Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If Nielson was to sell all his shares it may, just may, go below .01 cent pps. BUt "hopes" are never realistic.
Yeah really.
I believe honesty is the best policy about what being said against the company too but oh well on that one, right?
Yeah but doesn’t help with lies about the company being put in posts.
Yeah but there are a lot of lies being put in posts though.
It’s all being made up.
Wow, looks good!
You go ahead and do the work then. I'm not the one worried about the company.
Well you don't know that for a fact either. Just because they have no evidence of an escrow account doesn't mean there isn't one. But there are claims being made as if they are fact.
<....It would seem ARYC doesn’t have the funds to complete the audit and there may never have been an escrow account setup as previously stated by Mark.
This is pure speculation and no factual basis to it unless you talked to Mark directly which I am sure you didn't.
Hey, we all invested down here where other investors wouldn't tread but yet it's the company's fault???? I guess.
OK. So what.
Yes, and the pure speculation in that post could end too. Most of it is not factual.
I didn't say all of it was speculation but quite a bit of it of what is being said.
And you still missing my point: Hugie said that tweets aren’t credible but yet many companies use tweets for many other purposes.
But you are missing the point: It was said that a tweet isn’t credible, plain and simple. Walmart tweets about sales, etc. some of the other higher up companies tweet about other things. This just goes to show that tweets are credible.
Walmart does Twitter all the time so they’re not credible???? Many higher up stock companies do Twitter all the time so they’re not credible??? Just plain rediculous to claim that since you do Twitter you’re not credible. Just stupid.
Yep, I checked a lot of details and DD first before considering this is where to park my money. BUt that's me.
BUT...you know the risk and THAT is what I was getting at. No bitching or complaints needed because we know better. If you don't want the risk, invest higher up. Otherwise you're risking where 98% of investors won't tread. That's a fact jack!
I didn't completely say that. Lol. This is one that CAN be trusted! We have at least been to see the company, verified tweets by we now know the SEC, and talked to Mark extensively. This is why I invested in this company and haven't flipped the stock for profit like I have so many others.
BUt we all invested in pinkyland where anything goes and it gives no one the right to bitch because we know what we invested in -- where no one would invest! I've invested in this pinky stuff for over 12 years and I know it's my fault if I lose my money because companies can't be trusted this far under.
I guess and I don't know.
And again, you can only speculate that Nielson is upset and angry with Arrayit's lack of action. I don''t know where all this comes from that it's a definite that Nielson is up set and angry. We have no clue about Nielson's feelings. Just because he sold shares says nothing about his feelings so don't go there.
Oh well, so it is. And yet we are all here for something, right???
Endorsements of customers I hope but I haven't seen any.
ANd talking about reputations...how do you know what kind of darn reputation RRBB does have??? I haven't seen any customer endorsements, have you???? I don't think so. Good thought to bring up reputations if you have proof of it.
The only reputation that RRBB has is apparently giving dates that don't add up. Reputation is only giving as much as is warranted and that's not much. STALEMATE!!!
Oh poor RRBB...they don't need to be blamed. They could NEVER, EVER be wrong -- NOT!!!
Any proof they didn't? We're at a standoff, aren't we. So quite blaming Mark for every darn thing!!!
I guess he needs to quite listening to RRBB then. Hmmm??? I do believe it's RRBB giving dates. Possibly hire a different accounting firm?
Yes, to call Mark a liar is being a hypocrite!
No, no ,no it's because of others misleading about this company. Tweets have NOTHING to do with it. Negative vibes on here don't help.
While I agree with you that companies do use twitter to scam, there aren't very many that use it to scam because of SEC as a watch dog. Not every tweet is checked, but yet tweets are checked.
No, no, no twitter is hardly ever used for scamming because the SEC is watching. I wouldn't say the SEC is watching all the time but they do take notice. Let the arguments commence.
Wrong! Prove your point! Tweeting is hardly ever used for scamming.
Not without getting caught and is another reason why tweets are hardly ever used for scamming.
Not false. I just said, did I not, that then they can pr it. So both tweeting and pr can be used.
Tweets can be used to announce major events and then pr it.
8ks keep getting mentioned but we don't even know if an 8k would apply for fins under SEC rules.
Positive vibes by shareholders.