good moning all fellow caveats...lol It has been said that the "jv" has bought three billion shares off market, with intentions to sell at a higher PPS in the future. Hmmm.. I wonder dfoes the "jv" feel as we do as the caveat emptor sign appears the same for him as us?...
Lumb didnt see this one coming, I assure you. He fully intended to sell a few more milion or even billion to ffgo, hurasu, and the likes (his shells) to spread the wealth of resources to his new shells. In contact with Pinksheets, attorneys and the florida state regulators has stopped the nonsense to a point. An attorney when found who will tackle the class action suit will take him down the rest of the way.
I could gives a rats butt about the stock, and the loss at this point,My goal is the same. Hire an attorney and of course get the legal aspects out of the way for me to proceed with the huntgoldcorporation.com and .info websites telling all about the company in print. the legal ramifications will be clear and make me safe from prosecution.
Unlike lumb....Saner and the rest. Hurasu, skyline and ffgo are next. time to shut down the scams.
IMO

wheels are turning, and times they are a changing.
Hunt gold will have a new outlet or web presence due to be completed in days. Fortnight and very soon. At present legal issues are being taken care of and the presence will appear after the lawyers get done with the licensing issues. All i can say now is keep your faith, we will have a website..... maybe not the one some management expects but i assure you it will tell the story, and may even have streaming news, and quotes.

Iron pyrite prices and maybe a pic or two if allowed.. regardless the webnames can be purchased for a tidy sum, errrr ummmm maybe 200 million shares in a usa quoted company..
Isnt that what some hype companies get? LOL

Have fun, i know i am...JMHO

very soon the unnofficial website will be running in a fortnight or very soon... keep checking back, and PM me if you have any input as the new unofficial website will be live very shortly and of course the site is for sale to the right person with enough cash or even shares in a USA quoted company...LOL

www.huntgoldcorporation.com
www.huntgoldcorporation.info

Good luck all hglc folks.. have a great day!

IMO EOM

try huntgoldcorporation.com and.info

It would be called slanderous if statements made were in fact untrue and unsupported and even used to liable a company therefor hindering them from performing their goals.
HGLC has hindered itself as GWGO, FFGO, and the rest of the "so called" exploration companies. I doubt that the "so called Bashing" rates anywhere on a scale to the PR's easily proven to be innaccurate, misleading, and outright falsehoods in and of themselves.
Threats from the tyrants Tower is no different in scope , as the threats and attempts to retain a class action law firm.

Basically it comes to performance and "your companies" inability to accomplish very few if any of the goals set out in PR's. Mike Saner has had hundreds of days to make a gem appear and he cant even get a cheap template web presence up and running. Dividends can be promised and taken away. we all know this, but past performance has shown, until the market is right for the MYSTERY JV (lumb) the PPS has to be right, and then , maybe then a slight divi appears.
lumb has been banned in S.A> for market manipulation, what is the billions shares served here in the past months with no bid and no ask? Market makers jerking off, or Lumb manipulating between his shells.? Crying wolf is over. An attorney will take my case eventually and i will keep at it until I find one.

The SEC, Finra and Florida, Nevada, and anyone else who will read the letters will hear as much as has been gathered , based upon companies PR's, whether a forward look statement has been made or not. deception, fraud, scam, cheaters, thieves, what ever you call the management it all adds up to our position. NO ASK , NO BID, NO GOLD being mined or intention to mine....

All IMO EOM

A little South african News from the past that concerns our JV

TRANSACTIONS IN THE SHARES OF THE INTERNET GAMING CORPORATION LIMITED DURING AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER 2000

On 7 September 2000, the Registrar of Stock Exchanges caused an inspection to be instituted following an enquiry by the Surveillance Department of the Johannesburg Securities Exchange into what it perceived to be unusual share transactions between 10 August and 6 September 2000 in the shares of The Internet Gaming Corporation Limited.

The inspection related to the affairs of certain persons and entities in order to establish whether or not in participating in these share transactions they had contravened section 40 of the Stock Exchanges Control Act, 1985.

