is...retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Stop loss orders are set to limit loss, as the name inplies. You don't set a stop loss at a higher than current price. You are talking about a stop-limit order, a point at which it WILL sell at a profit.
"What Is a Stop-Loss Order?
A stop-loss order is an order placed with a broker to buy or sell a specific stock once the stock reaches a certain price. A stop-loss is designed to limit an investor's loss on a security position. For example, setting a stop-loss order for 10% below the price at which you bought the stock will limit your loss to 10%. Suppose you just purchased Microsoft (MSFT) at $20 per share. Right after buying the stock, you enter a stop-loss order for $18. If the stock falls below $18, your shares will then be sold at the prevailing market price.
Stop-limit orders are similar to stop-loss orders. However, as their name states, there is a limit on the price at which they will execute. There are then two prices specified in a stop-limit order: the stop price, which will convert the order to a sell order, and the limit price. Instead of the order becoming a market order to sell, the sell order becomes a limit order that will only execute at the limit price (or better)."
I do not and have never used a chart. I'm up $10M this year. Nuff said!! LOL!!!
Even a cave man could have made money on NSAV this year. How did it do for you last year? And the year before that. And before that?
Anyone with a stop loss in sub-penny stocks will eventually lose their money. These stocks are VOLATILE, meaning they go up and down. Having a stop loss is a virtual guarantee to sell at a loss.
If charts actually worked in penny stocks, everyone would be using them and they would all be rich.
NOTHING works. There is no system except to keep your eyes on your investments and make decisions as conditions warrant.
If charts worked half the time, they would not work half the time. Simpler to flip a penny.
You made money because EVERYONE in NSAV made money this year. Even those with blind luck and no dd of any kind made money.
A lesson to be learned is to have both a Roth IRA and a 401K while you are working and making income. You can't fund them with anything but wages.
The 401K is funded with before tax money, and the company usually matches up to some level. You can make as much money in it as you want, and only pay normal taxes on it when taking a distribution.
In a Roth, it is funded with after tax money, and you can make as much money in it as you want, company does not contribute, but ALL of it is tax free upon distribution. I didn't have a Roth, but now I wish I had done so. My 401K rollover is now in thee high 7 figures. If that was in a Roth, I could take it all in cash and pay no taxes.
They probably don't want a bunch of airheads calling them to 'verify' it is true. I've seen companies lose business by announcing a partner's name too soon. They have already SAID when it would be announced, just sit back and wait for it.
Meaningless. Just as he could put that in, he or a new CEO could take it out. These aren't laws, they are simply statements to the SOC of the domicile state that identifies the company and it's charter.
It is a simple matter to change the Articles of Incorporation. You don't even need permission. It is done by a vote of CEO and board of directors and then filed with the SOC.
Of course they are on the list. All of the delinquents should be there, unless Schwab has its own private list. OTCMarket pinks are either current or not. If not, they are the targets of this move by the SEC.
These rumors are ridiculous. Literally thousands of companies are delinquent. Some far more than others. The only prioritization I would expect is that if a company is current, their filings would be handled first, to keep them from becoming delinquent.
The idea that the 'business model' would be 'investigated' and some 'judge' would decide priority for the delinquent filers is simply not logical. I would expect it to be based solely on first in, first out, as it usually is. There are often questions to be resolved, which delays the process. When that happens, some other company gets processed while waiting for answers. I've seen it take 6 months to get current after the filings were done, and that was before the big push to clear the delinquents or move them off the pinks. This push in IN ADDITION to all the normal filings. It is a HUGE push to get this extra load through.
This isn't simply dividends...
These were free shares, given to us based on 1 free share for each 10 shares owned on ex-dividend day in 2017. Has nothing to do with regular dividends, which are given to shareholders as cash.
These 'free' shares were supposed to by restricted for 1 year, then revert to normal shares. It has been 4 years, and we've only recently learned they were never registered with SEC/Finra.
Tilton PUMPED us to buy shares. Then he reneged on his promise. That is a pretty underhanded way to get people to buy shares, but looking back, I'm $10M richer ONLY because of this dividend. (And a second one that never materialized, but I bought the shares anyway.) It is how I came to have so many shares in the first place.
