Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You've already established yourself as a liar, so I highly doubt it.
Up $10,395.19 today
Yup. And both Fridays were before 8am.
George advised them to reverse split, don't forget that part.
You're lying. You couldn't prove it even if you tried.
You didn't personally observe shit, you're just making it up hoping that people won't know the difference and might fall for it. Just another lying scumbag.
What’s funny is you have zero concept on what all the dealings were with GVSI and the SEC.
The old management SKIPPED the subcommittee review phase of the FINRA denial and went straight to the SEC to file an appeal, that was wrong to do. Old management needed to follow the FINRA steps and wait on the review board process, they didn’t.
The SEC and FINRA want to see the ticker and Sharp succeed, anyone posting otherwise is completely clueless.
Just another fallacy put to bed.
You are lying. I've looked into that claim when it's been made before before. And it's bullshit.
Go ahead, show us a bunch of examples of late Friday GVSI news that George "likes" to issue.
Oops, you can't. Because he doesn't.
He likes last minute news on Fridays…
That's certainly possible. I am just giving George the benefit of the doubt as I think a new Notice of Deficiency and/or appealing it would be important enough of a Material Event that he would need to explicitly disclose it to the public within 4 days. We are certainly way beyond the 4 and 7 day marks. But the dude has been super vague with stuff just like you mention.
I say they slapped him with a new notice of deficiency .And he had 7 days to appeal it or its closed .
No matter what it was the otc wizzer just cant seem to be transparent with the owners of the company aka shareholders aka sheep . Why that be ?
Assuming FINRA did not slap George with the pre-existing Notice of Deficiency and instead asked for the missing filings with a fresh request then George has 90 days to come up with them or the matter is closed - "denied". It doesn't just become a stalemate.
https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/6490 :
"(2) Lapsed Requests
Where a Requesting Party does not, in the reasonable determination of the Department, sufficiently respond to any request by the Department for additional information or documentation pursuant to paragraph (b)(3) above within 90 calendar days following such Department request, such party's request shall be deemed "lapsed" and be closed."
You must have missed the memo cuz as far as the rest of us can see, the visibility after the latest FINRA response has been essentially the same. Give me financials or you cannot proceed. Then GS says, I can't do that. Then we're back where we started. Give me the financials... Then GS says...
We are at a juncture where subjectivity is all that is left to break the deadlock. Someone has to give in and it's most likely going to be GS. Maybe, just maybe, FINRA will make an exception or offer a solution, either way it's back to unpredictability and subjectivity.
"Otherwise" means the shit ain't happening as long as the missing financials are still a concern.
$GVSI is otherwise prepared for a reverse merger
So what is George hinting about the future with this one?
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) December 13, 2023
Yes, you cherrypick momentary snaphots of a one minute chart and exclaim how much accumulation is going on when the reality of the bigger picture can be quite different.
It's called deception.
Actually, if you check the time I posted the accumulation, you will see that the stock was .0114 on over 800,000 volume early in the trading session, which would have translated out to about 10 million shares for the day if that pace had continued.
If they requested further information then George should have 90 days to respond, which goes out to the end of February.
If, on the other hand, they simply slapped him with the Notice of Deficiency that has existed since 2019 then he would have had 7 days to file an appeal. Then it is up to a panel that meets once a month to make a decision on appeals filed the previous month. His tweet was on November 28, it is conceivable that an appeal could have been filed in either November or December if that was the case. No clue when the panel would meet the following month.
Here are is the official rundown on how all this stuff works: https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/6490
The "soon" reply has already come and gone. Perhaps you should try paying attention instead of dreaming up lies to repeat.
They "soon" reply was that the missing financials were still a concern.
You know, the missing financials that George has already said he cannot produce.
Nothing has been characterized as "soon" since. There is no outstanding "soon" item at the moment. You are lying if you are claiming that there is.
Actually FINRA said “soon”.
Bullshit! You are lying. Again.
There is absolutely no such thing as "180 days MAX" for FINRA to act on a company action like a name/ticker change. That's why no proof of it existing has ever been shown - because it doesn't exist. All they came up with as "proof" is a link to a page on becoming a broker-dealer and hoping that people were too stupid to realize it was actually totally unrelated.
