I believe in analysis and not forecasting.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
.04999 and can’t squeeze by. So much like yesterday except lower highs
You gotta create a pacer account sir. Please see link to the Pacer webpage.
https://www.pacer.gov
Called and left a voicemail asking for them to call me back.
Looks like same shit as yesterday. New block it can’t pass over is .0499. Yesterday was .0519. Strange. Need some sort of push
Yeah neither am I — I’m more worried about that 8k
How could this prejudice the case?
My b this chart is from 3/1-yesterday
Low of .042 yesterday and EOD finished at .0519 that’s the trend line if I posted a chart
As long as we keep the trend going up. Higher lows etc. could have high in 6s and have EOD in high 5s. Once we get some news (either this or next week this will be good to go)
Chart looks good imo. Green Day and heading back up.
What a shit day.
It will be available Friday on a Pacer case search -- All Pacer accounts are updated the day of the hearing.
LOL you got me to luagh. Pretty impressive website those two have going on. Reason to believe they belong together.
EMA Current and Final Court Lawsuit Summary for the past three years to date.
Felt like everyone should know how many lawsuits EMA currently has open right now since everyone else just finds it convincing to say how sketchy EMA is with no factual data besides the current Vystar case. GLTA - I see this as a good thing -- EMA is a scam and majority of these lawsuits had to do with conversion of shares and transfer agents.
Filed
11/06/2017 EMA Financial, LLC v. Petron
12/11/2017 Ema Financial, LLC v. Joey N
01/09/2018 EMA Financial, LLC v. AIM Ex
12/11/2017 EMA Financial, LLC v. Joey N
04/24/2018 EMA Financial, LLC v. nFUSZ
06/05/2018 EMA Financial, LLC v. 5BARZ
04/24/2018 EMA Financial, LLC v. nFUSZ
12/18/2018 EMA Financial, LLC v. Redha
02/19/2019 EMA Financial, LLC v. Vystar
Ema Financial, LLC v. Textmu (TERMINATED 4/13/2016)
EMA Financial, LLC v. First Harv (PLAINTIFF W WINS $260000)
12/13/2018 EMA Financial, LLC (pla) 1:2018cv12568 Auctus Fund, LLC et al v. Sunst
No clue what you are saying. No clearly this chat has been so biased on new PRs that they forget if they lose this trial what in the f does any of that matter? Please explain the consequences that could arise from the court case. Again today everyone speaking around the consequences like it doesn’t exist and only good things are happening.
A lawsuit is a lawsuit! I think each and every shareholder should no the actual repercussions on this court case. Something everyone keeps forgetting is if they lose and what EMA says is held up by a judge Vystar is done! What am I missing here. All the PRs ideally mean nothing if they lose this battle.
And who in the hell would merge there worldwide bed company with a OTC stock that is currently in trial pending a potential lawsuit. What in the absolute H are some of these kids juicing on. Lucky 7 - no snap the user name is legit lucky 7 based on that coming out as an idea.
If anything that merger isn’t happening until this stock clears court and starts going from there. If all this happens I’m right with all of you this stock Will be nuts. Not sure what stock wouldn’t be if the dice rolled that way every time. But we def have some potential hurdles and re rolls coming in order to get it there and it being down 30% could have been an over the aggressive chart as of late or big boys selling out cause they know what’s coming
Sounds to me like Daddy Rontham is playing games along with his buddies. Having the families back but looks to me like that might not even be enough. Time will tell. Maybe this comes out alright but f** 31 initial complaints on EMA side and I saw about 10 different bullets where VYST breached contract. Don’t think the judge will play stupid when they come out be like ahhh yea we did it this way - only thing diffeeent about my way of saying that and VYST (they paid there professional English journalist to write the most fancy words while the lawyer spoke out loud to her so it convinced they would be okay in this case.)
And not to say this again. I never short stock, never will and have a small stake not worth taking out. Hoping to get one more jump here but all this after reading the list of comments from EMA I wouldn’t even no where to start. Hoping somewhere in there VYST paid them the amount of money and it was added incorrectly leaving it like that. Another possibility here but shit this is way over any Ihub VYST fans head. Let me know if any of you are lawyers and dan speak up on this or know or someone to put there due diligence into this. More then likely will turn out to be a damn project for them and not worth there time.
Re-Read these number sections in the initial complaint.
29. Additionally, Vystar’s most recent Form 10-Q filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission demonstrates that Vystar is legally insolvent, leaving
plaintiff’s ability to collect any potential judgment in substantial doubt. Preston Dec., ¶35, Ex. D.
30. In a recent filing with the SEC, Vystar admitted that it is likely insolvent, noted “an
accumulated deficit of $31 million” and “doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern”, and stated as follows:
The Company will need to significantly reorient its operations during 2018, which
could have a material adverse effect on the company’s ability to achieve its business
objectives and as a result may require the Company to file for bankruptcy or cease
operations…
Preston Dec., ¶36, Ex. E.
31. In the same Form 10-Q, Vystar admits that it had only $191,192.00 total cash. See
Exhibit D at p.1. Preston Dec., ¶38, Ex, D.
Case 1:19-cv-01545-ALC Document 8 Filed 02/19/19 Page 7 of 8
8
32. Current liabilities, according the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
required for publicly traded companies, are those coming due within 12 months. According to
Vystar’s own statements, it has $3,948,501.00 in current liabilities. Thus, Vystar’s assets are
sufficient to satisfy only a fraction of its outstanding debt. Exhibit D at 21. Preston Dec., ¶39, Ex.
