Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Haven't read anything about Bow Wow and Yung Juc in any of the latest pr's.. With ISBG going to the moon, they must be having a new video coming out to promote..
Also, Mrs. Autry must be kicking Wayne for getting her out of this great opportunity.
The Suite a MetLife, which was pre-paid all in cash for five years must have been kept empty all season. It was a shame no one was there to see all the ads on the jumbotron.
Read below, an oldie but goodie!
HOUSTON, TX--(Marketwired - Dec 9, 2015) - International Spirit & Beverage Group, Inc. (a Nevada Corporation) ( OTC PINK : ISBG ) ("ISBG"), an alcoholic beverage company specializing in the development, global sales and marketing of innovative wine & spirits brands, including the award-winning Cavoda Vodka, Besado Tequila, and Dziaq Liqueur, is pleased to announce the signing of Shad Moss (Bow Wow) and Yung Joc.
The individual contracts call for each artist to be responsible for assuming the role of "brand face" for ISBG's Besado Tequila in the urban market. They will help create advertising, content for brand awareness, and include the brand in their songs, videos, and concerts. Social media will be emphasized especially on Twitter and Instagram. Each artist was compensated with 5,000,000 million shares in ISBG stock plus stock and cash incentives upon the achievement of various significant sales milestones of ISBG products.
"I'm excited to be part of the ISBG family," stated Shad Moss (Bow Wow). "I believe ISBG's Besado Tequila will prove to be an up-and-coming winner. As a partner with ISBG I look forward to helping to take this to the next level."
"I am proud to be associated with a premium tequila like Besado," added Yung Joc. "I am enthused to partner with ISBG and look forward to a bright future with ISBG."
As part of each five-year contract, ISBG will provide and approve brand marketing support in several areas including artist production, artist video, concert production, endorsement by the artists, after parties for artists, music and song integration, product advertising, and branding for point of sale and point of purchase.
"We welcome Shad Moss and Yung Joc aboard the ISBG team. As fellow shareholders we look forward to a prosperous future," stated Jeff Freiberger, ISBG's Chief Operating Officer. "This arrangement is a testament to our celebrities' confidence in the future of ISBG. We look forward to updating shareholders with more detailed information in the near future."
Do you know Alonzo Pierce?
Yeah. I know about loans. I could send a copy of the promissory note signed by Pierce showing Besado as collateral
Yeah. You could be right. Maybe Pierce got a car title loan on his Honda. If Jackie Autry didn't repo it.
How will ISBG pay for the product. According to their own financial, they have no cash. Are you familiar with Pierce
Be careful. The bottler might attempt to collect from you the unpaid invoices. You know Pierce stiffed Flavorman.
How much cash ISBG had on hand in their last reporting. Less than 3k? Yeah that will buy a lot.
Maybe Bow Wow dumped his shares.
You just made a dying man laugh.
"Unaudited Statements"... Where's the audit?
$2,577.00 cash on hand.. Where's the Cash?
Where in the statement is the share buyback mentioned?
Why the sales and revenue numbers don't match the numbers in the pr...
Who prepared these statements?
Oh wait, I should know the answers. It's an Alonzo Pierce scam. It now makes sense, it's all bullshit..
The pump can proceed..
To protect their licenses, whoever the CPA and sign off attorney is, will have to state all previous disclosures were bullshit, which is a crime (against security laws)... Curious.. Sales, but no inventory reduction.. Revenue, but no revenue posted.. Debt reference..
