Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Great post gestalt2
See below from Wednesday
Here is your Buyins.net RegSHO Compliance Alert for October 23rd, 2018. Our RegSHO Compliance Service helps to protect CYDY from short sellers and market makers that are violating the more stringent RegSHO market integrity provisions recently enacted. We are monitoring the trading activity in CYDY and here is today's report:
Total Trading Volume: 144043
Daily Short Volume: 64100
Avg. Price of Shorts Today: 0.519
Short %: 44.50
Volume at Offer: 79817
Buy%: 0.000
Volume at Bid: 64150
Sell%: 0.000
Shares Crossed: 76.000
Cross%: 0.000
Net Buying vs. Selling: 15667
Price Change: 0.00000
Friction Factor: Abnormal Trading
The above data is used to calculate if a fair market is being made in the shares of CYDY. Friction Factor determines if there is normal or abnormal behavior in the price action of the stock when compared to the buying vs. selling trading statistics. Today, your Friction Factor was Abnormal Trading. Here is how to understand Friction Factor:
1. If Friction Factor is positive, more buying than selling caused CYDY's price to rise 2. If Friction Factor is negative, more selling than buying caused CYDY's price to fall 3. If Friction Factor is 0, there was no discernable activity either way 4. If Friction Factor is abnormal, it means that more buying than selling caused the price to drop, which is evidence of manipulative activity. In some cases more selling than buying can cause the price to increase. While this is rare, it must be noted as well.
By signing up for our RegSHO Compliance Service, we will monitor your trading daily and identify short selling, illegal short selling, manipulative market maker activity and alert the media when a short squeeze begins and when forced buy-ins occur because we were able to get broker dealers, FINRA or the SEC to force �buy to covers� upon short sellers that have not located, borrowed and delivered shares shorted by T+3.
Here are our unique data sources:
1. Nightly Threshold Security Lists ("Naked Short Lists"): data comes from AMEX, NASDAQ, NYSE, OTCBB, PINKSHEET exchanges directly.
2. Daily Size of Failures to Deliver ("Size of Naked Shorts on a day to day basis): directly from SEC 3. Daily Short Sales Times and Sales Data: data comes from AMEX, NASDAQ, NYSE, OTCBB, PINKSHEET exchanges directly.
4. Brokerage firms that trades go through: data comes directly from AMEX, NASDAQ, NYSE, OTCBB, PINKSHEET exchanges 5. Names and positions of short sellers with assets under management exceeding $100 million: data will come directly from SEC 6. Blue Sheet Data Requests: We deal directly with FINRA and SEC to alert them as to which stocks and which brokerage firms SEC and FINRA need to investigate.
7. Trading Statistics and Friction Factor are based on data provided by all US stock exchanges and proprietary analysis of the activity.
The data we provide is extremely useful for CYDY for the following reasons:
1. Stop naked short selling in the company you are covering 2. Break the market maker hold on Level II box causing so much price friction 3. Our SqueezeTrigger Reports that cross newswires and are sent to our 720,000 users help break the rest of the shorts 4. Discourage new short sellers from shorting your stock 5. Stop the negative perception that dropping stock price places on normal day to day business operations 6. Combined all of these facets help to stop the daily drain that the short attacks have on the company.
Nadar is not going anywhere! He has the full support of his Board from what I understand. He has raised over 140 million which is a milestone in itself. I really believe that we are very close to an FDA approval.
Here is your Buyins.net RegSHO Compliance Alert for October 17th, 2018. Our RegSHO Compliance Service helps to protect CYDY from short sellers and market makers that are violating the more stringent RegSHO market integrity provisions recently enacted. We are monitoring the trading activity in CYDY and here is today's report:
Total Trading Volume: 97351
Daily Short Volume: 20543
Avg. Price of Shorts Today: 0.525
Short %: 21.10
Volume at Offer: 53569
Buy%: 55.030
Volume at Bid: 43782
Sell%: 44.970
Shares Crossed: 0.000
Cross%: 0.000
Net Buying vs. Selling: 9787
Price Change: 0.00200
Friction Factor: 48935
The above data is used to calculate if a fair market is being made in the shares of CYDY. Friction Factor determines if there is normal or abnormal behavior in the price action of the stock when compared to the buying vs. selling trading statistics. Today, your Friction Factor was 48935. Here is how to understand Friction Factor:
1. If Friction Factor is positive, more buying than selling caused CYDY's price to rise 2. If Friction Factor is negative, more selling than buying caused CYDY's price to fall 3. If Friction Factor is 0, there was no discernable activity either way 4. If Friction Factor is abnormal, it means that more buying than selling caused the price to drop, which is evidence of manipulative activity. In some cases more selling than buying can cause the price to increase. While this is rare, it must be noted as well.