D.
Not to mention, but Vystar breaches contract a significant amount of times... I also do think EMA breaches contract in this case as well leaving me optimistic about a dismissal.. No reward either side but to me I'm more worried of alll the things EMA is accusing Vystar of in the initial complaint. Not sure if a judge would overturn the entire thing if there was a breach on both sides. Seems like injustice will be serving both parties in this situation in a way but giving someone more of a benefit.
I’m not trying to bash. I’m just getting sick and tired of people saying they have completely done there DD on this wall that I’m gonna make em all start thinking again. Shit this case does not look that easy if you read through every single docket report on the Pacer. 21 full reports with multiple reports within a single doc. I just don’t know if I can honestly say that VYST slipped on anything EMA said in that initial complaint that wasn’t good enough. VYST has some good points but does that prove over what EMA says in regards to not paying them full price. If VYST is pulling the shit they will all find themselves jobless unless Rotman just hires them there. Then that just leaves us all share less because I did simple accounting and this share price won’t just go down. It will go all the way down if this court case doesn’t go as planned like everyone says.
.000000*infinity or 4+ and Nasdaq listing
Case Number: 1:19-cv-01545-ALC
If you read a little bit of the case you could have found that your self ;) lol
And for everyone who has been talking so fond of the damn mgmt here I’m not sure if you could even proclaim these dudes at VYST are good because they pretty much put themselves and there company in the biggest hole they could have possibly dug themselves. Again one screw up and you’ll never hear the words VYST ever again unless it’s about how bad they screwed everyone. Last don’t think those big boys on wall steeet don’t read these pacer reports nightly. I hope y’all are right and that this chart was accumulating today for another bust to dollar land. It would be an epic run. But for two seconds don’t think this one is over until the judge slams the ball in favor of VYST
EMA official complaint (re read this through and then read why was posted yesterday and see how and if Vystar responds to each section code. One slip up on agreeing they are not innocent could ruin the entire trial and not one person could have a clue to what that code section even remotely means). If you think your are due diligence please provide factual evidence on these sections to let everyone know why VYST is 100% bullet prof while being held in court due to a lawsuit by EMA that could make them 100000% go bankrupt or bust VYST so bad they will no longer exist. That’s just be a slap in the face to all you that think there intelligent sounding words and highly intelligent sounding code sections were.)
Hard for me to believe majority if not all people in this chat know what a actual “good” response is to this. Did Vystar’s opposition statement to this sound intelligent? Sure but the key here folks is not that they sounded “smart” to a avg person. Does this sound smart to a judge who knows all the rules and did they overwhelmingly provide enough support to prove FACTS. 1. This case should be dismissed? 2. They win the case? Or 3. They did not overwhelming share enough actual FACTS to each and every point and reason the plaintiff is filing this case. Read again and re read what was posted last night. Everyone may have forgot to read both sides of the story but one slip up and Vystar is donzo. They will have the bag so far over there head they won’t be able to get outta this one and everyone goes down. I haven’t heard one reasonably overwhelming convincing post tonight. Reason for that is because nobody knows unless you’re a damn business court lawyer that would have any clue as to what was missed here and who has provided the best support to win this case.
OFFICIAlL Plaintiff Complaint
PLAINTIFF FINANCIAL LLC’S RULE 56.1 STATEMENT
Plaintiff EMA Financial, LLC (“Plaintiff” or “EMA”), respectfully submits this the
following statement of material, undisputed facts in connection with its motion for partial summary
judgment against Vystar Corp. (“Vystar”).
1. This action was filed on or about February 18, 2018. Preston Dec. Ex. E; Docket
entry no. 1.
2. On or about January 29, 2018, after arm’s-length negotiations, Vystar executed a
Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) and issued a Convertible Note to EMA (the “Note”)
in the amount of $80,000. On this same date, Vystar issued irrevocable instructions to its transfer
agent (the “TA Letter”, together with the Note, SPA, and other related transaction documents, the
“Agreements”) whereby it reserved certain shares to allow conversions of its stock, as described
in further detail below. Preston Dec. ¶7; Ex., Ex.B, Ex. H.
3. The Note provides that EMA has the right to convert all or part of the Note into
shares of Vystar common stock (the “Common Stock”). Specifically, §1.1 of the Note provides
in pertinent part:
Case 1:19-cv-01545-ALC Document 8 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 8
2
The Holder shall have the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, as of the date
which is 180 days from the Issue Date, to convert all or any part of the outstanding
amount due under this Note into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common
Stock.
Ex. A at 1.1. Preston Dec., ¶8.
4. Likewise, 1.4(a) of the Note provides that: “Subject to Section 1.1, this Note may
be converted by the Holder in whole or in part as of the date which is 180 days from the Issue
Date, by submitting to the Borrower a Notice of Conversion…” Preston Dec., ¶9, Ex. A.
5. As §1.2(a) of the Note dictates: “The conversion price hereunder (the "Conversion
Price") shall equal the lower of: (i) the closing sale price of the Common Stock on the Principal
Market on the Trading Day immediately preceding the Closing Date, and (ii) 65% of the average
of the two (2) lowest bid prices for the Common Stock of the Principal Market during the twenty
(20) consecutive Trading Days including and immediately preceding the Conversion Date, or the
closing bid price, whichever is lower…” Preston Dec., ¶10, Ex.A.