International Spirit & Beverage Group, Inc. (ISBG)
Other OTC - Other OTC Delayed Price. Currency in USD
Add to watchlist
Quote Lookup
0.0004+0.0002 (+100.00%)
At close: 3:59PM EST
People also watch
DKTSONCIIFCRICNBACOL
Summary
Conversations
Statistics
Profile
Financials
Options
Holders
Historical Data
Analysts
Show:Income StatementCash FlowBalance SheetAnnualQuarterly
Balance SheetAll numbers in thousands
Period Ending 3/31/2016 12/31/2015 9/30/2015 6/30/2015
Current Assets
Cash And Cash Equivalents 0.301 2.249 334.625 846.57
Short Term Investments - - - -
Net Receivables 70.8 70.8 70.8 70.8
Inventory 142.087 142.087 142.087 142.087
Other Current Assets - - - -
Total Current Assets - - - -
Long Term Investments - - - -
Property Plant and Equipment 8.507 8.507 8.507 5.965
Goodwill - - - -
Intangible Assets - - - -
Accumulated Amortization - - - -
Other Assets 253.202 253.202 253.202 253.202
Deferred Long Term Asset Charges - - - -
Total Assets 474.897 476.845 738.421 852.535
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable 54.224 52.917 31.689 320.526
Short/Current Long Term Debt - - - -
Other Current Liabilities - - - -
Total Current Liabilities - - - -
Long Term Debt 382.563 382.563 382.563 382.563
Other Liabilities - - - -
Deferred Long Term Liability Charges - - - -
Minority Interest - - - -
Negative Goodwill - - - -
Total Liabilities 436.787 435.48 414.252 320.526
Stockholders' Equity
Misc. Stocks Options Warrants - - - -
Redeemable Preferred Stock - - - -
Preferred Stock - - - -
Common Stock 4.048 4.048 4.048 3.906
Retained Earnings -4,774.525 -4,405.916 -3,155.984 -1,790.085
Treasury Stock - - - -
Capital Surplus 3,789.111 3,423.757 2,456.629 2,383.364
Other Stockholder Equity 1,019.466 1,019.466 1,019.466 -65.186
Total Stockholder Equity 38.11 41.365 324.169 532.009
Net Tangible Assets 38.11 41.365 324.169 532.009
Subject: Re: ISBG / DKTS 8/17/15
From: lou@seraphimstrategies.com (lou@seraphimstrategies.com)
To: eye4golf@aol.com;
Cc: sidneypitteus@yahoo.co.uk; -------------;
Date: Monday, August 17, 2015 10:11 AM
Wayne,
I can not and will not say who Sidney is, just that he has been following this a long time and is incredibly knowledgeable of securities laws from what I am told. I can say imo this entire situation will have much bigger problems then just two (the guys I know of) note holders that are pissed off.
I would not want to hold the bag if and when this all falls apart or gets a halt or suspension (not sure if I am using the correct terminology but it does happen) legal or regulatory developments that affect the company’s ability to conduct business will sometimes trigger a trading halt.
SEC Trading Suspensions to Protect Investors
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is authorized under federal law to suspend trading in any stock for a period of up to 10 business days. The SEC issues a suspension when it believes that the investing public may be at risk. Many factors influence the SEC’s decision. A very important one is a company’s failure to keep up the required filing of periodic reports—such as annual and quarterly reports—that provide the public with information about the company’s business, corporate outlook and financial performance to date. Another factor is the quality of the publicly available information, particularly if it appears to be inaccurate. The SEC will also consider the trading activity in a stock, evaluating who is actively trading and whether market manipulation may be taking place.
There is more then enough reason to suspend trading in isbg just based on the numerous 1111 share tape paints at end of the day or every time the stock down ticks, incredibly obvious. Since start of trading there is always more to sell a quick tape paint and more selling.
These investigations take time but it will happen imo. Wayne I have been told and demanded by someone not to contact you at all. They say it is hurting isbg because they are scared of losing funding from Mrs Autry, seeing how its the only capital they have to pay themselves I am not surprised. Someone has to pay for the launch parties, just as investors (debt holders) did last year with no real launch of product. I kept asking Alonzo why if you have no product are you wasting money on launch parties...of course never got a straight answer.
I am not knowledgeable at all on legal matters, but it does not take a genius to know that signed documents and proof of wire is acceptance of this clients note which Alonzo now claims doesn't exist. I have the docs dated July 25 2014 and a copy of the wire transfer. He is claiming it does not exist because I hurt his pride and called him a liar thief as well emailed Terry Williams and your friend Frieberger with no reply.
Alonzo hired Seraphim to write articles for the company which were approved by him prior to release. Alonzo was never given permission by me to use my email as a contact. He was asked numerous times by text and email to remove it and only finally did last month when recently he took down temn website which became dkts website only then was it finally removed. This is how I ended up with all of Alonzos emails from shareholders over the last yr and in fact it was me who connected Alonzo to Terry Williams because Mr Williams had called me via the web site and I put both of them in touch via email. I actually even suggested to Alonzo they may be a good fit for a merger here. Alonzos exact words were thank you so much Lou you have done an outstanding job and this is the best opportunity to come along in my lifetime.
