Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I can see the recent failures of Trippy the trinket troll is getting under his skin.
Failed theories on a "missing" video. Failed false map not linked to Juno. Failed attempt to say a reserve will stop a permit, later back peddling and admitting he has no idea if his moot points matter at all. Here's a hint, no, his useless points match all of his other useless attacks.
And doesn't a variance for an area mean that area is, in fact, not in a reserve?
Trippy is very good at focusing on what does not matter and crowing that it is all that matters. He knows his time here is limited.
Still not an affiliate btw, just a shareholder here. Just another attack strategy, repeat the lie enough and some will believe it. Also, projection as Trippy actually is an affiliate of EXPL yet calls other "affiliates" if they say anything positive about SFRX.
Anyway, he'll prattle on about this and that. Maybe back to "2 of 3 items" claim? More all caps?
It doesn't matter.
My limited one post of the day.
Good to see Trippy the trinket troll has admitted he posted the wrong map and tried to falsely link it to the Juno site. Or maybe he just didn't know what he was saying was false. Maybe he just didn't notice Juno has nothing to do with Searfarer's Quest. He's only been at this for 7 years. But he says he does know the difference, so...
But more importantly, Trippy has now also admitted that he has no clue as to whether a reserve area will even prevent SFRX from getting a permit or not. Wasn't that his whole purpose of posting the map?
I would say it's unbelievable but it's really par for the course. Typical of his 7-year crusade against SFRX shareholders.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, I would not put a lot of value in the word of anyone who once:
• Said to not buy a stock that later went up 3,000% (SFRX)
• Advised buying a stock that then went down 99.99% (EXPL)
• Had the gall to say the problem with EXPL, when it was trading around 50 cents, was that there was a lack of shares available and buyers were waiting for larger blocks to be available. EXPL now at .0001 and non-trading, non-reporting. Now says EXPL is “doing fine” and price doesn’t matter.
• Doesn't know the difference between a promissory note and a convertible note.
• Argues the tech for the SeaSearcher is imaginary while at the same time says it already exists.
• Pretends not to understand how the SeaSearcher has value.
• Is unable to see the expanding uses for the SeaSearcher tech in multiple industries and that it can be used on many wrecks, not just one
• Says Tim Reynolds does not understand salt water
• Implies the SFRX BOD is personally selling shares when they are not.
• Says no one is promoting EXPL while promoting EXPL at the same time
• Attacks a company for 7 years without owning shares while also claiming they have a buy order submitted to "load the boat" with SFRX shares when treasure hits, after filtering through a number of excuses, now says here for the “comedy”
• Thinks Micah being found guilty by a jury on 19 counts of fraud is just part of doing business and not a big deal, "he was just found liable, not guilty!" LOL! Losing 99.99% of your value and then going dark is apparently a good thing for a company now. Who knew?
• Equates being reimbursed for a phone bill as the same as receiving a salary, ignores that Kyle received no salary for 12 years, now complains about his salary while overestimating it by 100%
• Brags about making money on a P&D
• Does not believe a teredo crust exist and is just ‘hype’ because they lack the experience to know about them
• Complains about everything taking too long while working behind the scenes to slow things down
The above list is not complete, but it's plenty to make a sound decision regarding investment advice.
Keep in mind, Seafarer is criticized:
When Seafarer’s own CEO is positive about the company.
When they communicate with the public and when they do not communicate with the public.
When the price goes up (“wash trading!”) and when the price goes down.
When the volume is high (“wash trading!”) and when the volume is low.
When they have a new development and when they do not have a new development.
When they do something or when they don't appear to do anything.
When they announce what they expect to happen and when they do not announce what they expect to happen.
When they communicate to the public before something happens and if they make plans to communicate to the public after something happens.
When they promote something and when they purposely don't promote something.
When they hire someone or when they fire someone.
When Kennedy takes a salary and when he does not take a salary (12 years, no salary).
When... well, I guess it could be a long list.
Eventually it will be when they do find treasure and when they don't find enough treasure.
