Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thank you very much :)
Sorry but that doesn't help me to complete my files, get them up to date but thanks anyway
Let me help you. The DOJ asked for a 30 day delay in sentencing so that FINRA could review the TRADING RECORDS. But no that's not all. The DOJ then came back later and asked for another delay of 30 days. Seems there was alot of work to be done on those trading records So that is why there was no pacer update as to the Aug 18th sentencing date, it didn't happen
The trading records that Rufus requested years and years ago are now in the hands of a independent, not a gov entity,regulator. As Rufus always said the truth is in those records
Do you really think a guilty man would ask, then demand the smoking gun to be handed over to the law enforcement if he was really guilty? I bet the inhouse "scam buster" can answer that question, right JS?
The fact that they are being reviewed at the expensive of sentencing has a BUNCH of people very nervious That is a fact
So you got the sentencing pacer update. You know the exact one stating the punishment. You know where the judge said this, that and whatever..... "your nolonger free" type stuff
I missed it and would like to add it to my files
Thanks again for your help
I missed the pacer update on this one. Please post for me. Greatly appreciated Thanks
"Sentence is set for August 18, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 2106"
WHY!? Easy answer to that one
If all evidence was taken into account, the DOJ had no case against Rufus, Ben and Daryl. The DOJ had to compartmentalize their prosecution in order to get a conviction, limit the evidence that could be presented And judge batten allowed this to happen. A true travesty of justice
Where is the resident "scam buster" when you really need her
True Deano, there was no defense
Hmmm, you got to wonder why after 5 years no defense
Alot more going on than meets the eye
Those docs will be used.....at the right time
If you (plural) haven't read the motion for a new trial and you are serious about getting to know the events that took place over the last five years, do yourself a favor and read it Regardless of how you feel about Rufus, you owe it to yourself
JS, all good "scam busters" should know the details of the scam their busting, don't you think? READ, READ!
Checking out, checking in, leaving for dinner, leaving for a walk, LEAVING???? Nothing in that picture speaks of leaving, it just a picture of him in the lobby. Proves absolutely nothing
But that is just hair splitting, isn't it. The bottom line here is CSHD has cost Wall Street just to cover at the very least $2 trillion. That is alot of of money, they, ws, had to stop CSHD at all cost. They pulled in the SEC for help because the SEC owed "them" a few favors. That is it plain and simple, cut out the details, you have it!
As we all know living life, once a stone is unturned, you never know what will crawl out and how many. The CSHD stone got turned in Oct 06 with the halt and the vermins have been crawling out ever since in the form of the SEC, DOJ, and the federal judges,and organized criminals
The corruption runs deep, it seems to have penetrated every aspect of society and governments not only in the US but worldwide. You are living in a box if you haven't noticed or experienced such wide spread corruption. If you only understand that, then you have to have a clearer understanding of CSHD, the thief of your money, the cover up, and the parties responsible for a commiting an encompassing crime of stock manipulation. You can't commit this large of a crime by yourself or with a few buddies, it takes an organization, lots of "payoff money", deep contacts, the threat of murder or murder itself, bribes, and many more organized crime tactics
TAKE THIS IN THE SHORTS (HEHEHE), YOU BASHERS AND NAYSAYERS. THIS IS THE DAY (7/26/10) YOU HAVE BEEN DREADING!!!! OTHER DREADED DATES, 9/29/06 and 10/16/06
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Adopt NASD Rule 3210 (Short Sale Delivery Requirements) as FINRA Rule 4320 in the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook
A Notice by the Securities and Exchange Commission on 07/26/2010
http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2010/07/26/2010-18168/selfregulatory-organizations-financial-industry-regulatory-authority-inc-order-approving-a-proposed
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, [14] that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-FINRA-2010-028), as modified by Amendment No. 1, be and hereby is approved.Show citation box
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. [15]
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-18168 Filed 7-23-10; 8:45 am]
[/color]
ALLEDGED!!!