He as well released a press release with me as contact which I did not know of till after its release. This is when we started fighting like crazy because I told him you did not have a right to put me on as contact for something I knew nothing about, he was covering his own ass.
see this link http://finance.yahoo.com/news/top-shelf-ceo-announces-agreement-122800574.html I never knew this was being released or agreed to have my email on it at all.
Wayne, may you have great success in all your endeavors.
-----Original Message-----
From: "ME" <eye4golf@aol.com>
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 12:21pm
To: lou@seraphimstrategies.com
Subject: Re: ISBG / DKTS 8/17/15
Hi Lou:
Can you give me any idea as to who this person, Sidney Pitteus, is as he apparently resides in the UK. Also, since you seem so well informed, how is it that you think he is more informed than you?
It is just that I hate to begin corresponding with an unknown entity especially since you seem so knowledgeable.
Lou, I do have another question. it appears that Top Shelf Brands was once known as TEMN. At that time, anyone wanting further information was to contact Seraphim Strategies at your phone number 561-374-1482. Furthermore, since your email is lou@seraphimstrategies.com I am curious to know what was your previous affiliation with the company? Since you seem to have been closely affiliated, I have to assume that you certainly have more informaiton than does this person residing in the UK. Can you please fill me in on the details? What was or is his relation to the company?
Thank You,
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: lou <lou@seraphimstrategies.com>
To: ME <eye4golf@aol.com>
Sent: Mon, Aug 17, 2015 7:30 am
Subject: Re: ISBG / DKTS
Ask this person sidneypitteus@yahoo.co.uk all info and back-round of the
situation they can fill you in completely with much more detail then I can.
sidneypitteus@yahoo.co.uk
-----Original Message-----
From: "ME"
<eye4golf@aol.com>
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 10:23am
To:
lou@seraphimstrategies.com
Subject: Re: ISBG / DKTS
Hi Lou:
Thank you again
for all of the information.
Regards,
Wayne
-----Original
Message-----
From: lou <lou@seraphimstrategies.com>
To: ME
<eye4golf@aol.com>
Cc: ---------------; sidneypitteus
<sidneypitteus@yahoo.co.uk>
Sent: Sun, Aug 16, 2015 8:28 am
Subject: RE: Fwd:
ISBG / DKTS
PLEASE PUT TOGETHER ANY AND ALL QUESTIONS YOU HAVE AND DIRECT THEM
TO..
sidneypitteus@yahoo.co.uk
FROM WHAT I AM TOLD THIS PERSON HAS A GOOD
GRASP
AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE ENTIRE SITUATION
I WILL NO LONGER CONTACT YOU
AS I
HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF ALL THIS HE SAID SHE SAID CRAP, Good luck to you with
your
investment.
Wayne
I do not represent the note holders in DKTS/ISBG, my
only
concern is my note holder client and friend(50k)for 15 yrs as well as one
other
friend(75k) who is in this deal who is the person that introduced me
to
Alonzo.
I have spoken to total 6 guys who all did not agree to Alonzos
press
release which stated all note holders agreed but those guys are not my
concern,
I do not represent them or want anything to do with them. They were
contacted by
another note holder, I was asked to be involved with them and made
it clear
would side with whatever the majority of note holders decided but after
dealing
with Alonzos lies for the last year I have had enough. I do not need
anyone on
my side only documents,emails and txts proving my correctness in the
matter and
will provide regulators .
Total notes payable are 391k according
to the
attachment on this email which lists the note holders. My client/friend
note is
not listed, Alonzo is not even acknowledging this guy exists. Below is
an email
sent to someone to pass on to Alonzo chairman of ISBG . Its just
amazing because
a month ago I have emails from Alonzo saying (Lou in a perfect
world I would pay
back and might have a plan)...well in my opinion again they
have the funds now
so payback the note and we can all never speak again. Alonzo
also sent me a
email that says I have not forgotten you guy don't worry I
promise.