Basically it's every single thing they, the shareholders or anyone currently or previously associated with the company do – whether good or bad.
All I know is that I would not take advice from entities that have no firsthand knowledge about the operations or understandings regarding the crew, officers, scientists or the capabilities of the SeaSearcher.
The best source of information is from the company and people who are actively engaged with the equipment, strategy and operations.
If you think you are going to get insider information on this company or that you will know when something big is about to happen because of insider buying or insider activity, you are mistaken. The people who know will not be saying. The people who say they know, do not and will not. There will not be leaks.
You see, according to non-shareholding trolls of SFRX (who did get stuck with non-trading .0002 P&D EXPL):
Seafarer is a clown show that will never get a permit,
but if they do get a permit it will only be a ‘swim’ permit and won’t allow them to dig,
but if they do get a permit to dig then they don’t have the right equipment,
but if they do have the right equipment then the site has been picked over for 30 years and there is no wreck there,
but if it hasn't actually been picked over and there is a wreck there then FBAR won’t let them bring it up,
but if FBAR does let them bring it up then they won’t be able to find the treasure because they have no experience,
but if they do have experienced military trained divers and invent a SeaSearcher that helps them find it then the SeaSearcher doesn’t really exist,
but if the SeaSearcher does exist then it doesn’t work,
but if it does work then it’s nothing special and it’s already been done before with other equipment thus it already exist,
but if does exist and it is special then it’s not needed because all the treasure that has been found so far was found without it,
but if it does make finding treasure much much easier, faster and more efficient, then there won’t be much treasure there
but if there is a lot of treasure then they won’t be able to keep it
but if they can keep it then they won’t be able to keep it very long and Spain could come take it any day,
but if they don’t come take it and it is a lot then…
well, it’s only one wreck so it’s a “sell on the news” event and they couldn’t possibly use this new technology again on another wreck over and over again and again or transfer it’s usage to another industry and most definitely there would never be a military use for it even though that’s already been mentioned but it hasn’t happened yet so that means it will never happen.
Good luck to all the shareholders of SFRX!
#tonnagenottrinkets
You seem to have a talent for purposefully not making a point and posting about things that do not matter, are partial truths, are outdated or are simply wrong.
But I know you won't stop no matter how wrong you are.
I do feel for those who choose to put any faith whatsoever in what you say.
My limited 1 post for the day.
Just shows you how little the non-shareholders know about what is actually happening at Seafarer.
At least we won't be hearing more wild guesses and conspiracy theories about the "missing" video.
Oh, wait. Of course we will.
Critics are paid by the post or flat fee? Sean Murphy (aka flatreasurecapt) was monthly flat fee.
Excited for the future of SFRX!
Thank you for posting this wlfr. I knew I should have looked harder. And I guess congrats are in order for becoming an "affiliate" of SFRX? I'm not sure what makes one qualify for such a title... I guess making a positive post about SFRX is all it takes for someone to be falsely labeled "affiliate".
Was the vid never really missing as the trolls have suggested or was it just another made up attack against SFRX?
I don't really care but it does destroy the laughable accusations from non-shareholders. How embarrassing.
Will we be hearing an apology? Of course not. Just more doubling down on the wrong person EMPHATICALLY denying they said it and more "they can't know there's treasure there unless we already know there's treasure there!".
A lot like when they said the SeaSearcher was not real, then said it had already been invented. Now they claim it doesn't work.
Ho hum. Rinse and repeat.
Like I've said before, I'll continue to follow the lead of family members, large shareholders and people who actually represent the company and know exactly what is going on versus wild guesses from non-shareholders.
Excited to see some tonnage in our future!
I see the trinket troll has to work on the weekends as well as holidays. Birthday too?
The one thing you can depend on is that the reason is 100% not whatever the non-shareholding trinket troll is pushing.
How much time does one have to spend on a stock they don't even own to know a 6 month old video is missing?
As you can see, Micah's past fraudulent behavior and the abject failure of EXPL are sensitive subjects for Trippy the trinket troll.