6. Further, under §1.4(d) of the Note: “Upon receipt by the Borrower from the Holder
of a facsimile transmission or e-mail (or other reasonable means of communication) of a Notice of
Conversion meeting the requirements for conversion as provided in this Section 1.4 or upon an
event triggering the calculation of an Adjusted Conversion Price, the Borrower shall issue and
deliver or cause to be issued and delivered to or upon the order of the Holder certificates for the
Common Stock issuable upon such conversion within three (3) business days after such receipt or
such an event (the "Deadline")…” Preston Dec., ¶11, Ex.A.
7. In order to ensure that sufficient shares are available for conversion, §1.3 of the
Note provides that:
The Borrower covenants that the Borrower will at all times while this Note is
outstanding reserve from its authorized and unissued Common Stock a sufficient
number of shares, free from preemptive rights, to provide for the issuance of
Case 1:19-cv-01545-ALC Document 8 Filed 02/19/19 Page 2 of 8
3
Common Stock upon the full conversion of this Note. The Borrower is required at
all times to have authorized and reserved five (5) times the number of shares that is
actually issuable upon full conversion of this Note (based on the Conversion Price
of the Notes in effect from time to time)(the "Reserved Amount"). Initially, the
Company will instruct the Transfer Agent to reserve thirty million eight hundred
thousand (30,800,000) shares of common stock in the name of the Holder for
issuance upon conversion hereof. The Borrower represents that upon issuance, such
shares will be duly and validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
Preston Dec., ¶12, Ex.A.
8. In order to ensure that EMA at all times has shares reserved in connection with the
outstanding Note, §5 of the SPA states that:
In the event that the Company proposes to replace its transfer agent, the Company
shall provide, prior to the effective date of such replacement a fully executed
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions in a form as initially delivered pursuant to
this Agreement and the Securities (including but not limited to the provision to
irrevocably reserve shares of Common Stock in the Reserved Amount (as defined
in the Note) signed by the successor transfer agent to Company and the Company.
Preston Dec., ¶13, Ex. B. .
9. Page 1 of the Note provides that the Company must repay the unpaid interest and
principal balance of the Note by January 29, 2019 which may be extended by EMA until January
29, 2020. On or about December 20, 2018, EMA exercised its option to extend the maturity date
of the Note until January 29, 2020.
Preston Dec., ¶14, Ex. A.
VYSTAR BREACHES THE AGREEMENTS
10. On September 18, 2018 Vystar breached the Note, SPA, and TA Letter by failing
to maintain adequate reserves if its stock with its transfer agent and by failing to honor EMA’s
request that the share reserve be increased. Preston Dec., ¶15, Ex. I.
11. On or about October 23, 2018 Vystar switched transfer agents without notice to
EMA, did not re-establish the share reserve with the new transfer agent, and did not execute
Case 1:19-cv-01545-ALC Document 8 Filed 02/19/19 Page 3 of 8
4
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions with the new transfer agent in the same form and substance
as required under the Agreements, in violation of Sections 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 of the Note and Section 5
of the SPA. Preston Dec., ¶16, Ex.A, Ex. B.
12. On or about December 20, 2019, plaintiff provided Vystar with notice that it was
extending the maturity date of the Note until January 29, 2020 in accordance with the terms set
forth on page 1 of the Note. Preston Dec., ¶17, Ex. F.
13. On or about January 15, 2019, EMA submitted a Notice of Conversion, seeking to
convert a portion of the Note into 20,545,511 Vystar shares in accordance with Sections 1.1, and
Section 1.2(a) of the Note. Preston Dec., ¶18, Ex. C.
14. Vystar failed to honor the January 15, 2019 Notice of Conversion, in breach of the
Agreements. Preston Dec., ¶19.
15. Likewise, on February 5, 2019, EMA submitted a second Notice of Conversion,
seeking to convert a portion of the Note into 6,202,508 Vystar shares in accordance with Sections
1.1 and 1.2(a) of the Note. Preston Dec., ¶20, Ex. C.
16. Vystar failed to honor the February 5, 2019 Notice of Conversion, in breach of the
Agreements. Preston Dec., ¶21.
17. Among other things, Vystar claimed it was not going to honor EMA’s Notices of
Conversion because doing so would provide EMA with “too great a profit.” Instead of honoring
the Notice of Conversion, Vystar attempted to wire what it claimed were the amounts due to
plaintiff. In fact, under the terms of the Note, as more than six months since issuance had elapsed,
Vystar was required to honor the Notices of Conversion and convert the Note into shares of stock.
See Section 1.8 of the Note. The amounts sent by Vystar are currently being held in escrow.
Preston Dec., ¶23, Ex. A.