Last week
the note holders were sent terms finally of the convertible
preferred which they
did not agree to, but are being told to agree to by the
person that sold them
the notes,(so he can cover his own ass) he is using the
angle(if we sue it costs
money and we will get nothing anyway)so accept the
terms and pray this works
out, of course he is hyping isbg up major to them. I
have watched trading in
isbg since fima, if you were to look at level two all
day long, which I do,
there is allot of stock for sale with tiny trades to paint
the tape all day
everyday. Friday they pushed hard to make isbg look good so
that hopefully it
would appeal to note holders greed factor and they would sign
off on the new
terms. This is my opinion.
In my opinion as well the terms are
terrible(in a
phone call I had with Alonzo he swore up and down these new
convertible
preferred notes would be able to convert on issuance, of course now
they are
locked up another yr...this is Alonzos game... stall, delay,promise)
and in a yr
the stock is toilet paper at best. I will send you those terms if
you
like.
ANSWERING YOUR QUESTION, what it would mean to me as a lender
or
shareholder would be... Ms Autry paid 1 million dollars for 100 million
shares.
1000x higher then Alonzo and an undisclosed party who purchased the same
just
two months prior to Autrys investment. Alonzo issued himself 100 million
shares
for 1 thousand dollars and an undisclosed party also purchased 100
million
shares for 1 thousand dollars by converting that 1000 dollar note
into
100,000,000 shares in March of this year, less than 2 months before Ms.
Autrys
investment. That stock was converted from an older note which could
be
considered aged and in my opinion again, free trading shares would have
been
issued to this undisclosed party(I would bet anything saying that is your
big
seller very close to the company and isbg or someone very close to the
company
is lining their pockets)all the same exact steps that took place with
this
chairman's last three failed deals. I would think it incredibly unfair for
your
friend to pay 1000x higher but surely they will try to offer you a sweeter
deal
in the event she changed her mind and rescinded her funding as this is the
only
funding this company has.
YOU WILL OF COURSE HAVE GOOD TRADING DAYS AND
BAD
DAYS BUT BE ASSURED THIS WILL END UP A DILUTED WORTHLESS NOTHING IMO. MONEY
IS
MADE ALL THE TIME TRADING SCAMS BUT IN THE END THEY ARE STILL SCAMS OR
JUST
GROSSLY MISMANAGED COMPANIES. I WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED AT ALL IF NEXT WEEK
A PR
WAS ISSUED THAT ADDRESSED NOTE HOLDERS(SAYING ALL IS GOOD AND SETTLED BUT
IN
REALTY THAT WILL BE A LIE) AND THE 1 FOR 15 SHARES DIVIDEND THAT WAS
ANNOUNCED 3
MONTHS AGO WHICH NO SHAREHOLDER RECEIVED ALL WILL BE SAID TO BE
FANTASTIC THERE
AS WELL.
FACT IS THIS SCENARIO WITH ISBG, OF FUNDING,
PARTIES, VIDEOS, MASS
MEDIA, 100 MILLION SHARE BLOCKS IS SAME EXACT SCENARIO AS
DKTS ALONZOS LAST DEAL
WITH NOTHING BUT LIES FOR LAST 2 YRS IN WHICH MYSELF,
SHAREHOLDERS AND NOTE
HOLDERS BELIEVED.
NOTHING I SAY IS TO BE MISCONSTRUED AS
INVESTMENT ADVICE, I
AM NOT LICENSED AS FA OR BROKER, I WAS A BROKER FOR 17 YRS
AND LEFT THE BUSINESS
WITH A PERFECTLY CLEAN LICENSE HAVING NOT ONE SINGLE
COMPLAINT.
EMAIL SENT TO
THE GUY WHO PLACED ALL THESE NOTE WITH LENDERS,
Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:54
pm
____________ just so you do not think I was
bull shitting you attached are
pics of the note and share purchase agreement
signed by Alonzo and each page
initialed. I know your only concern is the guys
you put in this deal, that is
understood.
Alonzo, on July 25th 2014 you signed
and initialed each page of
this note and share agreement as well I have a copy
of the wire transfer that
you were in receipt of funds. In your quarterly report
5 months later dated Dec
31st 2014 which lists the note holders you failed to
list this note, maybe a
slight oversight;some might say a blatant omission with
attempt to defraud. Why
was this note not included in the filing?
I also have
the email that says, Lou
don't worry about Mr______ I did not forget your guy.
Seems you did forget or
intentionally meant to forget but either way you are
liable.
I will gladly
stay away from this entire deal never to be heard
from again if you would just
live up to your obligation.