YOU MEAN DOCUMENTED
POST SCRIPT:
RICO+%3d+T%2fA%2c+Hedge+Funds%2c+DTCC%2c+The+Fed%2c+and+SEC.+%0d%0a%0d%0a1%
The Assets and the Company itself are 2 different things.
$9 billion divided by 106 million shares= ?
Cut off date 9/29/06, Trap #1...Cut off date 10/16/06, Trap #2
GOT CERTS?
Good luck to the odius group of TEX, Frank, Hunter, et al.
"Just a case like ours is a case'
THAT IS INDEED THE POINT OF POSTING THIS MOTION. NOW YOU KNOW.... I HOPE
IT IS ABOUT KNOWLEDGE, TERPS!!!
THE COMPLEXITY OF FLIPPING THE CROOKS IS BEYOND THAT OF ANYTHING THAT HAS EVER HAPPENED BEFORE IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND
TIMING IS CRITICAL AND EVERY CHANGING
NO TRIAL THIS TIME, TERPS
Alana R. Black Senior Trial Counsel Georgia Bar No. 785045 E-mail: blacka@sec.gov
EMAIL HER, CHARLI!
NOT A TRUE STATEMENT HAS BEEN EVER MADE...BRAVO TEAMPLAYER
"The SEC would have liked to have escaped that bullet. They were not looking for facts, they want to expedite deregistering any stock as quick as possibly that is a victim of naked shorting in order to continue protecting the crooks."
The only thing I can add is "protecting the crooks and themselves (SEC)"
ANYONE HEARD THE WAREABOUTS OF ONE MS. BLACK, FORMALLY OF THE ATL. SEC? I UNDERSTAND FOLKS ARE LOOKING FOR HER
Thanks for your assistance in this matter
HA! HA! HA!
Check it out on the 11th
http://www.syfy.com/secretgovernmentwarehouses/index.php
VINDICTION FOR THE OLE GRIFFY BOY
OF ALL BONDS PRed, THIS BUNCH WAS THE ONLY ONE WITH A CONCERN...hint, hint
Humanitarian & Scientific World Foundation, Ltd.
__________ ____
400 Galleria Parkway, Suite 1500, Atlanta, Georgia 30339
Phone: (404)791-5490/ fax: (404)759-2298
Email: info@hsworldfoundation.com
CEASE AND DESIST ORDER
August 31, 2006
Mr. Rufus Paul Harris
President & CEO
Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp
125 Town Park Drive Suite 300
Kennesaw, GA 30144
Dear Mr. Harris:
Please be advised that due to the severe lack of communication, failure to provided the Credit Facilities as
outlined in the Global Funding Agreement 252455770-08122006-LBH and Annex in a timely manner after the
delivery of the necessary documents, which contained sensitive information regarding the assets for the
respective transactions, and the potential attempt to deceive our organization, Conversion Solutions Holdings
Corp and/or assigns is hereby issued this Cease & Desist Order, as per the request of Mr. Adnan Sakli, Trustee
of Humanitarian & Scientific World Foundation, Ltd. and Owner of the below mentioned assets. Please
discontinue all attempts to block the instrument with ISIN REGISTRATION NUMBER(S): FI0001004558 issued by
Republic of Finland and instrument with ISIN REGISTRATION NUMBER(S): XS0109242510 issued by Lehman
Brothers Holdings Plc. Please return or discard all confidential information forwarded to you regarding the
proposed funding opportunity. Failure to comply with this order will result in legal actions being taken.
FOR and on BEHALF of HUMANITARIAN & SCIENTIFIC WORLD FOUNDATION, LTD.