As we all know, feeding the trolls by trying to engage in sensible debate or conversation is a waste of our time, not Trippy's, but our time. Trippy has an agenda and nothing will stop that agenda.
So projection is the name of the game for the critics of SFRX.
Wasn't it a Nazi tactic to "accuse others of that which you are doing" ? Some make an art of it.
But he's a good fit with the failed EXPL and the fraudster. Birds of a feather I suppose.
Meanwhile great things happening at SFRX. I'll continue to follow the lead of the major investors and family members who individually own 100s of millions of shares.
Go SFRX!
Kyle has spent 15 years filtering through the riffraff, charlatans, thieves and liars who briefly passed by under the Seafarer umbrella. People like Sean Murphy (aka flatreasurecapt) who was paid monthly by convicted fraud Micah to attack SFRX online.
No need to go backward by your suggested hire.
Besides he's a good fit with the failed, non-trading, non-reporting, .0002 EXPL.
He and Micah are two peas in a pod.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr-25156
I don't know but 628M is more than last I heard.
Here's Maximilian's interview:
A shame that some have lost their right to meaningful engagement due to having no intent to find a viable and sensible conclusion. Just exist to fulfill their agenda.
I'm sure "you refuse to answer" accusations will be next.
You bet. Good for people to be informed.
Some like to deliver partial info that dodges and distorts the truth.
https://www.kurtalawfirm.com/blog/micah-eldred/
https://www.carlson-law.net/sec-litigation-release-florida-jury-broker-dealer-liable-in-securities-fraud-case/
https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2019-00448-135-8-cv
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr-24405
It's pretty easy to google Micah Eldred & fraud.
A shame that some have lost their right to meaningful engagement due to having no intent to find a viable and sensible conclusion. Just exist to fulfill their agenda.
Good to see some admitting they were off by 100% in the criticism of Kyle while ignoring he took no salary for 12 years.
I'm not so sure I would put a lot of value in the word of anyone who once:
• Said to not buy a stock that later went up 3,000% (SFRX)
• Advised buying a stock that then went down 99.99% (EXPL)
• Had the gaul to say the problem with EXPL, when it was trading around 50 cents, was that there was a lack of shares available and buyers were waiting for larger blocks to be available. EXPL now at .0001 and non-trading, non-reporting. Now says EXPL is “doing fine” and price doesn’t matter.
• Doesn't know the difference between a promissory note and a convertible note.
• Argues the tech for the SeaSearcher is imaginary while at the same time says it already exists.
• Pretends not to understand how the SeaSearcher has value.
• Is unable to see the expanding uses for the SeaSearcher tech in multiple industries and that it can be used on many wrecks, not just one
• Says Tim Reynolds does not understand salt water
• Implies the SFRX BOD is personally selling shares when they are not.
• Says no one is promoting EXPL while promoting EXPL at the same time
• Attacks a company for 7 years without owning shares while also claiming they have a buy order submitted to "load the boat" with SFRX shares when treasure hits, after filtering through a number of excuses, now says here for the “comedy”
• Thinks Micah being found guilty by a jury on 19 counts of fraud is just part of doing business and not a big deal, "he was just found liable, not guilty!" LOL!
• Equates being reimbursed for a phone bill as the same as receiving a salary, ignores that Kyle received no salary for 12 years, now complains about his salary while overestimating it by 100%
• Brags about making money on a P&D
• Does not believe a teredo crust exist and is just ‘hype’ because they lack the experience to know about them
• Complains about everything taking too long while working behind the scenes to slow things down
The above list is not complete, but it's plenty to make a sound decision regarding investment advice.
Keep in mind, Seafarer is criticized:
When Seafarer’s own CEO is positive about the company.
When they communicate with the public and when they do not communicate with the public.
When the price goes up (“wash trading!”) and when the price goes down.
When the volume is high (“wash trading!”) and when the volume is low.
When they have a new development and when they do not have a new development.
When they do something or when they don't appear to do anything.
When they announce what they expect to happen and when they do not announce what they expect to happen.
When they communicate to the public before something happens and if they make plans to communicate to the public after something happens.
