is...retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm not still selling. My next sell was going to be at $.15, but we didn't get there. So, I'm just waiting. Each sale for me needs to be between $50K and $100K, but selling the fewest possible while doing that.
Back when it was much lower, I was selling 5M at a time, then 1M, and now 500K. I hope to drop that to 100K as the price increases. that would be at $.50, for $50K.
I once has 225 million...about 100M now...
Apparently, you don't get it. Rechargeable batteries aren't 'born' with a full charge, and you can't use them and continue to have a full charge. And regenerative braking is recovering EXCESS energy from the kinetic energy of the car during braking. Yes, I watch e-racing.
SOMETHING has to charge those batteries, and it can NOT be the energy that CAME OUT of the batteries. Energy is LOST during the driving of the car, and THAT energy cannot be replaced without an energy source.
Thanks for the physics lesson. In order to have kinetic energy, SOMETHING had to GIVE IT that energy. In your car, it is the gas that gets the car going. It coasts due to kinetic energy. but it won't coast for a year. Kinetic energy is lost in many ways, and THAT cannot be recovered. The friction of the air alone will eventually stop it.
So, instead of attempting to teach an engineer about physics, why not question what the energy source is for this so-called car? Inquiring minds want to know THAT. I fricking guarantee what what has been said is impossible, and they have not told us yet what will power this car.
A battery is not an energy source. It is an energy STORAGE device. SOMETHING has to charge the battery, and THAT is what we need to know about.
Physical laws are never broken, because they CAN'T BE, since they are LAWS of PHYSICS. Believe what you want, yes inventions are everywhere, but THEY OBEY THE LAWS OF PHYSICS. Such inventions take ADVANTAGE of the laws, not break them. Airplanes fly because of these laws. Show me an airplane that needs no fuel or wings to fly, and I'll consider changing my position.
This isn't about inventing something that can run forever with no energy source - it is about SAYING it can be done with NO supporting information. What IS the energy source? Why is it kept secret? Why does it take a trailer behind a car to run it?
Like all other impossible ideas, it will have to be shown to be real for anyone with even a modicum of engineering/physics background to even consider it.
I learned physics in the 60's and keep learning every day. I see a lot of wild-ass ideas that are physically impossible.
Energy is energy. It can neither be created nor destroyed. THAT is the rule of physics. It CAN be converted from one form to another. In the process, SOME of that energy is lost. It is the term called 'work'. In most energy transformations, heat is given off. One the heat is given off, you can't get it back. So, no method of converting energy can be self-sustaining forever.
What does that have to do with anything. SB SAID the nft's are going to another company. All that remains is to disclose what company it is.
Yes, I know what non-fungible tokens are. They are digital ownership items built on blockchain, similar to crypto but different. Crypto coins are tradable for each other. NFT's are not tradable for other NFT's, they are unique ownership certificates for, generally, digital creations. If you buy the NFT, you 'own' it. You can sell it, but you can't trade it. Like baseball cards, except that there is only one.
Tilton is gone.
You are sadly mistaken. Brokerages are going to be PROHIBITED from trading pink stop/yield. Period. You can't SELL them if no one can BUY them. THINK ABOUT IT. At least NSAV is still current. But if you have shares in a pink stop, you may want to evaluate how long to hold them. If they get downlisted, you will simply be a bag holder, nothing else.
Yes, the filing is out. Still losing money, but somehow has a $17,000,000 'good will' asset. WTF???
There is no revenue, at all, which has been the case for the last 5 years, of which I have been a shareholder the whole time. Not a penny, yet.
The only 'money' made is from the issuance of shares, which they are now almost out of. (90M left to sell...)
It is impossible to say 'this type of recharging system will work' since they have not said what it is yet. One thing is for sure - there has to be an external energy source of some kind. Running a car on a battery uses power that cannot ever be recovered. There HAS to be a source for energy to charge the battery, and it cannot be the energy that was already lost in running the car. That is the most basic physics of all. There IS NO perpetual energy machine, and there cannot be one.
All we need to hear is how the thing is powered.
HPIL is a holding company. The NFT's will be held by one of the companies that are under the HPIL umbrella already, or a new one. Holding companies don't usually make money themselves - they take a cut of the profit of the companies they hold. That's how they work...think about it.
Since Cyernetics is off the table, for now, they are back to being a holding company, which means they need another entity to execute the NFT's.
No, if your shares are not up for sale, NO ONE can touch them. Why would anyone think that shares that are privately held in a brokerage could be 'borrowed' by MM's? They aren't AVAILABLE unless they are for sale, or held in a margin account.
And no one uses certificates any more. This isn't the 80's, you know.
That is exactly the wrong thing to do. If your shares are up for sale, they can be borrowed by MM's. They don't BUY them, they BORROW them and replace them later. You never know, but that's how it works. Yet another one that doesn't understand how Mm's work.
There is a way to lock your shares. Don't put them up for sale, and don't have them in a margin account. They can't touch those shares.
Naked shorting does not happen in the OTC. The reason? It is a fully automated market, and every single share that is traded is recorded in a database, so finding situations where shares were sold that were not bought would be as simple as having a program looking at all the trades. They do have that, you know and if any naked shorting was happening, it would stand out like a sore thumb.
