Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Isnt it funny that all ends up at 7260 Azure Dr., Suite 140-212, Las Vegas, NV 89130?
The short time majority owner B. Daniela Marisol Torres De Avila and Harold F. Buller were located there (Publish Date 03/24/2018 - otcmarkets). Then William Snyder (Publish Date 04/01/2018). Roberto Garcia Vega from Rivmar is also located there (Convertible Noteholder) and finally Luis Alfonso Santos Vega from Time Call as Notholder too (you can find the last ones with Silverflume). Is this coincidence? No its fishy. Maybe Clive is located there too.
From the 12/31/2020 Annual (otcmarkets):
On January 15, 2016, the Company received $311,000 from Whitecastle Capital Corp. for a convertible note with an interest rate of 8% per annum and has conversion price of $0.05, after a 2 year period, and a 4 year term to maturity.
How could Clive convert his shares for 0.0004 and not 0.05 as the annual report stated? If you interpret the conversion price as the strike price how could clive convert til feb. The price wasnt above 0.05? This is clearly misleading. Clive will get all his shares for 0.0004 and not 0.05 as you stated! Thats a fact!
You say Clive is friendly to AABB - He got 860M shares til 6/30/21 (see 10Q and list below) - The OS were 2.123B at his time --> as a related party you have at least 5% = 106M. So Clive wasnt stated as related party in the 6/30/21 (10Q) so we know he sold at least 750M shares. This is not friendly for me and against what the IR in the responds stated.
And again Clive will get finally round about 3.7B shares. If you anticipate he could sell his shares for at least 0.1 USD that leaves him with 370M Cash for a 1M Loan. Thats simple crazy and stupid from the company and a very very big issue!
Nov. 30, 2020 New Issuance 100,000,000 Common $0.0004 Yes Whitecastle Capital Corp. – Clive Mendenhall
Dec. 3, 2020 New Issuance 100,000,000 Common $0.0004 Yes Whitecastle Capital Corp. – Clive Mendenhall
Jan. 5, 2021 New Issuance 100,000,000 Common $0.0004 Yes Whitecastle
Capital Corp. – Clive Mendenhall
Jan. 7, 2021 New Issuance 125,000,000 Common $0.0004 Yes Whitecastle Capital Corp. – Clive Mendenhall
Jan. 25, 2021 New Issuance 125,000,000 Common $0.0004 Yes Whitecastle
Capital Corp. – Clive Mendenhall
Feb. 6, 2021 New Issuance 100,000,000 Common $0.0004 Yes Whitecastle
Capital Corp. – Clive Mendenhall
Mar. 10, 2021 New Issuance 100,000,000 Common $0.0004 Yes Whitecastle
Capital Corp. – Clive Mendenhall
Apr. 20, 2021 New Issuance 160,000,000 Common $0.0004 Yes Whitecastle Capital Corp. – Clive Mendenhall
I have an issue with Clive too! 2B more shares will bring aabb to almost 5B OS and that’s for a 900k loan with 70M. Further Clive is selling all his shares because he is no related party. How will the price move with such a large float? Impossible!
If you summerize all shares which clive get til now (all in the fillings).he got almost 1B shares all these shares where converted at 0.0004 (not 0.25!!!!). If you say 0.25 is the strike why could clive converted round about 500M shares til feb 2021? the price wasnt above 0.25 til feb 2021. With this in mind clive will convert the outstanding amount of 800k at 0.0004 too which will give him another 2B shares. the 0.25 conversion price is a misstatemend in the fillings because as a normal investor you think the outsting will be converted at 0.25 with round about 20M shares. Thats why i am pissed and why my lawyer contacted otcmarkets...and again when clive is such a good person to aabb why he sold at least 900M of his shares? he is not shown as a related party which owns at least 5%. Thats the second pint why my lawyer is in contact to otcmarkets.
Clive is a ghost with no shares
And whats behind this adress?
nope thats the problem. i only bring on topic that there is something fishy with the majority owner stake and the letterbox address. And I believe i am not the only one because the yiel sign is still "on".