When they promote something and when they purposely don't promote something.
When they hire someone or when they fire someone.
When Kennedy takes a salary and when he does not take a salary (12 years, no salary).
When... well, I guess it could be a long list.
Eventually it will be when they do find treasure and when they don't find enough treasure.
Basically it's every single thing they, the shareholders or anyone currently or previously associated with the company do – whether good or bad.
All I know is that I would not take advice from entities that have no firsthand knowledge about the operations or understandings regarding the crew, officers, scientists or the capabilities of the SeaSearcher.
The best source of information is from the company and people who are actively engaged with the equipment, strategy and operations.
If you think you are going to get insider information on this company or that you will know when something big is about to happen because of insider buying or insider activity, you are mistaken. The people who know will not be saying. The people who say they know, do not and will not. There will not be leaks.
You see, according to non-shareholding trolls of SFRX (who did get stuck with .0001 P&D EXPL):
Seafarer is a clown show that will never get a permit,
but if they do get a permit it will only be a ‘swim’ permit and won’t allow them to dig,
but if they do get a permit to dig then they don’t have the right equipment,
but if they do have the right equipment then the site has been picked over for 30 years and there is no wreck there,
but if it hasn't actually been picked over and there is a wreck there then FBAR won’t let them bring it up,
but if FBAR does let them bring it up then they won’t be able to find the treasure because they have no experience,
but if they do have experienced military trained divers and invent a SeaSearcher that helps them find it then the SeaSearcher doesn’t really exist,
but if the SeaSearcher does exist then it doesn’t work,
but if it does work then it’s nothing special and it’s already been done before with other equipment thus it already exist,
but if does exist and it is special then it’s not needed because all the treasure that has been found so far was found without it,
but if it does make finding treasure much much easier, faster and more efficient, then there won’t be much treasure there
but if there is a lot of treasure then they won’t be able to keep it
but if they can keep it then they won’t be able to keep it very long and Spain could come take it any day,
but if they don’t come take it and it is a lot then…
well, it’s only one wreck so it’s a “sell on the news” event and they couldn’t possibly use this new technology again on another wreck over and over again and again or transfer it’s usage to another industry and most definitely there would never be a military use for it even though that’s already been mentioned but it hasn’t happened yet so that means it will never happen.
Good luck to all the shareholders of SFRX!
#tonnagenottrinkets
Is it just me or do the critics of SFRX keep having weaker and weaker arguments?
Or maybe I've heard them all so many times they just seem ridiculous at this point?
I mean, so ol' crap regurgitated for 7 years or more. Come on!
Go SFRX!
Also, you would not see the family members or 'related parties' of the CEO holding on to their billion shares of SFRX. They would be cashing out. They have convertible notes going back about 10 years or so. 100's of thousands of dollars worth. As well as other large investors personally and individually holding on to a few hundred million shares, each.
I'll continue to follow their lead.
So yes, good luck to all the SFRX shareholders!
Bring on the tonnage!
Well, if that is the case then they were not the first to invent it, but they did "invent" it by way of seeing a need, constructing a solution from scratch, making revisions and the final result gets the job done. Maybe create would have been a better term.
Even if they were aware of the theory behind it, they still created/invented their own way of doing it.
Unless of course they were somehow able to see examples of what others have done and just recreated what they did, exactly as before. I don't see this group of scientists do that. They can't help but try to improve things every time they do it.
I don't know how their device came about, just that they saw a problem and created what they needed to fix it. Could be they had no idea it had been done before and they did, on their own, invent it, unaware that someone else had also done it.
Surely someone said "Hey, in the past they pumped freshwater from the top down to the bottom to clear the dark water." And from there they set about making what they needed.
Either way, they did what they needed to do the job. I'm good with that.
Larger picture, I doubt they would be creating all of these things if this whole thing was just one big con job as some who are completely uninvolved with the company and have conflicts of interest claim it to be.
It's been a long, long road but it does appear things are coming together.
Good luck to shareholders!
Trippy should probably not invest in SFRX. Not that he ever has in the last 7 years of comments.