The second one was supposed to be 1 share of the proposed new Hemp Beer company for each 17 shares of NSAV. I bought millions based on that idea.
There are two different issues with those shares. Yes, they are restricted, but they are also unregistered. Yes, some have gotten them, after paying $400-$800 to go through the process.
I don't think NSAV can get out of the pinks until that's all cleared up. If share price isn't the holdup, the unregistered shares might be, and it might be why NSAV couldn't get through a new accounting firm and had to go back to PST.
I'm not going to pay anything. I think they will eventually have to give them to us, as was promised.
As the stock price rises, they just become more valuable anyway. 500K X $.10 is $50K. I don't NEED to sell them, so they are fine just sitting there.
Maybe those companies aren't 5 years, 20 filings, late...
It is a computer mistake. WSJ doesn't do projections of penny stocks. it has been around for months, uncorrected. Don't be gullible and believe things that are impossible.
They need to file 20 quarters worth of missed fins, and possibly an attorney letter for each one. They are sequential, so the first missed one is first, then the second one includes what was in the first missed one and so on.
Go to a company that is current, and look over the last 5 years of THEIR filings. THAT is what HPIL is doing. It ain't simple, and the SEC/Finra can have questions anywhere along that trail.
Tilton didn't come to NSAV until 2017. It was a shambles then.
I didn't say anything about going against their articles. I said they can change the articles any time they want. It is the company's own statement of their AS and how their company is structured. It is EASY to change, and it is changed ALL THE TIME as the business changes.
I didn't say anything about going against their articles. I said they can change the articles any time they want. It is the company's own statement of their AS and how their company is structured. It is EASY to change, and it is changed ALL THE TIME as the business changes.
You simply don't get it. Companies change their share structure all the time, and there are just two ways to do it. The 6 BILLION OS is not a good thing, so they will FIX IT. We just need to see how they fix it.
Don't be so sure. As soon as JT is out and a new CEO is in place, they can change the articles to align with their business plan. An RS or a share buyback is entirely within reason. They have to FIX the share structure, and those are the two ways it can be done.
We hope they can manage a buyback, which would be good for us, but an RS is absolutely not out of the question. We simply need to wait and see what they do to fix it.
Actually, I have. You can go back in my posts to when that change was made and see that I wrote it then too.
You guys need to learn how and why articles of incorporation are changed. Want to increase the AS? Change the articles. Want to decrease the AS - change the articles. JT was the only voting member, so he could change them any time he wanted. Saying no RS for 10 years was simply not a 'thing'. He could have changed them the next day.
Of course not. You read about a company and decide whether to buy in or not. That no RS clause is meaningless, because all it took was a change in articles to make it so, and all it would take is to change the articles to do an RS.
You are the one that doesn't get it. A company can change its articles any time it wants. That 10 year no RS clause was a carrot, not a rule. It was intended to 'convince' people that an RS could not/would not be done. It is a ruse. Any company can do one simply by making a change in the articles. it is really that simply.
You don't understand. The Articles are MADE by the company and CHANGED by the company. All it takes is changing the AOI by vote. File with the SOC, and it's done. That whole 10 year thing was simply a carrot for inexperienced traders. The articles can be changed ANY TIME they want to.
Try using your compass to clear 0-60 in your car. Or, to move a feather.
JT has always said no RS while he is CEO. That's about to change. The articles of incorporation are easily changed by a vote of directors. It does not matter WHAT is already in the AOI, it can be changed, and often is. I just hope they go the route of share buyback rather than RS. But they WILL want to reduce the OS.
Yeah, the earth's electromagnetic field can power a compass, but it won't get you from 0 to 60 in a year or two.
No, it is not possible to create energy. Basic physics. It cannot be created or destroyed, it can only be converted from one form to another, and each time that happens energy is lost. It is called 'work'. This so-called 'drive train' has to have an energy source in order to function.
Piezo is a non-starter. No current to speak of. Possibly the nuclear waste can actually be made to work (making diamond from the radioactive carbon that is created in the reactors).