Case 1:19-cv-01545-ALC Document 8 Filed 02/19/19 Page 4 of 8
5
18. Section 3.2 of the Note provides for a breach in the event that:
The Borrower fails to issue shares of Common Stock to the Holder (or announces
or threatens in writing that it will not honor its obligation to do so at any time
following the execution hereof or) upon exercise by the Holder of the conversion
rights of the Holder in accordance with the terms of this Note, fails to transfer or
cause its transfer agent to transfer (issue) (electronically or in certificated form) any
certificate for shares of Common Stock issued to the Holder upon conversion of or
otherwise pursuant to this Note as and when required by this Note, the Borrower
directs its transfer agent not to transfer or delays, impairs, and/or hinders its transfer
agent in transferring (or issuing) (electronically or in certificated form) any
certificate for shares of Common Stock to be issued to the Holder upon conversion
of or otherwise pursuant to this Note as and when required by this Note, or fails to
remove (or directs its transfer agent not to remove or impairs, delays, and/or
hinders its transfer agent from removing) any restrictive legend (or to withdraw
any stop transfer instructions in respect thereof) on any certificate for any shares of
Common Stock issued to the Holder upon conversion of or otherwise pursuant to
this Note as and when required by this Note (or makes any written announcement,
statement or threat that it does not intend to honor the obligations described in this
paragraph)… It is an obligation of the Borrower to remain current in its obligations
to its transfer agent. It shall be an event of default of this Note, if a conversion of
this Note is delayed, hindered or frustrated due to a balance owed by the Borrower
to its transfer agent…
Preston Dec., ¶24, Ex. A.
19. Likewise, Section 5 of the SPA provides that
Upon receipt of a duly executed Notice of Conversion, the Company shall issue
irrevocable instructions to its transfer agent to issue certificates, registered in the
name of the Purchaser or its nominee, for the Conversion Shares in such
amounts as specified from time to time by the Purchaser to the Company upon
conversion of the Note, or any part thereof, in accordance with the terms thereof
(the "Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions"). In the event that the Company
proposes to replace its transfer agent, the Company shall provide, prior to the
effective date of such replacement, a fully executed irrevocable Transfer Agent
Instructions in a form as initially delivered pursuant to this Agreement and the
Securities (including but not limited to the provision to irrevocably reserve
shares of Common Stock in the Reserved Amount (as defined in the Note))
signed by the successor transfer agent to Company and the Company.
Preston Dec., ¶25, Ex B.
20. Similarly, 3.15 of the Note provides that:
Case 1:19-cv-01545-ALC Document 8 Filed 02/19/19 Page 5 of 8
6
In the event that the Borrower proposes to replace its transfer agent, the Borrower
fails to provide, prior to the effective date of such replacement, a fully executed
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions in a form as initially delivered pursuant to
the Purchase Agreement (including but not limited to the provision to irrevocably
reserve shares of Common Stock in the Reserved Amount) signed by the successor
transfer agent to Borrower and the Borrower.
Preston Dec., ¶26, Ex. C.
21. Based on the foregoing events, Vystar’s failure to honor EMA’s Notices of
Conversion and other actions and omissions has given rise to one or more “Event of Default”
pursuant to the terms the Note. In addition thereto, Vystar’s conduct has caused multiple “Events
of Default” to occur. Preston Dec., ¶27; Ex. A.
22. Section 3 of the Note outlines the negotiated-for and agreed-upon remedies for the
various Events of Default. Among other things, EMA is permitted to enforce any and all of
plaintiff’s rights under the Note and SPA, or otherwise as permitted by law. Preston Dec., ¶28, Ex.
A.
23. Page 1 of the Note provides that: “Any amount of principal or interest on this Note
which is not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of twenty-four (24%) per annum from the
due date thereof until the same is paid ("Default Interest").” Preston Dec., ¶29, Ex. A.
24. Due to Vystar’s persistent and willful failure to remedy its various breaches, default
interest has been accruing at a rate of 24%. Preston Dec., ¶30, Ex. A.
25. Section 3.16 of the Note provides that, in the Event of Default, “all other amounts
payable hereunder shall immediately become due and payable, all without demand, presentment
or notice, all of which hereby are expressly waived, together with all costs, including, without
limitation, legal fees and expenses, of collection, and the Holder shall be entitled to exercise all
other rights and remedies available at law or in equity.” Preston Dec., ¶31, Ex. A.
Case 1:19-cv-01545-ALC Document 8 Filed 02/19/19 Page 6 of 8
7
26. EMA has been, and continues to be, irreparably harmed by Vystar’s failure to honor
the Notices of Conversion, failure to maintain a reserve, and failure to remain current in its required
SEC filings. Preston Dec. ¶32.
27. Damages from Vystar’s failure to deliver the shares are inherently uncertain and
difficult to calculate. Since the parties entered in the Note on January 29, 2018, Vystar’s Stock
price has ranged from a low of $0.0005 on December 24, 2018 to a high of $0.158 on February
12, 2019. Preston Dec. ¶33; Ex. G.
28. Thus, the timing of conversions and sale of stock would be essential to the
determination of damages. Because it is difficult to discern with any accuracy precisely when
EMA would have sold the converted shares, and how many it would sell had the conversions been
honored, calculating its losses is extremely difficult. Preston Dec. ¶34.
29. Additionally, Vystar’s most recent Form 10-Q filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission demonstrates that Vystar is legally insolvent, leaving
plaintiff’s ability to collect any potential judgment in substantial doubt. Preston Dec., ¶35, Ex. D.
30. In a recent filing with the SEC, Vystar admitted that it is likely insolvent, noted “an
accumulated deficit of $31 million” and “doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern”, and stated as follows:
The Company will need to significantly reorient its operations during 2018, which
could have a material adverse effect on the company’s ability to achieve its business
objectives and as a result may require the Company to file for bankruptcy or cease
operations…
Preston Dec., ¶36, Ex. E.
31. In the same Form 10-Q, Vystar admits that it had only $191,192.00 total cash. See
Exhibit D at p.1. Preston Dec., ¶38, Ex, D.