Speaking of Wow
Watch this! It explains everything that is going on and now the tables have turned!!!
https://vimeo.com/42321845
Wh knows on this BB oh well we will know in 6 minutes
shows last .5280
.51/ .53
Strange 24 minutes before the opening and showing 112500 volume. Never see that this early
Thank you searching4rainbow
Great article now I hope we get blockchain
https://blockgeeks.com/guides/what-is-blockchain-technology/
Suvorov Tuesday, 04/10/18 02:18:27 PM
Re: trding post# 21502 0
Post #
21503
of 29655
Yeah if you could squeeze the shorts both problems can be easily solved.
Good luck!!
I will post this again as Finesand is a moderator and deleted what I posted. She has no position in CYDY and works I am sure for the naked shorts. Buyins said that many naked shorts invade the message boards. Why would she be talking negatively about the stock after she sold at .52 and is a moderator? Let's see how quick she deletes this.
WHY IS SHE A MODERATOR, TALKS TRASH ABOUT CYDY, OWNS ZERO STOCK
To understand what is going on start at number 14
http://www.deepcapturethemovie.com/
The stock should trade on their performance??
Are you kidding me, 90% of the stocks on the OTC BB and pink sheets FAIL!
Cytodyn is a BioTech startup they have to be approved by the FDA before they have performance.
They have 17 Million in cash, no debt and a burn rate of 2.5 million a month. We can make it through March of 2019.
WE HAVE TO WORK TO GET OFF THE BB AND ON NYSE OR OTC AND THAT IS WHY NADAR HIRED BUYINS.
ENJOY YOUR SUNDAY AND WHEN YOU GO TO CHURCH PRAY FOR ME AND CYTODYN!
Ms Finesand
I want to apoligize to you after my curt off the cuff comment but you seem like a person that will take the time and watch a movie on how the naked shorts tried to destroy a public company. It was Overstock.com. It is put together by Patrick Byrne owner of Overstock.com. It is worth a review over coffee.
http://www.deepcapturethemovie.com/
Yes, Gestalt2 this is fascinating but do not expect this to happen overnight this is a gradual process that will take a while. Can you imagine if 100 million short positions had to cover, I am not giving them mine well second thought maybe @93 a share....LOL
Finesand
With all respect, the link you sent me was fake news as the President says. It's probably run by an intern! ONE MORE TIME WE ARE SHORT MILLIONS OF SHARES! GET OVER IT
Finesand
I just bet you are part of the Short Team, I have looked at your post over the past several months and it's like a bunch of Cr**! I have been in this business over 40 years and it's your a novice. With all respect give me a name of someone who has bought from Paulson and sold and kept warrants.
I forgot a name change also
A company name change and CUSIP # change is a great way to shine some light on the degree to which has been manipulated via Naked Short ("Phantom"/Counterfeit) Shares.
Here is a link to info on CUSIP numbers for those unfamiliar with the subject:
http://www.stockhouse.com/Bullboards/MessageDetailThread.aspx?p=0&m=23494620&r=0&s=FSRT&t=LIST
The question: "Would a CUSIP change make the short shares have to cover?"
Seems from what I have read, a CUSIP change could force the cover of NSS positons if the change is done in conjunction with a name change. It is my understanding that the mechanics of the CUSIP change (with name change) would effectively prevent trading shares of the old CUSIP # and would create an entirely new set of shares through the DTC. By doing this, the DTC is forced to account for ALL of the old shares exchanged for the new shares. Without the name change, the old shares would simply be renamed. With the name change, they are physically exchanged which will isolate phantom shares and force covering.
