Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
🚨BREAKING!🚨Representative Ralph Norman @RepRalphNorman questions SEC Chairman Gary Gensler about $MMTLP.#MMTLPfiasco #AuditedAgreggatedShareCount pic.twitter.com/vMoPBLvNGG
— BusyBrands (@busybrands) September 27, 2023
🚨🚨BREAKING 🚨🚨
— BusyBrands (@busybrands) September 12, 2023
Senator Mike Crapo (@MikeCrapo ) Asks @GaryGensler about $MMTLP In a LIVE hearing.#AuditedAgreggatedShareCount #MMTLPFiasco
pic.twitter.com/UdKh2Laxq1
Nope try again...instead of addressing what was in the post including a blue sheet investigation and situation involving naked shorts(MMTLP) we get an unneeded "lesson" lol on the history of blue sheets. It's very clear to anyone reading these posts that the topic is never discussed its simply a ploy to make the big $$ look good. I'd advise anyone to go read the Goldman SEC order in its entirety as well and you can see how a multi billion company for now the 2nd time(nearly 20 years) can't seem to give accurate trading data when requested for a multitude of issues. But don't worry folks we should trust the big $$$ ROTFL.
When anyone speaks to people like they know everything and they know nothing are constantly wrong they will not listen so please keep doing it.Also when anyone constantly tries to diminish everything in favor of big money they will not listen...not the old day's here. Also I'd research the MMTLP blue sheet saga which is probably the biggest story out there right now. Start from the beginning with a dividend being illegally listed. The entire issue revolves around naked shorting. FOIA requests started to find the truth and found the blue sheet correspondence
$GTii 197,900 -> 729,400$FNGR 435,900 -> 1,540,000@HAMShortkiller pic.twitter.com/QNIG5ZaGPK
— 5 (@niceafro5) September 27, 2023
It really seems you have no idea how the process works which is comical...you do understand this action is on appeal right? You also understand Alpine has already tried to fight the backtesting requirement changes from NSCC and now as part of this STILL ONGOING appeal you have the backtesting/GTII issues. So again nothing is going to change while on appeal as it is and unsettled matter. Mic drop you say? More like a pants drop when you always add 2+2 and get 73 ROTFL
A. It's a way outside the rules as they are not supposed to communicate this way DUH! Why is the SEC going through all these messages? Again DUH! They ain't talking about a weekend BBQ.
And B. Again if you read the link entirely Citadel is named in the story thus the genesis of the "Citadel Again" SMH
It's waiting on the ability of some to understand the short numbers..but please don't use Citadel's explanation of them
Everyone can go read the complaint in full and realize you have zero idea what your talking about with this post so thank you for that LOL. Still waiting for the proof that Alpine got their backtesting deficiency "wired back" to them as well as something showing the issue with NSCC is closed(which it should be if it's cleared up like you say not continuously extended as per the news case releases) now you need to look for revised Financials for a 5 year time frame too from Citadel that don't exist ROTFL
If GTII were done, wouldn't it be back to historical lows? Hmmm so let's not count our chickens before they hatch...AGAIN...also I wonder how much the Kramers have been singing?
Judgement by the way obliterated when just recently we were told to "call CDEL" to have them "explain" how the short data should be read....you can't make this stuff up! ROTFL
https://twitter.com/Joeschmo3311/status/1705304254108381361?t=qVyBvStfVHPVUHRtpgz8PQ&s=19
From A REAL trader who has SEEN IT HAPPEN IN REAL TIME
Citadel just got caught for naked shorting...end of story on that...have to believe there's more to come
Idiots are not 100% correct when he said for years 1 way they illegally short is to mark shorts as longs rendering the SEC "explanation" of short interest useless and underreported. The SEC literally just told everyone although we knew. We also know they cant be the only one's. And a computer coding error happens when a human enters that code. How did the SEC find out about it? Citadel couldn't find it? For 5 years? LOL right
So for 5 years(with this issue with citadel only that was revealed so far) the short sale data was UNDER REPORTED meaning the precious explanations of some who cling to the explanation from the government agencies of the correct interpretation of short sale volume is false. Now and forever false as we only currently SEE 1 that was caught. All along Ham AND Wes Christian KNEW this was happening all over and were proven correct...again. I'll say again go research who created the OTC trading software for Jane Street Capital.."miscoding" and "computer glitch" ROTFL open your eyes
They NEVER EVER make them go back and fix the mistakes..find one for me where any broker marked wrong and they ever forced them to cover after an investigation...and they never "admit guilt" because they don't need to duh typical legal settlementcash grab. It speaks to multiple issues such as how did this happen for 5 years? Go look up WHO created the OTC trading software for Jane Street Capital. Tell us what changed from 2015-2020 that would have led to this? Easy to see who the sides are here folks it just keeps getting reinforced...hilarious! Oh and by the way STILL waiting for a link or any proof from your statements that the Alpine issue is over and or the Backtesting Charge was "wired back to them 90 days later"
Um no but nice try
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2023-192?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery
Pick better heroes...more to come
Wrong again
An individual that helped get reg sho set up and who also naked shorted as he was told to do and know alls about it...no website just listen to him speak there are tons of mediums available to do so or call him..I wouldn’t call someone who consistently wins cases and worked with the SEC and opportunist especially with the damage model required for him to take a case🤣🤣...so bottom line here is those who never want to do anything anyone offers as evidence,proof etc speaks volumes and the folks who see it happen comment after comment aren't buying it as they aren't "dumb retail" as portrayed...it ain't 2005 anymore
Neither, I understand their "explanation" just don't agree it's always accurate based on those who have seen manipulation first hand...call up Shareintel and Wes Christian and ask them to explain it to you...there a a multitude of other folks who have as well
FINRA? I wouldn't call it click bait though. Underreported amd inaccurate? Probably so from those who have investigated for companies and found that and those can do math over time
Yes marked short..you know like when they mark trades long when it's really short etc? Plenty of info out there from real traders who have SEEN it happen along with SEC litigation
Funny you think those "sells" were really sells..only 19% marked short today also hmmmm
Yup and it won't matter what they do to manipulate it this time
That would be a "no need to" I'll say again...there are only so many real shares available to trade...period
CDEL? ROTFL...that would be the LAST place anyone should contact. Maybe you could call them and have them teach you about derivatives and equity strategies to get around rule 203(b)(3)? Or you could simply understand as stated before. The..math..doesn't..add up compared to available shares..Those you speak at do
So is the misinterpretation of the interpretation.