____________________________________
Craig M. Cason
Trustee
Copyright (c) 2008 The Catholic University Law Review
Catholic University Law Review
COMMENT: PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS IN THE POST-ENRON ERA: THE DUTY TO WARN AND THE CASE FOR ABOLISHING THE GOVERNMENT MISCONDUCT TEST
Fall, 2008
58 Cath. U.L. Rev. 199
Author
Peter N. Downing +
Excerpt
The fall of Enron 1 fundamentally changed the federal government's approach to corporate criminal law enforcement and ushered in an era of increased governmental oversight of corporate America. 2 With the creation of the Corporate Fraud Task Force in 2002, 3 President George W. Bush emphasized the need for greater coordination between federal prosecutors and civil enforcement agencies. 4 Since then, the government has increasingly used simultaneous or successive civil and criminal proceedings, also known as parallel proceedings, 5 as a strategy to efficiently and effectively bring criminal indictments against corporations and their officers. 6
Parallel proceedings are one or more civil and criminal proceeding arising out of a single transaction against the same defendant. 7 Neither civil nor criminal procedures 8 specifically address situations that are unique to parallel proceedings, 9 such as whether evidence, statements, or admissions provided in one forum may be used in the other. 10 As a result, a defendant in a parallel proceeding may find himself faced with a uniquely difficult choice: whether to make disclosures in one proceeding that potentially could be self-incriminating in a parallel proceeding. 11 Thus, a defendant in a civil case may have to choose from the lesser of three evils: asserting his Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination and risking negative inferences; 12 making self-incriminating disclosures; 13 or refusing to comply with the court's discovery orders and risk being found in contempt of court. 14
KNOW THE ABOVE AND KNOW IT WELL!!!!!
That is all BS, Deano!
One other question for you, unknowninvestor
Please provide the particlars on the DOJ vs RPH liquidation thingy, like the case # or just post the order THANKS
And thank you for your responding to the last question. It definately answers more than one question
Have a good day
Back to lurking for me
JULY 23rd is a very popular date!!!
Alot of anticipation for all concerned in a journey that has lasted alot longer for ones other than us cshders...the JULY 23rd date
Liquidation of property, assets, sounds good to me!
I have a question for ya, Unknowinvestor?
Wouldn't you say that the goberment has a face to save at the expense of a patriot?
You really don't have to answer that if you don't want to
Not this time.
The wall street crooks have their notice.
Alot more to this bill than being reported
For example, The US Treasury is running the show NOW!
"The legislation requires a regulatory council to look for threats to the system, creates a consumer protection bureau, forces large failing firms to liquidate and polices financial instruments that have been largely unregulated."
THIS BILL SEALS THE FINAL FATE OF THE OLD SYSTEM AND USHERS IN THE PUBLIC EXPOSURE OF THE NEW
2. Did Rufus or his family sell?
Gee Baby: Yes Todd Harris 500k shares Oct 2, Rufus Mom 500k shares Oct 4, Anisa Harris 500k Oct 5th. Rufus's remaining 7.5 million shares had an admin hold placed on them
Rufus: Todd Harris 250,000 shares all still in his account!!! Faye Harris 350,000 shares all still in her account!!! Anissa Harris 1,000,000 all still in her account!!! Rufus Paul Harris 7,310,000 still in certificates and never placed in an account!!!
Those family shares were in ML accounts Rufus' shares certed. ML was in on the set-up of the dump trying to pin it on Rufus thru his family by selling shares of the family or should say shares disappearing from their accts. As I understand it
Yeap, that is it
Now it is time again. A decision HAS (past tense for hunter, JS, TEX and group) been made. But don't expect the public announcement until the ONE FELL SWOOP is teed up and the trigger is pulled
Did anyone notice the SEC suit, first court appearence with GS has been delayed until mid-July.
Prez Obama is scheduled to sign the Financial Reform Bill on 7/4. That bill should be called the BASEL BILL. The rug will be pulled out from under the TBTF and the FRB
GOBSMACKED TIME, EVERYONE. Strap yourself in, it ain't going to be pretty The good news is the panic will be short lived
On a side not, people here with a first floor approach will find other thing to do than hang out here
That would be ADMRIALTY LAW, not CONSTITUTIONAL LAW based on God given rights
The depth of the importance of CSHD is beyond your understanding, unfortunately for you
Sit back and watch, listen, your are going to be amazed at what you are part of, just amazingly amazed
Read the orginal charges Janice
He was accused of fraud by the SEC
Try to keep up, will ya?
HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU HAVE TO SAY..."NOT QUILTY"
TO GET DUE PROCESS. PER THE CONSTITUTION ONLY ONCE
THE CSHD TRUST WAS FUNDED BY THE WORLD, EUROPE AND ASIA TO BE MORE SPECIFIC
WONDER WHY?
BECAUSE CSHD IS THE TIP OF THE SPEAR
THE TIP OF THE SPEAR ISN"T FUNDED BY THE LIKES OF THE POWERFUL COUNTRIES IF IT WAS DESTINE TO FAIL IN A US FEDERAL COURT. NO, NO, THESE COUNTRIES DON"T BET ON A POTENTIAL LOSER, THEIR MONEY IS ON THE WINNER, THE TIP OF THE SPEAR. FAILURE IS NOT AN OPTION
TIP OF THE SPEAR=REBUILDING OF INFRASTRUCTURE TO IMPROVE HUMANITY'S STANDARD OF LIVING
WITH THE END OF ONE PHRASE IS THE BEGINNING OF THE NEW.
The moral of the story is- during the last trial a lot of people said "We will see when the case is over" and then the Civil case was lost by CSHD and Dufus. (Yes a ruling and fines owed handed down by the court means you lost). The new "buzz" was that he lost that one on purpose- why go to court if you are going to lose is the rationale
LOST? ON A DEFAULT! FRANK, GO READ THE US CONSTITUTION, YOU KNOW THE ONE THAT GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO POST YOUR UNINFORMED OPINION ON THIS SITE. EVERY US CITIZEN HAS THE RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS. A DEFAULT SUPERCEDES THAT RIGHT. A DEFAULT IS A CREATION OF THE ILLEGAL BEAGLE ESQUIRE CLUB, NOT THE CONSTITUTION. A DEFAULT IS AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS DENYING YOU THE RIGHT TO BARE ARMS. HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU HAVE TO SAY "NOT GUILTY" BEFORE THE COURT RECOGNIZES YOUR DENIAL OF GUILT WITHOUT QUESTION OR SANCTION A SLICK-WILLY MANUVER BY THE SEC TO ENTRAP YOU. THE CONSTITUTION SAYS IF YOU PLEAD NOT GUILTY THAT YOU GET A CHANCE TO PROVE IT. WAKE-UP FRANK
FRANK, WOULD YOU LIKE TO BE STRIPPED OF ALL YOUR RIGHTS PROVIDED YOU BY THE CONSTITUTION. WANT TO LIVE LIKE AN ANIMAL, UNDER THE THUMB OF CONTROLLERS WHO HAVE ONLY THEIR AGENDA IN MIND AND COULD CARELESS ABOUT YOU AND YOUR GOD GIVEN RIGHTS? WAKE-UP FRANK
AS MUCH AS YOU HATE TO RECOGNIZE THE OBVIOUS, THIS, THE CSHD SAGA, HAS GOT YOUR BEST INTEREST AT HEART AS ONE OF MANY OBJECTIVES. GOOD GOD MAN, THIS IS ABOUT YOUR FREEDOM, OUR FREEDOM. LOOK BEYOND THE WRITTEN WORD. WAKE-UP FRANK AND ALL YOU PEOPLE HERE
FIRST FLOORERS, can't expect more, can ya?
JA WENT TO GERMANY. HE ALSO WROTE A TEXT ON THE SEC WEDSITE DENOUNCING THE DESTRUCTIVE TOOL, NSS
NOW IT IS TIME FOR THE US TO MAKE THIS SAME MOVE.....FINANCIAL REFORM BILL???? DON'T SEE WHY NOT!
Germany's Naked Short-Selling Ban: Finally, It's About Time Someone Did
Visit: The Market Ticker
Submit
an article to In a particularly picayune piece of irony, FT reports today:
The German government is planning to ban the naked short-selling of all German stocks listed on the country’s exchanges in a sweeping enlargement of last week’s contentious bar on the naked short-selling of some securities.
