Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Why would you argue against other revenue possibilities utilizing quantum dots? Seems ridiculous to not explore all avenues. India is being built out which will still take sometime to complete. If there is an application that can make use of reactors in San Marcos wouldn't that be a good thing?
Hopefully we get more information soon.
Agreed. PR had no useful information which leads to a lot of speculation for investors. Hope we see a follow up PR that outlines the technology and possible revenue stream.
Authenticity Counterfeiting is damaging to company brands, profits, and reputations as sub-standard products and intellectual property are presented to consumers as the real thing. By unlocking the ability to track items individually and maintaining an ironclad ledger that can’t be tampered with, blockchain has the potential to be a useful tool in verifying the authenticity of products in multiple industries.
Wine is one product that’s seen an increase in fraud that is difficult to detect and prevent. For fine wine in particular, it’s value in a sale or auction all depends on its verified authenticity, which had proven difficult to validate beyond initial production, meaning that “each time a bottled is presented for sale, it must be reassessed anew,” explains Maureen Downey, a “wine detective” and authentication consultant, in The Brand Protection Professional. Using permissible blockchain, which requires peer-to-peer consensus within the decentralized leger, the record becomes immutable and spans the longevity and global trajectory many fine wines take. This digital protection is bolstered by physical measures, such as embedding a thin plastic layer equipped with a serial code, providing a physical component to prevent tampering while connecting “the bottle and the blockchain.”
In connecting the physical product with the blockchain, a multidisciplinary team of researchers at Michigan State University is exploring the revolutionary application of partnering blockchain with nanotechnology and DNA, or “blockchain-nano-DNA,” as Dr. Evangelyn C. Alocija of the Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering calls it. Initially, researchers considered the possibility of gold, silver, or magnetic nanoparticles as blockchain labels; however, these aren’t unique, which wouldn’t support an anti-counterfeiting system. MSU’s novel approach combines nanoparticles with DNA sequences to create and print a unique serial code for a product. This code can be embedded or printed, and later revealed applying a chemically based kit, which causes the DNA-nano code to shine under UV light. With this approach, products can be verified where digital coverage is lacking in the blockchain.
https://www.michiganstateuniversityonline.com/resources/acapp/brand-protection-potential-of-blockchain-technology/
Read the following and educate yourself before throwing out baseless comments
QD's are being explored for use in this exact application
https://www.michiganstateuniversityonline.com/resources/acapp/brand-protection-potential-of-blockchain-technology/
https://view.joomag.com/the-brand-protection-professional-the-bpp-volume-3-number-4/0026344001544470835?short
Continue to publication then page 8
Did you see Ted's recent pictures of tech city in India? It's moving ahead and at impressive pace.
The global blockchain technology market size is expected to reach USD 57,641.3 million by 2025, registering a CAGR of 69.4% from 2019 to 2025
Ok then explain why Nanoco has failed to land a display or any other deal? Watch this video from Oct 2016 and tell me what other reasonable explanation could there be other than cost? Nanoco seemed to be on a strong path following Nanosys.
Due to cost. Nanoco has a problem bringing their costs down to what the market will accept. Batch process is costly. It would be interesting to know if Nanosys is profitable.
Lending credence to the report, market research firm BlueFin Research last week claimed Apple discontinued development of QD image sensors, saying the company found the technology too expensive to mass produce
I do agree there are some minor unknowns for QMC to overcome but not to the magnitude Nanoco faced trying to scale in volume. As I've said many times in the past, that's where I believe QMC's flow technology will ultimately hold the advantage.
"Exceeding 7000 hours of continuous illumination with zero degradation is an extraordinary accomplishment that can move the reality of true QD-LED technology one step closer to reality.
It is even more so when you consider all our materials, regardless of whether they are prototype or production, are produced using our proprietary continuous flow production process enabling seamless scale-up to high volume production,” said Toshi Ando, Quantum Materials Corp Senior Director of Business Development."
Well said. Thank you.
Isn't that the primary reason Steve went with flow technology? It was to deal with the scaling issue. That's where I disagree and believe QMC will have a distinct edge over Nanoco and Nanosys with their batch process. Two different paths taken one which I believe will favor QMC.
I thought the conversation began with your assumption that OEMs have looked at QMC's product and ability to scale and passed on what they were presented.
Yes I agree no deals to date could indicate this but to assume as though it must have happened was not factual. I pointed out Nanocos trials and tribulations as an indication of how difficult this space is to make viable. I would be more than happy to see both companies succeed.
How is Nanoco not relevant as a comparable?
Wouldn't logical discussion and debate include analyzing and comparing another public company trying to bring similar product to market?
Talk about a half-full outlook??
Maybe that is your interpretation of the half full/empty comment but you have your head in the sand if you clearly can't see the division between posters that are positive about QMC reaching significant revenues and those that make you question when, or why they would ever invest.
Lol.. what was irrational about my post that resulted in the response?
Are Nanocos shortcomings not relevant to QMC?