Case 1:19-cv-01545-ALC Document 8 Filed 02/19/19 Page 7 of 8
8
32. Current liabilities, according the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
required for publicly traded companies, are those coming due within 12 months. According to
Vystar’s own statements, it has $3,948,501.00 in current liabilities. Thus, Vystar’s assets are
sufficient to satisfy only a fraction of its outstanding debt. Exhibit D at 21. Preston Dec., ¶39, Ex.
D.
Respectfully Submitted,
Dated: February 19, 2019
New York, New York
LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY FLEISCHMANN PC
By: /s/_______________________
Jeffrey Fleischmann, Esq.
Attorneys for EMA Financial, LLC
150 Broadway, Suite 900
New York, N.Y. 10004
Tel. (646) 657-9623
Fax (646) 351-0694
jf@lawjf.com
For those who don't have a Pacer account seems like a lot of the info is on the internet "Vystar vs EMA Lawsuit 2019"
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/27142119/Ema_Financial,_LLC_v_Vystar_Corp
Raven, the only concerning thing to me is it seems like both parties (plaintiff and the defendant) have done wrong which leaves reasons to believe either 1) case will be dismissed like you said or 2) defendant has to pay back X amount with a lot more justification on how much they have to pay back.
No shit this didn't fly crazy today.. Think about it:
You bought .007 and are up 50k - Wait around and lose it because Vystar loses the case - ceases operation - and also files for bankruptcy and stock is whiiiiiiped out.
OR
Your ride through it knowing there's a chance of no return and we hit major bucks in the near future. Seems like EMA is just as confident on winning this case as Vystar is.
Raven, I saw about 5 of the docs posted last night and knew there is more to this story then just Vystar POV. I am just saying if you're not a business lawyer you really have no clue to wtf is going on in this case then reading the defendants opposition to motion last night on Ihubb/twitter listening to a bunch of people rant on how Vystar will win this. It would be over if that was the case.
Not bashing. This has a chance, I am in but I'm going to consult a good buddy of mine that is a lawyer and can tell me what's going on with all these different section codes.
Doc.
No. Dates Description
Filed & Entered: 02/19/2019
Docket Text Notice to Attorney Regarding Deficient Proposed Order
1
Filed & Entered: 02/19/2019
Docket Text Complaint
2
Filed & Entered: 02/19/2019
Docket Text Civil Cover Sheet
3
Filed & Entered: 02/19/2019
Docket Text Request for Issuance of Summons
4
Filed & Entered: 02/19/2019
Docket Text Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement
5
Filed & Entered: 02/19/2019
Docket Text Proposed Order to Show Cause Without Emergency Relief
6
Filed & Entered: 02/19/2019
Docket Text Declaration
7
Filed & Entered: 02/19/2019
Docket Text Declaration
8
Filed & Entered: 02/19/2019
Docket Text Rule 56.1 Statement
9
Filed & Entered: 02/19/2019
Docket Text Memorandum of Law
10
Filed & Entered: 02/19/2019
Docket Text Proposed Order to Show Cause Without Emergency Relief
Filed & Entered: 02/20/2019
Docket Text Case Opening Initial Assignment Notice
Filed & Entered: 02/20/2019
Docket Text Case Designation
Filed & Entered: 02/20/2019
Docket Text Case Designated ECF
Filed & Entered: 02/20/2019
Docket Text Notice to Attorney Regarding Case Opening Statistical Error Correction
Filed & Entered: 02/20/2019
Docket Text Notice to Court Regarding Proposed Order
11
Filed & Entered: 02/20/2019
Docket Text Summons Issued
12
Filed & Entered: 02/21/2019
Docket Text Order to Show Cause
13
Filed & Entered: 02/21/2019
Docket Text Affidavit of Service Other
14
Filed & Entered: 02/21/2019
Docket Text Proposed Order to Show Cause Without Emergency Relief
Filed & Entered: 02/22/2019
Docket Text Notice to Attorney Regarding Rejection of Proposed Order
15
Filed & Entered: 03/01/2019
Docket Text Notice of Appearance
16
Filed & Entered: 03/01/2019
Terminated: 03/04/2019
Docket Text Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer
Filed & Entered: 03/04/2019
Docket Text Set/Reset Deadlines
17
Filed & Entered: 03/04/2019
Docket Text Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer
18
Filed & Entered: 03/07/2019
Docket Text Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion
19
Filed & Entered: 03/07/2019
Docket Text Declaration in Opposition to Motion
20
Filed & Entered: 03/07/2019
Docket Text Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement
21
Filed & Entered: 03/07/2019
Docket Text Counter Statement to Rule 56.1
Filed: 02/21/2019
Entered: 02/21/2019
Entered By: Robert Miranda,
Event Name(s): Order to Show Cause, Set Deadlines
Full Docket Text for Document 12:
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Let Defendant Vystar Corp., Inc. ("Vystar") show cause before Hon. Andrew L. Carter, Jr. in Courtroom 1306 at the Courthouse located at 40 Foley Square New York, New York on the 15th day of March 2019 at 2:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard as to why an Order should not be entered: (i) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 65 and 28 U.S.C. §2201, pending final determination of this action against Vystar, requiring Vystar to deliver to plaintiff EMA 20,545,511 shares of its Common Stock in accordance with the Notice of Conversion dated January 15, 2019, and an additional 6,202,508 shares of its Common Stock in accordance with the Notice of Conversion dated February 5, 2019, along with the necessary corporate resolutions, and authorizations, and to accept the contractually required legal opinions furnished to it by EMA to enable EMA to sell such Common Stock publicly without restriction provided that EMA's counsel, shall, in connection with contractually required legal opinions certify within those opinions that its conversion request is in compliance with SEC Rule 144(e)(3)(vi) and to take all steps necessary to effectuate same, and as further specified and set forth in items (ii) and (iii) in this Order to Show Cause. It is: ORDERED that answering papers, if any, must be served on Jeffrey Fleischmann, 150 Broadway, Suite 900, New York, New York 10038, and filed by March 4 2019. Further a hard copy must be delivered to chambers and filed on ECF on the same day; and it is further, ORDERED that service of this Order to Show Cause, together with the papers upon which it is based, and service of the Summons and Complaint, by filing same on ECF and via overnight delivery on Vystar Corp., Inc. 2484 Briarcliff Rd NE, #22, Suite 159 Atlanta, GA 30329, on or before February 22, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. be deemed good and sufficient service. (Show Cause Hearing set for 3/15/2019 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1306, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr.) (Service due by 2/22/2019. Show Cause Response due by 3/4/2019.) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 2/21/2019) (rjm)
Doc.