To be clear: Naked short-sales are already illegal.
A bit of explanation is called for here. You can't sell something you don't own. Therefore, to sell short you have to first acquire what you wish to sell. To do this you borrow it from someone else. For example:
"A" owns 100 shares of IBM stock.
"B" wishes to sell short 100 shares of IBM stock.
"B" therefore borrows "A's" stock, replacing that stock with an IOU for the 100 shares, and then sells them to "C."
There are still only 100 shares of stock. "A" is entitled to whatever dividends would normally be paid by those 100 shares even though he doesn't have them any more, and "B" has to make good on that. "C" has the physical shares and gets the cash dividends that are paid on them, if any.
If "A" wishes to sell his 100 shares "B" must return them. He must return them because the IOU "A" has is callable on "A's" demand, irrespective of the price "B" might have to pay to acquire them!
That price might be very high if there are no willing sellers at a "reasonable" price when "B" has to repurchase them. But that doesn't matter - "B" agreed to this when he entered into the short sale. This event, called a "short squeeze," is one of the risks of selling securities short - since you don't own them and have to borrow them the person you borrowed them from might want them back at any point in time - and you're obligated to deliver if that happens, even if it bankrupts you (and sometimes it does).
Unscrupulous people can and have gotten around this problem. How? By not actually having acquired the securities they allegedly sell short.
Hang on a second ... how is that possible?
Today, it's very possible. "Back in the day" it was pretty tough, since stocks were represented as physical pieces of paper. When the trade settled you had to deliver the physical shares.
But today when I place an order to buy a stock my broker says "ok, you did it," takes the (electronic) money out of my account and puts the (electronic) shares in my account. It's all a record in a computer - no physical evidence of those shares pass from one hand to another.
Stocks settle at "T+3," that is, the trade date plus three days. Why? Historically this was because certificates had to be mailed. But today, options and futures settle either same or next day, and stocks don't.
So what happens if I "short" some stock but didn't borrow it first?
Now "A" still has his 100 shares (instead of an IOU) and "C" has his 100 shares. "B" is "short" 100 shares.
Wait a second ... "C's" shares don't really exist in this case.
This is in fact a criminal offense. The specific crime is called "uttering", which is the offense of presenting a counterfeited or forged document to another person with knowledge of its forged nature.
The company who has its bonds or stocks forged and uttered is the harmed party. In addition the party who bought said naked-shorted shares or credit instruments without knowledge of their falsity is also harmed, as they have bought something that is in fact worth nothing as it doesn't really exist.
Why this would be considered a "shock" is beyond me. The simple fact of the matter is that naked short sales are frauds in each and every case and should be prosecuted as same. There is no reason for anyone to question "what's up" with this; it is simple recognition of a fact that has in fact been the case forever, and a decision to crack down on one of the monstrous frauds that have been perpetrated on investors over the last couple of decades.
Now let's talk about "naked credit instruments."
These are simply side bets that are entered into on the performance (or not) of a given security. That is, they're not really "naked short sales" as nothing is being counterfeited as is the case when someone sells stock or bonds naked short. The former is illegal - the latter is just pure gambling.
But here's the problem with these gambling contracts: When written by a regulated, government-backstopped bank, they are effectively counterfeiting money.
Why?
Because the sovereign is required to stand behind the institution in whole or part in some form or fashion. Whether this requirement is implicit or explicit so long as it exists the institution writing these naked credit instruments is in fact counterfeiting and uttering currency, as if the bet goes bad the government will be forced to either dip into the treasury to make the bet whole or borrow money in the markets and either give or lend it to the institution.
A claim to have money you don't have is in fact forgery - and again, as soon as you pass it to someone else, uttering.
This is the identical offense you commit when you pass a bad check. You write it knowing your account has insufficient funds to cover it and present it. That check is a credit instrument - when that promise to pay is not backed by actual money you have committed a crime.