Anyone can see for themselves what the actual rules are and what the actual time limits in place are at https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/6490 . Yes, there are some limits stated such as 7 days for a company to file an appeal or 90 days for a company to respond to a request for additional information. But there is absolutely nothing about FINRA only having 180 days to make their decision.
In fact, here is an example of a company where FINRA toook 471 days before they finally granted a name/ticker change. Screenshots as well as links provided so anyone can verify for themselves that this is factual.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/338043/content
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/ARBH/security
They can only keep it going for 180 days MAX, 35 days more, and then “SOON”, becomes The BIG DAY!!!
The notion that GS and his merger candidate(s) feel he MUST change the name seems to have been invented here; on ihub. Do you agree?
Bullshit. You are lying.
FINRA only said they would respond "soon" and they already have. And no they did not process the name and ticker change. Instead they had concerns over the missing financials. Which could in fact be the death knell for GVSI...
When FINRA said “Soon”, that confirmed that it “will happen” according to FINRA’s own words.
The FINRA "soon" response already happened. And they responded with concern about the missing financials.
So, no they were not at all confirming "that it will happen". You're such a liar.
In fact, that might presage exactly the opposite. If they asked for the financials that George has already said he cannot produce then he has 90 days to somehow come up with them or the matter will be closed - a de facto denial.
That's right. We might already be on the countdown clock to kaputsville. And while possible, I think it might be doubtful George would undertake any appeal process. That might be just money and effort down the drain seeing as how it did not work last time for the previous group that tried.
They did not say that the financials were being worked on. Just that they were still "cooperating".
Management continues to cooperate with FINRA at its own expense in order to achieve the name & symbol changes.
I'm thinking it has nothing to do with FINs.
$GVSI has finally received comments from FINRA who is concerned with acts by previous management, particularly, missing financials from that period.
What was the time period of the missing financials?
Couldn’t the current company draft zeros in an updated filing if the company was not operational?
They already gave their "soon" reply and it was that the missing financials are still a concern.
You go tell 'em they don't make a difference!
https://www.finra.org/contact-finra
Replying to my posts no longer work
You sure are milking that copy and paste over and over
Who even said any of that stuff? I never have for example. Not a one of those was uttered by me.
Simply adding his own name to a filing is quite different than coming up with 6 years of missing financials that he has already said he cannot come up with.
Pretending they are equivalent is disingenuous to say the least.
Yup, it has been absolutely insinuated that the supposed 180 day deadline meant the name and ticker change would be granted. You know, because "time is up!"
But that's all bullshit as I hope you now realize.
In almost all cases the merger happens first. Then the new merged entity picks their new name to go with or change the new entity to the established, recognized name they had already been using pre-merger. Whatever they like, they're in charge then.
It's quite odd to name change first, before a merger. I'm on board with the idea that George is trying to do it to demonstrate that it can be done, to alleviate any fears that a potential merger company would have. If they have done any decent due diligence whatsoever they would know of GVSI's past failure and would need to know that the problem has been overcome before they enter into a merger agreement. The potential merger companies may not even have anything to do with blockchain whatsoever, it may have just been the trial name George went with because it sounded good at the time. It was a long time ago he chose the name. It's extremely doubtful some company or companies have been waiting this entire time for this particular shell.
It's so odd that some are pumping that "a merger can come anytime even before FINRA grants name change!!"
No company with any intelligence at the head would do such a thing. They would want to know the FINRA problem has been solved first. Just another example of blatant pumping based on bullshit unfortunately.
By the way, my negativity comes from a place of realism. I don't "bash for cheapies" nor do I have some kind of grudge against George. I just can't stand the lying that goes on. Therefore I get called a "basher" by the pumpers. They want the naive that don't know better to think I am somehow an enemy and that I should not be listened to. The fact of the matter is I seek the truth. I would love to see George succeed and a lovely merger happen.
But in the meantime I'm a negative Nancy because of the way things are going. And people that don't have the time or inclination to do their own DD should know that things are not going as swimmingly as some would have them believe.