No. Deadline/Hearing Event Filed Due/Set Satisfied Terminated
12 Service Deadline 02/21/2019 02/22/2019
Show Cause Response Deadline 03/04/2019 03/08/2019
12 Show Cause Hearing 02/21/2019 03/15/2019
at 02:00 PM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X
EMA FINANCIAL, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
Company,
Plaintiff,
- against -
VYSTAR CORP., a Georgia Corporation,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No.:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X
PLAINTIFF FINANCIAL LLC’S RULE 56.1 STATEMENT
Plaintiff EMA Financial, LLC (“Plaintiff” or “EMA”), respectfully submits this the
following statement of material, undisputed facts in connection with its motion for partial summary
judgment against Vystar Corp. (“Vystar”).
1. This action was filed on or about February 18, 2018. Preston Dec. Ex. E; Docket
entry no. 1.
2. On or about January 29, 2018, after arm’s-length negotiations, Vystar executed a
Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) and issued a Convertible Note to EMA (the “Note”)
in the amount of $80,000. On this same date, Vystar issued irrevocable instructions to its transfer
agent (the “TA Letter”, together with the Note, SPA, and other related transaction documents, the
“Agreements”) whereby it reserved certain shares to allow conversions of its stock, as described
in further detail below. Preston Dec. ¶7; Ex., Ex.B, Ex. H.
3. The Note provides that EMA has the right to convert all or part of the Note into
shares of Vystar common stock (the “Common Stock”). Specifically, §1.1 of the Note provides
in pertinent part:
Case 1:19-cv-01545-ALC Document 8 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 8
2
The Holder shall have the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, as of the date
which is 180 days from the Issue Date, to convert all or any part of the outstanding
amount due under this Note into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common
Stock.
Ex. A at 1.1. Preston Dec., ¶8.
4. Likewise, 1.4(a) of the Note provides that: “Subject to Section 1.1, this Note may
be converted by the Holder in whole or in part as of the date which is 180 days from the Issue
Date, by submitting to the Borrower a Notice of Conversion…” Preston Dec., ¶9, Ex. A.
5. As §1.2(a) of the Note dictates: “The conversion price hereunder (the "Conversion
Price") shall equal the lower of: (i) the closing sale price of the Common Stock on the Principal
Market on the Trading Day immediately preceding the Closing Date, and (ii) 65% of the average
of the two (2) lowest bid prices for the Common Stock of the Principal Market during the twenty
(20) consecutive Trading Days including and immediately preceding the Conversion Date, or the
closing bid price, whichever is lower…” Preston Dec., ¶10, Ex.A.
6. Further, under §1.4(d) of the Note: “Upon receipt by the Borrower from the Holder
of a facsimile transmission or e-mail (or other reasonable means of communication) of a Notice of
Conversion meeting the requirements for conversion as provided in this Section 1.4 or upon an
event triggering the calculation of an Adjusted Conversion Price, the Borrower shall issue and
deliver or cause to be issued and delivered to or upon the order of the Holder certificates for the
Common Stock issuable upon such conversion within three (3) business days after such receipt or
such an event (the "Deadline")…” Preston Dec., ¶11, Ex.A.
7. In order to ensure that sufficient shares are available for conversion, §1.3 of the
Note provides that:
The Borrower covenants that the Borrower will at all times while this Note is
outstanding reserve from its authorized and unissued Common Stock a sufficient
number of shares, free from preemptive rights, to provide for the issuance of
Case 1:19-cv-01545-ALC Document 8 Filed 02/19/19 Page 2 of 8
3
Common Stock upon the full conversion of this Note. The Borrower is required at
all times to have authorized and reserved five (5) times the number of shares that is
actually issuable upon full conversion of this Note (based on the Conversion Price
of the Notes in effect from time to time)(the "Reserved Amount"). Initially, the
Company will instruct the Transfer Agent to reserve thirty million eight hundred
thousand (30,800,000) shares of common stock in the name of the Holder for
issuance upon conversion hereof. The Borrower represents that upon issuance, such
shares will be duly and validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
Preston Dec., ¶12, Ex.A.
