terms.
What false allegations have been made?
I would like to check them out and post the truth on this board.
The only reason is because of the link that was posted:
https://www.olsson.com/projects/elk-creek-superalloys-material-project
It does not state anything about being a proposed building, I feel the picture they posted should have been labeled as such.
No Putz, it may be a drawing of the way they think it will look (which is different than the other CAD design picture that was posted on this thread earler.)
Make all the jokes you want. Everybody knows (or should know) that it is not a real building.
That's quite a list, but I don't see anything about the 'patent' claim that was made for Niocorp.
There are more meanings than that.
In real life we know it is not real, just a made up picture.
Ok. Here it is:
https://www.olsson.com/news/olsson-helps-critical-mineral-mine-obtain-critical-path-permits
from November 18, 2020
just scroll down to the 'rendering'.
Web site using
'Rendering of production facility at the Elk Creek Superalloy Materials Project."
key word: 'rendering'
means not real
That was not an accurate statement, as I pointed out.
Maybe you should contact Olsson and have them update their web page to reflect what you posted --
from:
"We are Olsson, a nationally recognized...",
to:
"We are Olsson, world class entity..."
thanks for the photos.
With all that land maybe Niocorp should have used some of it to raise chickens and sell to the chicken guy. Would have at least had some source of income, other than selling stocks.