At this point, I believe the broker who sold the Phantom Shares would be responsible for making good on the transaction. Perhaps the broker would force a squeeze in the NEW CUSIP shares in order to cover. The price again would spike as the broker(s) who were guilty of selling counterfeits made good through the new market.
Here is a conversation that occurred with the CUSIP Service Bureau:
...The CUSIP Service Bureau rep stated that a CUSIP # change "usually" comes with a name change, but not always. He stated that a name change will "always" come with a CUSIP # change though. He told me that the "name change" and the "CUSIP # change" starts with the company's Transfer Agent (TA) coordinating electronically with the CUSIP Service Bureau by linking the company's name and address. Then the CUSIP Service Bureau Coordinates with the Depository Trust Company (DTC).
The DTC will serve as the overseer to coordinate with the regulatory authorities and/or agencies whomever as deemed necessary. Sometimes the TA will coordinate with the DTC too for certain confirmations or transactions as deemed necessary. The DTC makes sure there is proper share accountability for proper dissemination into our brokerage accounts. This is all done electronically.
After the company/TA receives their new CUSIP # from the CUSIP Service Bureau, the company/TA (& legal team) then coordinates with the NASDAQ and SEC for the already coordinated amount of shares as the new inventory. The company/TA will then coordinate with the DTC to confirm the amount of shares and other key info.
After accountability is confirmed by the DTC, the DTC then authorizes the brokerage companies to change all old CUSIP numbers to the new CUSIP numbers electronically within our brokerage accounts. A CUSIP# change is not enough from what most believe throughout the investing/trading community to force a covering of a naked shorted position in my opinion...
The CUSIP Service Bureau further explained it as when stock 1234 changes its name and CUSP# to stock 5678, the shares of stock 5678 are given to them electronically by the TA to replace stock 1234. This is the key transaction. If only a CUSIP # change transpires then a lesser type of accountability takes place. The name change matching the address of the company is what actually forces an exchange of the "old inventory" of shares to the "new inventory" of shares. Without the name change, there is NOT a "movement of shares" from the TA that takes place.
Only one phase of the accountability process is required to take place to verify accountability when only a CUSIP # change transpires because of the lack of not having a creation of the "new inventory" of shares by the company/TA. Therefore no movement of shares takes place. This is a simple misunderstanding by many companies, but if not considered, it could be the difference for any type of forced covering of any naked shorted positions.
If there is NO DILUTION, a covering of the naked shorted positions should take place due to what's revealed during the accountability process between the DTC after getting the "new inventory" of shares from the CUSIP Service Bureau if there is not only a CUSIP# change, but a name change too.
Because of the CUSIP # change, the MMs will be required to account for each of the old shares with the new shares. Because of the name change, it's important because it forces the DTC to play a more finite role by not only accounting for the old shares to equal the new shares electronically, but forces them to match a "new inventory" of shares that have been given to them from the CUSIP Service Bureau as the new official/approved inventory by way of the shares given from the company/TA.
May also explain recent TA change.
Tommy
Goldman and UBS are big players in this game. In fact, a rogue trader with UBS cost them millions to cover and he was fired.
https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/10/25/ubs-fined-12-million-over-short-selling/
Believe me, they are still in this scheme.
If you are bored this is a great read.
http://www.deepcapture.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/deepcapture-the-story-v1.pdf
d0lphint0m
One other way changes the place of incorporation from Delaware to Nevada
and you have to change the cusip# when that happens shorts have to cover.
Chump
You are so correct! Now I am going to check the ribs on the grill
Goldenisla
This is what buyins.net will be doing from the report they sent out to the public.
The data we provide is extremely useful for CYDY for the following reasons:
1. Stop naked short selling in shares of CYDY
2. Break the market maker hold on Level II box causing so much price friction
3. Our SqueezeTrigger Reports that cross newswires and are sent to our 750,000
users help break the rest of the shorts
4. Discourage new short sellers from shorting your stock
5. Stop the negative perception that dropping stock price places on normal day
to day business operations
6. Combined all of these facets help to stop the daily drain that the short attacks
have on the company.
Here is a quick technology overview:
Here is a quick technology overview:
http://www.buyins.com/brochure.pdf
Background information on our CEO:
http://www.buyins.com/images/tomronk.pdf
Yes you are right
Just read the link and see what they have been doing to CYDY
http://www.buyins.com/reports/cydy10-11-18.pdf
OK SORRY I SAID I WAS DONE BUT HAVE TO USE ALL MY AMMUNITION.
