Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Its called using my brain. Sold some before the drop from .04 and added to my boat load at the bottom. I sold some at .19 too. Believe me most investors on the OTC does exactly that. ARYC is retirement so just keep adding Mate. Have a good night
Not flipping Mate. Always had a substantial long position here. Can't even fathom ARYC going to dollar land and me being on the sidelines.
I always take responsibility for my own actions. I pushed the button when I bought my shares and when I see a stock stalls out I take some money off the table to double my shares when the dust settles. I don't need to vent here for things I choose to do and failed - for whatever reason. Im here to make some money!!! Good luck to you Mate
When you buy shares on the OTC you can loose it in two seconds. High risk High reward. BTW, I bought a shyte load more shares over the last few days. When I buy a lotto ticket and my numbers don't come in, what do I do? Tear it up and try again right. I don't try to convince everyone the Lotto is evil. Im a gambler and making out just fine, you could never convince me that there is not a great opportunity investing in ARYC
LOL Thank you! Tragically funny.
ARYC could almost be done with internal fins and if some investors did not harass the auditor could have sent them over shortly. But NO now we have to find another auditor.
I agree, but you have to respect peaks and valleys to get more $$$ to increase your shares. Still think this goes low .20s and hopefully bounce from there. Been waiting
Bottom at .22? I did the same. In at .33 all the way up and got out at .55 on the way down. Oh well, shows you what happens when you get married to a penny stock.
OMG, just loaded some more as the train was leaving the station.
yes elusion, thanks
Reality can be very elusive since we live in an elution. Don't look at ARYC for one month or so. Either you will hit the Jackpot or not. Good luck Mate!
LOL I think that was my post that was deleted. I did mean it from the bottom of my heart . I will buy your shares, but get one of those blowup baseball bats and beat the hell out of your computer for misleading you, ahh man - deleted again.
Thanks for that, been there and know how frightening that is!
Makes total sense! Years ago I played an online game and was threatened on FB. Gave up the game cause it was frightening what people could do. Anyone can write obscene messages on your friend's wall about you and your family and FB does'nt care a shyte about it. I would have done the same! Note there were no disagreement between companies.
It is about conviction. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty, until then and it is a moot point.
And sometimes there is mold due to bad insulation and I have to fix it before tenant pays. Aryc runs a sterile lab
There are no "eviction proceedings". I own rented properties - many. Sometimes the tenant requests the land lord to fix stuff and if I don't provide, the tenant refuses to pay rent. I then may go to court and want them evicted. In the end Judge Judy makes a decision and we move on.
10 months to be exact and if you try to track the case it states "This case is no longer available in Court", so settled!
Hey Zues, great name, my dog is called Zues and I love him to bits. Living in the desert, I taught him not to chase or kill any living creature ever, even if it is 100% against his genes. Anyways, so about the rent not being paid, where did you read about this terrible debacle?
Nice, back in the green!
This is back in the green today. If you sold earlier today and bought at the bottom you could have double the shares. That's what most negative posters do here anyways. Nothing here is ever what it seems.
lol 20k - beer money.
Said as you buy some to flip lol
Wow, interesting post. If I was Mark my wife would post a similar post on my behave defending me today. What is interesting is that RRBB ceased services as Arrayit Corporation’s independent registered public accountants as of June 3, 2019 and you established the "imthanos" account on June 5, 2019. So if your observation is true, when will the Internal Financials be ready to be sent to I assume the new auditors. (I know short notice to find another Auditor). Also instead of holding ALL the Financials, could you not have released some previous years to calm the negativity. If I was RRBB waiting for any documents from ARYC from October 28, 2016 to June 3, 2019, I could have responded as per Starlight's email... Not attacking, just curious.
Nothing Mark said ever had any truth to it. How can anyone justify investing a dime here. Think this was the final straw breaking the camel's the back for now... Unless Mark...btw, why is Mark doing the talking, he obviously either does not know what goes on or is told by the wife how to lie. Anyways, the next trick ARYC spins better be good for this to go anywhere.
lol based on what?
Thanks Georgie great call!
I hear you man. Been around since .0008 and saw that whatever the hype/promise was, was just a chance to make some money. Jesus, the same shyte over and over for more than two years, you sort of get the drift after a while. I guess it has been a really good penny stock as long as you were only engaged and not married to it. Anyways 8K was filed so lets see what tomorrow brings, maybe Ill marry it after all.
Yes very exciting! Glad I bought more today when the flash sale was happening.
Many lost money because they did not understand this stock, so the sour grapes issue. But I have made a shit load here and will retire with where this is going. Could be as early as tomorrow morning lol.