Is their struggle to market not a indication of the difficulties Steve and QMC are facing?
Just keepin it real.. and no we would never be bro's
This is Nanoco you're referring to? After repeated assurances by Edelman that Nanoco is the world leader and ramping up and optimizing facilities at Runcorn and with Dow. No display sales to date.
Failed partnerships
Osram
Tokyo Electron
Dow
Merck
Apple
Wah Hung?
Oh and don't forget the illustrious Edelman has almost divested of all his shares.. lots of confidence there.
All good! Lots to look forward to now that a facility is under construction. QMC's ability to scale up with quality and consistency has always been it's primary focus. That's where I believe QMC will have the edge, particularly in large scale solar projects where large quantities of qdots will be needed. Nanosys may be able to produce cheap enough for the display industry but perhaps not for solar.
Scaling is where Nanoco has struggled and Nanosys, Samsung/Hansol have had to make large capital investments to produce and expand.
All QMC investors should be thankful for Nanosys who have helped to prove up Qdot technology and shown they can be viable in this market. If Samsung or any display manufacturer working with Nanosys had failed miserably we would be really screwed. Hopefully Steve can manage to catch something Nanosys isn't pursing and at least get us on the field.
Apple to switch from OLED to microLED displays in Apple Watch as soon as next year
https://9to5mac.com/2019/07/22/microled-apple-watch-report/
Based on the failed initial agreement I can see why. Like I mentioned I don't see any short or long term value for QMC, just linked their site out of curiosity. Probably shouldn't have lol
ZDNet: LG's OLED TV strategy needs to change or face mobile's plight.
https://www.zdnet.com/article/lgs-oled-tv-strategy-needs-to-change-or-face-mobiles-plight/
Funny Freschfield has updated their site. They indicate a residential project is under development in Burnaby BC.
https://freschfield.com/
Just posting for interest sake.. I don't believe it holds any value for qmc.
Dow/Nanoco failed to scale up qdot production due to either cost or quality issues.
QMC Flow technology solves that problem.
And how does that change the fact that Adam Long is shady AF?
Lol what? Of course the BOD and Sri ignored the cash levels look at how they left the company.
Making product in the reactor is the key to the companies success, you don't take offline the one piece if equipment that is the fundamental reason for future success.
Your arguement is ridiculous, same can be said for Nanoco then? Haven't they been running Runcorn 24/7 for the last few years? Where is all the sales?
QMC has the ability to ramp up accordingly, when India infrastructure is complete flow reactors producing qdots with all three factors in place quality/quantity/cost will result in renevues.
We know the Indian group has reviewed the technology and have stated QMC to be a key tenant for the 12,000 square feet nanotech-focused facility is being established as the anchor project within the recently announced Electronics Manufacturing Cluster in the Guwahati Tech City.
What is your personal opinion of Adam Long? Or can't you comment on a friend?
When vultures finance you ..this came up on L2.
Lets hope the judge takes this into consideration.
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:UhFXYkTPNkYJ:https://www.scamwarners.com/forum/viewtopic.php%3Ff%3D43%26p%3D390963+&cd=13&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Adam Long L2 Capital - Fraudster
Topic description
Board index
Specific scams Email Scams Targeting Businesses You are here
Welcome, Google [Bot]
It is currently Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:07 pm
Last visit was: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:07 pm
Adam Long L2 Capital - Fraudster
1 post
Page 1 of 1
Adam Long L2 Capital - Fraudster
by Ryan Green Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:01 pm
Adam Long emails public businesses promising them money, enters into financing agreements with them and then destroys their stock price through illegal practices.
Adam Long criminally forged the signature of David Lethem, CEO of FTE Networks – to change the maturity of a note so he could convert it earlier. CEO threatened to file criminal forgery claims against Adam Long and L2 Capital so Adam Long secretly settled the dispute with a confidential settlement agreement.
L2 Capital Adam Long tried to screw over Amedica and MoneyonMobile by using both anti-dilution and ratchet provisions at the same time on the warrants to make an excessive illegal windfall profit and they company fought them on this. Watch out for these dirty toxic death spiral financiers
Adam long claims to re a resident of Puerto Rico for most of the year, but secretly spends most of his real time outside of Puerto Rico. He incorporated in Puerto Rico to take advantage of Act 20 and Act 22 does to avoid paying taxes to the US government. He sends his passport on a plane and bribes people just to get his passport stamped so he can show that to the IRS and claim he has been in Puerto Rico.
Adam Long likes to take advantage of companies and when he doesn’t get his way he likes to sue:
SBI Investments, LLC, 2014-1 And L2 Capital LLC v. Quantum Materials Corp. and Empire Stock Transfer, Inc., 03-17-00749-CV (Tex. App. 2018). Adam long refused to give back his share of collateral to the company as he said there may be some defaults by the company.