This is a interview with David Wenger who ouns Shareintell and goes after this illegal scheme. It is worth reading!! His Company is just like buyins.net. If I am right David saved overstock.com from being destroyed by the naked shorts.
Podcast: ShareIntel CEO David Wenger on how public company executives can track short sellers
Republish
Reprint
James West, MidasLetter | April 12, 2016 | Last Updated: Apr 12 1:30 PM ET
More from MidasLetter
ShareIntel makes software to help public company executives track who is buying and selling their stock.
FotoliaShareIntel makes software to help public company executives track who is buying and selling their stock.
David Wenger is the CEO of ShareIntel, a company that makes software to help public company executives track who is buying and selling their stock with a level of accuracy that has not been available until now.
Midas-Letter-financial-radio-podcast-thumbListen to the podcast interview with David Wenger: Audio Player
00:0000:00Use Up/Down Arrow keys to increase or decrease volume.
James West is an investor and the author of the Midas Letter, an investing research report focused on small cap stocks. The views expressed on this podcast are his own and are presented for general informational purposes only — they should not be construed as advice to invest in any securities mentioned.
James West: David, thanks for joining us today.
David Wenger: Thank you for having me.
James West: David, can you tell us what is ShareIntel, and what is it that ShareIntel does?
David Wenger: ShareIntel, in very simple terms, is a software as a service designed to provide transparency into who’s buying, who’s selling, who’s friend, who’s foe. It’s designed to tell a CEO, a CFO, a fiduciary of a public company who’s buying and selling his shares.
James West: Okay. So you basically can look at the owners’ list, the non-objecting beneficial owners’ list, the objecting beneficial owners’ list, and other sources of data, to determine who’s holding what?
David Wenger: Yes, exactly. There are multiple data providers, multiple sources for data; most of these are quasi-governmental reporting entities. Much of the data is controlled by the banks, broker-dealers and clearing firms. The data I’m referring to is shareholder information. It’s private in nature. So we aggregate data from disparate sources, and we assign common identifiers, which is part of data management process, enabling us to compare it. So we piece together, if you will, pieces of a puzzle that enable us to create transparency into, in one unique, archival, historic, easy to access and understand and follow, database.
James West: Okay. So then what is it that you’re doing that a public company can’t do for itself already?
David Wenger: Well, as I said, much of the information on shareholders and share holdings, and the ability to track critical broker-dealer and shareholder information, is controlled by the banks, broker-dealers and clearing firms responsible for trade executions in its stock. Knowing how to access this data is where ShareIntel can help.
James West: So this would be a useful tool to combat, for example, naked short selling?
David Wenger: Oh, for sure.
James West: Okay. And is naked short selling a major problem in North American markets?
David Wenger: I would argue that it is, and probably more so today than at any point in history. As you know, trades are processed today, trades are going off, they’re processed by computers and trades are going off in gigaseconds. What’s a gigasecond? While the stock borrow process is still very much a people-driven, largely manual process.
Andrew Krystal: Can you give us an example of how your drill-down software has been deployed successfully?
David Wenger: Well, in very simple terms, to sort of pick up on that last comment, when stock is not located or borrowed prior to a trade, it results in settlement fails, in essentially the creation of phantom or counterfeit shares in the marketplace. This in turn creates stock dilution, which decreases the value of a company’s market cap by pushing the share price down. And what we do is simply provide a window into this sort of activity. You can’t manage what you can’t see, is what I’m often quoted as saying. If you can’t see this data, if you don’t know that this is happening, you can’t begin to manage the process.
So we have multiple examples of where we’ve been able to help companies, but a large part of that is confidential.
James West: Okay, so let’s just back it up for a sec there, David. What is the product that ShareIntel offers that facilitates the drilling down into the data that reveals who’s holding what and who’s selling what?
David Wenger: Well, it begins with understanding who your shareholders are. You have to be able to DrilDown behind street name, down to individual names and addresses, to identify who’s buying, who’s selling, you know, to identify who, for example, is a real investor, a true anchor investor. Who are your friends, and who are your foes? There’s a whole host of information that’s available out there, but it’s very hard to access and it’s in disparate form. So comparing it becomes very difficult.