____________ if you
could pass this on to Alonzo,
as you requested I will not contact isbg and am
willing to play nice for a bit,
think it over please with a rational head.
I am
asking you one more time Alonzo
to kindly settle this matter in a civilized
way.
Best
Lou
WAYNE THIS IS FROM
SOMEONE WITH A GOOD UNDERSTANDING OF THE
SITUATION AND THE LAW.
Perhaps I can
assist here. I think you (and maybe the
barrister) are misunderstanding the
nature of the potential claims involved
here. In my (informal, speculative,
not-intended-as-legal-advice) opinion, the
lenders’ claims are not primarily
contract claims, or claims on the notes
themselves. Rather, they are tort claims
involving common law fraud and unjust
enrichment (and maybe some others
depending on the venue/jurisdiction), which do
not require an enforceable note
or other agreement to be valid (i.e., “implied”
or “constructive” or “quasi”
contract claims, as they are sometimes referred
to).
Under, say, Florida law,
Quote:The essential elements of common-law
fraud are: (1) a false statement of
fact; (2) known by the person making the
statement to be false at the time it
was made; (3) made for the purpose of
inducing another to act in reliance
thereon; (4) action by the other person in
reliance on the correctness of the
statement; and (5) resulting damage to the
other person.
Gandy v. Trans
World Computer Tech. Grp., 787 So. 2d 116, 118
(Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
In
this case, one might argue that, in order to
induce the lenders to give him/DKTS
money, (1) Alonzo falsely stated that he
would issue them valid notes in
exchange for the loan, and that he had the
corporate authority to do so; (2)
Alonzo knew (or should have known, i.e.,
constructive knowledge) that the notes
would not be valid and that he did not
have the authority, as evidenced by his
eventual admission in the settlement
that the disputed shares were valid; (3)
that he made the statements for the
purpose of inducing the lenders to give him
money in reliance on his statements;
(4) that the lenders did, in fact, give him
a bunch of money (some apparently
even without so much as a written agreement)
in reliance on his false statements
of fact; and (5) the lenders have been
damages as a result of that reliance now
that the falsity of Alonzo’s
representations has become apparent.
Likewise under
Florida law,
Quote:the
elements of a cause of action for unjust enrichment
are: (1) plaintiff has
conferred a benefit on the defendant, who has knowledge
thereof; (2) defendant
voluntarily accepts and retains the benefit conferred;
and (3) the circumstances
are such that it would be inequitable for the
defendant to retain the benefit
without paying the value thereof to the
plaintiff.
Shands Teaching Hosp. &
Clinics, Inc. v. Beech St. Corp., 899 So.
2d 1222, 1227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2005)
Under that theory of recovery, then,
one might argue that (1) the
lenders conferred a benefit on Alonzo by loaning
him money; (2) Alonzo accepted
that benefit and retained it, not only in the
form of money but by literally
taking (“75% of”) the product their money was
used to develop out the back door
and into another corporate entity of which he
is the controlling shareholder,
not to mention that he may have even used their
money to buy that other company
in the first place; and (3) based on all the
circumstances of what went down
with TEMN/DKTS/ISBG the past year and a half --
all the PRs that turned out to
be false, all the delays, all the excuse making,
etc., etc., plus Alonzo’s
formation of the private LLC’s to hold the DKTS assets
without the lenders’
knowledge then transferring those to ISBG after what was
obviously months of
planning, his PR claiming a deal was made on the notes,
etc., etc., etc. -- it
would simply be inequitable (i.e., totally unfair) for
Alonzo to retain the
benefit of his actions without paying the benefit thereof
(including lost/future
profits on Besado, I would think) to the people he
screwed.
What else? Let’s
see, how about negligent misrepresentation if they
can’t prove straight-up
fraud:
Quote:To demonstrate a negligent
misrepresentation claim,
[plaintiff] must demonstrate that the defendants made a
false statement
concerning a material fact, that, in the exercise of reasonable
care under the
circumstances, the defendants were negligent in making the
statement because
they should have known the statement was false, that the
defendant intended that
[plaintiff] would rely on the false statement, that
[plaintiff] reasonably and
justifiably relied on the false statement, and that
[plaintiff]suffered damages
as a result.
Sunoptic Technologies, LLC v.
Integra Luxtec, Inc., No.