Section 40 prohibits, amongst others, the creation of fictitious transactions in order to stimulate activities or influence or manipulate the price of listed securities, or the entering into any transaction with such objective.

It should be emphasized that the inspection was not aimed at the business activities of The Internet Gaming Corporation Limited as such, but focused exclusively on transactions conducted in the shares of that company by the inspected parties. SOUND FAMILIAR?

On 28 February 2001 the inspector presented a final report to the Registrar who, in terms of the Inspection of Financial Institutions Act, 1998, made copies of the report available only to a certain affected party. The Act limits the disclosure of information obtained during an inspection. The recipient of the report was invited to submit his comments or response to the report to the Registrar and was allowed a reasonable time to do so. No response was received by the Registrar’s office despite a further invitation to that effect.

After due consideration of the report, the Registrar adopted the view that the matter justified further investigation by the competent authorities into whether section 40 of the Stock Exchanges Control Act had been contravened in the course of the share transactions which formed the subject of the inspection.

The matter has accordingly been referred to the Director of Public Prosecutions who has been furnished with a copy of the inspection report.

Although this release is made in the interests of transparency, neither the Financial Services Board nor the office of the DPP would in law be entitled to furnish more information or to comment further on this issue. The FSB will most definitely also not speculate as to how the DPP will exercise his prerogative of either prosecuting or declining to prosecute any party. Interested parties are accordingly requested not to contact the FSB or the DPP while the matter is still under investigation.

REGISTRAR OF STOCK EXCHANGES
FINANCIAL SERVICES BOARD
20 September 2001

thank you

Name: STEPHEN CRAIG LUMB
Address:
WALTON CASTLE
CASTLE ROAD
CLEVEDON
AVON
Postcode : BS21 7AA
Date of Birth : 21/04/1967
Nationality: SOUTH AFRICAN

Number of disqualification orders: 1
Disqualified From: 10/07/2007 To: 09/07/2010
Reason: CDDA 1986 S5


Director Disqualification Details

This screen shows details of current disqualification orders.

A director may be disqualified as a result of an investigation by one of the following authorities:-
The Police - if fraud is suspected.
DTI Investigations - for general misconduct whilst running a company.
The Insolvency Service - usually as a result of an investigation of failed companies where a director knowingly continues to trade whilst insolvent.
Companies House - for breaches of the filing requirements as specified in the Companies Act.
If a case is proven, an individual is disqualified by order of court. On such occasions, for the period of time specified in the order the director shall not without leave of court:-
Be a director of a company.
Be a liquidator or administrator of a company.
Be a receiver or manager of a company's property.
Be concerned or take part, whether directly or indirectly, in the promotion, formation or management of a company.
Disqualifications are made under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, Sections 2-12. For example, CDDA 1986 S6.

Sections 2 - 5: Disqualifications for general misconduct in connection with companies:-
2: On conviction of an indictable offence.
3: For persistent breaches of company legislation.
4: For fraud, etc, in winding-up.
5: On summary conviction.
Sections 6 - 9: Disqualification for unfitness to act as company director:-
6: Unfit directors of insolvent companies.
7: Disqualification undertaking made by an individual
8: Disqualification after investigation of company.
9: Matters for determining unfitness of directors.
Sections 10 - 12: Other cases of disqualification:-
10: Participating in wrongful trading.
11: Undischarged bankrupts.
12: Failure to pay under county court administration order.
The maximum period of disqualification is 15 years.Section 17 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 - Application for leave under an Order
A Director may apply to the Court to vary the terms of the original Disqualification Order. In certain circumstances the court may allow the disqualified individual to continue as a director of a specific company or companies for either an interim period of time or the whole term of the disqualification. Details of any exemptions will be provided.
For further information, please refer to the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.

let every one see what we have already seen.... he jaywalked and for this summary conviction he is disqualified to conduct business in the UK for 3 years......Jeeesh rough on jaywalkers huh?

interesting reading from Mike Saners previous days in court...


Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Except as provided below, we know of no legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which any of our property interests are subject, which are pending, threatened or contemplated, or of any unsatisfied judgments against us.
We were named as the defendant in a civil action, Case Number 05CV1454, styled Wall Street Investor Resources Corp., a Maryland corporation v. Savoy Resources Corp., a Colorado corporation, filed in the District Court of El Paso County, Colorado, on April 19, 2005. The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for alleged unpaid marketing consulting services in the amount of approximately $28,221. We intend to vigorously defend against the claim.
In December of 2004, nine plaintiffs filed a civil action, Case Number 04CV4894, styled Byron Hampton, Floyd Wandler, Ryan Wandler, Louis Gheyle, Dimka Boussy, 676538 B.C. Ltd., Donna Koop, Cathy Tough and Platinum Resource Holding
(sic), Inc., Plaintiffs, versus Savoy Resources Corp., Robert Slavik, Weiguo Lang, Patricia Cudd, Zhengli (sic) (Charles) Ge, Daniel S. McKinney and PacWest Transfer, LLC, Defendants, in the District Court of El Paso County, Colorado, against seven defendants, including Savoy, the Company's President/Chief Executive Officer and Board of Directors, its transfer agent and its legal counsel. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants wrongfully cancelled and otherwise dispossessed them of a total of 17,867,250 shares of common stock of Savoy owned collectively by them. Defendant Savoy denied the allegations and filed a counterclaim against Mr. Floyd Wandler alleging that he breached his fiduciary duty to Savoy. In January of 2005, the Court granted a temporary restraining order enjoining the defendants from taking any action whatsoever with respect to the shares and any benefits obtained from them and ordering the defendants to immediately provide a full accounting of any sales or other dispositions of the Shares and any benefits received from them. On May 13, 2005, Savoy and the other defendants, except Mr. Slavik, entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release with the plaintiffs providing for dismissal with prejudice by the plaintiffs of their pending claims and counterclaims against the defendants, except Mr. Slavik, and the defendants' dismissal with prejudice of their pending claims and counterclaims against the plaintiffs in the Civil Action and against two of the plaintiffs and two other individuals, as the defendants, in the civil action number 04-cv-00290-EWN-CBS styled Savoy Resources Corp., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, versus Floyd Wandler, Byron Hampton, Michael Gheyle and Robert Welch, Defendants, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. Savoy filed this case in February of 2005 against the defendants seeking their disgorgement of short swing profits from purchases and sales of common stock of Savoy in violation of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As part of the settlement, the plaintiffs agreed to cancellation and return to treasury of 8,055,000 shares of common stock subject to the Civil Action. The balance of 4,000,000 shares will be impounded in escrow and released to the plaintiffs at the rate of 50,000 shares per week on the first day of each week commencing September 1, 2005, through the last week of April 2007.
14

Priz........I have no doubt that drilling has taken place and that Mr Ed is working. The questionable conduct of management has been my beef. I cant and wont put anymore faith into the fallacy that drilling and assays means profit for us.
These properties are all the same GWGO ffgo and hglc lands and names that have been tossed like a fruit salad. The company has no intentions on mining anything except wallets, and the new hurasu now has copperstone and bouse, WOW! who will get it next?
The whole shell swapping silent JV, confidentiality crap has gone far enough. HGLC is a rose with thorns of poison imo.
Roses look nice, but they wilt and die, and so does the PR train that hglc has used.

IF HGLC wants to stay out of hot water it needs to actually start fulfilling the fiction with a little truth. Ore will not be processed and the next step in its short life has been planned already, either lumb will have saner R/S and eventually r/m into a new shell to shed the HUNT name which is now and forever a scam at best, and the people know this.
I applaud your faith, and hope you eventually make a buck or two, but remember this......Divs in more of nothing still equals nothing...good luck to you.
EOM

summary conviction that boots him, barrs him, de registers him, for over 5 years? Misdeameanor? BS more has to be there in his actions as ceo or director and more has been done by him to get himself banned for years. IT DOESNT ADD UP PD>>>IMO

thanks janice

WHEN AN ATTORNEY ACCEPTS INVESTIGATING INTO THIS, I will surely post anything i have. Your calls to them will be as welcome as anyones... It is just time to act before the scam runs its course any further..IMO

SCRAPPY DOO...... I SAID I WILL GET SATISFACTION, NOT .0002

CATCH UP FROM THIS MORNINGS POSTS....