What is not true? It is all on otcmarkets. have a look at the 2015er annuals and you would see the name William Snyder with the related address 7260 E AZURE DR., SUITE 140-212, LAS VEGAS, NV 89130. This address doesnt exist but 7260 West AZURE DR., SUITE 140-212, LAS VEGAS, NV 89130 exist. At this adress there is a William Snyder Martinez. Fun Fact Buller and Daniella Torres use the same adress, whicht are holding 88.4% for a very short time. What do you think about this?
MTRT got a nice run. Hope we could see same here. They got their interwiev with hints in Dec 2020. I will check their merger style...
To end the nonsense with Barrick and William Snyder: Have a look back.
First the majority holder was Bryan Glass with 88.35 % (you could see it in their annuals before 12/31/2015). In 2015 there was a change with the majority owner. They published a lot of 12/31/2015 annuals at otcmarkets:
Publish Date 05/17/2016: B. Daniela Marisol Torres De Avila is the beneficial owner of 13.25% of the common stock. Harold F. Buller is the beneficial owner of 75.1% of the common stock.
Publish Date 05/23/2016: William Snyder of 7260 E Azure Dr., Suite 140-212, Las Vegas, NV 89130 is the beneficial owner of 81% of the common stock. William Snyder is not an officer or Director. James
Gilbert of 1980 FESTIVAL PLAZA DRIVE SUITE 300, LAS VEGAS, NV 89135 is President and Director of the Company
Publish Date 03/24/2018: DANIELA MARISOL TORRES DE AVILA IS THE BENEFICIAL OWNER OF 13.25% OF THE COMMON STOCK. HAROLD F. BULLER IS THE BENEFICIAL OWNER OF 75.1% OF THE COMMON STOCK. BOTH HOLDERS OF 7260 E AZURE DR., SUITE 140-212, LAS VEGAS, NV 89130 ARE NEITHER AN OFFICER OR DIRECTOR. JAMES GILBERT IS PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY.
Publish Date 04/01/2018: WILLIAM SNYDER OF 7260 E AZURE DR., SUITE 140-212, LAS VEGAS, NV 89130 IS THE BENEFICIAL OWNER OF 81% OF THE COMMON STOCK. HE IS NEITHER AN OFFICER OR DIRECTOR. JAMES GILBERT IS PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY.
So you could see the majority owner part in 2015 looks complicated because these are all statements for the 31/12/2015. Another point the adress 7260 E AZURE DR., SUITE 140-212, LAS VEGAS, NV 89130 doesnt exist, it must be 7260 WEST AZURE DR., SUITE 140-212, LAS VEGAS, NV 89130. This adress is a letterbox for a lot of companies. I couldn find anything about DANIELA MARISOL TORRES DE AVILA or HAROLD F. BULLER. But at this adress there is a William Snyder MARTINEZ who manage some companies like INTELCALL LLC. I think it is not William E. Snyder This majority owner part looks fishy. And again why isnt Clive a related party with almost 1B shares. If he believes in the company why does he sold at least 900M shares (you need 5% as a related party). This ownership part is really fishy and i think thats why otcmarkets has still the yield on it!
No audit, no uplisting, late walket, no Fiat, dilution with Clive…
Thanks!
Could we affected by the new sec delisting rule which is in effect at end of sept because we are not pink current right now?
This happens when a company don’t care about dilution. And you see Clive is a really big issue!
You said the same last year! Have a look at post # 15230 but Clive is still here and he will be here next year with another 2B additional shares as give away!
Yield sign on otcmarkets it’s maybe because of incomplete information because of Clive and whitecastle! My lawyer gave otcmarkets and sec a hint!
That’s it in short! Thx!
Thought they would do an audit and an uplisting. What do i miss?
BTW tencent owns tencent music as well it’s like Spotify . And what own we? Colima! Haeh
not with clive and more thnan 4B OS
Ppl getting more and more impatient. Company should finally give us some PR!
Without „clive“ the stock could be 1 usd - 2 usd right now. Clive and his additional 2B share are a really big issue here. Benny I would tell investors the same If i would get 1M shares from the company.