3:08-CV-878-J-16JRK, 2009 WL 722320, at *2 (M.D. Fla.
Mar. 18, 2009)
Should
have known the statement was false? Haha, remember that
8-K Alonzo signed back
in February 2014 that said “There is no record of a
designation of the Preferred
A shares filed with the Nevada Secretary of State”?
Here it
is:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1390891/000118518514000382/teamnation8k022014.htm
So
with
those shares not existing, of course he had authority to issue the
notes.
Oh
wait…
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=107803440
If
only
he had checked the Nevada SOS first… but totally not negligent
right?
Let’s
see, what else… could maybe throw in some claims for breach of
fiduciary duty,
breach of loyalty, breach of duty of good faith and fair
dealing, again
depending on the jurisdiction. Why, there’s a whole smorgasbord
of potential
claims that don’t need a contract underlying them!
Just to
reiterate, these
claims don’t need an enforceable or valid note. Basically all
the fraud/unjust
enrichment ones need is willful misrepresentation, reliance on
those
misrepresentations, and an unfair benefit conferred to the liar. The
other
satellite claims flow from those basic acts. Heck, claims like these could
be
based on a $50,000 handshake under the right set of facts.
Of course, most
of
these claims would be against Alonzo personally, as corporations generally
are
not liable for the torts of their officers (due to the “corporate veil”),
and
officers generally aren’t liable for claims against the corporation. More
on
that below, but also don’t think that you couldn’t pull ISBG’s officers and
the
Big Tent boys into this mess too if you wanted to. It all depends on who
knew
what when, which, even if they eventually disproved the claims, would
require
some pretty painful and expensive discovery in order to do so,
including
depositions under oath and production of lots of emails and phone
records
between Alonzo and all the people now part of ISBG. Let’s see… off the
top of my
head…
Civil conspiracy between ISBG and Alonzo to commit the alleged
fraudulent
acts? (“To state a claim for civil conspiracy, the plaintiff must
demonstrate
(1) an agreement between two or more parties; (2) to do an unlawful
act or to do
a lawful act by unlawful means; (3) the doing of some overt act in
pursuance of
the conspiracy; and (4) damage to plaintiff as a result of the acts
done under
the conspiracy.” Sunoptic Technologies, LLC v. Integra Luxtec, Inc.,
No.
3:08-CV-878-J-16JRK, 2009 WL 722320, at *5 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 18,
2009)).
Tortious
interference? (“The elements of tortious interference with a
business
relationship are: (1) the existence of a business relationship, not
necessarily
evidenced by an enforceable contract, under which the plaintiff has
legal
rights; (2) the defendant's knowledge of the relationship; (3) an
intentional
and unjustified interference with the relationship by the defendant;
and (4)
damage to the plaintiff as a result of the interference.” Palm Beach
Cnty.
Health Care Dist. v. Prof'l Med. Educ., Inc., 13 So. 3d 1090, 1094 (Fla.
Dist.
Ct. App. 2009)).
To reiterate again, those are not claims against Alonzo
or
DKTS, those would rope in ISBG as independently liable for . And that’s
just
what comes immediately to mind in about 20 minutes, never mind what you
could
come up with if the stakes were real…
Back to the corporate
veil/Alonzo/DKTS
issue, again it would depend on the facts unearthed during
discovery, but it
seems like you could make a pretty good case that DKTS was
basically the “alter
ego” of Alonzo and a court should not hesitate to “pierce
the corporate veil.”
Except, in this case it would essentially be “reverse
piercing,” which is
supported by the case law in a number of states. That is,
ordinarily you pierce
the veil to go after an officer directly for an
act/omission of the corporation.
Here, by contrast, you would be trying to
pierce the veil to hold the
corporation liable for the act/omission of its
officer.
“Simply stated, veil
piercing is an equitable remedy used to prevent
the fraudulent or improper use
of the corporate form from injuring the party
seeking to pierce the corporate
veil.” In re Checiek, 492 B.R. 918, 920 (Bankr.
M.D. Fla. 2013).
-----Original Message-----
From: "ME"
<eye4golf@aol.com>
Sent: Saturday,
August 15, 2015 4:03pm
To:
lou@seraphimstrategies.com
Subject: Fwd: ISBG /
DKTS
Hi Lou:
Are you
saying that this whole thing, for
all 7 note holders, can be paid off for
$11,910? Or convert it to 476,400,000
ISBG common, which makes no sense for them
to convert at 40,000 to 1.