Conceivably, batteries made from this stuff can last for hundreds of years. But making it big enough to power a car is highly unlikely - you need a LOT of energy to run a car, and nothing suggested so far has anywhere near the amount of energy that is needed.
It would be easier to add a hydrogen tank that powers a fuel cell, which produces electricity to change the battery (s) and its only discharge is water.
Those already exist in warehouses for forklifts, etc. Adapting it to a private vehicle would at least be in the realm of feasibility. Forklifts use a lot of energy to operate also...
I made $1.5M yesterday, and lost $1.5M today. A wash for these two days.
None knows how the SBC/NSAV connection was initially made. Tilton was still talking pot in January of this year. I think SBC picked NSAV, not the other way around. I think this was the plan all along and we're just seeing it play out. Tilton still has a bunch of preferreds, but those are voting stock, and he won't be voting any more. They are probably buying them out from him.
I think this has been a longer term play by SBC from the beginning, since each 'piece' lines up with the others, and JT would have had no idea how to do that.
The question in my mind is whether they will rename Net Savings Link to something else, since the exchange is already supposed to be named NSAV and it conflicts with Net Savings Link. As soon as they mentioned the wholly owned exchange, named NSAV, I because suspicious because of the obvious conflict in names.
Etrade is fine with HPIL. I did receive a notice that when the SEC rule goes into effect, there will be no trading on pink stop/yield.
Winners don't NEED to prove anything. I certainly don't care if anyone believes me, but I have no reason to lie to a bunch of strangers. But at one point, I did have 225M shares of NSAV that were BELOW .0001. Just last November.
You are wrong there...I still have 100M in trips. I've sold 100M so far also, always on the rise.
Nobody 'walked it down'. All it takes is for large shareholders to sell at market, and the stock immediately tanks. It tanks because MM's don't have to abide by the spread, so they give less and less, which drops the price. It is simple.
Someone decided to just dump a lot of shares at market. That FORCES the price down. But the good news is that those shares will be bought back up and it will recover.
I think there will be an extension before delisting also. But that doesn't mean the brokerages will observe the extension. Any one of them can simply refuse to let you buy delinquent stocks.
TDA doesn't trade pink stop companies, period. There ARE no TDA 'investors'. HPIL has been that way for 5 years. 5 years of filings is 20 separate filings to be submitted IN ORDER and approved by FINRA/SEC. Many of the other pink stop/yield companies are trying to do the same thing. Then there are the thousands of companies that aren't late on fins, but continue to file every 3 months. ALL of those delinquent filings must be approved during this grace period or they'll be delisted off the pink market.
The stock buyback is in no way an 'apology'. The share structure is out of hand, and the only two ways to fix it are stock buyback or reverse split. I suspect the nearly 4 billion shares from recently converted notes are what they are going to buy back. They said they tried to pay off the note and the lender wouldn't accept it.
Right. OTC won't be updated until Finra/SEC finish their work. Not sure why people keep pointing at the out of date OTC data, when everyone knows it won't be updated until the approval.
NSAV the company is Net Savings Link. The exchange is supposedly named 'NSAV', but it doesn't seem to be broken down into anything meaningful. Somewhere, there is a web page for the exchange already.
L2 shows shares trading, but you never know if that is a whole order or a tranche. You will see trades for 1 share at times. I got one myself, when buying 1M shares, I got two tranches of 999,999 and 1 share. You would see those on L2.
I also bought a few mil of HPIL and got 13 tranches of 99,000 plus some others. The tranches are just parts of orders filling. If someone buys or sells at 'market' the orders go through immediately, because the spread is not observed for market orders.
The spread has a bid, an offer, and a quantity. Those are guarantees that you can get at least that quantity at that price if you are within the spread with your limit buy/sell.
Gaps don't HAVE to do anything. The fact is that the pinks are volatile, meaning they go up and down regularly. Thus, gaps normally fill, but not because of any 'rule'. Any stock can gap up and stay that way.
You cannot base your trading on old wives' tales and expect to make money.
It is not 'might' be hard to sell...The SEC rule is that you can't buy or sell a pink that is not current after the 28th of Sept.
If no one can buy it, no one can sell it.