Ahhh so you didn't listen to that video or read her book because it blows your "ideas" on how things work in real life out of the water...I'll take a PhD who worked at DTC and understands the fraud along with hearing with my own ears from real traders who have seen naked shorting in real time over anyone who disputes it...and everyone knows who runs and owns the DTC therein lies one of the problems LMFAO
It's a horrible post as it does not cover this specific situation lol wow...all one needs to do to erase this "ideal" of how it works is the fact that Alpine was caught providing one sided bids and not acting as a bona fide market maker during the wells notice investigation by FINRA in the case documents(thats just ONE ISSUE). If anyone crawls out of the dark and actually listens to the attorneys and others who have FOUND the naked shorts in other stocks(including cases revolving around debentures and found front running the sales of unregistered shares) they would know this is just ONE way to naked short. Lastly we are to believe that a company who has averaged a violation a year since existence(40 in 39 years) to be doing anything on the up and up?...absolutely hilarious there are those who think most investors are blind and not educated now like 15 years ago ROTFL.
First you said you didn't say "wire money" now you assume we need a lesson lol...that is not what we asked so I'll ask again very simply..How do you know the DTC after 90 days returned the 2.3 million for sure? Also let's not forget there was a 1% charge per day on that 2.3 million so did the DTC just decide to not collect that? Also how many times a stock is NAMED in any public documents like these? Another question would be why then have this case not terminated if all is hunky dory and this money returned? Alpine had already tried to challenge the new net capital rules once and failed. Why out of 230 OTC stocks(source Scottsdale vs FINRA case and FINRA Wells notice investigation findings) was GTII the main driver of this issue? Why is a broker like this shorting a stock? For whom and why so large? Also understand that Naked shorts will not show up on their books...willingly anyway...and thats what everyone who says they don't exist hides behind. When the SEC busts people for Naked shorting they rarely if ever name the stocks or why didn't this get caught right away with current systems in place? You cannot answer the question about how you figured the DTC sent the money back to Alpine but i know the group who was saying it and makes sense itsbspread here too lol. End of story and the questions asked are not intended for you to answer they are intended to make people think who aren't paid not to. Way bigger things in play here if you stop...look and listen
Whenever a bs claim is thrown out there we always have a deflection tactic 🤣🤣
"90 days later DTC wired it back to them" is exactly what you said re- read your post and we are still waiting for a link to prove your claim
Oh please share where you saw that where they were wired back money? I'd love to hear who told you this lol give us a link
You know a better question to ask is why on earth would Seeking Alpha put out a hit piece on a .60 stock thats going nowhere? Is it because they know in middle of October shares have to be actually delivered and not just a placeholder for the dividend? Do they think big news is coming???? Also why would anyone want to keep trashing GTII daily here and everywhere else? Those are all rhetorical because we all know why.
Highly doubtful that's your mission and I'm neither. But let's address your questions even though you choose to never actually study anything posted here or comment when proven wrong(like when you said nobody went to congress)
#1 My guess is someone caught wind of Alpine’s impending doom and so why waste time and money when they were done for? Let FINRA do it duh
#2 I can't recall posting the DTC October info as you claim but perhaps Intially when it came out. #2A Why if it was resolved is it still not ended then? You need to think really hard as to why on that one. It's been pushed down the road several times. And from where do you assume that anything was paid or settled by Alpine’s that came from the NSCC? Are we supposed to believe Alpine who over 40 times has been subject to enforcement actions? That's close to once a year since inception.
#3 Mistakes happen, Lawyers catch it and want to be safe. When you misspeak or misspell, should we assume you're up to nefarious acts?
#4 The math on the very common stock compensation plan thats was PR'd about back in October of 2022 is so miniscule it meas zero. All one has to do is look at the SP on or around those dates...means zilch,zero,Nada even IF GTII were a fundamental play which at present it is not and everyone in it understands that. And they understand the lame playbook talking about that and the other old tired tactics