Ya think I will however get satisfaction...I promise you that...EOM

Its a risk when you get up out of bed that you dont stub your toe.... It is a risk every time your drive, fly, and eat. What is the point of life with no risk? What is the point of gambling with no chance of winning?

what is the point in waiting for a fraud to scam others? and lie longer and longer as promises are passed up time and time again.... If this is a lotto play.. I will help you out with your so called "otc class" Dont gamble! Put your money to work for you and not into a wishing well, where the odds of a geiser returning it and many other pennies back to you is slim to none. ALLRIGHT WE KNOW ITS COLOR, AND WE KNOW ITS RISK...... teach us something we dont know thru countless hours of DD and lies told to us by this fraudulant scam of a stock.

CAN U PLEASE MASTER PENNY TRADER?

Do your Thing Ill do mine Pickstock.... I will stand by no more and do nothing as my hard earned dollars are stolen and mismanaged by a fraudulant company. face it, We all aint saints here, and we all aint devils either, just a plain and simple investor who is not simple minded. I represent myself. No others, I however hope to have an attorney willing to rep anyone who would like to join in......


DO YOUR THING, ILL DO MINE...

Juk we need to find as much about the rest of the BOD and Mike Saner, go for FFGO Boards as well as they are a major shareholder and thier board is directly involved as well... shoot me a PM when you can with more gumbo to stew on, and prep for the attorneys.
ThX

Criminal FRAUD IMO has been accomplished. but thats my opinion.
I do feel that civil litigation could open the door to the criminal leg of justice. A federal district taking that on would have probable cause and effect and tackle the criminal aspects in due time. Writing fed authorities at this point is too early. the SEC has replied to me with grim news. However the reason for lack of investigation is what turned me cold and blackhearted towards the "class suit" efforts.
See the SEC says they are a non reporting stock. Finra can play them into oblivion with halts or suspensions, however as many know, the problem isnt the trading in the market. It is how they fraudulently draw investors in. That to me is where the suit tackles the fraud case. WHICH IN TURN OPENS UP THE CRIMINAL CASE.


imo

pink, blue , purple, it matters not, money to an attorney is green by any color description, and the more people promote
"the pink sheet lotto play" theory the more it is accepted.

Ask Kerkorian if Ford was a lotto, or ask Wamu and Indymac shareholders the same. Risk is always a part of stocks, but should the "losing battle"theory because it is OTC or pink or grey is no excuse to perpertrate and continue a long standing fraud in the USA. PERIOD>>>>>>>>>.

Thats why i said before anyone starts institutional investors cry.... I already knew that and said so months and months ago...I feel it is time to step up and be a small investor with an atittude.... write the attorney, write the press, screw the mdm solutions " your company" crap... They are paid to say what they say. screw emails to Saner, and Lumb, screw writing a hole in the wall drop box service, go for the throat and hire an attorney who wants part of the 625, and 65 million let alone the assets, keeping in mind the shareholders as plaintiffs will see some recovery in the process.

and before anyone says institutional investors....keep in mind I personally dont think another lumb shell or lumb himself as a jv is institutional, or at least not financially institutional.
maybe institutional in his own mind. or in the psychiatrists...LOL IMO

yeppers...i know..and the sad thing is many intent to grift or pass the scam on knowing it has done all the popping it will do in these worst economic times. Which is why i have written off the loss, but vengefully intend to pursue a gain in other forums, such as press and blogs, and court.

The single most damning evidence against hglc, will be the forced audit or release of the financials which they so cleverly use to bait investors. If any money has been made by HGLC is in the form of us small investors buying in. The institutional line of crap they throw out is bunk. And everyone knows it.