HATTER, so a few weeks back you were going to produce the so called smoking gun court docs proving the dishonesty of ARYC, but instead you copy and paste these out of context paragraphs? Here is the truth that puts all that in perspective:
Arrayit Asks Court to Dismiss Request Seeking to Block Issuance of Shares
Apr 29, 2015 | staff reporter
NEW YORK (GenomeWeb) – Arrayit this week responded to an investor lawsuit over the company's alleged failure to meet the terms of an agreement to settle earlier litigation, arguing that it is the plaintiffs in the case who have not lived up to their end of the deal.
Additionally, Arrayit said that a contract to develop food safety testing technology with the US Department of Agriculture is in jeopardy based on the actions of one of the plaintiffs in the case.
In a filing with the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, Arrayit has also asked the court to dismiss the investors' request for an injunction that would bar the company from issuing certain securities to a group of lenders.
The roots of the legal row extend back to August 2014, when Arrayit investor Reuben Taub sued Arrayit's management for "fraud and failure to properly disclose withholding and other tax liabilities of the company" as well as "misrepresentations concerning the development costs for, and company's ownership interest in, OvaDx," a microarray-based test for early stage ovarian cancer that Arrayit has been developing with Avant Diagnostics, which spun off from Arrayit in 2011.
A month later, Arrayit disclosed in a filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission that the suit had been dismissed and that it had entered into a deal to provide a company called Array Molecular — owned by Taub and certain other Arrayit investors including Irwin Zalcberg — with intellectual property for use in developing a DNA microarray platform for detecting pathogens in food.
Notably, this arrangement also included a contract Arrayit had struck with the USDA to develop the food-testing technology. According to court filings, it also required Arrayit to double the number of shares that could be purchased through warrants held by Taub and Zalcberg and to provide Zalcberg with additional shares and warrants.
Earlier this year, Taub sued Arrayit and its management for allegedly failing to meet the terms of the settlement, neglecting to transfer any IP or technology to Array Molecular, and not providing any securities to Taub and Zalcberg.
Zalcberg later joined the suit as a plaintiff.
As part of that suit, Taub asked the court to prevent Arrayit from distributing securities to certain parties that loaned the firm money, arguing that the securities represented the only asset that could be used to satisfy judgment in the case.
This week, Arrayit and its management asked the court to reject the plaintiffs' request to prevent it from issuing securities, stating that "there are no restrictions in any agreement between the parties that prevent Arrayit from issuing shares to anyone."
The request, Arrayit added, is part of an attempt by the plaintiffs to "refashion" the initial settlement agreement to their advantage.
Further, Arrayit claims that its settlement with Taub called for Array Molecular to raise up to $2 million to fund development of the food safety testing technology, but that the plaintiffs "have yet to raise a single dollar of that obligation."
Arrayit said that it has been working on the technology, anticipating reimbursement from Array Molecular for its expenses, but without that money it was forced to borrow $630,000 from various third parties. These loans included options for repayment in the form of Arrayit stock.
"Had [the] plaintiffs provided funding for the project, as agreed to, the loans would not have been necessary in the first place," Arrayit said. Although a portion of those loans have been converted to shares, additional conversion can be prevented by the plaintiffs, it added.
In a statement to the court, Arrayit CEO Rene Schena also claimed that its USDA contract has been threatened by Taub's actions at a scientific meeting last year.
Specifically, Arrayit alleged that Taub was present at the meeting, which included a presentation by the company and USDA collaborators, but that he was "so disruptive and insulting to the USDA representative in charge of developing the [food safety] test that she checked further into Taub's background," discovering that he had pleaded no contest to securities violations charges by the SEC in 1999.
Schena stated in the court filing that the USDA representative told her that the agency "would not move forward" with the food safety project as long as Taub was involved.
Arrayit has asked the court to reject any injunction request that would prevent it from issuing stock to its lenders, or, if an injunction is granted, to require the plaintiffs to post a $2 million bond to pay off the lenders.
To be eligible to be quoted on the OTCQB, ENDV is required to meet a minimum closing bid price on OTC Markets of $.01 for each of the last 30 calendar days. If they go below $.01 they will probably do R/S to keep the price above $.01. Not fun if you believed and invested here.
Sure, shit happens when you in business. I just build a 47,000 sqtf. spec house in upscale Los Angeles, selling for 100 million dollars currently. In the last four years I have been sued twice and won, and I had to filed at least one lawsuit. You can do all the research you want but inevitably you run into a knucklehead and have to battle it out. It's part of doing business. Cant let the skillful scary characters make you abandon ship!!!
