in the end, the paste and cut countersuit will never materialize. After the current defendants get sued, they won't have any money left to pay their money hungry lawyers.

"And when I called Raytheon and spoke to their Director of Investor Relations, he HAD NO IDEA WHO THEY WERE! "

He sure does now. I challenge you to call him back

I believe you are correct Stewie you can even go to the demented ones website and read that it the court papers they have links to, in Paragraph 16 I think, where TMMI states they own it out right paid in full, and then in the response from the defendants, they did not deny it. It isn't even going to be disputed in court. It's a done deal. agreed to by both sides.

what I understand is that TMMI states they have accepted and paid in full for the fractal version 1.0 - 1.4 which is wholly owned property of TMMI and the defendants admit the allegation.

Hey Fraccy, ...You continue to say TMMI owns nothing....can you interpret the defendants response in paragraph 16. ...It states....In response to Paragraph 16 of Plaintiffs complaint, defendants state the allegations contained therein constitute conclusions of law and thus require no answer, however, to the extent it contains allegations of fact, answering Defendants admit the allegations in the first sentence of paragraph 16... what does the first sentence of paragraph 16 of the Plaintiffs complaint state? ...Exhibit A...to the 1993 TMMI License state that the licensed software consists of ISI's Fractal version 1.5 software existing as of the effective date, and further states that Plaintiff TMMI has been delivered and has accepted and has paid in full for the fractal version 1.0 - 1.4 which is wholly owned property of TMMI, pursuant to the acquired licenses from ISI.

if you go over to the court, take a picture and post it so we can interpret it correctly. Thanks

ok Fraccy, waiting for your details and link to where you got your info that you posted

everybody know Dimension already have no customers contracts licenses patents revenues but not sure Dimension still alive after trial, they have no customer no revenue no contracts no licenses no patents NOTHING!

When you first posted on this board you stated that you saw that Raytheon working with small company stock price almost double so you buy.....so the reason you are even on this board is because of the partnership between Raytheon and TMMI. Now you're just a parrot of a poster that has been proven wrong over and over again. You said you were a TMMI shareholder, yet seems like you just wish ill of TMMI. btw, where did you first hear about this game changing partnership? You acted like you never heard of TMMI until you heard about the partnership. please explain

Maybe you should check your P.O. box and see if you got any new LOI

yet the Judge did not agree with you as proved by the fact the case continues.....hmmmmmm

due diligence? aren't you the one that when you splashed on the scene stated that you saw small company work with Raytheon stock double so I buy? now your talking about due diligence?

I don't have to go to to Vegas to see how this trial is going, I can read the minutes as to what has happened and who is more prepared. I see the Judges orders.....basically it's "denied" to defendants.... Don't you already Bill on here saying that he has been to Vegas and read the papers, and then months later fessing up to the fact that there was probably 1000's of pages that he didn't read, yet reported to this board, much like you, that he knows what is going on? lol, please.... as you have already proved, reading court documents, and understanding them are two different things

So it is a slam dunk win for the defendants as you have stated.....yet the case continues...y?....oh that's right, you stated that the case was continuing because the judge wanted to make sure that the lawyers all got rich. hmmmm so I have to wonder why the defendant's lead attorney jumped ship from a case that is a no brainer win, and was only continuing so he could makes lots of money.....it all makes so much sense now...lol

If DFI tricked investors to trade in their shares for DFMI shares, saying there has been a merger, yet there is no signed merger papers, when another company comes along and takes DFMI over, is it a buyer beware type situation, because the new buyer didn't look under the hood,(check to see if a legal merger actually had been filed),and they got a lemon? or is it fraud every time?

yes you did post court info before it was made public....how did you get that info....and like Stew asked "numerous times to clarify what you claimed is so "clear" to everyone " hasn't been responded to....so pretty much everything you post is just a bunch of noise

according to their web site: "The Growth Capital Expo brings together the best ideas, the most promising companies and the top deal makers in emerging growth finance." The most promising companies!!!!! sounds like TMMI

Correct you are Jay! Did you know that a defense attorney's biggest pet peeve is being lied to by their own clients? No matter how sordid the details of the case, defense attorneys need to know the truth. That is how they decide if they will take the case and how to plan their defense. I wonder how much time John Krieger wasted trying to build a defense around the most important piece of evidence, only to find out that it really does not exist! No wonder he ran away from this case. As for him getting hired by Gordon Silver, they probably saw that he was a man of high character, morals and intelligence not to commit perjury.

After realizing he was lied to, your lead attorney resigned, knowing that the case was a lost cause. Wonder what ever happened to him?

Court case facts:....