If everyones memory is not shot.... think back to the first thing that brought you to HGLC....? what was it the news of divies extraordinary or not... was it the past prices, the never ending "gaining more property" the "gold fever" or was it just pure LOTTO?

either way, you invested. This should not be treated as a wishing well that never gives back the pennies... It is a publicly traded stock, yet the public has no say so. Time to force the hand of the majority shareholders and BOD... lawsuits do just that.
Imagine thier faces when they recive a summons? OH mY GOD our financials need to be right, and our books need to be burned, and our records need to be fabricated, and we need an excuse for all our past performance and lies...LOL

IT WILL COME TO LIGHT.... we are at the final table and the bluff will be told or fold... either way we will get an answer eventually. IMO
(reckon enough used batteries have been sold that an acct even exists with records of 65 million dollars or 625 million dollars?

DOUBT IT>>>>>>>>>>>>Lumb your chickens are coming to roost and you have shut the henhouse door....Tooo bad....time to wake up as we roosters crow until we are heard..

PS Mike Saner, could ya throw a little chicken feed out for the hopefuls and longs to feed on while we work laying the golden eggs the attorneys want?

youre speaking for hundreds waiting in the wings? lotto players? or speaking for yourself alone? I speak for myself and urge other to join if they want... Thats purely personal choice which HGLC has not promised and taken away yet...LOL


DO YOUR THING,...., I will do mine...EOM

done some of them already, like i said i have been lurking in the shadows but busy as a cat in a room full of rockers..LOL

Ill keep it up until walter cronkite comes back from the grave to write about this scam...>LOL JK

C man .......class action does not have to include all investors. You may bow out at the end/or beginning... It is your choice. I guarentee when an attorney gets his claws into this and the money is traced, all will come tumbling down, as we all know the 65 million was transacted on paper and typed words only as never did any funds transfer to any idiot running this scam. If they say it was their attorneys will look for it.. When the right attorney takes his claws and starts digging.... all shells that Lumb has are in jeopardy i promise you that.. Shareholders are in a win win in my opionion if a suit is filed.. Bankruptcy will show the financials as well. If we lose our shares, so be it, a good attorney will see to it that assets would be liquidated, and if possible at above .0001.

That is win win... call the bluff.... make em show their hands.
Lies and deciet are easily proven with financial records in court. Sign the waiver if not interested...

Alaskan warrior has offended many here representing himself as a shareholder and using terminology that is distasteful, which he apologized for. he is just doing what he as a shareholder can do. If emailing is his forte' so be it.. I am going for the juglar vein. MSNBC< MSN MONEY, slate, cncb, national enquirer i dont care, a human interest story as well as one heck of a fictional story lies in the wait. I will be emailing, writing facts and posting help signs up at as many publishers , magazines, web blogs and any other people who would like to further investigate this fraud. Vengeance is mine sayeth the share oasis...IMO

Read the back of any lotto played in any state in the union bro....odds are posted. We cant win if we dont play the odds.

Lightning striking in the right place at the right time is billions to one odds. I for one have written off any sizable profit coming from this scam. I would however rather see the stocks management called on the countless lies told, and maybe an attorney who wants a peice of the 625 million in molygold sales, 65 million in silver lookout or even 33% of all the BLM land leases i dont know... Its better then living a lie any longer, and Mike Saner knows we are gunning for Lumb moreso than him.... there isnt enough catlitter in the sandbox to cover the lumb stench this stock has.... trust in your heart and do what you heart tells you.. I wont sit around any longer and wait for a pop, nor do i care if it does.
I want justice and i want to kick open the door to the finacials on this and any other shell bulls^%$ con game lumb has privy to.
IMO DO YOUR THING! I must do mine..

is 65 million dollars retained by "your company" a start?
I feel the assets will be there, or force a financial report of assets in courts and the findings from the finances as a public traded stock will be enough alone to hang em high...IMO

Sooner or later one attorney with guts and time on his hands will take our case...I am a vengeful spirit on a mission to find one.

EOM

If your asking how a suit is better? I feel any legal action towards the company will end in a settelment at best. "your company" has played the fiddle to the wrong audience long enough. Time to call thier bluff...IMO

they can have 75% for all i care, im after the people more then the profit at this point.. It has become personal..

I think you can send a book of lies to them that HGLC has essentially hung themselves with to them.. I will call them in a day or two, after as many investors complain in html thru thier report a fraud page..