Thanks mfdesigner! Just incase you don't want to subscribe to read the document, here it is:
Arrayit Asks Court to Dismiss Request Seeking to Block Issuance of Shares
Apr 29, 2015 | staff reporter
NEW YORK (GenomeWeb) – Arrayit this week responded to an investor lawsuit over the company's alleged failure to meet the terms of an agreement to settle earlier litigation, arguing that it is the plaintiffs in the case who have not lived up to their end of the deal.
Additionally, Arrayit said that a contract to develop food safety testing technology with the US Department of Agriculture is in jeopardy based on the actions of one of the plaintiffs in the case.
In a filing with the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, Arrayit has also asked the court to dismiss the investors' request for an injunction that would bar the company from issuing certain securities to a group of lenders.
The roots of the legal row extend back to August 2014, when Arrayit investor Reuben Taub sued Arrayit's management for "fraud and failure to properly disclose withholding and other tax liabilities of the company" as well as "misrepresentations concerning the development costs for, and company's ownership interest in, OvaDx," a microarray-based test for early stage ovarian cancer that Arrayit has been developing with Avant Diagnostics, which spun off from Arrayit in 2011.
A month later, Arrayit disclosed in a filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission that the suit had been dismissed and that it had entered into a deal to provide a company called Array Molecular — owned by Taub and certain other Arrayit investors including Irwin Zalcberg — with intellectual property for use in developing a DNA microarray platform for detecting pathogens in food.
Notably, this arrangement also included a contract Arrayit had struck with the USDA to develop the food-testing technology. According to court filings, it also required Arrayit to double the number of shares that could be purchased through warrants held by Taub and Zalcberg and to provide Zalcberg with additional shares and warrants.
Earlier this year, Taub sued Arrayit and its management for allegedly failing to meet the terms of the settlement, neglecting to transfer any IP or technology to Array Molecular, and not providing any securities to Taub and Zalcberg.
Zalcberg later joined the suit as a plaintiff.
As part of that suit, Taub asked the court to prevent Arrayit from distributing securities to certain parties that loaned the firm money, arguing that the securities represented the only asset that could be used to satisfy judgment in the case.
This week, Arrayit and its management asked the court to reject the plaintiffs' request to prevent it from issuing securities, stating that "there are no restrictions in any agreement between the parties that prevent Arrayit from issuing shares to anyone."
The request, Arrayit added, is part of an attempt by the plaintiffs to "refashion" the initial settlement agreement to their advantage.
Further, Arrayit claims that its settlement with Taub called for Array Molecular to raise up to $2 million to fund development of the food safety testing technology, but that the plaintiffs "have yet to raise a single dollar of that obligation."
Arrayit said that it has been working on the technology, anticipating reimbursement from Array Molecular for its expenses, but without that money it was forced to borrow $630,000 from various third parties. These loans included options for repayment in the form of Arrayit stock.
"Had [the] plaintiffs provided funding for the project, as agreed to, the loans would not have been necessary in the first place," Arrayit said. Although a portion of those loans have been converted to shares, additional conversion can be prevented by the plaintiffs, it added.
In a statement to the court, Arrayit CEO Rene Schena also claimed that its USDA contract has been threatened by Taub's actions at a scientific meeting last year.
Specifically, Arrayit alleged that Taub was present at the meeting, which included a presentation by the company and USDA collaborators, but that he was "so disruptive and insulting to the USDA representative in charge of developing the [food safety] test that she checked further into Taub's background," discovering that he had pleaded no contest to securities violations charges by the SEC in 1999.
Schena stated in the court filing that the USDA representative told her that the agency "would not move forward" with the food safety project as long as Taub was involved.
Arrayit has asked the court to reject any injunction request that would prevent it from issuing stock to its lenders, or, if an injunction is granted, to require the plaintiffs to post a $2 million bond to pay off the lenders.
So show some evidence she cant pay the morgage
LOL that's funny Hatter, I sell stuff on eBay too... and I pay the mortgage as well!
Yup great recap. I went through he board rules and it is fine for me to post here whenever and express my views may it be negative or positive. One Step Vending last year said they will have the website up and running shortly, did not happen! Google sites selling CDB product, there's a large amount of them selling great product! Guess you have no positive info to add about the company right now either?
I have a strong position here and wont sell until the next run. So by the way, what's up with the website. The home page has a cart and indicates at some point you would be able to buy product from them. But site seems to have been under construction for ever. Maybe they should get on it... I am having a great day, hope you have one too!
What I know is the company is mute. Said they will post pictures of their installed machines. Just no news at all. If they had something to share they will, meaning they have nothing worthwhile happening.
Don't know man, looks like .000 is coming. Someone took their investment just now and moved on. Wonder if there is really any business here.