8. In order to ensure that EMA at all times has shares reserved in connection with the
outstanding Note, §5 of the SPA states that:
In the event that the Company proposes to replace its transfer agent, the Company
shall provide, prior to the effective date of such replacement a fully executed
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions in a form as initially delivered pursuant to
this Agreement and the Securities (including but not limited to the provision to
irrevocably reserve shares of Common Stock in the Reserved Amount (as defined
in the Note) signed by the successor transfer agent to Company and the Company.
Preston Dec., ¶13, Ex. B. .
9. Page 1 of the Note provides that the Company must repay the unpaid interest and
principal balance of the Note by January 29, 2019 which may be extended by EMA until January
29, 2020. On or about December 20, 2018, EMA exercised its option to extend the maturity date
of the Note until January 29, 2020.
Preston Dec., ¶14, Ex. A.
VYSTAR BREACHES THE AGREEMENTS
10. On September 18, 2018 Vystar breached the Note, SPA, and TA Letter by failing
to maintain adequate reserves if its stock with its transfer agent and by failing to honor EMA’s
request that the share reserve be increased. Preston Dec., ¶15, Ex. I.
11. On or about October 23, 2018 Vystar switched transfer agents without notice to
EMA, did not re-establish the share reserve with the new transfer agent, and did not execute
Case 1:19-cv-01545-ALC Document 8 Filed 02/19/19 Page 3 of 8
4
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions with the new transfer agent in the same form and substance
as required under the Agreements, in violation of Sections 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 of the Note and Section 5
of the SPA. Preston Dec., ¶16, Ex.A, Ex. B.
12. On or about December 20, 2019, plaintiff provided Vystar with notice that it was
extending the maturity date of the Note until January 29, 2020 in accordance with the terms set
forth on page 1 of the Note. Preston Dec., ¶17, Ex. F.
13. On or about January 15, 2019, EMA submitted a Notice of Conversion, seeking to
convert a portion of the Note into 20,545,511 Vystar shares in accordance with Sections 1.1, and
Section 1.2(a) of the Note. Preston Dec., ¶18, Ex. C.
14. Vystar failed to honor the January 15, 2019 Notice of Conversion, in breach of the
Agreements. Preston Dec., ¶19.
15. Likewise, on February 5, 2019, EMA submitted a second Notice of Conversion,
seeking to convert a portion of the Note into 6,202,508 Vystar shares in accordance with Sections
1.1 and 1.2(a) of the Note. Preston Dec., ¶20, Ex. C.
16. Vystar failed to honor the February 5, 2019 Notice of Conversion, in breach of the
Agreements. Preston Dec., ¶21.
17. Among other things, Vystar claimed it was not going to honor EMA’s Notices of
Conversion because doing so would provide EMA with “too great a profit.” Instead of honoring
the Notice of Conversion, Vystar attempted to wire what it claimed were the amounts due to
plaintiff. In fact, under the terms of the Note, as more than six months since issuance had elapsed,
Vystar was required to honor the Notices of Conversion and convert the Note into shares of stock.
See Section 1.8 of the Note. The amounts sent by Vystar are currently being held in escrow.
Preston Dec., ¶23, Ex. A.
Case 1:19-cv-01545-ALC Document 8 Filed 02/19/19 Page 4 of 8
5
18. Section 3.2 of the Note provides for a breach in the event that:
The Borrower fails to issue shares of Common Stock to the Holder (or announces
or threatens in writing that it will not honor its obligation to do so at any time
following the execution hereof or) upon exercise by the Holder of the conversion
rights of the Holder in accordance with the terms of this Note, fails to transfer or
cause its transfer agent to transfer (issue) (electronically or in certificated form) any
certificate for shares of Common Stock issued to the Holder upon conversion of or
otherwise pursuant to this Note as and when required by this Note, the Borrower
directs its transfer agent not to transfer or delays, impairs, and/or hinders its transfer
agent in transferring (or issuing) (electronically or in certificated form) any
certificate for shares of Common Stock to be issued to the Holder upon conversion
of or otherwise pursuant to this Note as and when required by this Note, or fails to
remove (or directs its transfer agent not to remove or impairs, delays, and/or
hinders its transfer agent from removing) any restrictive legend (or to withdraw
any stop transfer instructions in respect thereof) on any certificate for any shares of
Common Stock issued to the Holder upon conversion of or otherwise pursuant to
this Note as and when required by this Note (or makes any written announcement,
statement or threat that it does not intend to honor the obligations described in this
paragraph)… It is an obligation of the Borrower to remain current in its obligations
to its transfer agent. It shall be an event of default of this Note, if a conversion of
this Note is delayed, hindered or frustrated due to a balance owed by the Borrower
to its transfer agent…
Preston Dec., ¶24, Ex. A.
19. Likewise, Section 5 of the SPA provides that
Upon receipt of a duly executed Notice of Conversion, the Company shall issue
irrevocable instructions to its transfer agent to issue certificates, registered in the
name of the Purchaser or its nominee, for the Conversion Shares in such
amounts as specified from time to time by the Purchaser to the Company upon
conversion of the Note, or any part thereof, in accordance with the terms thereof
(the "Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions"). In the event that the Company
proposes to replace its transfer agent, the Company shall provide, prior to the
effective date of such replacement, a fully executed irrevocable Transfer Agent
Instructions in a form as initially delivered pursuant to this Agreement and the
Securities (including but not limited to the provision to irrevocably reserve
shares of Common Stock in the Reserved Amount (as defined in the Note))
signed by the successor transfer agent to Company and the Company.