James West: And so you have a product that specifically performs that function?
David Wenger: Correct.
James West: And what’s that product called?
David Wenger: DrilDown.
James West: Okay. So your DrilDown software program is something that a public company can license in order to track who’s holding what and when they’re selling, what they’re selling, as you say, to know who your friends are?
David Wenger: Correct. Absolutely.
Andrew Krystal: How would you then use that information to target anchor investors?
David Wenger: Well, think about it this way: in the world that I grew up in, 25 years ago, I’m dating myself; there were arguably let’s say roughly 200 regional investment banks and armies of brokers. And those brokers performed a very meaningful function for, in particular, development phased companies, companies that were new to the marketplace, recently IPOd. They would essentially reach out to investors, actually identify the investors, find these investors, maintain relationships with these investors, and keep them apprised of the company’s development.
That no longer exists. Those brokers are gone, the regional investment banks are gone, and I think we’re down to less than 30 now. So many of these companies have been orphaned. In fact, a lot of them have been shorted out of businesses because it’s been easier to make money in the last 20 years forcing companies out of business, shorting their stocks, in some cases illegally, pushing the share price down, and capturing profits that way rather than invest in companies.
So it really becomes – it’s incumbent upon companies today to recognize that they have to know who their investors are. It starts with a database of knowing who their current investors are, knowing who their key anchor investors are, and reaching out, developing those relationships and maintaining those relationships. For example, if there’s a seller in the marketplace, you can use this software to help cross a block of stock. It’s all geared to managing a company’s market cap effectively. The onus, unfortunately, is on the individual issuer, client issuer or company, to fill the gap, to fill the void that the traditional retail broker used to perform.
James West: Right. So then how does a public company president use the information generated by the DrilDown software, how do they actually use that to prevent naked short selling or even just opportunistic short selling that might even be legal? How can they prevent that?
David Wenger: Well, you first have to understand if it’s happening. And I think there’s an overwhelming body of evidence out there to suggest or verify that it is in fact happening. The next question becomes, is it happening to you? And you’ve got to ask yourself, has your share price decreased in value for the last several months in a row for no apparent reason? Does your stock come under selling pressure any time there’s a press release, regardless of how positive the news is? Are people making negative, slanderous posts on message boards? And so on.
We can tell a company if this is happening, and we can identify parties to a transaction which are resulting in fails in the settlement process. This DrilDown software that we’ve created tracks settlements. It tracks long positions. And where we can see anomalies in the data, and identify party to the transactions, we can begin to see who and what and why and how this is happening and advise the client issuer company on meaningful action steps. This is actionable data.
Andrew Krystal: Do you believe that if companies were to use your software to display graphic evidence that they do on their website, that short sellers would be thwarted from targeting them?
David Wenger: That’s the idea. But it’s more than just — there’s two aspects to the power of this software, if you will. There’s the reactive and the proactive, the offensive or the defensive. We talked a little bit about the surveillance side or the reactive side, the protection mode, if you will, that a company needs to be in to effectively identify and go after those that would be nefarious — trading the stock in an abusive manner, perhaps violating the rules, illegally naked short selling. But the other thing that the company can do, as we talked about a little bit earlier, is go on the offensive, or the proactive, to be sure to reach out, to communicate their story very effectively to their existing shareholder base, to use this software to target likely investors, and again, investors: underscore the word investors, as opposed to those who would just trade in and out of the stock and attempt to manipulate the stock to drive it down to capture quick profits. Does that make sense?
Andrew Krystal: Oh yeah.
James West: You bet. So what are the privacy issues surrounding the use of your software?
David Wenger: Well, they’re meaningful. ShareIntel becomes an authorized third party agent on behalf of the issuer company when they become a client; we go about the business of aggregating data that is private in nature, it belongs to the company. We do not repurpose this data. So essentially what we’re doing is using our expertise to piece together — if you were to use a jigsaw puzzle analogy, if you were to piece together 75 pieces of a 100-piece jigsaw puzzle, could you see the image?
James West: I see. Interesting.
Andrew Krystal: I wanted to ask about your company’s output; could you actually, in terms of retribution, use that in court in terms of pursuing illegal naked shorts?
