Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That's what you say but I see we could be more positive about the company. I am.
And we wonder why this stock doesn't go up and stay up. It will after fins come out.
No, the ooomph isn't gone. We are just in a waiting period. More people will invest. WATCH!
I was joking about that but you believe what you want. :)
Yes, and we ALL invested in this scam, right Hugie? And we're making HUGE money too. :)
We would have more investors but the Caveat Emptor being promoted so much by others have had a terrible effect on the pps. Lift the Caveat Emptor and buyers will come. That's all I can say. BUt when the Caveat Emptor is lifted there will be no more cheapies.
Yep, manipulation always happening.
Wow, there’s a lot of hoping that this drops instead of buying in on the cheapies.
Yeah, it's one big lie. Whatever.
I still say that’s not what would happen. See, people doubt this company anyway and they would end up calling those companies just to make certain it’s legit. I’m telling you that’s what would happen, harassment.
Nope, that’s not the way it would go though. You contact those companies just to make certain they are doing business with Arrayit and if enough people make contact that becomes harassment.
So they can hound the companies to death and make wish they never did business with Arrayit.
Oh well.
It’s very hard I’ve heard to get him on the phone.
That's your opinion yet again.
Nope, anyone that has visited the company shares pretty much everything that was said.
That's YOUR perspective. But when you get no answers from this board, it requires a visit. If you have ANY, any shares in this company and you have those huge concerns like he's got, you visit the company you're invested in.
Again, and again, and again: You ask those questions when you go visit.
Look, it's not too deceiving if you visit the company. At least you get to ask those hard questions that keep arising on this board that you can't get from board members or that you don't believe other board members who have visited. A visit can perhaps be worth a thousand words, but you keep saying no to any visit.
Because you’re not Mark and apparently he doesn’t seem to think it’s warranted. That’s why.
Nice try, but Mark didn't cause the sell off nor was he the one that sold to cause the sell off. THe SEC form up above proves who you meant.
Yes you did!
Oh now, come on! When you read the SEC form up above everyone knows who you mean: Jason Nielson! He was the largest shareholder who sold that day. ANd then you come on and say that the largest shareholder has brought us where we are now.
Yes, you did. You said "Sending the pps to where it is now". Good enough for it not to be true.
Yeah right.
Jason Nielson didn't cause the sell off as you stated in your post. I have your EXACT statement below:
Then the largest shareholder sold a large portion of his shares sending it to where it is now.
Not true now is it?
YOu don't have to when you say that Jason Nielson caused the sell off! Dates really don't matter, do they.
Yes you did! You said Jason Nielson caused the sell off on 4/4 and that's not true!!
BUt yet so true. You said that Jason Nielson is what caused the sell off on 4/4 and it's not true!!
Jason Nielson didn't cause the sell off as you said. YOu are wrong.
THat is accurate.
IT doesn't matter about that now. You said the sell off occurred because Mr. Nielson sold his shares and that's NOT TRUE!!!!
But it's still not accurate. You said the sell off occurred because of Mr. Nielson selling his shares and that's NOT TRUE!!
That is absolutely correct!
If I'm not mistaken the pps was still at .20 on 4/1 and that's when the sell off took place. The pps went to .04 and THAT is when Mr. Nielson sold his shares. So yes, you aren't accurate. Mr. Nielson, from your statement caused the sell off and that simply isn't correct. YOu are wrong!!!
That's not true! Tell it like it is about the "largest shareholder selling" part. Mr. Nielson didn't sell his shares at the top .20 pps but at the bottom .04 pps. Tell this accurately!!! THe sell off didn't occur because of Mr. Nielson, and THAT is what you are trying to say. NOT TRUE!!!!!
Well around about that time there was a promise for financials and it never happened so the stock had a sell off.
Ok, I get it. It’s not shares. :)
You’re still hoping.
Haha! If you’re going by that this stock is nothing like that. Sorry. :)