Preston Dec., ¶25, Ex B.
20. Similarly, 3.15 of the Note provides that:
Case 1:19-cv-01545-ALC Document 8 Filed 02/19/19 Page 5 of 8
6
In the event that the Borrower proposes to replace its transfer agent, the Borrower
fails to provide, prior to the effective date of such replacement, a fully executed
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions in a form as initially delivered pursuant to
the Purchase Agreement (including but not limited to the provision to irrevocably
reserve shares of Common Stock in the Reserved Amount) signed by the successor
transfer agent to Borrower and the Borrower.
Preston Dec., ¶26, Ex. C.
21. Based on the foregoing events, Vystar’s failure to honor EMA’s Notices of
Conversion and other actions and omissions has given rise to one or more “Event of Default”
pursuant to the terms the Note. In addition thereto, Vystar’s conduct has caused multiple “Events
of Default” to occur. Preston Dec., ¶27; Ex. A.
22. Section 3 of the Note outlines the negotiated-for and agreed-upon remedies for the
various Events of Default. Among other things, EMA is permitted to enforce any and all of
plaintiff’s rights under the Note and SPA, or otherwise as permitted by law. Preston Dec., ¶28, Ex.
A.
23. Page 1 of the Note provides that: “Any amount of principal or interest on this Note
which is not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of twenty-four (24%) per annum from the
due date thereof until the same is paid ("Default Interest").” Preston Dec., ¶29, Ex. A.
24. Due to Vystar’s persistent and willful failure to remedy its various breaches, default
interest has been accruing at a rate of 24%. Preston Dec., ¶30, Ex. A.
25. Section 3.16 of the Note provides that, in the Event of Default, “all other amounts
payable hereunder shall immediately become due and payable, all without demand, presentment
or notice, all of which hereby are expressly waived, together with all costs, including, without
limitation, legal fees and expenses, of collection, and the Holder shall be entitled to exercise all
other rights and remedies available at law or in equity.” Preston Dec., ¶31, Ex. A.
Case 1:19-cv-01545-ALC Document 8 Filed 02/19/19 Page 6 of 8
7
26. EMA has been, and continues to be, irreparably harmed by Vystar’s failure to honor
the Notices of Conversion, failure to maintain a reserve, and failure to remain current in its required
SEC filings. Preston Dec. ¶32.
27. Damages from Vystar’s failure to deliver the shares are inherently uncertain and
difficult to calculate. Since the parties entered in the Note on January 29, 2018, Vystar’s Stock
price has ranged from a low of $0.0005 on December 24, 2018 to a high of $0.158 on February
12, 2019. Preston Dec. ¶33; Ex. G.
28. Thus, the timing of conversions and sale of stock would be essential to the
determination of damages. Because it is difficult to discern with any accuracy precisely when
EMA would have sold the converted shares, and how many it would sell had the conversions been
honored, calculating its losses is extremely difficult. Preston Dec. ¶34.
29. Additionally, Vystar’s most recent Form 10-Q filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission demonstrates that Vystar is legally insolvent, leaving
plaintiff’s ability to collect any potential judgment in substantial doubt. Preston Dec., ¶35, Ex. D.
30. In a recent filing with the SEC, Vystar admitted that it is likely insolvent, noted “an
accumulated deficit of $31 million” and “doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern”, and stated as follows:
The Company will need to significantly reorient its operations during 2018, which
could have a material adverse effect on the company’s ability to achieve its business
objectives and as a result may require the Company to file for bankruptcy or cease
operations…
Preston Dec., ¶36, Ex. E.
31. In the same Form 10-Q, Vystar admits that it had only $191,192.00 total cash. See
Exhibit D at p.1. Preston Dec., ¶38, Ex, D.
Case 1:19-cv-01545-ALC Document 8 Filed 02/19/19 Page 7 of 8
8
32. Current liabilities, according the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
required for publicly traded companies, are those coming due within 12 months. According to
Vystar’s own statements, it has $3,948,501.00 in current liabilities. Thus, Vystar’s assets are
sufficient to satisfy only a fraction of its outstanding debt. Exhibit D at 21. Preston Dec., ¶39, Ex.
D.
Respectfully Submitted,
Dated: February 19, 2019
New York, New York
LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY FLEISCHMANN PC
By: /s/_______________________
Jeffrey Fleischmann, Esq.
Attorneys for EMA Financial, LLC
150 Broadway, Suite 900
New York, N.Y. 10004
Tel. (646) 657-9623
Fax (646) 351-0694
jf@lawjf.com
Either this stock goes crazy or they go bankrupt and cease of operations.
This trial has been going on since 2/19/2019, this case has been going on for a while with only some of the papers shown on here. I am looking at the entire docket right now.
Red to Green - Power of VYST
That court doc solidified this. One thing I question is when is the case going to finalized. I have a pacer account but did anyone check the overview reports to see if this decision has be signed off on. Usually takes 60 days or check the docket on everything that has been filed.
https://www.stockscores.com/charts/charts/?ticker=vyst
I have a pretty good idea what’s going on in this stock chart but still learning. Could someone outline why this chart is so good so I can understand a little better?
Hard for me to be believe this stock is worth the price it currently is when you got pharma stocks out there on phase 1, 2, or 3 with no actual product till it clears. Only way it’s going is up. .0018. This thing with this news is worth more.
Higher lows is all I'm seeing here. Shaking the weak out.