Adam R. Long has a history duplicity both in business and extra-martial affairs. Adam Long began got his first taste of scheming pockets when working as a broker at Ayre Investments. Long then briefly worked for Waddell and Reed as a financial advisor, then went to work for Wells Fargo Financial. Adam Long was promoted to a position in the Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Division, which provided subprime loans to less qualified applicants – yes the same type of loans which contributed to the 2008 crisis. As evidence of Long’s poor character, we can look to the SEC case “Case No. 14-2617-JAR, Bankruptcy Case No. 09-23473 ) Adversary No. 09-6172” – “IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that the bankruptcy court’s Order finding the debt owed to James Yoder by Debtor Adam Long is nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and Judgment in the amount of $906,551 in Yoder’s favor are AFFIRMED” {REDACTED} In recent months, Adam Long has been defrauding investors of his two firms L2 Capital and Oasis Capital. Refusing to pay back returns owed to investors, Long in the meantime is investing the returns – profiting for his own gain and lying to investors.
8900 Stateline Road
Suite 410
Leawood, KS 66206
United States
Phone:
816-960-0100
http://www.ltwocapital.com
Key Executives For L2 Capital, LLC
Mr. Edward M. Liceaga
Managing Partner
Mr. Adam Long
Managing Partner
http://www.worldwatch.org/node/6220
https://cleantechnica.com/2019/01/14/india-plans-40-gigawatts-of-solar-wind-auctions-every-year-till-2028/
QMC = place-time-technology all coming together at once.
“The Indian government has made a priority of putting in place multi-hundred gigawatt levels of renewable energy sources by the year 2025, of which a large percentage of that power generation is slated to be provided by solar. We believe that thin-film quantum dot solar is the best candidate for filling this mandated initiative due to its low capex and opex cost when compared to traditional PV/silicon based solar especially given the fact that India has placed a huge premium on domestically sourced goods as part of their "Make in India" program to promote domestic industries. To that end we have laid out a very comprehensive roadmap to providing this solution with a now completed solar cell design with commercially economic power yield levels along with fixed component QD chemistry and plan to commence production of solar cells via a continuous, rapid feed flexographic based printing process as soon as the manufacturing facility in Assam is up and running,” Squires continued. “Now that we have received this initial funding the next step is providing two large scale quantum dot reactors to establish QD production at the India facility to support the solar cell print line which we expect to receive a purchase order for this equipment in the next few weeks along with an 80% upfront payment. You can expect a series of announcements regarding this venture over the next 6 to 12 months in the form of interim updates and we look forward to sharing the progress of this exciting and forward-thinking project with all shareholders as it unfolds."
QDVision leader Seth Coe-Sullivan laughed at QMC then ended up in a asset sale. Have a read on the Nanoco boards (which I know you do) and posters there are now hoping to regain some value in a similar asset sale.
After all the snide remarks and doubt QMC is progressing with government backing.
"Construction has commenced on the new 120,000 sq. ft. facility with ground pilings being laid and NDT testing underway."
Quantum Materials Corp CEO Stephen B. Squires commented, “We are pleased to see our patented technology being deployed in India and we are working closely with our licensees to better understand the Indian market and the nuances of doing business in this rapidly developing region. In addition to our primary mission of developing infrastructure to support roll-to-roll printing of next-generation quantum dot-based thin-film solar cells, the Tech City plant will be developing technology to support commercial production of QD based films for high color gamut flat panel displays as well as QD-LED general lighting and energy storage applications.”
Yep they don't have anyone close by that understands the technology.
http://www.iitg.ac.in/physics/fac/giri/index.htm
San Marcos Texas, April 29, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading American cadmium-free quantum dot and nanomaterials manufacturer Quantum Materials Corp, (OTCQB: QTMM) announced today that it has produced and is demonstrating to select customers a 100% cadmium-free 55 inch QDX™ quantum dot display technology that achieves an industry-leading 95% Rec. 2020 color gamut coverage. This superior level of performance is achieved by utilizing the Company's proprietary quantum dot enhanced film while eliminating the costly barrier film previously necessary for QD-based display designs.
I will take the language in the PR as proof over your personal interpretation of a photo
Agreed Ted. Thank you.
Did you ever read the post Ted put up directly in response to your doubts awhile ago??
To spec out the FWHM of the red or green QDs, wouldn't you have to take your measurement before the color filter in the display screen?
Don't the color filters "mix" the RGB inputs and then render the broader color spectrum that you then see at the face of the display? So the peaks are going to be broader when measured at the displays face?
Read it and weep sunshine
San Marcos Texas, April 29, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading American cadmium-free quantum dot and nanomaterials manufacturer Quantum Materials Corp, (OTCQB: QTMM) announced today that it has produced and is demonstrating to select customers a 100% cadmium-free 55 inch QDX™ quantum dot display technology that achieves an industry-leading 95% Rec. 2020 color gamut coverage. This superior level of performance is achieved by utilizing the Company's proprietary quantum dot enhanced film while eliminating the costly barrier film previously necessary for QD-based display designs.
How's "play that bounce bro" going for ya? Lol
Crying in your cornflakes still?