Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Like how everyone laughed at you not being able to read or count this weekend?
So it would seem that you are suggesting a few things.
1. EQLB, a distributor of lastshot, not the creator or owner of the product, is going to distribute the product to another distributor in a region they are not liscensed to do so. This is ridiculous.
2. EQLB has formulated or created a new flavor, when again they are a marketer and distributor, not the creator or formulator of last shot. Again, ridiculous.
3. You are trading on knowledge that is substantial that is not publically avaiable and you are going to release it on Friday instead of it coming through an official channel. Really?
Have you been drinking tonight? Perhaps you should have a few last shots and call it a night.
Africa Beverage Company, Inc. exclusive and Master Distributor for the continent of Africa.
From
http://drinklastshot.com/af/terms-and-condition/
This doesn't mention EQLB in any way.
Except the press releases from October 2014 state that EQLB only has an agreement in place to distribute last shot in the US.
Oh, so you've verified that ppg is a partner?
His statement is an opinion that you can't disprove any more than he can prove. Only time will tell.
That said, you cherry picking an example doesn't prove your case. I'm sure for every example you show, he could show 5 that support his statement.
I also find it funny that after giving a ticker that has anemic volume, you say thats necessary for pps.
FURTHERMORE (not further more) you should learn to spell before calling someone else out.
Up 22% on the asx. Looking good for this week.
I agree that 2020 is irrelevant for most in this board. However, previous posters have pointed out f500 deal PRs con HCTI as far back as 2009. That should raise a red flag.
My advice is to watch finra daily and dump the second you see something posted.
Here we go with the I must be a kid who is wasting your time or doesn't understand how the world works. Stop lying and I'll stop calling you a liar. You conveniently deleted all of your posts from last night. Why is that?
I watched that episode of modern marvels also. Does that mean I worked with indycar?
Were you working in IRL while crushing and exporting cars to Africa?
Did you flatten them in the crusher to get the 4th car in like they did in your video?
Again, you posted something as a fact without realizing that it completely disproves what you're saying.
You realize that you misinterpreted the data. According to your own link, the US ranks in the top 20 LEAST corrupt countries. The higher score means less corrupt.
The Nissan Versa is 175.4 inches long. 14.6 ft. But again, I'm sure you fit 58 ft of car into a 40 ft container.
Fact check your lies better, or make them vague enough that someone else can't fact check them in minutes.
I just googled the average size of compact cars. They average 177.2 inches. That means roughly 14 ft each for the smallest cars . So you fit 48-60 ft of cars into 40 ft of space? Keep in mind that 40 ft containers are only 8 ft wide so you can't say you parked them sideways.
I'm sure we should just believe you though....right?
We're not talking about the company.
We're talking about people here including yourself saying a university has endorsed the company. Prove it.
Show me the purchase order or the official university statement. Otherwise stop misrepresenting the situation.
I own a lot of stuff I'm not happy with and wouldn't endorse or buy again.
Do you have purchase orders?
Do you have a written statement from Stanford endorsing the product?
No. Because they don't endorse the product.
Should we write Stanford and let them know that they "endorsed" you by following a twitter handle?
How long do you think they will continue to follow you when they learn how you are misrepresenting the situation?
What else are you misrepresenting?
Yeah...but...but....$5 million in revenues. The company is great. They would never lie about anything. The financials are going to be proof. They'll show you. Well, maybe they won't but now we're in pharma now and is going to be HUGE.
It's fun watching the same people who "spoke" with the turn around specialist and talked about how great he was, now bash him and say how great the new nonexistent CEO is.
Trading halt in place for the next couple of days while an offtake agreement is being worked out. It looks like we could see some nice movement.
No wonder?
How much money have you made with HCTI?
The f500 deals have never been presented as though they might happen. The pr's have always said f500 partner.
Why didn't they already use this type of funding? They've had multiple f500 deals for along time now. By your logic, they should never have needed to dilute. Not much has changed in the last year except for the OS though.
As for dholmes and his interpretation of notes and dilution, he's been so accurate in the past, right? No dilution film October to February according to him. This is the time period where we went from 700m shares to 1.5b. That was only retail and weak hands though. The only reason he might be right now is because the OS is maxed. That's only temporary though, so who knows.
So simple according to you. Want to tell me how you managed to read it wrong?
Yet members of this board who have talked to IR have confirmed that the a/s won't be changing. So who knows better, you or the person who submitted the form?
If by DD you mean speculation, sure.
The company, management, and IR have been consistent and shown you exactly what they are over and over again. Why do you act surprised and hurt when they behave exactly as they have been and not how you hoped they would?
IR probably made a simple mistake as well, unless we see a filing. Maybe it will be released at the same time as the other "huge" release within the next day or so, that was ready weeks ago according to IR.
400,000m?
So.... 400,000m = 400,000,000,000
So 400 billion? You're saying they are increasing the a/s?
No doubt. I picked up a few more this morning. Looking forward to watching this.
That's because it's not used to make polystyrene
What has patience gotten anyone here besides a loss?
Thanks for the response. I'm slowly making my way through the previous posts. I started with a small position a few days ago, and have now averaged up.
Dumping 800,000,000 shares intro the market at an average of roughly 0.003 netted them over 2 million dollars. Why do they need toxic notes?
Is there any reason this keeps sneaking up day after day?
Funny how votes are only carrying with 51% but you say that just a single entity controls 76% of the voting power.
Funny how the company in the filing directly tells you what percentage of the voting power is held by the series B preferred shares.
Care to explain how your numbers don't match what the company reports, but mine do? Who knows, maybe you're right and me and the filing presented by the company are both wrong.
Notice also how you tried to belittle me, exactly as I said you do.
(1)
Represents 100,000 shares owned by Mr. Kristul’s wife,
Maria Kristul.
(2)
Includes the 2,700,000 Series B Preferred Shares which in
the aggregate carry the voting power of 47.11% of the Company’s voting
capital as of
the Record Date
So you can't read filings?????
Do you understand that the filing lists the number of shares and the voting power they hold right next to them?
They are also nice enough to total this for you as well.
I'm sorry you can't do simple addition.
Don't take my word for it, but you can't prove what I've said wrong.
You and the company say that NTI is wholly owned by HCTI. That is a tangible asset. Yet, it doesn't show anywhere.
You and the company claim that votes are carried by 7 entities with more than 50% of voting power, but they only account for 48%.
You and the company's IR claimed no dilution. You both claimed this all the way from 700 million shares to 1.5 billion.
So now, we're just supposed to take your "expert opinion" and continue to trust that everything you and the company say is fact?
It's funny, every one of these examples, you claimed to know as fact something. When it turned out that you couldn't prove or explain it, you acted as though the person challenging you was just too dumb to understand and you weren't going to waste your time on them. Let's plan to talk after the next set of financials, the reverse split, and then again in 12 months.
A company is a tangible item. You say they own the company. We're not talking about licenses anymore.
Great. NTI is an asset that has some value, right?
Where does that show on the financials?