They will own the used camera batteries and we all will get satisfaction of knowing the scam is over..

I pray any interested party jump in now, or play long and play hard...It dont matter to me anymore.

Juk,

I need you to forward all the collective links and descriptives of said lies to the law firm mentioned in the link..


Thanks... together we can "mine the gold" one way or another..

EOM IMO

I have been quiet for some time now, and my research and DD and collective thinking and gatherings have been put to the test. I have been on and off the phone with as many attorneys who will speak to me as i can. the link provided may get some spark to the fuel needed to get litigation started. Minority shareholders who have no voting rights or say so, have a say so in court... Link is very important if you wish to see the ball start rolling to discredit HGLC management or get new management from outside the lumb family of scammers..
The attorneys will reply sooner or later and the more we gather the harder it is for HGLC to cover thier crap up...
Action must be swift and my hiatus from posting was time well spent researching and DD law firms who operate secuirties and exchange class action suits.

COMPLAIN WHERE IT COUNTS>>>>>.....

IMO

The more investors complain here the better..

http://www.milberg.com/?s_kwcid=TC-1829-15688341522-S-38831202022&OVRAW=class%20action%20law%20firm&OVKEY=class%20action%20law%20firm&OVMTC=standard&OVADID=38831202022&OVKWID=15688341522

go online and file a prelim complaint with this firm...

http://www.milberg.com/?s_kwcid=TC-1829-15688341522-S-38831202022&OVRAW=class%20action%20law%20firm&OVKEY=class%20action%20law%20firm&OVMTC=standard&OVADID=38831202022&OVKWID=15688341522

I have at present contacted at least 4 attorneys specialising in class action against securities.. Many are very busy at this time and have pushed the complaint to the side for now, some have responded and assigned a preliminary investigator to determine if a suit is viable. I will keep in contact and will not post any attorneys or responses from any attorneys until i have one locked in for a shredding spree....EOM

Brad....If possible could a sticky note be posted on all relevent addresses for shareholders to file or write the appropriate authorities? Phone numbers and the likes.
Between the posters here i am sure a list can be gathered..

Thanks Brad

I have reposted the florida office to complain to....I have been told they will undo any fraud running scams in a "fortnight" provided the information submitted can be verified and facts proven. Unfortunately PR's dont always consititute as facts with the foward looking statement and the BOD of any company with the consideration of the majority shareholder(s) can do the opposite of what they toot as news, without any notice written or otherwise.

Lumb is very smart and he has kept his name free from the BOD and will continue to be a silent manager. If wE MINORITY shareholders want justice the only acceptable path is in the form of a class action law suit. Finding an attorney that has teeth and will go after all assets the company has may be the answer. In these times class actions are popping up left and right against companies by shareholders who see mismanagement as the issue. Case example; Yahoo! The CEO ruined prospective merger with MSFT and blew billions of investors dreams and hopes and money. Yahoo was trading at 22.00 and would not settle with msft for 23? CEO screwed the pooch!....
With HGLC's history a surefire way to crush the egoes and atittudes of any scammers is the class action suit.

Finding a lawyer who wants to make a mint of assets is the key..

Yellow pages anyone?

IMO

According to our public records, Hunt Gold does not have any securities registered with the SEC. Also, the Pinksheets, the exchange in which Hunt Gold was trading, issued an alert due to lack of information by the company. If you have not done so already, since Hunt Gold is apparently incorporated in the state of Florida, you may want to report your complaint to the state securities regulators there for any further assistance they may be able to provide in this matter. Their address is:

Florida
Financial Services Commission
Office of Financial Regulation
200 East Gaines Street
The Fletcher Building
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0372

Michael Gross
Acting Director, Division of Securities
(850) 410-9500
(850) 410-9748 (Fax)

Please note, a company can withdraw a dividend even after an announcement.

Once again, thank you for your email. We hope that this information is helpful to you.

Sincerely,

KAREN R FLEMMING-MCDOWELL
Office of Investor Education and Advocacy
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F St, NE
Washington, DC 20549-0213
(202) 551-6325