So to clarify, SFRX has already invented a device that clears the water on the bottom when it's too dark from poor clarity to see down there by pumping fresh water from the top down where the divers are. They've used it many times. Clever. Smart.
They are currently making a handheld version of the SeaSearcher metal discriminator. Smart to expand on a product when you are 100% confident that it works. The handheld version tells me it works. Or at least they sure think it does. So they move on to fitting it to a handheld. Makes sense.
And apparently they are building something that can sense a ship in the water from 50 miles away.
Someone unfamiliar with science would say that's impossible.
Consider this:
Nice. Not surprising though.
Progress always being made by SFRX and crew.
I'm holding on to my shares, that's for sure.
As expected, no answer to a reasonable question.
Instead, the usual injection of bullshit theories and unfounded accusations in attempt to spread false rumors about SFRX.
More clarification of why civil engagement is a waste of time for actual shareholders like myself who are here to benefit fellow shareholders.
Tonnage, not trinkets.
Trippy, which part of the calculations behind the estimate from the representative of the Fisher family (who Kyle spoke with) did you actually disagree with?
I've seen you attack Kyle as lying since someone else from the Fisher family said it wasn't them, but I haven't heard what part of the evaluation was actually wrong... according to you.
There I go again, expecting you to answer with a reasonable answer.
Will I ever learn?
Tonnage Trippy, not .0001
Yes, SFRX is hard at work. Making things happen. The heat is on!
Meanwhile, Trippy the .0001 trinket troll is up to his usual tricks.
"potential"
Again, see my previous post.
Some entities love to put out partial or useless information as though it is relevant to SFRX and treasure wrecks.
They knows reader will draw conclusions based on the misleading info. Consistently negative conclusions regarding SFRX of course.
It's a shame because it largely forces certain social information sharing platforms into a condition of uselessness as there is too much trash to wade through to get to any useful and accurate info, so many just give up.
Which is still a win if your goal is to damage the company.
Hey, here's a hashtag that actually applies:
#tonnagenot.0001
Enjoy the holiday weekend actual shareholders of SFRX!
Speaking of a body of work:
I'm not so sure I would put a lot of value in the word of anyone who once:
• Said to not buy a stock that later went up 3,000% (SFRX)
• Advised buying a stock that then went down 99.99% (EXPL)
• Had the gaul to say the problem with EXPL, when it was trading around 50 cents, was that there was a lack of shares available and buyers were waiting for larger blocks to be available. EXPL now at .0001 and non-trading, non-reporting. Now says EXPL is “doing fine.”
• Doesn't know the difference between a promissory note and a convertible note.
• Argues the tech for the SeaSearcher is imaginary while at the same time says it already exists.
• Pretends not to understand how the SeaSearcher has value.
• Is unable to see the expanding uses for the SeaSearcher tech in multiple industries and that it can be used on many wrecks, not just one
• Says Tim Reynolds does not understand salt water
• Implies the SFRX BOD is personally selling shares when they are not.
• Says no one is promoting EXPL while promoting EXPL at the same time
• Attacks a company for 7 years without owning shares while also claiming they have a buy order submitted to "load the boat" with SFRX shares when treasure hits
• Thinks Micah being found guilty by a jury on 19 counts of fraud is just part of doing business and not a big deal, "he was just found liable, not guilty!" LOL!
• Equates being reimbursed for a phone bill as the same as receiving a salary
• Brags about making money on a P&D
• Does not believe a teredo crust exist and is just ‘hype’ because they lack the experience to know about them
The above list is not complete, but it's plenty to make a sound decision regarding investment advice.
Keep in mind, Seafarer is criticized:
When Seafarer’s own CEO is positive about the company.
When they communicate with the public and when they do not communicate with the public.
When the price goes up (“wash trading!”) and when the price goes down.
When the volume is high (“wash trading!”) and when the volume is low.
When they have a new development and when they do not have a new development.
When they do something or when they don't appear to do anything.
When they announce what they expect to happen and when they do not announce what they expect to happen.