David Wenger: We do and have been involved in litigation support. So we are more than simply a software company, we are a team of seasoned experts with probably collectively 100+ years of experience on Wall Street. So the answer is Yes.
James West: Wow. And so why do so few companies pursue short sellers?
David Wenger: Well, I think a lot of the smaller companies which are the logical easier targets, they simply don’t have the resources. They don’t have the money, and nobody wants to ever talk about having to litigate, and again, this software is designed to avoid that sort of thing. But at the end of the day, to a large extent, we’re collecting data. We’re in effect gathering evidence, the kind of evidence that attorneys would normally have to spend a small fortune on in a discovery process. So if a company gets to a point, unfortunately, if they get to a point where they need to rely on this data to litigate, well, guess what? They have it.
Andrew Krystal: David, what’s going on with government regulators? Shouldn’t they be doing some of the heavy lifting here in terms of going after naked shorts?
David Wenger: In an ideal world, absolutely. I think that the regulators are simply understaffed, and I think to a large extent, if you look at the average age of somebody at the SCC is a kid out of college, two years out of college. Never worked at a trading desk, never worked in the operations department, and doesn’t really have a really good understanding of this problem. It’s a complex problem, and I think that they’re aware of it and they’re trying to do what they can.
Some would argue that we’re still in a ‘too big to fail’ environment. So the question becomes, if this is really prevalent, which we think it is, how do you unwind it in a responsible manner? And my suspicion is, behind the scenes they’re trying to solve some of those issues, but for now, if you’re a company and you’re public, you’d better be aware of the fact that you need to get in the fight. You need to fight for yourself.
James West: You bet. So could you see this becoming a standard feature of the public company toolbox in the future, where fund managers are going to say, I’m not going to invest in your company unless you know exactly what’s going on with your shareholder base, and I highly recommend you use DrilDown to accomplish that. Can you see that becoming an eventual possible reality?
David Wenger: Well, I think that would be a strong possibility, we would hope. You know, we’re out there trying to level the playing field. We’re out there trying to create transparency where very little exists. And I think that the investing public would be a lot more comfortable, and the fund managers would be a lot more comfortable knowing that these tools are being deployed.
Andrew Krystal: David, how does a public company CEO go about arranging a trial of your program and software?
David Wenger: Well, they would simply need to contact us. They can go to our website at www.shareintel.com, or I can be contacted directly via email. My number is 203-838-5471. The email and co-ordinates are also on the website. We’d be delighted to talk about helping any and all companies out there that feel like they could benefit from our services, which I will add is the vast majority of them.
James West: Now you know what I want to do, I’m just wondering, David, a question like ‘so how much does this cost a public company a year to run’, do you think that would be something where guys who are listening, who are public companies, would say ‘oh, that’s it?!’ or whether they’d say ‘oh, wow, that’s too expensive for me, I’m not even going to look at it’.
David Wenger: Here’s how that conversation should go. A), we’re not interested in talking to any CEO or CFO that doesn’t see this as a critical need to have. If you don’t see this as a critical need to have in today’s world, you’re not educated. You’re either not educated or you’re sticking your head in the sand, and for whatever reason, you don’t want to get in the fight.
I would argue – and you can think about this for a minute, because this is really the truth. We’re out there, we’re on the side of the angels. We’re providing a very meaningful and, I would argue, critically valuable service. It’s not a like to have, it’s a need to have. So what I would ask the audience or the average CEO is, what is it costing you not to have a service like this in place? In other words, if ShareIntel could put a nickel, a dime, a quarter back in your share price, what did that translate to? I would argue there’s a meaningful and significant cost not deploying a service like this, and we’re the only game in town, and we’ve got two patents on this.
So yes, companies will see this as a budget item. The CFO’s job is always to push back; he’s the guy watching the pennies. But if you start thinking about how quickly the pennies add up, I go back to what I’m often told I repeat too frequently: you can’t manage what you can’t see. And if you’re not deploying a service like this, you’re flying blind. You simply don’t have a lot of alternatives. Those armies of brokers that I referred to don’t exist in today’s world.
James West: Right.