Plus it's fun to be a thorn in the side of the lying douchebag pumpers.
LMAO, go tell them they don't know what the hell they're doing.
https://www.finra.org/contact-finra
Those 90 days might just be counting down. Tick Tock
No, FINRA has not processed GVSI's request for name and ticker changes, otherwise they would be on the Daily List. FINRA has seen the request, they have read the request, they have responded to the request, etc. But those are not "processing" in the context of FINRA and corporate actions. Once they decide to process then the changes go on the Daily List. As of yet they have not decided to process, obviously.
Actually, I knew more at age 16 than you have learned in your lifetime. And they have "processed" the $GVSI application for name and symbol change, just have a few concerns to clear up, then BOOM, it appears on the daily list. Anyone stating otherwise is lying to try to bash the stock price down to buy cheap shares.. next..
It seems name change and finra membership may be correlated. Not sure. Very confusing literature. Later today I will Google again. Finra does have 180 day deadline in some matters, apparently.
If FINRA had processed the GVSI application then the name and ticker change would have shown up on the Daily List. That's what the word "process" means in this particular context.
Maybe you should try knowing what you're talking about before being dismissive and looking like an idiot.
Actually FINRA has already PROCESSED $GVSI APPLICATION, in much less than 180 days, evidenced by George telling us they have responded to the application. next...
Yeah but I googled specifically re name change and I'm pretty sure it's 180
That page has absolutely nothing to do with processing corporate actions.
It is quite clearly all about applying to FINRA to be a new broker-dealer firm.
Throwing out a link and a quote and hoping that people won't actually examine them and realize that they don't have anything to do with name and ticker changes is pure scumbaggery.
FINRA must review and process substantially complete applications within 180 calendar days. Learn what to expect after you apply, including how to amend an application and what to expect from the membership interview.
https://www.finra.org/registration-exams-ce/broker-dealers/new-firms#:~:text=FINRA%20must%20review%20and%20process,expect%20from%20the%20membership%20interview.
His "FINRA deadline" is bullshit. He's lying.
It's just a ploy to create a false sense of urgency to sucker the naive into buying before the supposed deadline and the "guaranteed approval".
Go ahead, ask him where it says that FINRA has a 180 day deadline. Have him give you a link to it. Unfortunately, he won't be able to give you one. Because it's not real.
I've asked for proof several times and just got ghosted. If they had proof they would be jumping over themselves to provide it.
Where does it say FINRA must complete within 180 days?
You wouldn't be lying about that, would you?
$GVSI applied for Name and Ticker change on July 18th. FINRA must complete within 180 days. I believe that is around January 15th or so.
FINRA already gave their "soon" response. It was that the missing financials are still a concern. I guess you must have "forgotten".
We've been right about the very most important thing of all - the missing financials still being a problem.
You know, the ones that the lying pumpers claimed were no longer an issue, having been "put to bed".
Nope. Y'all were lying your asses off and we were correct all along.
Those were all before FINRA got serious and slapped the Notice of Deficiency on in 2019. Since that was applied there has not been a single successful corporate action.
Cutler's was an absolute failure, even including an SEC appeal.
And George's doesn't seem to be doing so hot either. They want the financials that he has already said he cannot come up with. The very ones that got Cutler denied when he couldn't come up with them.
For the first one all he had to do was add his name in. That's all. That's it.
For the second one it looks like he has to come up with the years of missing financials that he has already said he cannot come up with.
Just a weeee bit of difference between the two situations.
You're like a crazy dude in front of an airport ranting that airplanes don't exist while they can clearly be seen taking off and landing right behind him.
Good luck pretending there is no Expert Market in your own mind. Everyone else can clearly see that it's quite real.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/research/stock-screener
Yup, fortunately it is about as easy to get back off of Expert Market as it is to find yourself there - just get out some filings. The tradeability still suffers though and that's the part that really sucks.
I'm still perplexed as to this one dude's insistence that the Expert Market doesn't even exist. Trying to pull the wool over people's eyes or really that ignorant? Sometimes it's hard to tell.