You mean 5 cents with Clive and his 3B shares in the back!
And he is converted a lot more than as 2B waiting for him. This means share price will drop to is half because we have then 4B OS
Not with Clive mother back. He will flood the market with his 2B additional shares and again AABB is not tencent one of the largest Chinese tech companies which created wechat which is the Chinese WhatsApp
This 0.05 conversion price is not right either as the issuance price (see 0.0004) or as the strike price (how could Clive converted 550M shares between nov 2020 and feb 2021, were the share price was below 0.05). This 0.05 is a misleading information.
He will say no problem with dilution, no big deal and Clive will be long gone (like he did last year). Despite will go over 5 dollars, AABB exchange is a game changer and AABB is bigger than expected…blablabla and therefore he got probably 1M shares ( look at the 10Q 2021Q2)
Clive and his crazy convertible note happened. With this note no dollars possible
You speaking from tencent of if the biggest Chinese companies with a long history ?????
Again how it was possible to convert 550M share for Clive between nov 2020 and feb 2021? The shareprice wasn’t above 0.05 but it was always stated a conversion price of 0.05 in the fillings back to 2016. and how do think about the conversion of 160M in April for 0.0004? Again the conversion price of 0.05 was already stated since 2016!
Didn’t you read the fillings? Look at 10Q for Q1 2021 conversion price 0.05 but how is it possible that Clive got 160M shares in April 2021 for 64k? Tell me? This is fishy !
That’s a false statement. Have a look back to 2016 in all 10Qs and 10Ks the conversion price of the Whitecastle note was mentioned with 0.05 usd. First conversation began nov 2020 and first time AABB went above 0.05 was in feb 2021. pls explain how is it possible for whitecastle to convert almost 550M shares till feb 2021 with a conversion price of 0.05 (as stated in all old „fillings) Whether the SP wasn’t above 0.05? That conversation price of 0.05 is a false statement which misleading investors. I thought the same like you and invested because 20M is not a big deal but than I realized that there additional 2B shares needed to pay off the loan. Btw you is Clive and whitecastle? I couldn’t find anything about them even with a lawyer and IR isn’t responding to the questions!
They have to dilute because of the convertible note from Whitecastle (Clive). This note has a outstanding principal of 750k right now. The note is paid off with shares each at 0.0004 usd so they need almost 2B shares to pay off the loan. It’s all in the 10q and 10k but you have to read it.
Because they have to issue shares for the convertible note. That’s it. The need additional 2B shares to pay off this note . If no more retirement is possible they have to raise AS from 2.5 B to 5B so we will end with at least 4B shares after the convertible note is done.
But gitreal is right on the point that there are no information about whitecastle and Clive! I searched by myself and even with a lawyer for them but we both couldn’t find any information despite the Aabb fillings.
Nope! I did my DD! Tell how could they convert 550M shares to Clive from nov 20 to feb 21 where the price didn’t reach 0.05 cents? The 0.05 is a misleading information cause it isn’t the strike price !
The convertibles was only 300k as they „bought“ the loan from another lender. The problem was they extended the loan with 600k to 900k as they didn’t need the Money. And be honest the 300k could get buy other options too. Right now they have 70m cash as of the LOIs Bonanza (11M) and los Reyes (30M) will cost 40M which leave them with 30M. They don’t need additional money with an „offering“
And that’s why i am so pissed . The Information is misleading because nobody knew til April/may that this note is so toxic. I hadn’t invested with additional 2B shares but now I am at loss and one of my rules never sell at a loss.
But without Clive we could be at 2 usd but with Clive we are at 0.125 and dumping of 1B additional shares will kill every run up.
But why got Clive 550M shares till feb 2020 as the SP wasn’t above 0.05? The 10Qs and the 10K from 2020 always stated that conversation price of 0.05 usd even in 2019! How is it possible with your theory that Clive converted this shares even the SP was below 0.05? This conversation price is a misleading investor information as I thought conversion at 0.05 and anticipated dilution of round about 20M shares and not 2B!