David Wenger: There’s not a lot of support for small companies out there. It all begins and ends with the data. You have to leverage this data, and I think we’re out there, I think we’re creating the new paradigm. I’m told by many that that’s what we’re doing.
Andrew Krystal: And you can add to the share price.
David Wenger: Absolutely. Absolutely.
James West: All right, David, that’s a fascinating interview. We’re going to catch up with you in a couple quarters’ time and see how it is going. Thank you so much for your time today.
David Wenger: Thank you.
Andrew Krystal: Thank you, David.
I have 4 million shares first accumulated around 2011 family and friends
WE HVE NOT SOLD ANY
I HAVE FRIENDS WHO IF ALL ADDED UP HAVE 10 MILLION AND HAVE NOT SOLD ANY.
NONE OF OURS PURCHASED THROUGH PAULSON BUT I BET PAULSON WOULD TELL US THE SAME THING. PEOPLE LISTEN I HAVE BEEN IN THIS GAME FOR 41 YEARS AND I FINALLY THINK WE WILL START TO SEE THINGS CHANGING.
OK I AM DONE
If you look at the naked short sales for this year it is clear that it's not the Paulson people selling it's the scam being run by Knight Securities. We will all know in the next few weeks if this buyins.net is the real deal. We have been blaming Paulson for selling and keeping warrants but I really think the illegal naked shorts. If anyone knows someone who has sold with Paulson in large blocks let me know.
I believe that the hiring of buyins.net is the best thing that has happened to CYDY in years. Buyins.net believes that CYDY is short several million naked positions. We saw what happened Friday look at the volume.
October 12, 2018 / M2 PRESSWIRE / BUYINS.NET, http://www.buyins.net, a leading provider of Regulation SHO compliance monitoring, short sale trading statistics and market integrity surveillance, has initiated coverage on CytoDyn, Inc. (OTC: CYDY) after releasing the latest short sale data through October 10, 2018. The total aggregate number of shares shorted since August 2009 is approximately 98.28 million shares. Approximately 41.52% of daily trading volume is short selling. The SqueezeTrigger price for all CYDY shares shorted is $0.84. A short squeeze is expected to begin when shares of CYDY exceed this level
I believe when we hit 84 cents the squeeze will start.
Check this out
http://www.buyins.com/reports/cydy10-11-18.pdf
http://icrowdnewswire.com/2018/10/12/buyins-net-issues-cytodyn-cydy-squeezetrigger-report
I hope they will have money for Cytodyn left
https://www.aol.com/article/finance/2017/08/03/executive-and-escort-spent-millions-on-company-card/23063720/
Anthony puts in 1 million and you think it's not good....What we are seeing is the phantom shorts moving from one account to another. NAKED SHORTS. When good news comes they start to pound.
Mr Pears and Mr Smith playing this game
He is not gone, he is trying his best to trade this on fear and get back in, lol Day trading will sting you if you're not careful. I would say he got out at .55 and thought it would hold. Now desperately wants back in.
I have been a stockholder since 2011 and I own 3.2 million shares. I have met with the company many times. Nadar has the total support of the Board of CYDY. He is not going anywhere, Really folks he has done an incredible job getting Pro140 through the hoops of the FDA. I do not at all think there will be a buyout but a selling off pieces of PRO140. HIV will go first to a BP that has been meeting with them. I am sure they have had several meetings. Remember what we have in Phase 2 that is worth probably more than HIV. We could have maybe 10 more pieces. Resting and Long CYDY!
You are right Chump! I spoke to a person at Cytodyn that acknowledged this. I have been long CYDY and wrote my notes down verbatim. I am no beginner at this as I have 3,000,000 million shares but keep low key. I have been in this for a long time. What you are saying, I wrote down. Goodnight and Goodbye. OBTW I am not recommending any buy or sell of CYDY.
In the order to up list, we need to be at $2.00 per share for a total of 5 days. That is for the NYSE.
I have been long CYDY for almost four years and believe in the drug. Two things to remember 1. It stops the mutation of HIV. 2. It prevents cancer from metastasizing.
Number 1 is in phase 3. Number 2 is in Phase 2. Can you imagine stopping breast cancer and prostate?
Any news on IFUE
I am so concered that Defender runs this site where are you ProIFUE. This is not a site that is Pto IFUE