Lou, if it
is not that, what amount did each note
holder invest? Are they all entitled a
150% premium? You see, I am trying to
wrap my arms around the entire situation.
Thank You,
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: lou <
lou@seraphimstrategies.com>
To: ME <
eye4golf@aol.com>
Sent: Sat, Aug 15, 2015 8:17 am
Subject:
ISBG / DKTS
READ
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=116235657
It
seems
that
the company can pay off the note for $11,910 ($4,764 + 150% premium)
on
thirty
days notice or Don Morrison can convert it into 476,400,000
common
shares
whenever he likes.
We know they have $11,910, thanks to Ms.
Autry, why
then are
they risking that kind of dilution? Some unknown person to
whom Mr.
Morrison
sold $1,000 worth of the note has already converted it into
100,000,000
shares
in March of this year, less than 2 months before Ms. Autry
turned over a
bit
less than $1M for exactly the same number of shares....which
at last report
she
has yet to receive.
She knew this stuff when she invested,
right?
Everybody
should know it NOW...it's right there in the filing.
Let's
look at it
another
way:
The Disclosure Statement said this:
Total shares
outstanding:
390,608,097
as of: July 10, 2015
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 5:55 AM, <lou@seraphimstrategies.com> wrote:
>
>
> ISBG WILL FAIL, JUST LIKE TEXX TEMN AND DKTS IN A YR DEBT HOLDERS WILL GET
> NOTHING AND SHARE HOLDERS JUST LIKE THE LAST THREE WILL HAVE WORTHLESS
> PAPER TO WIPE THEIR ASSES WITH.
> AMAZING 2 MILL INVESTED AND 5 MILL CREDIT BUT ALONZO COULD STILL NOT GET
> THIS LAUNCHED.
>
> BUT WITH 900K FROM AUTRY THEY WILL CERTAINLY BE A HUGE SUCCESS, PAYING 5
> SALARIES OR SO AND ALREADY 1.7 MILL IN DEBT.
>
> MAY 2014
>
>
> http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/DKTS/news/Texas-Based-Top-Shelf-Brands-Holdings-Offers-High-End--Cutting-Edge-Wine--amp--Spirit-Products-to-Growing-Market?id=81638&b=y
>
> THE BRAND RECEIVED A 2 MILLION INVESTMENT, ANY IDEA ON WHERE IT MIGHT BE,
> WHAT HAPPEN TO THE TWO MILLION, WHAT DID IT GET SPENT ON? SURELY NOT
> PRODUCING TEQILA.
>
> The brand has received over $2 million in initial investment and more than
> 50 million hits on YouTube...50 MILLION HITS, NOT EVEN POSSIBLE. MORE
> AMAZING IS THE FAKE VIEW COUNTS ON THE ISBG CAVODA VIDEOS..IMO THEY ARE
> PURCHASED VIEWS WHICH IS VERY EASY TO DO FOR 20 DOLLARS HIRING A FREELANCER
> OUT OF INDIA
>
> APRIL 2014
>
>
> http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/DKTS/news/Top-Shelf-Brands-Holdings-Corp-secures--5-million-Credit-Facility?id=78683&b=y
>
> 5 MILLION CREDIT LINE
>
> Top Shelf Brands Holdings Corp secures $5 million Credit Facility. WHAT
> HAPPENED HERE?
>
> JUNE2014
>
>
> http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/DKTS/news/Top-Shelf-Brands--TEMN--Management-Discusses-Besado-Tequila-and-Business?id=81986&b=y
>
> Alonzo Pierce CEO added that we have a proven concept, proven management
> and advisors, and have created substantial consumer demand for two brands
> that are in categories experiencing exponential growth. All of our products
> are based on considerable research and analysis...