But in your case when you utter a bad check the merchant eats it, as it bounces and is returned to them. When a bank utters a naked credit instrument without having the cash necessary to back it in full the government eats it when the bet goes bad.
This too is a fraud, and that Germany is actually going to start punishing people who commit fraud is one of those "duh" moments - or if you prefer, it's about damn time.
Disclosure: No positions
WISHING ALL THE DADS OUT THERE A HAPPY FATHER'S DAY!!!
THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION IS A BIG FAT, LOUD, YES!!!
FACT!!!!!
dditfirst, you have missed the elevator off the first floor, again
Hang-on, it will be back
In the mean time, look up the meaning of GOBSmACKED
Reset SOLUTIONS
Convert SOLUTIONS
Convertible SOLUTIONS
CONVERSION SOLUTIONS
Very nice TeamPlayer!!!
Yes, Masta. The NSS scheme is NOT to cover!!
The plan is to put the infected company out of business or get the SEC crooks to delist the infected company so they, the mm/brokers/dealers, never have to cover!!!!! Then the mafia comes in and high-jacks the assets and potential assets. OH, also the counterfeit shares are bundled with other worthless paper into large tronces, sliced up like cookie dough and the slices sold to investors all over the world backed by the good faith of jerks like Moodys AAA ratings Any investor from individuals to retirement funds to COUNTRIES were sold this chit!!! This scam became national security issues for countries all over the world including the USA. These creeps took the defrauded investors money and left them holding worthless paper that could not be converted to cash when the defrauded invest needed cash
That in a nut shell is the NSS/derivative scam
Can you see how iMportant it becaMe that these crooks were stopped?! Without soMe very brave people and a fool proof plan, these crooks could have caused a worldwide depression that would have sent huManity back to the stone ages and that is a FACT! And if anyone here deny the above then these people are scaMers or part of the scaM
When all the details of what I just outlined becoMes public knowledge, your eyes will be bugged-out like never before and you'll be glad for people and coMpanies Making up the CONGLAMERATE
FYI
NSS=DERIVATIVES
LAST REPORT OVER $700 TRILLION OF SUCH CRAP
WHAT IS REPORTED IS NEVER CORRECT SO PROBABLY TWICE THAT
KNIDA LIKE 50 PLUS DAYS AGO THERE WAS ONLY 5000 GALLONS PER DAY OF OIL PUMPING INTO THE GULF...BS
DO YOUR REMEMBER CSHD OUT OF THE BLUE SHOWED UP ON THE BERLIN EXCHANGE.
WANT TO TALK ABOUT A CORRUPT, NSS PLAYGROUND, THIS IS THE MOTHER WHEN THE COMPANY YOU INVESTED IN SHOWS UP ON THIS EXCHANGE YOU KNOW WITHOUT A DOUBT YOUR COMPANY HAS BEEN NSS TO THE MAX IF THERE IS A MAX!
THE GERMAN EXCHANGES IS LIKE THE FINAL GRAVEYARD. THE BONES OF ONCE HIGH POTENTIAL COMPANIES EXIST THERE ALONG WITH THE INVESTORS MONEY
BUT AS OF A FEW WEEKS AGO, THAT PROBLEM HAS BEEN REPORTED TO NOLONGER EXIST
SO WHAT ISSUES WERE JA GOING TO RESOLVE????? AS CEO?
DID'T RUFUS HAVE A PROBLEM WITH TRAVELING ACROSS THE POND? NOT SURE WHY BUT I DO REMEMEBER SOMETHING LIKE THAT
UNDERSTAND, YOU HAVE BEEN WATCHING A BROADWAY PLAY FOR THE LAST FOUR YEARS FEATURING NUMEROUS CHARACTERS WITH DESIGNED ROLES
WHO IS ON FIRST, ON THIRD, WHO ARE THE BAD GUYS, THE GOOD GUYS
WHEN YOU ARE CONCRETED TO THE FIRST FLOOR, YOU GOT NO IDEA