Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I am only going off of public information and logical thinking; nice try...
I refer you to dsaul's post 48882; a person with understanding and vision.
Garbone - If you had any idea what the company has been up against, you'd change your thinking. I can assure you, Eves & Neary aren't in this game to leave us hanging dry. I can also assure you, they, too, wish things were more linear and without delay. But, lastly, I can tell you this: what will be revealed with the new processes, upon commercialization, will blow your socks off---and nothing will touch it.
Impact of policy & politics on share prices
A country's government shapes the business environment in which companies operate.
Government policies such as changes to regulations, taxation, interest rates and spending programmes therefore have a huge influence on individual companies' performance and their stock price.
This lesson will show you how these government policies influence the price of shares
https://learn.tradimo.com/advanced-stock-trading/impact-of-policy-politics-on-share-prices
And had this bs carbon tax model been signed, it would have put CCTI, and other coal companies, back a few years #Geopolitics
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/12/3/18123684/trump-g20-climate-change-paris-agreement
Everything is connected.
Seriously????? Here's a 101 for you:
Impact of policy & politics on share prices
A country's government shapes the business environment in which companies operate.
Government policies such as changes to regulations, taxation, interest rates and spending programmes therefore have a huge influence on individual companies' performance and their stock price.
This lesson will show you how these government policies influence the price of shares
https://learn.tradimo.com/advanced-stock-trading/impact-of-policy-politics-on-share-prices
As if it's not commercially viable.....seriously???? Again, mgmt and the R&D guys don't jump just b/c a shareholder is disgruntled and can't wrap his or her head around "Foreward Looking Statement." The future success of this company isn't going rise or fall due to a select few irate people on a random forum, who feel they deserve more: more pr, more communication, more ROI, etc., etc., etc.
If one can't stomach it, one should divest their engagement. Completely.
#Truth; thank you for the eloquent breakdown of how development on a path to commercialization works.
And that's just what's being published.....
LOLOLOLOLOL
Just checking in to see how the echo chamber is coming along....
Foreward Looking Statement
Based upon what charges?
Beautiful. #Gratitude.
Future indeed! And an exciting one at that!
That is disingenuous; the evolution of the process now includes Rare Earth Mineral Extraction - this kind of refinement does not take place overnight--CCTI and UofWy are not deliberately holding this up from success. The process to commercialization is not linear and it doesn't jump when the shareholders say so.
Please expand
So does this mean you are completely divested in CCTC?
....that's funny....
Indeed....we've watched this dance for a while now - take the easy money when you can, and ride the rest out; substantive news will be here sooner than we think. Lets not get our knickers in a twist, Boys.
You and I have been at this, now, Beebs for how long--we've seen corps domestic and abroad try and buy this on the cheap and suppress the tech - and yet it's still here: with better processes, extractions, and potential for mass royalties from the secondary byproducts.
There is no downside. "Pristine, Clean, Beautiful Coal" is here to stay.
You are distorting what he said. He is not going to give the technology away at a discount-he doesn't need to. Ask yourself why--the answer is because the process is so effing brilliant, effective, and efficient, he doesn't have to. That's why.
The 7th rule is really appropriate - a complete drag.
No imagination. Just regurgitation.
"...the first rule of power tactics: Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.
...The second rule is: Never go outside the experience of your people.
…The third rule is: Wherever possible go outside the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.
…the fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
…the fourth rule carries within it the fifth rule: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.
…the sixth rule is: A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
…the seventh rule is: A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
…the eighth rule: Keep the pressure on.
…the ninth rule: The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
The tenth rule: The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
…The eleventh rule is: If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.
…The twelfth rule: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.
…The thirteenth rule: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." — Rules for Radicals
...except it's not working...
"Or maybe we’re staring at the bitchin’est concrete pad because final “likely client” DD is done and they’re not interested. That would explain a few things. "
"Only a fool would think there’s no opportunity to profit AND increase personal share count now. We’re no closer to the finish line than we were two weeks ago. No pilot plant, no clients, no final design plan. All things promised months ago. Yet now, somehow, we’re supposed to keep trending upward? That’s not how markets work. "
"We could just as easily be one announcement away from dilution or massive delay. Maybe even more easily. It works both ways, and there’s always a gamble.
But management’s repeated inability to meet stated timelines, coupled with paid-for promotional crap being published, made it pretty obvious to me that things are not as they should be for a proper move up."
"Yes, I’m sure those announcements are “pending”. I don’t doubt it for a minute. Equally sure they’ll be here “soon”.
Management is peddling the same crap they’ve been peddling for more than a year now. The continued lack of specifics after two missed deadlines is not a good sign.
Considering they also tweeted that ridiculous Wall Street Reporter piece about “potential” and “expectations” (their favorite weasel word) today, several days after it originally published, I’d say they’re just trying to keep the pump going a little longer."
That's the most optimism, I've seen yet.
...last trade was .23 at 14:04:15; why is the quote still showing .201 as the high when it's .25???
....we have the technology...
The post with tech that washes the coal is so antiquated-they're still working on an horizontal platform. Not even close in competition to CCTI's process.
No Army Can Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come....
If it hits .80, it's going to $1....
Not nearly as efficient as CCTI's process.
I have no doubt....
Beebs! Doesn't this remind you of the early days????
Indeed......
What is he supposed to do; live on air?
Revised:
The truth is, geopolitics and non-complimentary energy policies have impacted this company more than anyone will ever acknowledge.
Pre-Robin, say whatever you want.
Post-Robin, 2010 - January 2017, it's been an uphill battle. And moving the goal-posts wasn't some sort of ruse to get one over on the shareholders; that's utter folly.
Have you talked to the coal unions or coal state boards, or even the miners? I have. Across many coal producing states. And those macroeconomics/politics have impacted all facets of this sector. Kill it as a sector; kill initiative and research and development-----AND investment.
I would urge all those investors to stop in eastern KY, TN, WV of a mining town and talk to those men and how the energy policies of 2008-2016 administration impacted them, including clean initiatives. Ask them to compare life and the industry during those years to what they are since January 2017. Even better, talk to our competition, White Coal, or the now defunct FutureGen and see how things impacted them.
The missed deadlines has never been intentional by Eves; nor is it due to incompetence. It's collateral fallout of expectations that haven't come through due to all kinds of factors--most notably, geopolitical. This company, as well as, all others, do not operate in a bubble.
The bottom line is this: At the end of the day Clean Coal Technologies, Inc. is nothing without the mining companies. You can not separate the two.