1. Every motion by the Plaintiffs has been granted.

2. Every motion by the defendants to have the case dismissed has been denied, even when they threaten (apparently an empty threat) that if the case is not dismissed, they would bring in ISI, from the Aug.2013 minutes as posted by Jay in post 11207. (so where day at? bring them in already)

3. The defendants lead attorney refuses to lie to the court when asked if there was a legal merger. His answer, there could be your Honor, indicates he might have been told there was a legal merger, but that he actually never saw it, and that the defendants were probably still looking for it. (wonder if they checked the magazine rack in the dentist waiting office.

4. The defendants lead attorney resigns. hmmmmm....maybe because he realized he was lied to and the case can't be won.

At any rate, for someone to post on this board that "haha TMM clearly losing this case badly and will be own by Dimension everybody know that " indicates that this poster either has the defendants and plaintiffs confused, has zero knowledge of the law, or is just trying to deceive investors. If it's the latter, well, that is just despicable

actually what you call "a calculated gamble " looks more like a precise plan that has played out perfectly step by step....remember, every plaintiff request has been granted! You are looking at this like it was the old TMMI bringing on this case. but this is the new TMMI and with their lawyers, have set up the defendants like bowling pins. The defendants have tried to get this case dismissed several times, but it hasn't happened. No , this case is unfolding nicely. It's the defendants who are not happy with what has transpired.

"director of investor relations raython have no idea who TMM anyway " that info came from the same guy who stated the trial was continuing because the judge wants the lawyers to get rich and because the judge didn't bother to read the case she was presiding over lol sounds like a solid source....they are working together whether one guy at Raytheon knows Tmmi or not, plus, I think that person stated Raytheon doesn't know who TMM is....no one on this board knows who Tmm is.....good luck

The Judge said TMMI MUST SUE HP= ZERO!!!!

so I take it you can't find in the court papers where the judge states "tmm must sue HP" either... but now that you have your prediction out, we'll see how that works out

"The judge said tmm MUST SUE HP!"..... is that in the court transcripts? I don't see where it says tmm must sue HP

correct you are Jay. one has to wonder though, if bringing ISI into this case is such a death warrant for the plaintiffs, why are the defendants waffling so much on doing the paperwork to bring them into the case? If I were a defendant in this case and believed it would turn this trial around, as some are posting here, that paperwork would have been in the next day

"Next, understand what Conditionally means. It means tmm MUST SUE HP IN ORDER TO CONTINUE THIS RIDICULOUS CASE! " no it doesn't, that is just a plain wrong statement

"Clearly your attorney friend doesn't know much about Nevada law. Things are done differently in Nevada than Colorado"..... are you talking about the corruption and incompetence you've posted about previously?

Ha Ha Moe....good one... Still haven't seen HP mentioned in the court case, but whatever.... if TMMI and Raytheon get things to work out the way they want, then those companies you mentioned will come running to TMMI, not to worry

tell us about the 19 months with a patent you can't use.

Correct Jay, 10 days to answer would have been the 28th. Did the defendants figure out who their lead attorney is yet? maybe they didn't answer because they have run out of money? or that they finally realize the jig is up? at any rate, that's pretty bad news for defendants. stick a fork in them I think they are done

It was probably spelled out in those "probably thousands of court documents" you didn't read

wow TMM has been working with Raytheon? so has TMMI good luck

Sounds like you know what you're doing. So I take it you wouldn't invest in TMMI, and don't have any shares? or like your "up" brother fraccy you gonna tell us you invest in a company that has nothing?

Me too... I information everywhere, internet, make calls, talk people, sticky notes, all form high level communicate devise use. Much much more info on Tmmi working with Raytheon. please provide any link to any of any the info you have. You have lots of sources....show us one....other than someone on here just saying so...just one....

oh I know that TMMI is working with Raytheon that is a fact...that's why I was asking Whazzup where he was getting his information from

You are wrong! what makes you say Raytheon doesn't know who TMMI is? Is that conclusion from your research? where did you get that from? or do you base your facts on Fraccy saying 1 out of 63,000 employees at Raytheon did not know who TMMI was?

Bill you forgot to give me a shout out. so let me ask, what's your point? Like Jay said, you got problems with what they are reporting bring it to the attention of the powers that be, then you too can stand by the mailbox and wait for your whistle blowers check like fraccy.
In the mean time, everything looks peachy for TMMI (maybe not so much for that company TMM that a few on here keep mentioning) but working with Raytheon!!! that in and of itself, plus so far tossing a shut out in court. every request plaintiffs have requested has been granted... just sit back for awhile and enjoy the ride

"TMM financials show ugly truth that they going broke in maybe 2-3 month"...... you made this statement....so you are saying TMMI will be bankrupt in 2 or 3 months?

Actually Jay on post 10740 reported that he called the courts and the minutes had not been released yet, and then in post 10744 you reported about the court case...easy to see....again...good job reporting on the big TMMI win. Oh can you send me the link where you see HP mentioned? I don't see HP