EVERY SHARE is recorded as to who sold it and who bought it. So, no naked shorting in the OTC. Only an MM 'could' do it, but they would be caught almost immediately and face steep fines.
I guess most traders don't understand what 'automated' means. It means there are NO PEOPLE filling orders, and computers are not going to decide to do naked shorting on their own, to make a few partial cents on penny stocks.
Don't know what ever happened to common sense, but the wild claims I see here all the time are mostly not even possible. It reflects on the understanding of how the market even works.
You need to learn what that report is about. It is not retail, meaning us.
There is also a margin, which amounts to about $2.50 per share shorted, IF you can find a broker to do it. I don't know of ANY broker that will permit shorting of penny stocks. If you know of one, TELL US who it is. Etrade says right on their web site that it is not permitted.
But anyway, regardless of that, it makes no sense to short a stock that is under a penny. It would cost you thousands of dollars in margin to make a few 10's of dollars IF the price dropped, and ONLY if it dropped. But for the same money, you could buy the stock and make MUCH more if it went up a click or two.
Why would anyone want to short a penny stock that can drop by half or double in the same day? Sheer logic says it would be suicidal for your portfolio because you CAN'T GUESS what any sub penny stock will do in a given day.
Actually, you can short OTC stocks of $5 or higher, just not penny stocks.
No, you can't short penny stocks, period. Try it.
If you want to buy a large amount of shares and not drive the price up, you set a buy at a limit. You can buy 50M shares at the same price that way. You don't need no stinking CEO to arrange it and name it falsely.
It is mumbo jumbo. A share 'buyback' is when a company buys its OWN shares and retires them. Buying and selling between investors is called TRADING, and it has NO AFFECT on the OS.
The AS is 60B. The OS is between 14-15B...
No, there is no share buyback, and there won't be one.
What brokerage will let you purchase at 5 decimal places? That's where Mm's trade.
You can't buy at less than .0001. MM's can, we can't.
It is not a buyback. SB should not have used that word. This is a private transaction between two or more shareholders. That is called TRADING, no matter how it is arranged.
But, if you had shares, would you sell them for less than you could get on the open market? Of course not.
And, if you WANT shares, would you pay more than you could buy them for on the open market? Of course not.
To sell, you set a limit to make sure you get at least that much per share. To buy, you set a limit as to the most you will pay.
No 'share buyback' needed - it only leads to confusion, because the term has a legal meaning, and that is not what is happening.
In a share buyback, the COMPANY buys its own shares and retires them. That reduces the OS. That ain't happening.
Lastly, virtually all of us have our shares in brokerages. You can't bypass your brokerage JUST to sell to a single person or entity. You could TIME a sell by one person/group and a buy by another person/group at exactly the same time, if you managed to set them both up within the MM's spread. But again, that's just trading.
NSAV financials are always late. Have always been late. will probably always be late. Still made a pile of money here...
They were ALL bought by MM's. Who do you think processes your orders?
There are more than one way to do a buyback. Sometimes, it is open market, other times it is 'offers'.
In this case, we have not been told how it will be done. Or IF it will be done.
It won't be done by HPIL while they are delinquent, in any case.
If you want to know the AS, look where it is recorded. (Hint: Not OTCM.)
Easy. No one is updating OTCM because they are delinquent. It will all have to be updated to get current.
Traded today. If sellers sell at market, the price tanks. Always. You have bad traders if they are selling at market.
The amendment is not binding, never has been. Management changes its articles of incorporation any time it needs to. It isn't an SEC/finra thing, it is how the company is set up within the sate in which it is incorporated. So, any part of it can be 'amended' by the company.
Can't really delay something that can't be done anyway. There is no share buyback AT ALL until the company is both current, and announces the buyback through an SEC filing. A tweet is not sufficient.
Opinion doesn't matter. We will have to wait until they explain it. But the company, itself, cannot be involved without the filings. People buying stock is just trading, whether they decide to hold it or trade it.
"Insiders are legally permitted to buy and sell shares of the firm and any subsidiaries that employ them. However, these transactions must be properly registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and are done with advance filings. You can find details of this type of insider trading on the SEC's EDGAR database."
If it's delinquent, it is delinquent. OTC is where the status is displayed.
It depends on the series of the preferred shares. There are voting series and non-voting series.
They keep talking about uplisting. They won't do any uplisting with unregistered shares. That will have to be fixed first. I'm not paying NSAV for those shares they supposedly 'gave' me. I've waited for years, and I can wait more.
Oh, it still exists. Worth almost $3M at this point. I've taken out all I need and reinvested it and paid off all debt. So I'm fine with just sitting on the rest for a while.
The buying back of a company's shares is a legal function that must be accompanied with a filing explaining exactly what is going to happen, how many shares are involved, etc.
Anything else is stock manipulation, which would be illegal.
The company itself can absolutely not buy shares without that filing.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rule10b18.asp" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" >Rules for buying back share
(For some reason, this url won't post correctly.)
"In addition to meeting these four requirements, companies are also required to disclose certain information quarterly on Form 10-Q, and annually on Form 10-K. The company must provide a table showing several month-by-month statistics. These statistics include:
The total number of shares purchased
The average price paid per share
The total number of shares purchased under publicly-announced repurchase programs
The maximum number of shares (or maximum dollar amount) it can repurchase under these programs"
There will be no share buyback until the company is current in its reporting.