>
> PROVEN TO BE A TOTAL SCAM OR INCREDIBLY INCOMPETENT..LETS JUST MENTION
> CAVODA, HAS BEEN PROMOTING CAVODA FOR 3 YRS, I HAVE NEVER HEARD OF IT BUT
> THEN AGAIN I DONT WATCH RAP VIDEOS OR HANG IN HIP HOP CLUBS
>
> REALLY WHERE IS THIS DEMAND AND DID WE EVER SEE THIS ANALYSIS
>
>
> http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/DKTS/news/Top-Shelf-Brands-Featuring-Besado-Tequila--Will-Begin-Taking-Orders-at-Special-Release-Party-Tastings-Prior-to-Summer-Launch?id=82360&b=y
>
> The initial run for both the Silver and Anejo Besado Tequila is valued at
> of $1.3 million dollars with 45% gross profit margins
>
> ...WHERE IS THIS INITIAL RUN VALUED AT 1.3 A YR AGO
>
> OH AND BOW WOW, T PAIN AND JUICY WHATEVER ARE GOING TO MAKE THIS A HUGE
> HIT BY GETTING DRUNK IN A VIDEOS,
>
> I WILL TOAST A SHOT TO ALL YOU IN A YR
>
> GOOD LUCK
>
>
>
____________________.com
To
CCGreg ,
Allan
Message body
Just for the record I dont care at all about any of the other lenders or
want them involved, or want to represent anyone in any way. This was at
the request of James Sallah and I told him I would reach out to ______.
If you want to be part of it you can email me. If not, best of wishes in
trying to get your settlement on your own.
On ________ 12:40, ________ wrote:
> Gentleman,
>
> Over the past several months I've been in contact with all of you
> concerning the Pierce-TEMN-DKTS-ISBG situation.
>
> Tomorrow, attorney James Sallah (561) 989-9080 will be filing a
> Federal Lawsuit against Pierce et al.
>
> If you would like to join in as a plaintiff in the suit with your
> claims against Pierce et al. Please contact _______________,
> , for details. Or, reach out directly to
> attorney James Sallah (561) 989-9080.
>
> I wish everyone success. Please let me know if I can be of any further
> assistance.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
Better than the buying of Pierce's ISBG stock
Go ahead and buy as much as you want. Call your friends and relatives. I'm sure they will thank you
You have seen the first draft. I wonder if they are attorney shopping again. Also a repeat of not being able to pay the financial preparer again
To no bid.
Pierce history will repeat. ISBG, DKTS, TEMN, TEXX.
If this pr and fins so big, why are they being held back. Reason, just a teaser. There will not be a positive pr and there will not be current financials released.
Why.. It's one of the oldest tricks in scamming. It's called SALTING!
Not going to happen. Check history for numerous unfulfilled statements. Look at Pierce history at ISBG, FIMA, DKTS, TEMN, TEXX. Just using common sense will prove point.
3-2-1-no bid. History repeats. Pierce stays consistent. SCAM. PUMP AND DUMP
Go worry about it. I don't have to do anything for you. Pierce knows. Are you one of his clowns. Ask Pierce about Wayne with the Autry trust which required audited Financials. Ask Rob at Loma Financial who controlled the quad 4 note. Do your homework buddy
Go back and read ISBG pr's. Then read the financial filing from the cpa based in Las Vegas. Read ISBG pr referencing the hiring of the New Jersey based cpa firm. You will then have the contact information.
If you know anything about Pierce, ISBG, DKTS, TEMN, TEXX. You would know Louis Levenstein. I have all the email exchanges between himself and Alonzo
The sell to ask now at 9 to 1. Not much confidence being shown.
The same applies to ISBG. Unprofessional and illegal in its activities. The last financials done for Pierce weren't given to him because he couldn't pay the preparation fee.
I've spoken to 4 different accounting firms who were either contacted or hired to do either an audit or unaudited financials but refused to sign off due to extreme irregularities.
Where's the thumbs up in front of the computer screen
Pierce history repeats. No news, no filings, no nothing. Just a bunch of empty promises and outright lies. If you can't see this scam, continue dreaming.
Louis Levenstein, if you know anything about Pierce, ISBG, DKTS, TEXX. You would know Lou and you would know this a continuance of a Pierce scam.
My statement is not a point of view, BUT A FACT, NO FINANCIALS TOMORROW
Who's head of the marketing dept.. Or, who's on the marketing team.
There will not be any financials tomorrow. Fact.
I predict it will go to no bid again. Pierce history as always repeats.
No. Not an insider, just knows and understands Pierce operations.
Never. I know why.
Very unlikely
You are right.. A LLC in Louisiana owns Besado..
180 million on the sell..