When they communicate to the public before something happens and if they make plans to communicate to the public after something happens.
When they promote something and when they purposely don't promote something.
When they hire someone or when they fire someone.
When Kennedy takes a salary and when he does not take a salary (12 years, no salary).
When... well, I guess it could be a long list.
Eventually it will be when they do find treasure and when they don't find treasure.
Basically it's every single thing they, the shareholders or anyone currently or previously associated with the company do – whether good or bad.
All I know is that I would not take advice from entities that have no firsthand knowledge about the operations or understandings regarding the crew, officers, scientists or the capabilities of the SeaSearcher.
The best source of information is from the company and people who are actively engaged with the equipment, strategy and operations.
If you think you are going to get insider information on this company or that you will know when something big is about to happen because of insider buying or insider activity, you are mistaken. The people who know will not be saying. The people who say they know, do not and will not. There will not be leaks.
You see, according to non-shareholding trolls of SFRX (who did get stuck with .0001 P&D EXPL):
Seafarer is a clown show that will never get a permit,
but if they do get a permit it will only be a ‘swim’ permit and won’t allow them to dig,
but if they do get a permit to dig then they don’t have the right equipment,
but if they do have the right equipment then the site has been picked over for 30 years and there is no wreck there,
but if it hasn't actually been picked over and there is a wreck there then FBAR won’t let them bring it up,
but if FBAR does let them bring it up then they won’t be able to find the treasure because they have no experience,
but if they do have experienced military trained divers and invent a SeaSearcher that helps them find it then the SeaSearcher doesn’t really exist,
but if the SeaSearcher does exist then it doesn’t work,
but if it does work then it’s nothing special and it’s already been done before with other equipment thus it already exist,
but if does exist and it is special then it’s not needed because all the treasure that has been found so far was found without it,
but if it does make finding treasure much much easier, faster and more efficient, then there won’t be much treasure there
but if there is a lot of treasure then they won’t be able to keep it
but if they can keep it then they won’t be able to keep it very long and Spain could come take it any day,
but if they don’t come take it and it is a lot then…
well, it’s only one wreck so it’s a “sell on the news” event and they couldn’t possibly use this new technology again on another wreck over and over again and again or transfer it’s usage to another industry and most definitely there would never be a military use for it even though that’s already been mentioned but it hasn’t happened yet so that means it will never happen.
Good luck to all the shareholders of SFRX!
#tonnagenottrinkets
I can't comment on no episode release today as I don't work for the company but I am a shareholder, a longtime shareholder and I try to stay informed as much as reasonably possible. So I wouldn't put too much stock into there being no release today. Maybe it's just running late or maybe they said what they wanted to for now. The last episode did say "Big things coming." Could be they want their next episode to be those big things.
I have an overall feeling good things are happening and SFRX is continuing to move in the right direction. At some point SFRX has to let success and actions speak for the company. They know this.
Very recent events have gone in their favor.
As a large and longtime shareholder, I'm confident in and looking forward to further events happening and seeing this company take off.
Best of luck to the shareholders of SFRX. I'll be holding on to my large accumulation of shares of SFRX.
I fully expect everyone's understanding of some, as of now, much debated issues will be made very clear in the near future.
Every day is one day closer.
Interview with Megan Reynolds:
Every day is one day closer to major success with SFRX. Looking forward to a bright and shiny future for SFRX.
Latest episode:
This Micah?
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2021/lr25156.htm
Combine that with the scam he tried to pull on SFRX shareholders, which Kennedy stopped, and you get the feeling he's not a good guy. How's his EXPL doing? Oh, right.
EXPL is no longer reporting fins, no longer trading and is stuck at .0001 after being well over $1. So a complete loss for shareholders.
But sure, hitch your wagon to that guy, Trippy.
I'll stick with my many many shares of SFRX.
Unfortunate that Trippy the .0001 trinket troll still doesn't understand a teredo crust.
Previous attempts at reasonable discussion have bore fruitless results and proven a complete waste of time.
Here's the SFRX archeologist showing that he knows his stuff.
I noticed this part was conveniently skipped.